Advanced Search
Article Contents

What Kind of Initial Errors Cause the Severest Prediction Uncertainty of El Nino in Zebiak-Cane Model


doi: 10.1007/s00376-008-0577-4

  • With the Zebiak-Cane (ZC) model, the initial error that has the largest effect on ENSO prediction is explored by conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP). The results demonstrate that CNOP-type errors cause the largest prediction error of ENSO in the ZC model. By analyzing the behavior of CNOP-type errors, we find that for the normal states and the relatively weak El Nino events in the ZC model, the predictions tend to yield false alarms due to the uncertainties caused by CNOP. For the relatively strong El Nino events, the ZC model largely underestimates their intensities. Also, our results suggest that the error growth of El Nino in the ZC model depends on the phases of both the annual cycle and ENSO. The condition during northern spring and summer is most favorable for the error growth. The ENSO prediction bestriding these two seasons may be the most difficult. A linear singular vector (LSV) approach is also used to estimate the error growth of ENSO, but it underestimates the prediction uncertainties of ENSO in the ZC model. This result indicates that the different initial errors cause different amplitudes of prediction errors though they have same magnitudes. CNOP yields the severest prediction uncertainty. That is to say, the prediction skill of ENSO is closely related to the types of initial error. This finding illustrates a theoretical basis of data assimilation. It is expected that a data assimilation method can filter the initial errors related to CNOP and improve the ENSO forecast skill.
  • [1] Se-Hwan YANG, LI Chaofan, and LU Riyu, 2014: Predictability of Winter Rainfall in South China as Demonstrated by the Coupled Models of ENSEMBLES, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 779-786.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3172-2
    [2] MU Mu, DUAN Wansuo, XU Hui, WANG Bo, 2006: Applications of Conditional Nonlinear Optimal Perturbation in Predictability Study and Sensitivity Analysis of Weather and Climate, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 23, 992-1002.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-006-0992-3
    [3] BEI Naifang, Fuqing ZHANG, 2014: Mesoscale Predictability of Moist Baroclinic Waves: Variable and Scale-dependent Error Growth, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 995-1008.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-3191-7
    [4] DUAN Wansuo, ZHANG Rui, 2010: Is Model Parameter Error Related to a Significant Spring Predictability Barrier for El Nino events? Results from a Theoretical Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 1003-1013.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9166-4
    [5] WANG Huijun, FAN Ke, SUN Jianqi, LI Shuanglin, LIN Zhaohui, ZHOU Guangqing, CHEN Lijuan, LANG Xianmei, LI Fang, ZHU Yali, CHEN Hong, ZHENG Fei, 2015: A Review of Seasonal Climate Prediction Research in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 149-168.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-0016-7
    [6] Se-Hwan YANG, LU Riyu, 2014: Predictability of the East Asian Winter Monsoon Indices by the Coupled Models of ENSEMBLES, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 1279-1292.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4020-8
    [7] LI Chun, MA Hao, 2012: Relationship between ENSO and Winter Rainfall over Southeast China and Its Decadal Variability, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 1129-1141.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-1248-z
    [8] WANG Qiang, MU Mu, Henk A. DIJKSTRA, 2012: Application of the Conditional Nonlinear Optimal Perturbation Method to the Predictability Study of the Kuroshio Large Meander, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 118-134.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0199-0
    [9] Mu Mu, Duan Wansuo, Wang Jiacheng, 2002: The Predictability Problems in Numerical Weather and Climate Prediction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 191-204.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0016-x
    [10] ZHU Benlu, LIN Wantao, ZHANG Yun, 2010: Analysis Study on Perturbation Energy and Predictability of Heavy Precipitation in South China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 382-392.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-8164-x
    [11] Xia LIU, Qiang WANG, Mu MU, 2018: Optimal Initial Error Growth in the Prediction of the Kuroshio Large Meander Based on a High-resolution Regional Ocean Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 1362-1371.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-8003-z
    [12] Xiaoran ZHUANG, Jinzhong MIN, Liu ZHANG, Shizhang WANG, Naigeng WU, Haonan ZHU, 2020: Insights into Convective-scale Predictability in East China: Error Growth Dynamics and Associated Impact on Precipitation of Warm-Season Convective Events, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 893-911.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-9269-5
    [13] WANG Zhiren, WU Dexing, CHEN Xue'en, QIAO Ran, 2013: ENSO Indices and Analyses, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1491-1506.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2238-x
    [14] Xinyi XING, Xianghui FANG, Da PANG, Chaopeng JI, 2024: Seasonal Variation of the Sea Surface Temperature Growth Rate of ENSO, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 465-477.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3005-x
    [15] LI Gang*, LI Chongyin, TAN Yanke, and BAI Tao, 2014: The Interdecadal Changes of South Pacific Sea Surface Temperature in the Mid-1990s and Their Connections with ENSO, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 66-84.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2280-3
    [16] Xiaofei WU, Jiangyu MAO, 2019: Decadal Changes in Interannual Dependence of the Bay of Bengal Summer Monsoon Onset on ENSO Modulated by the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 1404-1416.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-019-9043-8
    [17] Yuanhai FU, Zhongda LIN, Tao WANG, 2021: Simulated Relationship between Wintertime ENSO and East Asian Summer Rainfall: From CMIP3 to CMIP6, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 221-236.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0147-y
    [18] Yadi LI, Xichen LI, Juan FENG, Yi ZHOU, Wenzhu WANG, Yurong HOU, 2024: Uncertainties of ENSO-related Regional Hadley Circulation Anomalies within Eight Reanalysis Datasets, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 115-140.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3047-0
    [19] Jingrui YAN, Wenjun ZHANG, Suqiong HU, Feng JIANG, 2024: Different ENSO Impacts on Eastern China Precipitation Patterns in Early and Late Winter Associated with Seasonally-Varying Kuroshio Anticyclonic Anomalies, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3196-1
    [20] Bin MU, Juhui REN, Shijin YUAN, Rong-Hua ZHANG, Lei CHEN, Chuan GAO, 2019: The Optimal Precursors for ENSO Events Depicted Using the Gradient-definition-based Method in an Intermediate Coupled Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 1381-1392.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-019-9040-y

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 10 July 2008
Manuscript revised: 10 July 2008
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

What Kind of Initial Errors Cause the Severest Prediction Uncertainty of El Nino in Zebiak-Cane Model

  • 1. State Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029;State Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029

Abstract: With the Zebiak-Cane (ZC) model, the initial error that has the largest effect on ENSO prediction is explored by conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP). The results demonstrate that CNOP-type errors cause the largest prediction error of ENSO in the ZC model. By analyzing the behavior of CNOP-type errors, we find that for the normal states and the relatively weak El Nino events in the ZC model, the predictions tend to yield false alarms due to the uncertainties caused by CNOP. For the relatively strong El Nino events, the ZC model largely underestimates their intensities. Also, our results suggest that the error growth of El Nino in the ZC model depends on the phases of both the annual cycle and ENSO. The condition during northern spring and summer is most favorable for the error growth. The ENSO prediction bestriding these two seasons may be the most difficult. A linear singular vector (LSV) approach is also used to estimate the error growth of ENSO, but it underestimates the prediction uncertainties of ENSO in the ZC model. This result indicates that the different initial errors cause different amplitudes of prediction errors though they have same magnitudes. CNOP yields the severest prediction uncertainty. That is to say, the prediction skill of ENSO is closely related to the types of initial error. This finding illustrates a theoretical basis of data assimilation. It is expected that a data assimilation method can filter the initial errors related to CNOP and improve the ENSO forecast skill.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return