China’s Carbon Emissions in International Trade under Tariff Adjustments

Fan YANG; Jieming CHOU; Wenjie DONG; Mingyang SUN

doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2021.21102

Volume 27 Issue 1

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Climatic and Environmental Research > 2022 > 27(1): 197-205

YANG Fan, CHOU Jieming, DONG Wenjie, et al. 2022. China’s Carbon Emissions in International Trade under Tariff Adjustments [J]. Climatic and Environmental Research (in Chinese), 27 (1): 197−205 doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2021.21102

Citation:

PDF( 2600 KB)

China’s Carbon Emissions in International Trade under Tariff Adjustments

doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2021.21102

1.
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
2.
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, Guangdong Province 519080

Funds: National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant 2018YFC1509003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 42075167)

Received Date: 2021-06-10
Available Online: 2021-12-29
Publish Date: 2022-01-25

Abstract

Abstract

To adapt to climate change, China, as the country creating the highest levels of carbon emissions in the world, is formulating a carbon emission reduction plan. The plan under development considers many aspects of emission generation and proposes a goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. With the ever-increasing globalization of trade, the carbon emissions produced locally in China are increasingly impacting other countries worldwide. Thus, the carbon policies negotiated as terms of trade between countries can greatly impact worldwide carbon emission levels. Similarly, setting the level of tariffs based on emission levels will bring about significant changes in the international trade for goods. Consequently, this will likely lead to changes in the treatment of emissions in import and export agreements. This article examines the trade conflicts between China and the United States. In doing so, it simulates the additional tariffs imposed by China and the United States and combines the results of the global trade analysis model and the input–output analysis method. It concludes by quantitatively analyzing the changes in China’s hidden import and export emissions under the proposed tariff changes. The article finds that after China and the United States have hypothetically imposed tariffs, although the trade between China and the United States and the emissions thereof would be greatly reduced, the emissions of China’s exports to the world nonetheless would have significantly increased. In addition, due to the impact of the import market, China’s emissions from imports worldwide would have been significantly reduced, which would lead to an increase in China’s net exports of carbon emissions after tariffs. These exports would be concentrated in energy-intensive industries. Based on a review of the current results, China continues to export a significant amount of emissions to the world despite applicable trade restrictions. Promoting the progress of the new energy industry through trade may more efficiently solve the problem of carbon emission reduction.
- Climate change,
- Trade tariffs,
- Input–output analysis,
- Emissions contained in products

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	Feng K S, Davis S J, Sun L X, et al. 2013. Outsourcing CO₂ within China [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(28): 11654−11659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219918110
[2]	Friedlingstein P, O'Sullivan M, Jones M W, et al. 2020. Global carbon budget 2020 [J]. Earth System Science Data, 12(4): 3269−3340. doi: 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
[3]	耿涌, 董会娟, 郗凤明, 等. 2010. 应对气候变化的碳足迹研究综述 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 20(10): 6−12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.102-2104.2010.10.002 Geng Yong, Dong Huijuan, Xi Fengming, et al. 2010. A review of the research on carbon footprint responding to climate change [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 20(10): 6−12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.102-2104.2010.10.002
[4]	国家统计局能源统计司. 2019. 中国能源统计年鉴 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社. Department of energy statistics, National Bureau of Statistics. 2019. China Energy Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese) [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
[5]	Hertel T W. 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[6]	IPCC. 2008. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [M]. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
[7]	Jakob M, Marschinski R. 2013. Interpreting trade-related CO₂ emission transfers [J]. Nature Climate Change, 3(1): 19−23. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1630
[8]	Leontief W. 1970. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input–output approach [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3): 262−271. doi: 10.2307/1926294
[9]	Li J J, Chandio A A, Liu Y C. 2020. Trade impacts on embodied carbon emissions - evidence from the bilateral trade between China and Germany [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17: 5076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145076
[10]	Liu Z, Guan D B, Wei W, et al. 2015. Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China [J]. Nature, 524(7565): 335−338. doi: 10.1038/nature14677
[11]	Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2018-06-15)[2021-06-01]. USTR issues tariffs on Chinese products in response to unfair trade practices [EB/OL].https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2018/june/ustr-issues-tariffs-chinese-products.
[12]	Trump D J. 2017. National security strategy of the United States of America [R].
[13]	Walmsley T L, Dimaranan B V, McDougall R A. 2012. A baseline scenario for the dynamic GTAP model [M]//Ianchovichina E I, Walmsley T L. Dynamic Modeling and Applications for Global Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 136–157.
[14]	王红岩, 李景明, 赵群, 等. 2009. 中国新能源资源基础及发展前景展望 [J]. 石油学报, 30(3): 469−474. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2009.03.029 Wang Hongyan, Li Jingming, Zhao Qun, et al. 2009. Resources and development of new energy in China [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (in Chinese), 30(3): 469−474. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2009.03.029
[15]	Weber C L, Peters G P, Guan D B, et al. 2008. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change [J]. Energy Policy, 36(9): 3572−3577. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.009
[16]	韦韬, 彭水军. 2017. 基于多区域投入产出模型的国际贸易隐含能源及碳排放转移研究 [J]. 资源科学, 39(1): 94−104. doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.01.10 Wei Tao, Peng Shuijun. 2017. Embodied energy and carbon emissions transferred in international trade using a MRIO model [J]. Resources Science (in Chinese), 39(1): 94−104. doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.01.10
[17]	Wiedmann T. 2009. A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting [J]. Ecological Economics, 69(2): 211−222. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.026
[18]	Yang Z Y, Dong W J, Wei T, et al. 2015. Constructing long-term (1948–2011) consumption-based emissions inventories [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103: 793−800. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.053
[19]	余碧莹, 赵光普, 安润颖, 等. 2021. 碳中和目标下中国碳排放路径研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 23(2): 17−24. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.7380 Yu Biying, Zhao Guangpu, An Runying, et al. 2021. Research on China’s CO₂ emission pathway under carbon neutral target [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 23(2): 17−24. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.7380
[20]	张占仓. 2015. 中国经济新常态与可持续发展新趋势 [J]. 河南科学, 33(1): 91−98. Zhang Zhancang. 2015. The new normal of Chinese economy and new trend of its sustainable development [J]. Henan Science (in Chinese), 33(1): 91−98.