Advanced Search
Article Contents

Black Carbon Size in Snow of Chinese Altai Mountain in Central Asia


doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-2141-z

  • Black carbon (BC) in snow plays an important role to accelerate snow melting. However, current studies mostly focused on BC concentrations, few on their size distributions in snow which affected BC’s effect on albedo changes. Here we presented refractory BC (rBC) concentrations and size distributions in snow collected from Chinese Altai Mountains in Central Asia from November 2016 to April 2017. The results revealed that the average rBC concentrations were 5.77 and 2.82 ng g−1 for the surface snow and sub-surface snow, which were relatively higher in the melting season (April) than that in winter (November-January). The mass median volume-equivalent diameter of rBC size in surface snow was approximately at 120−150 nm, which was typically smaller than that in the atmosphere (about 200 nm for urban atmosphere). However, there existed no specific mass median volume-equivalent diameter of BC size for sub-surface snow in winter. While during the melting season, the median mass size of rBC in sub-surface snow was similar to that in surface snow. Backward trajectories indicated that anthropogenic sourced BC dominated rBC in snow (70%−85%). This study will promote our understanding on BC size distributions in snow, and highlight the possible impact of BC size on climate effect.
    摘要: 雪冰中的黑碳对加速积雪消融具有重要作用。然而,目前的研究大多集中于黑碳浓度的影响,很少关注积雪中黑碳粒径的分布,这显著影响黑碳对反照率变化的评估。鉴于此,我们于2016年11月至2017年4月在北疆阿勒泰地区开展了积雪中难熔黑碳浓度和粒径分布的研究。结果表明,表雪和次表层雪的黑碳平均浓度分别为5.77和2.82 ng g−1,且在融雪季节(4月)相对冬季(11月至1月)偏高。表雪中黑碳粒径的质量中值直径约为120−150 nm,小于大气中黑碳颗粒的直径(城市大气中约为200 nm)。然而,冬季次表层雪中黑碳粒径的质量中值直径不明显,而在融雪季节,次表层雪中黑碳的中值粒径与表层雪中相似。结合火点资料的后向轨迹表明,北疆阿勒泰地区积雪中人为源黑碳占主导(70%−85%)。该研究将进一步促进我们对雪中黑碳粒径分布的理解,并为评估黑碳粒径大小对气候效应的可能影响提供基础数据。
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  The location map of (a) the study area in Chinese Altai Mountains and (b) snow sampling at Koktokay Snow Cover Station (Modified from Zhang et al., 2019)

    Figure 2.  Refractory BC concentrations in surface and sub-surface snow of Central Asia and the snow depth variations during November 2016 to April 2017 at Koktokay Snow Station of Chinese Altai regions in Central Asia. Snow depth data cited from (Zhong et al., 2021).

    Figure 3.  Refractory BC mass size distributions from surface and sub-surface snow during winter and spring at Koktokay Snow Cover Station, respectively. (a) BC size for surface snow in winter, (b) BC size for surface snow in spring, (c) BC size for sub-surface snow in winter, and BC size for sub-surface snow in spring(d). (Error bars present the standard deviation.)

    Figure 4.  Distributions of BC mass size distributions from snow and aerosol based on the published literatures. (Data can be referred to Table 1 and Table S2 in the ESM.)

    Figure 5.  The normalized BC mass size distributions in the atmosphere and snow. (a) The normalized BC mass size distributions from the urban and remote atmosphere, and snow samples from Colorado snowfalls within 60 km of Denver, Colorade, in both semi-rural and rural areas were cited from (Schwarz et al., 2013). (b) The normalized BC mass size distributions from Arctic snow at Barrow. The Arctic snow samples were collected by Yulan ZHANG in 2017 (Zhang et al., 2020b).

    Figure 6.  A four-days-back trajectory analysis (a) and contributions of BC emitted from natural fires (b) during the studied periods in Central Asia. Black dots are air parcels that did not pass near a fire, while the colored dots are air mass parcels that crossed fires. Green dots are fires that occurred between −48 h and 0 h before arriving at the site. Pink dots indicate air parcels that crossed over a fire between −96 h and −48 h, but not afterwards. Red dots indicate fires that occurred before and after −48 h. Contributions in (b) was retrieved from the FINN v1.5 global fire emission inventory.

    Table 1.  A summary of BC mass size distributions in snow from different regions.

    Study areaSnow typesBC size measurement method (BC size range)Mass median size(nm)References
    Arctic regionsNy-Ålesund, SvalbardFresh snow/falling snowSP2 (70−4170 nm)240Sinha et al., 2018
    GreenlandSnowpack/ surface snowSP2 (70−4170 nm)200Mori et al., 2019
    AlaskaSnowpack/ surface snowSP2 (70−4170 nm)320Mori et al., 2019
    Barrow, AlaskaSurface snowSP2 (70−500 nm)160Unpublished data
    AntarcticaWest AntarcticaSnow/firn coreSP2 (70−2000 nm)162±40Marquetto et al., 2020
    McMurdo Dry Valleys,
    West Antarctica
    SnowpitSP2 (70−800 nm)300−400Khan et al., 2018
    Eastern AntarcticaSurface snowSP2 (70−4170 nm)140Kinase et al., 2020
    Middle latitudesChinese Altai regionsSurface/sub-surface snowSP2 (70−500 nm)120−150This study
    Northern Tibetan PlateauSurface snowSP2 (70−500 nm)180−200Zhang et al., 2017b
    Dudh Koshi River basin of Nepal, HimalayasSeasonal snowSP2 (70−5000 nm)2500 (fresh snow)4000 (aged snow)Khan et al., 2020
    Sapporo, JapanSurface snowSP2 (70−850 nm)175Ohata et al., 2013
    Denver, USAFresh snow/falling snowSP2 (70−2450 nm)240Schwarz et al., 2013
    Note: SP2—Single Particle Soot Photometer.
    DownLoad: CSV
  • Aizen, V.B., and Coauthors, 1995: Stable-isotope and trace element time series from Fedchenko glacier (Pamir) snow/firn cores. Journal of Glaciology, 55(190), 1−15.
    AMAP, 2021: Arctic Climate Change Update 2021: Key Trends and Impacts. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Tromsø, Norwa.
    AMAP, 2015: AMAP Assessment 2015: Black carbon and ozone as Arctic climate forcers. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Tromsø, Norwa.
    Azam, M.F., and Coauthors, 2021: Glaciohydrology of the Himalaya-Karakoram. Science, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf3668
    Berner, A., S. Sidla, Z. Galambos, C. Kruisz, R. Hitzenberger, H. M. ten Brink, and G. P. A. Kos, 1996: Modal character of atmospheric black carbon size distributions. J. Geophys. Res., 101(D14), 19 559−19 565, https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd03425.
    Bertò, M., an dCoauthors, 2021: Variability of black carbon mass concentration in surface snow at Svalbard. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12479-2021
    Bond, T. C., and Coauthors, 2013: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5380−5552, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171.
    Chen, W. Q., J. L. Ding, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Pu, B. H. Liu, and X. Y. Cao, 2019: Black carbon in seasonal snow across northern of Xinjiang. China Environmental Science, 39(1), 83−91, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2019.01.009. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Chen, X. T., S. C. Kang, J. H. Yang, and Z. M. Ji. 2021: Investigation of black carbon climate effects in the Arctic in winter and spring. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 142145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142145.
    Doherty, S. J., T. C. Grenfell, S. Forsström, D. L. Hegg, R. E. Brandt, and S. G. Warren, 2013: Observed vertical redistribution of black carbon and other insoluble light-absorbing particles in melting snow. J. Geophys. Res., 118(11), 5553−5569, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50235.
    Dumont, M., and Coauthors, 2014: Contribution of light-absorbing impurities in snow to Greenland’s darkening since 2009. Nature Geoscience, 7, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2180.
    Di Mauro, B., F. Fava, L. Ferrero, R. Garzonio, G. Baccolo, B. Delmonte, R. Colombo, 2015: Mineral dust impact on snow radiative properties in the European Alps combing ground, UAV, and satellite observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120, 6080−6097, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023287.
    Flanner, M. G., C. S. Zender, J. T. Randerson, and P. J. Rasch, 2007: Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008003.
    Gustafsson, Ö., and V. Ramanathan, 2016: Convergence on climate warming by black carbon aerosols. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603570113
    Hansen, J., and L. Nazarenko, 2004: Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 101, 423−428, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2237157100.
    He, C., and Coauthors, 2015: Variation of the radiative properties during black carbin aging: theoretical and experimental intercomparison. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 11967−11980, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11967-2015.
    He, C. L., M. G. Flanner, F. Chen, M. Barlage, K.-N. Liou, S. C. Kang, J. Ming, and Y. Qian, 2018c: Black carbon-induced snow albedo reduction over the Tibetan Plateau: Uncertainties from snow grain shape and aerosol-snow mixing state based on an updated SNICAR model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(15), 11 507−11 527, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11507-2018.
    He, C. L., K.-N. Liou, and Y. Takano, 2018a: Resolving size distribution of black carbon internally mixed with snow: Impact on snow optical properties and albedo. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45(6), 2697−2705, https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077062.
    He, C. L., K.-N. Liou, Y. Takano, P. Yang, L. Qi, and F. Chen, 2018b: Impact of grain shape and multiple black carbon internal mixing on snow albedo: Parameterization and radiative effect analysis. J. Geophys. Res., 123, 1253−1268, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027752.
    Huang, X.-F., and Coauthors, 2011: Black carbon measurements in the Pearl River Delta region of China. J. Geophys. Res., 116(D12), D12208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014933.
    IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekci, R. Yu and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press.
    Kang, S. C., and Coauthors, 2019: Linking atmospheric pollution to cryospheric change in the Third Pole region: Current progress and future prospects. National Science Review, 6, 796−809, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz031.
    Kang, S. C., Y. L. Zhang, Y. Qian, and H. L. Wang, 2020: A review of black carbon in snow and ice and its impact on the cryosphere. Earth-Science Reviews, 210, 103346, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103346.
    Kang, S. C., and Coauthors, 2022: Black carbon and organic carbon dataset over the Third Pole. Earth System Science Data, 14, 683−707, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-683-2022.
    Khan, A. L., G. R. McMeeking, J. P. Schwarz, P. Xian, K. A. Welch, W. Berry Lyons, and D. M. McKnight, 2018: Near-surface refractory black carbon observations in the atmosphere and snow in the McMurdo dry valleys, Antarctica, and potential impacts of foehn winds. J. Geophys. Res., 123(5), 2877−2887, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027696.
    Khan, A. L., K. Rittger, P. Xian, J. M. Katich, R. L. Armstrong, R. B. Kayastha, J. L. Dana, and D. M. McKnight, 2020: Biofuel burning influences refractory black carbon concentrations in seasonal snow at lower elevations of the Dudh Koshi river basin of Nepal. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 371, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00371.
    Kinase, T., and Coauthors, 2020: Concentrations and size distributions of black carbon in the surface snow of eastern Antarctica in 2011. J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JD030737, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030737.
    Kondo, Y., and Coauthors, 2011: Emissions of black carbon, organic, and inorganic aerosols from biomass burning in North America and Asia in 2008. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D08204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015152.
    Kozlov, V. S., M. V. Panchenko, D. G. Chernov, V. P. Shmargunov, E. P. Yausheva, 2017: Annual dynamics of the black carbon size distribution in the near-ground submicron aerosol in western Siberia. Proc SPIE 10466, 23rd International Symposium on Atmospheric and Ocean Optics, Irkutsk, Russian Federation, SPIE, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2284463.
    Krasowsky, T. S., G. R. McMeeking, C. Sioutas, and G. Ban-Weiss, 2018: Characterizing the evolution of physical properties and mixing state of black carbon particles: From near a major highway to the broader urban plume in Los Angeles. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(16), 11 991−12 010, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11991-2018.
    Li, C. L., and Coauthors, 2016: Sources of black carbon to the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau glaciers. Nature Communications, 7, 12574, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12574.
    Li, X. F., and Coauthors, 2018: Light-absorbing impurities in a southern Tibetan Plateau glacier: Variations and potential impact on snow albedo and radiative forcing. Atmospheric Research, 200, 77−87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.10.002.
    Li, Y., and Coauthors, 2021: Black carbon and dust in the Third Pole glaciers: Revaluated concentrations, mass absorption cross-sections and contributions to glacier ablation. Science of the Total Environment, 789, 147746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147746.
    Lim, S., X. Faïn, M. Zanatta, J. Cozic, J.-L. Jaffrezo, P. Ginot, and P. Laj, 2014: Refractory black carbon mass concentrations in snow and ice: Method evaluation and inter-comparison with elemental carbon measurement. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 7, 3307−3324, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3307-2014.
    Marquetto, L., S. Kaspari, and J. C. Simões, 2020: Mass and number size distributions of rBC in snow and firn samples from Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica. Earth and Space Science, 7(11), e2020EA001198, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ea001198.
    Ménégoz, M., G., and Coauthors, 2014: Snow cover sensitivity to black carbon deposition in the Himalayas: from atmospheric and ice core measurements to regional climate simulations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, 4237−4249, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014.
    Mori, T., and Coauthors, 2019: Black carbon and inorganic aerosols in Arctic snowpack. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124, 13,325−13,356, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030623.
    Moteki, N., Y. Kondo, and S.-I. Nakamura, 2010: Method to measure refractive indices of small nonspherical particles: Application to black carbon particles. Journal of Aerosol Science, 41, 513−521, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013.
    Moteki, N., and Y. Kondo, 2010: Effects of Mixing State on Black Carbon Measurements by Laser-Induced Incandescence. Aerosol Science and Technology, 41, 398−417, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701199728.
    Moteki, N., Y. Kondo, N. Oshima, N. Takegawa, M. Koike, K. Kita, H. Matsui, and M. Kajino, 2012: Size dependence of wet removal of black carbon aerosols during transport from the boundary layer to the free troposphere. Geophyical Research Letters, 39, L13802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052034.
    Motos, G., J. C. Corbin, J. Schmale, R. L. Modini, M. Bertò, P. Kupiszewski, U. Baltensperger, and M. Gysel‐Beer, 2020: Black carbon aerosols in the lower free troposphere are heavily coated in summer but largely uncoated in winter at Jungfraujoch in the Swiss Alps. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088011.
    Nie, Y., and Coauthors, 2021: Glacial change and hydrological implications in the Himalaya and Karakoram. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00124-w
    Niu, H. W., and Coauthors, 2017: Distribution of light-absorbing impurities in snow of glacier on Mt. Yulong, southeastern Tibetan Plateau. Atmospheric Research, 197, 474−484, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.07.004.
    Ohata, S., N. Moteki, J. Schwarz , D. Fahey, and Y. Kondo, 2013: Evaluation of a Method to Measure Black Carbon Particles Suspended in Rainwater and Snow Samples. Aerosol Science and Technology, 47, 1073−1082, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.824067.
    Ohata, S., N. Moteki, T. Mori, M. Koike, and Y. Kondo, 2016: A key process controlling the wet removal of aerosols: new observational evidence. Nature Scientific Reports, 6, 34113, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34113.
    Pu, W., X. Wang, H. L. Wei, Y. Zhou, J. S. Shi, Z. Y. Hu, H. C. Jin, and Q. L. Chen, 2017: Properties of black carbon and other insoluble light-absorbing particles in seasonal snow of northwestern China. The Cryosphere, 11(3), 1213−1233, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1213-2017.
    Raatikainen, T., D. Brus, A.-P. Hyvärinen, J. Svensson, E. Asmi, and H. Lihavainen, 2015: Black carbon concentrations and mixing state in the Finnish Arctic. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(17), 10 057−10 070, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10057-2015.
    Ramanathan, V. and G. Carmichael, 2008: Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nature Geoscience, 1, 221−227, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156.
    Schmale, J., and Coauthors, 2017: Modulation of snow reflectance and snowmelt from Central Asian glaciers by anthropogenic black carbon. Scientific Report, 7, 40501, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40501.
    Schulz, H., and Coauthors, 2019: High Arctic aircraft measurements characterising black carbon vertical variability in spring and summer. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(4), 2361−2384, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2361-2019.
    Schwarz, J.P., and Coauthors, 2008: Measurement of the mixing state, mass, and optical size of individual black carbon particles in urban and biomass burning emissions. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L13810, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033968.
    Schwarz, J. P., S. J. Doherty, F. Li, S. T. Ruggiero, C. E. Tanner, A. E. Perring, R. S. Go, and D. W. Fahey, 2012: Assessing Single Particle Soot Photometer and Integrating Sphere/Integrating Sandwich Spectrophotometer measurement techniques for quantifying black carbon concentration in snow. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 5, 2581−2592, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2581-2012.
    Schwarz, J. P., R. S. Gao, A. E. Perring, J. R. Spackman, and D. W. Fahey, 2013: Black carbon aerosol size in snow. Scientific Reports, 3, 1356, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01356.
    Sinha, P. R., and Coauthors, 2018: Seasonal progression of the deposition of black carbon by snowfall at Ny-Ålesund, Spitsbergen. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123, 997−1016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028027.
    Shindell, D., and Coauthors, 2012: Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science, 335, 183−189, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026.
    Skiles, S.M., M. Flanner, J.M. Cook, M. Dumont, and T.H. Painter, 2018: Radiative forcing by light-absorbing particles in snow. Nature Climate Change, 8, 964−917, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0296-5.
    Sprenger, M., and H. Wernli, 2015: The LAGRANTO Lagrangian analysis tool-version 2.0. Geoscientific Model Development, 8, 2569−2586, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2569-2015.
    Sun, T. L., L. Y. He, L. W. Zeng, and X. F. Huang, 2012: Black carbon measurement during Beijing Paralympic Games. China Environmental Science, 32, 2123−2127, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2012.12.002. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Thamban, N. M., S. N. Tripathi, S. P. Moosakutty, P. Kuntamukkala, and V. P. Kanawade, 2017: Internally mixed black carbon in the Indo-Gangetic Plain and its effect on absorption enhancement. Atmospheric Research, 197, 211−223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.07.007.
    Wang, M., B. Q. Xu, H. L. Wang, R. D. Zhang, Y. Yang, S. P. Gao, X. X. Tang, and N. L. Wang, 2021: Black carbon deposited in Hariqin Glacier of the Central Tibetan Plateau record changes in the emission from Eurasia. Environmental Pollution, 273, 115778, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115778.
    Wang, Q. Y., and Coauthors, 2014: Black carbon aerosol characterization in a remote area of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, western China. Science of the Total Environment, 479−480, 151−158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.098.
    Wang, Q. Y., and Coauthors, 2016a: Size distribution and mixing state of refractory black carbon aerosol from a coastal city in South China. Atmospheric Research, 181, 163−171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.06.022.
    Wang, Q. Y., and Coauthors, 2016b: Physicochemical characteristics of black carbon aerosol and its radiative impact in a polluted urban area of China. J. Geophys. Res., 121, 12 505−12 519, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024748.
    Wang, Q. Y., and Coauthors, 2018: Sources and physicochemical characteristics of black carbon aerosol from the southeastern Tibetan Plateau: Internal mixing enhances light absorption. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(7), 4639−4656, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4639-2018.
    Wang, X., S. Doherty, J. Huang, 2013: Black carbon and other light-absorbing impurities in snow across Northern China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmosphere, 118, 1471−1492, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018291.
    Wang, X., T. L. Shi, X. Y. Zhang, and Y. Chen, 2020: An overview of snow albedo sensitivity to black carbon contamination and snow grain properties based on experimental datasets across the northern hemisphere. Current Pollution Reports, 6, 368−379, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00157-1.
    Ward, T. J., B. Trost, J. Conner, J. Flanagan, and R. K. M. Jayanty, 2012: PM2.5 source Apportionment in a Subarctic Airshed – Fairbanks, Alaska. Aerosol Air Quality Research, 12, 536−543, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.11.0208.
    Warren, S. G., and W. J. Wiscombe, 1980: A model for the spectral albedo of snow. II: Snow containing atmospheric aerosols. Journal of Atmospheric Science, 37, 2734−2745, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2734:AMFTSA>2.0.CO;2.
    Wernli, H., and H. C. Davies, 1997: A Lagrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. I: the method and some applications. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 467−489.
    Wiedinmyer, C., and Coauthors, 2011: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): A high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning. Geoscientific Model Development, 4(3), 625−641, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011.
    Wu, Y. F., and Coauthors, 2017: Size distribution and source of black carbon aerosol in urban Beijing during winter haze episodes. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(12), 7965−7975, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7965-2017.
    Xu, B., and Coauthors, 2009: Black soot and the survival of Tibetan glaciers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106(52), 22114−22118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910444106.
    Yao, T. D., and Coauthors, 2012a: Third pole environment (TPE). Environmental Development, 3, 52−64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2012.04.002.
    Yao, X. J., S. Y. Liu, W. Q. Guo, B. J. Huai, M. P. Sun, and J. L. Xu, 2012b: Glacier change of Altay Mountain in China from 1960 to 2009-Based on the second glacier inventory of China. Journal of Natural Resources, 27(10), 1734−1745. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Zhang, Y. L., and Coauthors, 2017a: Light-absorbing impurities enhance glacier albedo reduction in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6915−6933, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026397.
    Zhang, Y. L., and Coauthors, 2017b: Characteristics of black carbon in snow from Laohugou No. 12 glacier on the northern Tibetan Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 607−608, 1237−1249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.100.
    Zhang, Y. L., and Coauthors, 2019: Dissolved organic carbon in snow cover of the Chinese Altai Mountains, Central Asia: Concentrations, sources and light-absorption properties. Science of the Total Environment, 647, 1385−1397, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.417.
    Zhang, Y. L., and Coauthors, 2020a: Effects of black carbon and mineral dust on glacial melting on the Muz Taw glacier, Central Asia. Science of the Total Environment, 740, 140056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140056.
    Zhang, Y. L., and Coauthors, 2020b: Dissolved organic carbon in Alaskan Arctic snow: Concentrations, light-absorption properties, and bioavailability. Tellus B, 72, 1778968, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2020.1778968.
    Zhang, Y., T. Gao, S. Kang, D. Shangguan, X. Luo, 2021: Albedo reduction as an important driver for glacier melting in Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding areas. Earth-Science Reviews, 220, 103735, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103735.
    Zhao, D. L., J. J. Sheng, Y. M. Du, W. Zhou, F. Wang, W. Xiao, and D. P. Ding, 2021: Concentration and physical characteristics of black carbon in winter snow of Beijing in 2015. Atmosphere, 12(7), 816, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12070816.
    Zhong, X. Y., S. C. Kang, W. Zhang, J. H. Yang, X. F. Li, Y. L. Zhang, Y. J. Liu, and P. F. Chen, 2019: Light-absorbing impurities in snow cover across Northern Xinjiang, China. J. Glaciol., 65, 940−956, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2019.69.
    Zhong, X. Y., and Coauthors, 2021: Continuously observed light absorbing impurities in snow cover over the southern Altai Mts. in China: Concentrations, impacts and potential sources. Environmental Pollution, 270, 116234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116234.
  • [1] LIU Ge, WU Renguang, ZHANG Yuanzhi, and NAN Sulan, 2014: The Summer Snow Cover Anomaly over the Tibetan Plateau and Its Association with Simultaneous Precipitation over the Mei-yu-Baiu region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 755-764.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3183-z
    [2] WANG Zhili, ZHANG Hua, SHEN Xueshun, 2011: Radiative Forcing and Climate Response Due to Black Carbon in Snow and Ice, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 1336-1344.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0117-5
    [3] Luciano MARQUETTO, Susan KASPARI, Jefferson Cardia SIMÕES, Emil BABIK, 2020: Refractory Black Carbon Results and a Method Comparison between Solid-state Cutting and Continuous Melting Sampling of a West Antarctic Snow and Firn Core, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 545-554.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-019-9124-8
    [4] Xuke LIU, Xiaojing JIA, Min WANG, Qifeng QIAN, 2022: The Impact of Tibetan Plateau Snow Cover on the Summer Temperature in Central Asia, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1103-1114.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1011-4
    [5] Li Guo ping, Lu Jinghua, Jin Bingling, Bu Nima, 2001: The Effects of Anomalous Snow Cover of the Tibetan Plateau on the Surface Heating, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 1207-1214.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-001-0034-0
    [6] Haoxin ZHANG, Naiming YUAN, Zhuguo MA, Yu HUANG, 2021: Understanding the Soil Temperature Variability at Different Depths: Effects of Surface Air Temperature, Snow Cover, and the Soil Memory, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 493-503.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0074-y
    [7] LIU Huaqiang, SUN Zhaobo, WANG Ju, MIN Jinzhong, 2004: A Modeling Study of the Effects of Anomalous Snow Cover over the Tibetan Plateau upon the South Asian Summer Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 964-975.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915598
    [8] Qian YANG, Shichang KANG, Haipeng YU, Yaoxian YANG, 2023: Impact of the Shrinkage of Arctic Sea Ice on Eurasian Snow Cover Changes in 1979–2021, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 2183-2194.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2272-x
    [9] Fangchi LIU, Xiaojing JIA, Wei DONG, 2024: Changes in Spring Snow Cover over the Eastern and Western Tibetan Plateau and Their Associated Mechanism, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 959-973.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3111-9
    [10] Junlin AN, Huan LV, Min XUE, Zefeng ZHANG, Bo HU, Junxiu WANG, Bin ZHU, 2021: Analysis of the Effect of Optical Properties of Black Carbon on Ozone in an Urban Environment at the Yangtze River Delta, China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1153-1164.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0367-9
    [11] Sheng LAI, Zuowei XIE, Cholaw BUEH, Yuanfa GONG, 2020: Fidelity of the APHRODITE Dataset in Representing Extreme Precipitation over Central Asia, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 1405-1416.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0098-3
    [12] Yuan QIU, Jinming FENG, Zhongwei YAN, Jun WANG, 2022: High-resolution Projection Dataset of Agroclimatic Indicators over Central Asia, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1734-1745.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-2008-3
    [13] Linhao ZHONG, Lijuan HUA, Zhaohui GONG, Yao YAO, Lin MU, 2022: Quantifying the Spatial Characteristics of the Moisture Transport Affecting Precipitation Seasonality and Recycling Variability in Central Asia, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 967-984.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1383-5
    [14] Michael BRODY, Maksim KULIKOV, Sagynbek ORUNBAEV, Peter J. VAN OEVELEN, 2024: The Global Energy and Water Exchanges (GEWEX) Project in Central Asia: The Case for a Regional Hydroclimate Project, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 777-783.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3384-2
    [15] Michael Brody, Maksim Kulikov, Sagynbek Orumbaev, Peter van Oevelen, 2024: The Global Energy and Water Exchanges Project in Central Asia; The Case for a Regional Hydroclimate Project, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3384-z
    [16] YU Yu, CHEN Hongbin, XIA Xiangao, XUAN Yuejian, YU Ke, 2010: Significant Variations of Surface Albedo during a Snowy Period at Xianghe Observatory, China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 80-86.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-8151-2
    [17] Junhua YANG, Shichang KANG, Yuling HU, Xintong CHEN, Mukesh RAI, 2022: Influence of South Asian Biomass Burning on Ozone and Aerosol Concentrations Over the Tibetan Plateau, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1184-1197.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1197-0
    [18] YU Jianhua, Benjamin GUINOT, YU Tong, WANG Xin, LIU Wenqing, 2005: Seasonal Variations of Number Size Distributions and Mass Concentrations of Atmospheric Particles in Beijing, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 22, 401-407.  doi: 10.1007/BF02918753
    [19] LIU Hongnian, ZHANG Li, WU Jian, 2010: A Modeling Study of the Climate Effects of Sulfate and Carbonaceous Aerosols over China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 1276-1288.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9188-y
    [20] Wolfgang SCHWANGHART, Brigitta SCH\"UTT, Michael WALTHER, 2008: Holocene Climate Evolution of the Ugii Nuur Basin, Mongolia, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 25, 986-998.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-008-0986-4
  • ESM-220141-2.pdf

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 08 June 2022
Manuscript revised: 25 October 2022
Manuscript accepted: 07 December 2022
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Black Carbon Size in Snow of Chinese Altai Mountain in Central Asia

    Corresponding author: Shichang KANG, shichang.kang@lzb.ac.cn
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental System (Ministry of Education), College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 3. Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
  • 4. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract: Black carbon (BC) in snow plays an important role to accelerate snow melting. However, current studies mostly focused on BC concentrations, few on their size distributions in snow which affected BC’s effect on albedo changes. Here we presented refractory BC (rBC) concentrations and size distributions in snow collected from Chinese Altai Mountains in Central Asia from November 2016 to April 2017. The results revealed that the average rBC concentrations were 5.77 and 2.82 ng g−1 for the surface snow and sub-surface snow, which were relatively higher in the melting season (April) than that in winter (November-January). The mass median volume-equivalent diameter of rBC size in surface snow was approximately at 120−150 nm, which was typically smaller than that in the atmosphere (about 200 nm for urban atmosphere). However, there existed no specific mass median volume-equivalent diameter of BC size for sub-surface snow in winter. While during the melting season, the median mass size of rBC in sub-surface snow was similar to that in surface snow. Backward trajectories indicated that anthropogenic sourced BC dominated rBC in snow (70%−85%). This study will promote our understanding on BC size distributions in snow, and highlight the possible impact of BC size on climate effect.

摘要: 雪冰中的黑碳对加速积雪消融具有重要作用。然而,目前的研究大多集中于黑碳浓度的影响,很少关注积雪中黑碳粒径的分布,这显著影响黑碳对反照率变化的评估。鉴于此,我们于2016年11月至2017年4月在北疆阿勒泰地区开展了积雪中难熔黑碳浓度和粒径分布的研究。结果表明,表雪和次表层雪的黑碳平均浓度分别为5.77和2.82 ng g−1,且在融雪季节(4月)相对冬季(11月至1月)偏高。表雪中黑碳粒径的质量中值直径约为120−150 nm,小于大气中黑碳颗粒的直径(城市大气中约为200 nm)。然而,冬季次表层雪中黑碳粒径的质量中值直径不明显,而在融雪季节,次表层雪中黑碳的中值粒径与表层雪中相似。结合火点资料的后向轨迹表明,北疆阿勒泰地区积雪中人为源黑碳占主导(70%−85%)。该研究将进一步促进我们对雪中黑碳粒径分布的理解,并为评估黑碳粒径大小对气候效应的可能影响提供基础数据。

    2.   Materials and methods
    • The Altai Mountains is complex mountain system of Central Asia. It extends approximately 2000 km in a southeast-northwest direction, which stretches from the Gobi Desert to the West Siberian Plain through several countries (including China, Mongolia, Russia, and Kazakhstan). Our study area (Koktokay Snow Station) is located in the upper Kayiertesi river basin of Chinese Altai Mountains, in the Northern Xinjiang Province (Fig. 1). The climate of the region is predominated by the westerlies, representing the severely continental climate (Yao et al., 2012a). The winter season is influenced by the great Asiatic anticyclone or high-pressure area. Snow accumulation usually starts in November due to the westerlies conveying large precipitation and melts from March to April in spring (Zhong et al., 2021). In general, the annual temperature varied from 0.7ºC to 4.8ºC, and the precipitation fluctuated from 75 to 309 mm (Yao et al., 2012b).

      Figure 1.  The location map of (a) the study area in Chinese Altai Mountains and (b) snow sampling at Koktokay Snow Cover Station (Modified from Zhang et al., 2019)

      From November 2016 to April 2017, we collected a total of 82 snow samples in Chinese Altai Mountains of Central Asia for rBC analysis. The snow sampling site was at Koktokay Snow Station (with original name Kuwei Snow Station) (47°21'9.1"N, 89°39'43.22"E, Fig. 1) located in the upper Kayiertesi river basin, which was set up by the Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences. These collected samples included 47 surface snow samples (with snowpack depth of 0−5 cm) and 35 sub-surface snow samples (with snowpack depth of 5−10 cm). In order to prevent possible contaminations, we used polycarbonate square bottle (30 ml, Nalgene) directly to collect snow following “dirty hands, clean hands” protocol as we did in the previous studies (Zhang et al., 2017b). After sampling, these bottles were kept in frozen during storage or transportation until melted at room temperature and analyzed for rBC in a class 100 clean room. Meanwhile, the snow depth was also observed by using ultrasonic snow depth sensor (Campbell RS50A).

    • In this study, rBC concentrations and size distributions in snow cover were analyzed by Single Particle Soot Photometer with BC size range of 70−500 nm (SP2, Droplet Measurement Technology, Boulder, USA) following the method described by previous studies (Schwarz et al., 2008, 2012, 2013; Moteki et al., 2010; Lim et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2017b). In brief, SP2 uses a laser-induced incandescence method to directly measure the mass of individual BC particle, without considering the particle morphology or light scattering coating materials (Moteki and Kondo, 2010). Then the BC particle mass can be translated to volume-equivalent diameter by assuming a 1.8 g cm−3 void-free density. Meanwhile, SP2 can measure rBC particles in snow and precipitation samples with the help of nebulizer (CETAC U5000AT in this study) (Lim et al., 2014). In this study, the individual rBC particles pass through an intra-cavity laser (1064 nm) by the SP2. The detection limit of rBC particle was 0.3 fg per particle, with rBC size range of 70–500 nm by SP2. The nebulizer efficiency in this study, is approximately 15%–20% by measuring the Polystyrene Sphere Latex standard samples (Standard Aquadag, Acheson Inc., USA; 10 ng mL−1) before and after the snow sample analysis. We have to note that this technique leads to a lower estimate of BC concentrations in snow samples (compared to that measured by Thermal/Optical method) due to that rBC particles can agglomerate in snow and are hence not detectable by the SP2. More details for SP2 analysis can be referred to Zhang et al. (2017b) and Lim et al. (2014). A detailed discussion on differences of BC concentrations measured by different methods has been revealed in our previous study (Kang et al., 2020).

    • A 4-day backward air mass trajectories analysis was performed based on the Lagrangian analysis tool LAGRANTO and used wind filed at 0.25° × 0.25° resolution, provided by the operational analysis of European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) (Wernli and Davies, 1997; Sprenger and Wernli, 2015), to discuss the potential sources of BC in snow as to previous studies (Zhang et al., 2017b, 2020a). Here natural sourced BC includes emissions from wildfires only based on the FINN v1.5 global fire emission inventory, while anthropogenic BC includes BC emissions from fossil fuel combustion and domestic biomass burning. Briefly, backward air mass trajectories were launched every 6 h between 1 November 2017 to 30 April 2018 for the study area. For calculating BC emissions from natural contributions, we used the FINN v1.5 global fire emission inventory in this study to be speciated with the GEOS-chem mechanism (Wiedinmyer et al., 2011). Further details on the trajectory calculation can be found in Zhang et al. (2017b).

    3.   Results and discussions
    • Temporal variations of rBC showed a general increasing trend during the study period from November 2016 to April 2017 (Fig. 2). The average rBC concentrations were 5.77±3.07 and 2.82±1.71 ng g−1 for the surface snow and sub-surface snow with a range of 0.43−12.52 and 0.15−8.08 ng g−1 during studied period, respectively. The average rBC concentrations were 1.55±0.92 and 1.30±1.06 ng g−1 in winter (November 2016 to February 2017) for surface snow and sub-surface snow, respectively; while in spring (March 2017−April 2017), rBC data for surface snow and sub-surface snow were 6.39±2.77 and 3.14±1.65 ng g−1, respectively [Table S1 in the electronic supplementary material (ESM)]. The higher values of rBC in surface snow indicated rBC tended to be accumulated at the surface because of its hydrophobicity, with the average amplification factor (defined as ratios of surface-to-subsurface snow BC concentrations) of about 2. The maximum rBC concentrations occurred in the late melting season (early April 2017), which provided further evidence that the strong melting could enrich rBC particles at the surface snow. This trend was different from the BC records measured by using Thermal/Optical Carbon Analyzer, which showed the maximum values to occur on 27 March 2017 (Zhong et al., 2021). The rBC measured by SP2 in this study only represented partial BC particles with size between 70–500 nm. However, BC with size larger than 2.2 μm constrained by the quartz fiber filters (with pore size of 2.2 μm) was measured by Thermal/Optical method (DRI) (Zhang et al., 2017a; Zhong et al., 2021). In general, BC concentrations measured by Thermal/Optical method can result in 2−3 orders of magnitude higher than that of BC measured by SP2 (Zhang et al., 2017b; Kang et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). For instance, the BC concentrations by Thermal/Optical method in snow cover and glacier of Altai region ranged from 111−4733 ng g−1 and 196−7720 ng g−1, respectively (Zhang et al., 2020a; Zhong et al., 2021). Besides, the estimated BC in snow (the estimated true mass of BC per mass of snow derived by separating the spectrally resolved total light absorption) revealed approximately 22−174 ng g−1 in the Altai region, with snow samples filtered by 0.4 μm Nuclepore filter (Wang et al., 2013; Pu et al., 2017). While for the ice cores BC concentrations measured by SP2, the rBC concentrations only ranged from 0.41 to 7.84 ng g−1 (Wang et al., 2021). In summary, great care is needed when BC concentrations are compared among different studies if BC measured by different methods.

      Figure 2.  Refractory BC concentrations in surface and sub-surface snow of Central Asia and the snow depth variations during November 2016 to April 2017 at Koktokay Snow Station of Chinese Altai regions in Central Asia. Snow depth data cited from (Zhong et al., 2021).

    • The rBC mass size distributions from Altai snow samples can typically closely fitted to a pure lognormal function with a mass median diameter of about 120−150 nm VED (Fig. 3). For the surface snow, BC mass size distributions in winter season were quite similar to that in spring season when the snow began to melt. However, due to the accumulation of BC in surface snow in spring, the normalized probability in spring became relatively concentrated in the mass median VED of 120−150 nm VED (Figs. 3a and 3b). For the sub-surface snow, a large difference of BC mass size distributions was found in winter season, with no significant mass median VED (Fig. 3c). In spring, the distributions of BC size in sub-surface snow (Fig. 3d) exhibited the variations that were typical in the surface snow with rBC size mass median VED of about 130−140 nm. The results showed the BC median size was small enough, and a large fraction of BC particles from the total accumulation mode mass could not be measured by SP2, as became evidence from the log-normal fit. Besides, because of the measured limitation of BC size by SP2 in this study (70−500 nm), we cannot discuss the BC size with VED larger than 500 nm.

      Figure 3.  Refractory BC mass size distributions from surface and sub-surface snow during winter and spring at Koktokay Snow Cover Station, respectively. (a) BC size for surface snow in winter, (b) BC size for surface snow in spring, (c) BC size for sub-surface snow in winter, and BC size for sub-surface snow in spring(d). (Error bars present the standard deviation.)

    • In order to understand BC mass size distributions in atmosphere and snow globally, we have collected the published literatures on related studies of BC size in atmosphere and snow (Table 1 and Table S2 in the ESM). It was indicated that atmospheric BC size distributions and median mass diameter was identified with large differences (Fig. 4). In general, for the ambient atmospheric BC observation in the Los Angeles basin (the typical urban area), the BC mass median size was about 100 nm (Fig. 4 and Table S2). The peak diameter of BC in the mass size distributions was 170 nm for 30 m away from the highway in Los Angeles with heavy fossil fuel emissions of BC due to the traffic; on the other hand, for the sites far from the highway, the peak of the BC size distribution was about 77−90 nm (Krasowsky et al., 2018). In the urban region of Xiamen city in South China, atmospheric BC particles was mono-modal with a mass median diameter of ~175 nm during non-polluted times, and ~195 nm during polluted conditions due to stronger biomass burning activities during pollution episodes (Wang et al., 2016a). In Shenzhen city (Southern China), distributions of BC size were characterized by the peak diameter ranging from 210−222 nm (Huang et al., 2011). In Beijing city, BC showed a mono-mode peaking with median diameter of 207 nm (Sun et al., 2012). Meanwhile, during winter haze episodes in urban Beijing city, peak diameter of BC size distributions was about 213 nm (Wu et al., 2017). The mass size distribution mode for BC mass size at Kanpur in the Indo-Gangetic Plain showed the peak at about 180 nm (Thamban et al., 2017).

      Study areaSnow typesBC size measurement method (BC size range)Mass median size(nm)References
      Arctic regionsNy-Ålesund, SvalbardFresh snow/falling snowSP2 (70−4170 nm)240Sinha et al., 2018
      GreenlandSnowpack/ surface snowSP2 (70−4170 nm)200Mori et al., 2019
      AlaskaSnowpack/ surface snowSP2 (70−4170 nm)320Mori et al., 2019
      Barrow, AlaskaSurface snowSP2 (70−500 nm)160Unpublished data
      AntarcticaWest AntarcticaSnow/firn coreSP2 (70−2000 nm)162±40Marquetto et al., 2020
      McMurdo Dry Valleys,
      West Antarctica
      SnowpitSP2 (70−800 nm)300−400Khan et al., 2018
      Eastern AntarcticaSurface snowSP2 (70−4170 nm)140Kinase et al., 2020
      Middle latitudesChinese Altai regionsSurface/sub-surface snowSP2 (70−500 nm)120−150This study
      Northern Tibetan PlateauSurface snowSP2 (70−500 nm)180−200Zhang et al., 2017b
      Dudh Koshi River basin of Nepal, HimalayasSeasonal snowSP2 (70−5000 nm)2500 (fresh snow)4000 (aged snow)Khan et al., 2020
      Sapporo, JapanSurface snowSP2 (70−850 nm)175Ohata et al., 2013
      Denver, USAFresh snow/falling snowSP2 (70−2450 nm)240Schwarz et al., 2013
      Note: SP2—Single Particle Soot Photometer.

      Table 1.  A summary of BC mass size distributions in snow from different regions.

      Figure 4.  Distributions of BC mass size distributions from snow and aerosol based on the published literatures. (Data can be referred to Table 1 and Table S2 in the ESM.)

      However, in the northern Tibetan Plateau (Qinghai Lake) of remote areas, BC was observed with mass median diameter of ~175 nm (Wang et al., 2014). In southeast Tibet, the average BC median mass diameter was the largest (184 nm) when the polluted air masses originated from central Bangladesh, while smaller BC sizes were found when the polluted air masses came from north India (173 nm) or the central Tibetan Plateau (177 nm) (Wang et al., 2018). At Jungfraujoch in the Swiss Alps (3580 m a.s.l.), BC distributions of each season peaked at very similar median diameters between roughly 130 to 150 nm (Motos et al., 2020). In western Siberia without heavy anthropogenic emissions, BC median diameter varied from 140 to 220 nm with significant impact of smokes from forest fires to the studied site (Kozlov et al., 2017). In the Finnish Arctic during winter 2011−12, BC mass size was log-normally distributed with median diameter of 194 nm (Raatikainen et al., 2015). Over the High Canadian Arctic (>70ºN), BC mass-mean diameter ranged from above 200 nm in the lower polar dome dominated by low-level transport to < 190 nm at higher levels, indicating BC aerosol was affected by wet removal mechanisms preferential to larger particle diameters when lifting processes were involved during transport (Schulz et al., 2019). The significant differences of BC in ambient atmosphere indicated that impacts of BC sources, transport, and atmospheric chemicals processes.

      When deposited onto snow, atmospheric BC particles can experience dry and wet deposition processes, and their size distributions in snow may be changed. As shown in Figure 4 and Table 1, BC size distributions in snow also exhibited large differences depending on region and remoteness. In specific, for the snowfall in Colorado, BC median size was about 219 nm, and a significant shoulder of BC mass size distributions particular with BC particles size lager than 300 nm (Schwarz et al., 2013) (Fig. 5a). In Beijing city, BC particle size in snow increased from 180−210 nm from 19 to 21 November in 2015, suggesting BC was more aged on 21 November (Zhao et al., 2021). In Qilian Mountains of Northern Tibetan Plateau, mass median diameter of BC from surface snow of Laohugou glacier No.12 was detected to be 180−220 nm (Zhang et al., 2017b). In the Dudh Koshi River basin of Nepal, Himalayan regions, rBC size distribution in seasonal snow showed a slight shift to a larger mode of particle sizes from the fresh snow (2.5 μm to the aged snow samples (~4 μm) (Khan et al., 2020). In the central Asia of this study, the median mass diameter of BC in snow was about 120−150 nm. In Sapporo (Japan), BC in surface snow had a median mass diameter of about 175 nm (Ohata et al., 2013). Mass size distributions for BC in snow across Alaska and Finland were observed to be about 320 nm and 358 nm, respectively (Mori et al., 2019). In particular, in Anchorage and Fairbanks, wood burning in winter was an important source of BC (Ward et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2021), which would shift the BC to a larger median mass diameter, compared to those from fossil fuel combustions (Schwarz et al., 2008; Kondo et al., 2011). Meanwhile, for Alaska Arctic snow at Barrow in late spring (Fig. 5b), the size distribution of BC in snow presented a mass median diameter at about 160 nm (unpublished data from our group), smaller than that from study by (Mori et al., 2019). BC size distribution in snowpack of Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, was at about 218 nm (Sinha et al., 2018). In Greenland regions, median mass diameter of surface snow was at 200 nm (Mori et al., 2019). In West Antarctica, BC mass size distributions in Antarctic snow presented a multimodal distribution with mass median diameter at 162 nm (Marquetto et al., 2020). While in East Antarctica, BC mass size distributions in snow samples (~140 nm) were generally smaller than those in Arctic snow (Kinase et al., 2020). From BC in snowpit at McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica, mass median diameter of BC size was estimated to be in the 300–400 nm range, which was higher than typical ambient air BC (Khan et al., 2018). BC mass size distributions in snowpack was impacted by the size distribution of BC in the atmosphere. Furthermore, these ambient BC particles underwent size-dependent nucleation and wet removal of BC during the transport from major continental sources to deposit onto snow, altering the original size distributions (Ohata et al., 2016).

      Figure 5.  The normalized BC mass size distributions in the atmosphere and snow. (a) The normalized BC mass size distributions from the urban and remote atmosphere, and snow samples from Colorado snowfalls within 60 km of Denver, Colorade, in both semi-rural and rural areas were cited from (Schwarz et al., 2013). (b) The normalized BC mass size distributions from Arctic snow at Barrow. The Arctic snow samples were collected by Yulan ZHANG in 2017 (Zhang et al., 2020b).

      We have to note that, because lack of direct measurement of atmospheric BC size in our study area, it was limited to discuss the BC size distribution from atmosphere to snow. Meanwhile, the difference of BC mixing state in the frozen state (snow) and melting water were not analyzed due to the detection limitation. The impact of snow melting on the changes of BC mixing state were not estimated until now. With the development of frozen transmission electron microscopy, it is possible to analyze the BC distributions in snow, which may provide more accurate information on the size distribution of BC in snow in future.

    • The emission types (biomass burning or fossil fuel combustions), aging, transport pathways, removal process from the atmosphere of BC aerosol can substantially affect the BC size distributions in snow (Bond et al., 2013). Previous studies revealed that the BC median mass diameter for particles from biomass burning plume (~210 nm) was larger than that from urban fossil fuel burning (~170 nm) (Schwarz et al., 2008; Kondo et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2016b). Usually, the less distinct finer mode of BC aerosols can be attributed to the fresh emissions from combustion sources, while the coarse mode had an unclear origin (Berner et al., 1996). BC aerosols in urban regions were a complex of comparable contributions from both fresh emissions and regional transport under atmospheric circulation (Wang et al., 2016a). The BC aerosol in remote areas with rapid mixing and aging processes, the median mass size was usually smaller than the ambient urban BC aerosols (Table S2). For example, in Arctic regions, BC median size was about 200 nm for aerosols (Raatikainen et al., 2015; Schulz et al., 2019); however, the BC size for the snow can reach to about 320 nm (Mori et al., 2019). Meanwhile, we have to note that BC mass median size for snow or atmosphere differed globally, which may be dominated by different BC sources (biomass burning vs fossil fuel combustions).

      Because of the hydrophobicity of BC particles, scavenging fractions of BC due to percolation of snow meltwater were estimated at 10%–30% at Barrow and Greenland (Doherty et al., 2013). In southeast Tibetan Plateau, the amplification factors of BC for surface to sub-surface snow range from 1.55 to 8.39, with scavenging efficiencies of 20% (Niu et al., 2017). In Our study, the average amplification factor is about 2, indicating the relatively accumulating BC in the surface snow. Especially, melt amplification of BC appeared generally to be confined to the top few centimeters of the snowpack, as shown by the relatively high concentration in surface snow compared to that in sub-surface snow in this study (Fig. 2). Snow metamorphism appeared to play a non-negligible role on BC content in snow (Bertò et al., 2021).

      Besides, the BC particles in snow can be internal mixing with other insoluble particles (Doherty et al., 2013). Such internal mixing can enhance the albedo effects by up to 30% for spherical grains relative to external mixing (He et al., 2018a). In the Tibetan Plateau, BC–snow internal mixing enhances the mean albedo effects over the plateau by 30%–60% relative to external mixing (He et al., 2018b). BC size effects for application to climate models indicated large differences ~24% and ~40% in BC-snow albedo forcing simulations (He et al., 2018c). Meanwhile, Schwarz et al. (2013) found that there existed a corresponding reduction in BC absorption in snow of 40% by Mie theory, indicating BC size in snow was the dominant source of uncertainty in BC’s absorption properties for calculations of BC’s snow albedo climate forcing. These studies further emphasized that we have to consider the impact of BC size in snow when simulating its climate effect in future.

    • The study region was controlled by westerlies, profoundly impacted by the Central Asia dust aerosols (Chen et al., 2021). Footprint analysis of backward air trajectories indicated that air masses arriving at the study site mainly originated from northern Xinjiang, Central Asia, and even west Siberia during the studied periods (Fig. 6a). Fire dots (colored dots in the Fig. 6a) concentrated in the northern Xinjiang and Central Asia, and very few were discernible in the eastern part of Xinjiang and northwestern Gansu province. Meanwhile, the results indicated that local wildfires (<50 km) contributed only a small portion of the total BC (~10%) deposited on the snow cover at Altai region (Fig. 6b). However, long-distance transport (the blue, red and orange bars, with distance > 100 km) of BC from fires contributed about 15%–30% of BC deposition (Fig. 6b). Both local emissions and long-range transport of BC aerosols from fires played an important role of BC in snow. Nevertheless, the results further indicated that about 70%–85% of BC in this region during winter was mainly affected by anthropogenic emission, including fossil fuel and biofuel combustions from the traffic, heating, and industrial activity.

      Figure 6.  A four-days-back trajectory analysis (a) and contributions of BC emitted from natural fires (b) during the studied periods in Central Asia. Black dots are air parcels that did not pass near a fire, while the colored dots are air mass parcels that crossed fires. Green dots are fires that occurred between −48 h and 0 h before arriving at the site. Pink dots indicate air parcels that crossed over a fire between −96 h and −48 h, but not afterwards. Red dots indicate fires that occurred before and after −48 h. Contributions in (b) was retrieved from the FINN v1.5 global fire emission inventory.

      Previous studies in this region indicated that residential emissions were the largest source of BC in snow in Northern Xinjiang based on the WRF-Chem simulations, with contributions from 53% to 85%; and industrial activity was the second largest source of BC (Zhong et al., 2019). The positive matrix factorization model indicated biomass burning (especially the biofuel for heating in winter and early spring) was normally prevalent in Northern China (including Xinjiang) (Pu et al., 2017). For BC from Muz Taw glacier in Sawir Mountains further evidenced that more than 80% of BC deposited was attributed to anthropogenic emissions (Zhang et al., 2020a). Backward trajectories analysis illustrated that the local pollution dominated BC in snow across Tianshan Mountains; however, the Altai region was dominated by the Russian-Northern Kazakhstan-East Kazakhstan transport path with less contribution from local pollution (Chen et al., 2019). Combined our study, these results revealed that BC in snow of Northern Xinjiang was mostly contributed with the anthropogenic sources through atmospheric transport, with dominant sources of BC from anthropogenic activities.

    4.   Conclusions
    • Snow cover samples were collected and studied for rBC size in snow at Koktokay Snow Station in Chinese Altai Mountains of Northern Xinjiang during November 2016 to April 2017. The results indicated that rBC concentrations in snow showed a general increasing trend during the studied periods, with average of 5.77 and 2.82 ng g−1 for the surface snow and sub-surface snow, respectively. These data were 2−3 orders of magnitude lower than BC concentrations measured by Thermal/Optical methods in the same study region due to the detection limits of BC size by SP2 in this study. The distributions of BC size in surface snow were represented by a lognormal function with mass median size of 120−150 nm volume equivalent diameter. However, no specific mass median size of BC for sub-surface snow in winter could be identified. Meanwhile, large differences of BC size between atmosphere and snow were also discussed on a global scale, and we found that BC origins, BC mixing status, and post-deposition due to melting may affect the BC size distributions. Backward trajectories provided evidence that anthropogenic emissions of BC aerosols dominated BC in snow of Chinese Altai Mountains, with contribution of about 70%−85%. Climate effects of BC size distributions associated with snow grains are still unknown and need to be investigated in future studies.

      Acknowledgements. This study was supported by the second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (2019QZKK0605), the National Science Foundation of China (42271132), Longyuan Youth Innovative Program of Gansu Province, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2021-74). The data supporting can be obtained from supplementary information.

      Electronic supplementary material: Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2141-z.

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return