Black, P. G.,Coauthors, 2007: Air-sea exchange in hurricanes: Synthesis of observations from the coupled boundary layer air-sea transfer experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 357-374, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-3-357
Bougeault P.,P. Lacarrere, 1989: Parameterization of orography-induced turbulence in a mesobeta-scale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1872, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1872:POOITI>2.0.CO;2
Braun S. A.,W.-K. Tao, 2000: Sensitivity of high-resolution simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to planetary boundary layer parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3941-3961, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)129<3941:SOHRSO>2.0.CO;2
Cha D.-H.,Y. Q. Wang, 2013: A dynamical initialization scheme for real-time forecasts of tropical cyclones using the WRF model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 964-986, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00077.1
Chen L.-S.,Y.-H. Ding, 1979: An Introduction to Typhoons in the Western Pacific. Science Press, Beijing, China, 179- 181. (in Chinese)
Chen F.,J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2
Davis C.,L. F. Bosart, 2002: Numerical simulations of the genesis of Hurricane Diana (1984). Part II: Sensitivity of track and intensity prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1100-1124, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1100:NSOTGO>2.0.CO;2
Deng G.,Y.-S. Zhou, and J.-T. Li, 2005: The experiments of the boundary layer schemes on simulated typhoon Part I. The effect on the structure of typhoon. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 29(3), 813-824, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2005.03.09
Dudhia J.,1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077-3107, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3077:NSOCOD>2.0.CO;2
Emanuel K. A.,1986: An air-sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: Steady-state maintenance. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0585:AASITF>2.0.CO;2
Emanuel K. A.,1995: Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to surface exchange coefficients and a revised steady-state model incorporating eye dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3969-3976, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3969:SOTCTS>2.0.CO;2
Emanuel K. A.,1997: Some aspects of hurricane inner-core dynamics and energetics. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1014-1026, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<1014:SAOHIC>2.0.CO;2
Foster R. C.,2009: Boundary-layer similarity under an axisymmetric, gradient wind vortex. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 131, 321-344, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9379-1
Gopalakrishnan S. G.,F. D. Marks Jr., J. A. Zhang, X. Zhang, J.-W. Bao, and V. Tallapragada, 2013: A study of the impacts of vertical diffusion on the structure and intensity of the tropical cyclones using the high resolution HWRF system. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 524-541, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0340.1
Hill K. A.,G. M. Lackmann, 2009: Analysis of idealized tropical cyclone simulations using the weather research and forecasting model: Sensitivity to turbulence parameterization and grid spacing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137: 745-765, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2220.1
Holland, G. J., 1984: Tropical cyclone motion. A comparison of theory and observation. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 68, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<0068:TCMACO>2.0.CO;2
Hong S.-Y.,H.-L. Pan, 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2322, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2322:NBLVDI>2.0.CO;2
Hong S.-Y.,J. Dudhia, and S. H. Chen, 2004: A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132: 103-120, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0103:ARATIM>2.0.CO;2
Hong S.-Y.,Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318-2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1
Hu X.-M.,J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, and F.-Q. Zhang, 2010: Evaluation of three planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 49, 1831-1844, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2432.1
Ikeda, K., Coauthors, 2010: Simulation of seasonal snowfall over Colorado, Atmos. Res., 97, 462-477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.04.010
Janjić, Z. I., 1994: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:TSMECM>2.0.CO;2
Janjić, Z. I., 2000: Comments on "Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models". J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3686, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<3686:CODAEO>2.0.CO;2
Janjić, Z. I., 2001: Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model. NCEP Office Note #437, 61 pp.
Jiménez, P. A., J. Dudhia, J. F. González-Rouco, J. Navarro, J. P. Montávez, E. García-Bustamante, 2012: A revised scheme for the WRF surface layer formulation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 898-918, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00056.1
Kepert J. D.,2012: Choosing a boundary layer parameterization for tropical cyclone modeling. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140(5), 1427-1445, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00217.1
Li X. L.,Z.-X. Pu, 2008: Sensitivity of numerical simulation of early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to cloud microphysical and planetary boundary layer parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136(12): 4819-4838, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2366.1
Liu J. J.,F. M. Zhang, and Z. X. Pu, 2017: Numerical simulation of the rapid intensification of Hurricane Katrina (2005): Sensitivity to boundary layer parameterization schemes. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 34(4), 482-496, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6209-5
Malkus J. S.,1958: On the structure and maintenance of the mature hurricane eye. J. Meteor., 15, 337, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1958)015<0337:OTSAMO>2.0.CO;2
Malkus, J. S, H. Riehl, 1960: On the dynamics and energy transformations in steady-state hurricanes. Tellus, 12, 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1960.tb01279.x
Mellor G. L.,T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20, 851-875, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i004p00851
Ming J.,J. A. Zhang, 2016: Effects of surface flux parameterization on the numerically simulated intensity and structure of typhoon morakot (2009). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33( 1), 58- 72.10.1007/s00376-015-4202-z0cf580c2480b5e62b3e8fc4e939c9f08http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnki.com.cn%2FArticle%2FCJFDTotal-DQJZ201601006.htmhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00376-015-4202-zThe effects of surface flux parameterizations on tropical cyclone(TC) intensity and structure are investigated using the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting(WRF-ARW) modeling system with high-resolution simulations of Typhoon Morakot(2009).Numerical experiments are designed to simulate Typhoon Morakot(2009) with different formulations of surface exchange coefficients for enthalpy(C_K) and momentum(C_D) transfers,including those from recent observational studies based on in situ aircraft data collected in Atlantic hurricanes.The results show that the simulated intensity and structure are sensitive to C_K and C_D,but the simulated track is not.Consistent with previous studies,the simulated storm intensity is found to be more sensitive to the ratio of C_K/C_D than to C_K or C_D alone.The pressure-wind relationship is also found to be influenced by the exchange coefficients,consistent with recent numerical studies.This paper emphasizes the importance of C_D and C_K on TC structure simulations.The results suggest that C_D and C_K have a large impact on surface wind and flux distributions,boundary layer heights,the warm core,and precipitation.Compared to available observations,the experiment with observed C_D and C_K generally simulated better intensity and structure than the other experiments,especially over the ocean.The reasons for the structural differences among the experiments with different C_D and C_K setups are discussed in the context of TC dynamics and thermodynamics.
Mlawer E. J.,S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16 663-16 682, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237
Nakanishi M.,H. Niino, 2004: An improved Mellor-Yamada level-3 model with condensation physics: Its design and verification. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 112, 1-31, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000020164.04146.98
Ooyama K.,1969: Numerical simulation of the life cycle of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 3, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<0003:NSOTLC>2.0.CO;2
Rosenthal S. L.,1971: The response of a tropical cyclone model to variations in boundary layer parameters, initial conditions, lateral boundary conditions, and domain size. Mon. Wea. Rev., 99, 767, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1971)099<0767:TROATC>2.3.CO;2
Rotunno R.,K. A. Emanuel, 1987: An air-sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part II: Evolutionary study using a nonhydrostatic axisymmetric numerical model. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 542, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<0542:AAITFT>2.0.CO;2
Shin H. H.,S. Y. Hong, 2011: Intercomparison of planetary boundary-layer parametrizations in the WRF model for a single day from CASES-99. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 139(2), 261-281, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9583-z
Skamarock, W. C.,Coauthors, 2008: A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475 + STR, Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo, https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH
Smith, R. K, G. L. Thomsen, 2010: Dependence of tropical-cyclone intensification on the boundary-layer representation in a numerical model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1671-1685, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.687
Stull R. B.,1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 515-520, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8
Sukoriansky S.,B. Galperin, 2008: A Quasi-Normal Scale Elimination (QNSE) theory of turbulent flows with stable stratification and its application in weather forecast systems. Proc. 6th IASME/WSEAS International Conf. on Heat Transfer, Thermal Engineering and Environment (THE'08), Rhodes, Greece, WSEAS Press, 376- 380.
Sukoriansky S.,B. Galperin, and V. Perov, 2005: `Application of a new spectral theory of stably stratified turbulence to the atmospheric boundary layer over sea ice'. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 117, 231-257, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-6848-4
Wang C.-X.,2013: Experiments of influence of planetary boundary layer parameterization on Muifa typhoon prediction. Advances in Earth Science, 28( 2), 197- 208. (in Chinese)10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2013.02.01979daffc9880fb91f8cb290a03e6d7d3bbhttp%3A%2F%2Fen.cnki.com.cn%2FArticle_en%2FCJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201302003.htmhttp://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201302003.htmThe GRAPES-TCM is used to make prediction experiments for Typhoon Muifa(1109).Thirty six experiments are made and the integral time is 72 h.By experiments,the influence of two boundary layer parameterization schemes鈥擬RF scheme and YSU scheme on typhoon prediction under different circumstances is analyzed. Theexperiment results show that Muifa track and intensity are both sensitive to the boundary layer scheme's change.The sensitivity magnitude is related to some other factors such as convection parameterization scheme and typhoon initial intensity.The intensity sensitivity is greater than the track sensitivity.For weak typhoon,the track and intensity predictions with YSU scheme are overall better than that with MRF scheme.For strong typhoon,between the two boundary layer schemes,MRF scheme's track prediction is better.Which scheme's intensity prediction is better is related to the choice of the convection scheme.In all cases,Muifa intensity with YSU scheme is obviously stronger than that with MRF scheme,and the precipitation and the sensible heat flux and latent heat flux with YSU scheme are all greater than that with MRF scheme.When the boundary layer scheme is YSU scheme,the turbulence mixing in the boundary layer is more powerful,which leads to more sensible heat flux and more latent heat flux.More latent heat flux leads to more precipitation which releases more latent heat.More latent heat release and more sensible heat flux lead to stronger typhoon.
Wang H.,Y. Q. Wang, and H.-M. Xu, 2013: Improving simulation of a tropical cyclone using dynamical initialization and large-scale spectral nudging: A case study of Typhoon Megi (2010). Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 27, 455-475, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-013-0418-y
Wang Y. Q.,2012: Recent research progress on tropical cyclone structure and intensity. Tropical Cyclone Research and Review, 1, 254-275, https://doi.org/10.6057/2012TCRR02.05
Wang Y. Q.,J. D. Kepert, and G. J. Holland, 2001: The effect of sea spray evaporation on tropical cyclone boundary layer structure and intensity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2481-2500, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2481:TEOSSE>2.0.CO;2
Xu H.-Y.,Y. Zhu, R. Liu, H.-F. Shen, D.-H. Wang, and G.-Q. Zhai, 2013: Simulation experiments with different planetary boundary layer schemes in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 37(1), 149-159, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2012.12021
Ying M.,W. Zhang, H. Yu, X. Q. Lu, J. X. Feng, Y. X. Fan, Y. T. Zhu, and D. Q. Chen, 2014: An overview of the China meteorological administration tropical cyclone database. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 31, 287-301, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1
Yu Z.,Y. Wang and H. Xu, 2015: Observed rainfall asymmetry in tropical cyclones making landfall over China. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 54( 1), 117- 136.10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0359.19fd15219dde150bd5b290f89017ca540http%3A%2F%2Fadsabs.harvard.edu%2Fabs%2F2015JApMC..54..117Yhttp://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0359.1In this study, the rainfall asymmetries in tropical cyclones (TCs) that made landfall in the Hainan (HN),Guangdong (GD), Fujian (FJ), and Zhejiang (ZJ) provinces of mainland China and Taiwan (TW) from2001 to 2009 were analyzed on the basis of TRMM satellite 3B42 rainfall estimates. The results reveal thatin landfalling TCs, the wavenumber 1 rainfall asymmetry shows the downshear to downshear-left maximumin environmental vertical wind shear (VWS), which is consistent with previous studies for TCs overthe open oceans. A cyclonic rotation from south China to east China in the location of the rainfall maximumhas been identified. Before landfall, the location of the rainfall maximum rotated from southwest tosoutheast of the TC center for TCs making landfall in the regions from HN to GD, TW, FJ, and ZJ. Afterlandfall, the rotation became from southwest to northeast of the TC center from south China to east China.It is shown that this cyclonic rotation in the location of the rainfall maximum is well correlated with a cyclonicrotation from south China to east China in the environmental VWS between 200 and 850 hPa, indicatingthat the rainfall asymmetry in TCs that made landfall over China is predominantly controlled bythe large-scale VWS. The cyclonic rotation of VWS is found to be related to different interactions betweenthe midlatitude westerlies and the landfalling TCs in different regions. The results also indicate that theaxisymmetric (wavenumber 0) component of rainfall generally decreased rapidly after landfall in moststudied regions.1.
Zhang C.-X.,Y. Q. Wang, and K. Hamilton, 2011: Improved representation of boundary layer clouds over the Southeast Pacific in ARW-WRF using a modified Tiedtke cumulus parameterization scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3489-3513, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05091.1
Zhang D.-L.,W. Z. Zheng, 2004: Diurnal cycles of surface winds and temperatures as simulated by five boundary layer parameterizations. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 157, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0157:DCOSWA>2.0.CO;2
Zhang F. M.,Z. X. Pu, 2017: Effects of vertical eddy diffusivity parameterization on the evolution of landfalling hurricanes. J. Atmos. Sci., 74(6), 1879-1905, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0214.1
Zhang F. M.,Z. X. Pu, and C. H. Wang, 2017: Effects of boundary layer vertical mixing on the evolution of hurricanes over land. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145(6), 2343-2361, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0421.1
Zhang J. A.,D. S. Nolan, R. F. Rogers, and V. Tallapragada, 2015: Evaluating the impact of improvements in the boundary layer parameterization on hurricane intensity and structure forecasts in HWRF. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 3136-3155, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00339.1
Zhu P.,K. Menelaou, and Z. D. Zhu, 2014: Impact of subgrid-scale vertical turbulent mixing on eyewall asymmetric structures and mesovortices of hurricanes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 416-438, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2147
Zhu Q.-G.,J. H. Lin, S.-W. Shou, and D.-S. Tang. 2000: Principles and Methods of Synoptic Meteorology. China Meteorological Press, Beijing, China, 320- 321.