Advanced Search
Article Contents

Topographic Effect on Geostrophic Adjustment and Frontogenesis


doi: 10.1007/s00376-001-0042-0

  • Three conservative principles: potential vorticity, absolute momentum and potential temperature are used to study the influence of topography on the local frontogenesis and geostrophic adjustment, which are induced by the inhomogeneous thermal fields. It is found that the horizontal distribution of the initial potential temperature and its position relative to the mountain play important roles during the geostrophic adjustment and local frontogenesis. The frontogenesis is weakened by the mountain when the initial thermal perturbation is located at the base of the upwind slope. The frontal discontinuity cannot occur unless the horizontal contrast of the initial potential temperature is great enough. Whereas, the situation is opposite when the initial thermal disturbance is mainly situated near the peak of the mountain. Complementary to the aforementioned cases, the effect of topography on the frontogenesis depends on the stratification of the flow when the initial thermal disturbance lies at the foot of lee slope. For weak stratification, topography is favorable to the formation of frontal discontinuity, vice versa. This discrepancy is attributed to the difference of subsidence warming, caused by the mountain, when the stratification is either strong or weak. Furthermore, the energy conversion ratio between the kinetic and potential energy during the geostrophic adjustment process is also affected by the topography. In contrast to the flat bottom case, the ratio is reduced (increased) when the initial thermal perturbation lies in the up-wind slope (lee slope). The reason is that the gravity force does negative work in the former case while does positive work in the latter case.
  • [1] Wu Rongsheng, Fang Juan, 2001: Mechanism of Balanced Flow and Frontogenesis, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 323-334.  doi: 10.1007/BF02919313
    [2] Majid M. Farahani, Wu Rongsheng, 1998: A Numerical Study of Geostrophic Adjustment and Frontogenesis, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 15, 179-192.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-998-0038-0
    [3] YANG Shuai, GAO Shouting, LU Chungu, 2014: A Generalized Frontogenesis Function and Its Application, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 1065-1078.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-3228-y
    [4] Fang Juan, Wu Rongsheng, 2002: Energetics of Geostrophic Adjustment in Rotating Flow, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 845-854.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0049-1
    [5] ZHOU Lingli, DU Huiliang, ZHAI Guoqing, WANG Donghai, 2013: Numerical Simulation of the Sudden Rainstorm Associated with the Remnants of Typhoon Meranti (2010), ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1353-1372.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2127-3
    [6] Guoping SHI, Xinfa QIU, Yan ZENG, 2018: New Method for Estimating Daily Global Solar Radiation over Sloped Topography in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 285-295.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-6243-y
    [7] PENG Jiayi, FANG Juan, WU Rongsheng, 2004: Interaction of Mesoscale Convection and Frontogenesis, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 814-823.  doi: 10.1007/BF02916377
    [8] Fang Juan, Wu Rongsheng, 1998: Frontogenesis, Evolution and the Time Scale of Front Formation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 15, 233-246.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-998-0042-4
    [9] Yang Hongwei, Wang Bin, Ji Zhongzhen, 2002: Application of the Artificial Compression Method to the Simulation of Two-Dimensional Frontogenesis, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 863-869.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0051-7
    [10] Wang Yunfeng, Wu Rongsheng, Pan Yinong, 2000: Evolution and Frontogenesis of an Imbalanced Flow —the Influence of Vapor Distribution and Orographic Forcing, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 17, 256-274.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-000-0008-7
    [11] Guojing LI, Dongxiao WANG, Changming DONG, Jiayi PAN, Yeqiang SHU, Zhenqiu ZHANG, 2024: Frontogenesis and Frontolysis of a Cold Filament Driven by the Cross-Filament Wind and Wave Fields Simulated by a Large Eddy Simulation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 509-528.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3037-2
    [12] YANG Shuai, GAO Shouting, Chungu LU, 2015: Investigation of the Mei-yu Front Using a New Deformation Frontogenesis Function, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 635-647.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4147-7
    [13] Zhang Fuqing, Steven E. Koch, Christopher A. Davis, 2000: A survey of Unbalanced Flow Diagnostics and Their Application, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 17, 165-183.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-000-0001-1
    [14] Zhao Ming, 1991: The Effect of Topography on Quasi-Geostrophic Frontogenesis, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 8, 23-40.  doi: 10.1007/BF02657362
    [15] Qingchang QIN, Xueshun SHEN, Chungang CHEN, Feng XIAO, Yongjiu DAI, Xingliang LI, 2019: A 3D Nonhydrostatic Compressible Atmospheric Dynamic Core by Multi-moment Constrained Finite Volume Method, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 1129-1142.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-019-9002-4
    [16] Xinlin YANG, Jianhua SUN, 2018: Organizational Modes of Severe Wind-producing Convective Systems over North China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 540-549.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-7114-2
    [17] Shaukat ALI, DAN Li, FU Congbin, YANG Yang, 2015: Performance of Convective Parameterization Schemes in Asia Using RegCM: Simulations in Three Typical Regions for the Period 1998-2002, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 715-730.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4158-4
    [18] Mengyu DENG, Riyu LU, Chaofan LI, 2022: Contrasts between the Interannual Variations of Extreme Rainfall over Western and Eastern Sichuan in Mid-summer, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 999-1011.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1219-3
    [19] LIU Guimei, WANG Hui, SUN Song, HAN Boping, 2003: Numerical Study on the Velocity Structure around Tidal Fronts in the Yellow Sea, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 20, 453-460.  doi: 10.1007/BF02690803
    [20] Zipeng YUAN, Xiaoyong ZHUGE, Yuan WANG, 2020: The Forced Secondary Circulation of the Mei-yu Front, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 766-780.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-9177-8

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 10 July 2001
Manuscript revised: 10 July 2001
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Topographic Effect on Geostrophic Adjustment and Frontogenesis

  • 1. The Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Sever Weather MOE, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,The Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Sever Weather MOE, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093

Abstract: Three conservative principles: potential vorticity, absolute momentum and potential temperature are used to study the influence of topography on the local frontogenesis and geostrophic adjustment, which are induced by the inhomogeneous thermal fields. It is found that the horizontal distribution of the initial potential temperature and its position relative to the mountain play important roles during the geostrophic adjustment and local frontogenesis. The frontogenesis is weakened by the mountain when the initial thermal perturbation is located at the base of the upwind slope. The frontal discontinuity cannot occur unless the horizontal contrast of the initial potential temperature is great enough. Whereas, the situation is opposite when the initial thermal disturbance is mainly situated near the peak of the mountain. Complementary to the aforementioned cases, the effect of topography on the frontogenesis depends on the stratification of the flow when the initial thermal disturbance lies at the foot of lee slope. For weak stratification, topography is favorable to the formation of frontal discontinuity, vice versa. This discrepancy is attributed to the difference of subsidence warming, caused by the mountain, when the stratification is either strong or weak. Furthermore, the energy conversion ratio between the kinetic and potential energy during the geostrophic adjustment process is also affected by the topography. In contrast to the flat bottom case, the ratio is reduced (increased) when the initial thermal perturbation lies in the up-wind slope (lee slope). The reason is that the gravity force does negative work in the former case while does positive work in the latter case.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return