Advanced Search
Article Contents

Atmospheric and Coupled Model Intercomparison in Terms of Amplitude-Phase Characteristics of Surface Air Temperature Annual Cycle


doi: 10.1007/BF02915586

  • A model intercomparison in terms of surface air temperature annual cycle ampitude-phase characteristics(SAT AC APC)is performed. The models included in the intercomparison belong to two groups:five atmospheric models with prescribed sea surface temperature and sea ice cover and four coupled models forced by the atmospheric abundances of anthropogenic consituents (in total six coupled model simulations). Over land, the models, simulating higher than observed time averaged SAT,also tend to simulate smaller than observed amplitude of its annual and semiannual harmonics and (outside the Tropics laterthan-observed spring and autumn moments. The models with larger(smaller) time averaged amplitudes of annual and semiannual harmonics also tend to simulate larger(smaller)interannual standard deviations. Over the oceans, the coupled models with larger interannual standard deviations of annual mean SAT tend to simulate larger interannual standard deviations of both annual and semiannual SAT harmonics amplitudes. Most model errors are located in the belts 60°-70°N and 60°-70°S and over Antarctica. These errors are larger for those coupled models which do not employ dynamical modules for sea ice.No systematic differences are found in the simulated time averaged fields of the surface air temperature annual cycle characteristics for atmospheric models on one hand and for the coupled models on the other. But the coupled models generally simulate interannual variability of SAT AC APC better than the atmospheric models (which tend to underestimate it). For the coupled models, the results are not very sensitive to the choice of the particular scenario of anthropogenic forcing.There is a strong linear positive relationship between the model simulated time averaged semiannual SAT harmonics amplitude and interannual standard deviation of annual mean SAT.It is stronger over the tropical oceans and is weaker in the extratropics. In the tropical oceanic areas, it is stronger for the coupled than for the atmospheric models.
  • [1] LI Tao, ZHENG Xiaogu, DAI Yongjiu, YANG Chi, CHEN Zhuoqi, ZHANG Shupeng, WU Guocan, WANG Zhonglei, HUANG Chengcheng, SHEN Yan, LIAO Rongwei, 2014: Mapping Near-surface Air Temperature, Pressure, Relative Humidity and Wind Speed over Mainland China with High Spatiotemporal Resolution, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 1127-1135.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-3190-8
    [2] Alexey V.ELISEEV, Igor I. MOKHOV, 2003: Amplitude-Phase Characteristics of the Annual Cycle of Surface Air Temperature in the Northern Hemisphere, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 20, 1-16.  doi: 10.1007/BF03342045
    [3] Chineke Theo Chidiezie, Li Weiping, 1999: IAP General Circulation Models: A First Step Towards Developing a Local Area Model for Weather Prediction in Nigeria, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 16, 119-132.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-999-0008-1
    [4] YU Lejiang, ZHANG Zhanhai, ZHOU Mingyu, Shiyuan ZHONG, Donald LENSCHOW, Hsiaoming HSU, WU Huiding, SUN Bo, 2010: Validation of ECMWF and NCEP--NCAR Reanalysis Data in Antarctica, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 1151-1168.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9140-1
    [5] CHEN Linling, Ola M. JOHANNESSEN, WANG Huijun, Atsumu OHMURA, 2011: Accumulation over the Greenland Ice Sheet as Represented in Reanalysis Data, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 1030-1038.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-0150-9
    [6] Yadi LI, Xichen LI, Juan FENG, Yi ZHOU, Wenzhu WANG, Yurong HOU, 2024: Uncertainties of ENSO-related Regional Hadley Circulation Anomalies within Eight Reanalysis Datasets, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 115-140.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3047-0
    [7] Deniz BOZKURT, David H. BROMWICH, Jorge CARRASCO, Keith M. HINES, Juan Carlos MAUREIRA, Roberto RONDANELLI, 2020: Recent Near-surface Temperature Trends in the Antarctic Peninsula from Observed, Reanalysis and Regional Climate Model Data, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 477-493.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-9183-x
    [8] Liu Qinyu, Jia Yinglai, Wang Xiaohua, Yang Haijun, 2001: On the Annual Cycle Characteristics of the Sea Surface Height in South China Sea, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 613-622.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-001-0049-6
    [9] YU Yongqiang, HE Jie, ZHENG Weipeng, and LUAN Yihua, 2013: Annual Cycle and Interannual Variability in the Tropical Pacific as Simulated by Three Versions of FGOALS, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 621-637.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2184-2
    [10] Lixia ZHANG, Tianjun ZHOU, Nicholas P. KLINGAMAN, Peili WU, Malcolm ROBERTS, 2018: Effect of Horizontal Resolution on the Representation of the Global Monsoon Annual Cycle in AGCMs, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 1003-1020.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-7273-9
    [11] QIAN Cheng, FU Congbin, Zhaohua WU, YAN Zhongwei, 2011: The Role of Changes in the Annual Cycle in Earlier Onset of Climatic Spring in Northern China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 284-296.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9221-1
    [12] Yang Haijun, Liu Qinyu, Jia Xujing, 1999: On the Upper Oceanic Heat Budget in the South China Sea: Annual Cycle, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 16, 619-629.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-999-0036-x
    [13] QIAN Cheng, Zhaohua WU, FU Congbin, ZHOU Tianjun, 2010: On Multi-Timescale Variability of Temperature in China in Modulated Annual Cycle Reference Frame, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 1169-1182.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9121-4
    [14] LIN Pengfei, LIU Hailong, YU Yongqiang, ZHANG Xuehong, 2011: Response of Sea Surface Temperature to Chlorophyll-a Concentration in the Tropical Pacific: Annual Mean, Seasonal Cycle, and Interannual Variability, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 492-510.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-0015-2
    [15] Chao Jiping, Yuan Shaoyu, Chao Qingchen, Tian Jiwei, 2002: A Data Analysis Study on the Evolution of the EI Ni?o/ La Ni?a Cycle, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 837-844.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0048-2
    [16] Seung-Jae LEE, E. Hugo BERBERY, Domingo ALCARAZ-SEGURA, 2013: Effect of Implementing Ecosystem Functional Type Data in a Mesoscale Climate Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1373-1386.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2143-3
    [17] XIE Jiping, ZHU Jiang, XU Li, GUO Pinwen, 2005: Evaluation of Mid-Depth Currents of NCEP Reanalysis Data in the Tropical Pacific Using ARGO Float Position Information, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 22, 677-684.  doi: 10.1007/BF02918711
    [18] ZHOU Lian-Tong, HUANG Ronghui, 2010: An Assessment of the Quality of Surface Sensible Heat Flux Derived from Reanalysis Data through Comparison with Station Observations in Northwest China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 500-512.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9081-8
    [19] ZHAO Tianbao, FU Congbin, 2009: Intercomparison of the Summertime Subtropical High from the ERA-40 and NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis over East Eurasia and the western North Pacific, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 26, 119-131.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-0119-8
    [20] ZENG Xinmin, LIU Jinbo, MA Zhuguo, SONG Shuai, XI Chaoli, WANG Hanjie, 2010: Study on the Effects of Land Surface Heterogeneitiesin Temperature and Moisture on Annual Scale Regional Climate Simulation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 154-163.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-8117-4

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 10 November 2004
Manuscript revised: 10 November 2004
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Atmospheric and Coupled Model Intercomparison in Terms of Amplitude-Phase Characteristics of Surface Air Temperature Annual Cycle

  • 1. A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics RAS,3 Pyzhevsky,119017 Moscow,Russia,A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics RAS,3 Pyzhevsky,119017 Moscow,Russia,Russian Hydrometcentre,9 Bol. Predtechensky,123242 Moscow,Russia,Russian Hydrometcentre,9 Bol. Predtechensky,123242 Moscow,Russia

Abstract: A model intercomparison in terms of surface air temperature annual cycle ampitude-phase characteristics(SAT AC APC)is performed. The models included in the intercomparison belong to two groups:five atmospheric models with prescribed sea surface temperature and sea ice cover and four coupled models forced by the atmospheric abundances of anthropogenic consituents (in total six coupled model simulations). Over land, the models, simulating higher than observed time averaged SAT,also tend to simulate smaller than observed amplitude of its annual and semiannual harmonics and (outside the Tropics laterthan-observed spring and autumn moments. The models with larger(smaller) time averaged amplitudes of annual and semiannual harmonics also tend to simulate larger(smaller)interannual standard deviations. Over the oceans, the coupled models with larger interannual standard deviations of annual mean SAT tend to simulate larger interannual standard deviations of both annual and semiannual SAT harmonics amplitudes. Most model errors are located in the belts 60°-70°N and 60°-70°S and over Antarctica. These errors are larger for those coupled models which do not employ dynamical modules for sea ice.No systematic differences are found in the simulated time averaged fields of the surface air temperature annual cycle characteristics for atmospheric models on one hand and for the coupled models on the other. But the coupled models generally simulate interannual variability of SAT AC APC better than the atmospheric models (which tend to underestimate it). For the coupled models, the results are not very sensitive to the choice of the particular scenario of anthropogenic forcing.There is a strong linear positive relationship between the model simulated time averaged semiannual SAT harmonics amplitude and interannual standard deviation of annual mean SAT.It is stronger over the tropical oceans and is weaker in the extratropics. In the tropical oceanic areas, it is stronger for the coupled than for the atmospheric models.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return