Advanced Search
Article Contents

A Comparison of Four Precipitation Distribution Models Used in Daily Stochastic Models


doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9180-6

  • Stochastic weather generators are statistical models that produce random numbers that resemble the observed weather data on which they have been fitted; they are widely used in meteorological and hydrological simulations. For modeling daily precipitation in weather generators, first-order Markov chain--dependent exponential, gamma, mixed-exponential, and lognormal distributions can be used. To examine the performance of these four distributions for precipitation simulation, they were fitted to observed data collected at 10 stations in the watershed of Yishu River. The parameters of these models were estimated using a maximum-likelihood technique performed using genetic algorithms. Parameters for each calendar month and the Fourier series describing parameters for the whole year were estimated separately. Bayesian information criterion, simulated monthly mean, maximum daily value, and variance were tested and compared to evaluate the fitness and performance of these models. The results indicate that the lognormal and mixed-exponential distributions give smaller BICs, but their stochastic simulations have overestimation and underestimation respectively, while the gamma and exponential distributions give larger BICs, but their stochastic simulations produced monthly mean precipitation very well. When these distributions were fitted using Fourier series, they all underestimated the above statistics for the months of June, July and August.
  • [1] JIANG Zhihong, DING Yuguo, ZHENG Chunyu, CHEN Weilin, 2011: An Improved, Downscaled, Fine Model for Simulation of Daily Weather States, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 1357-1366.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0086-8
    [2] Wu Jindong, Wang Shili, 2001: Incorporating Stochastic Weather Generators into Studies on Climate Impacts: Methods and Uncertainties, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 937-949.
    [3] ZHAO Qiaohua, SUN Jihua, ZHU Guangwei, 2012: Simulation and Exploration of the Mechanisms Underlying the Spatiotemporal Distribution of Surface Mixed Layer Depth in a Large Shallow Lake, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 1360-1373.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-1262-1
    [4] S. N. Bavadekar, R. M. Khaladkar, 1994: Estimation of Winds at Different Isobaric Levels Based on the Observed Winds at 850 hPa Level Using Double Fourier Series, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 11, 327-334.  doi: 10.1007/BF02658152
    [5] Zhang Renjian, Wang Mingxing, Fu Jianzhong, 2001: Preliminary Research on the Size Distribution of???Aerosols in Beijing, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 225-230.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-001-0015-3
    [6] LI Jianping, ZENG Qingcun, 2003: A New Monsoon Index and the Geographical Distribution of the Global Monsoons, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 20, 299-302.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-003-0016-5
    [7] XU Zhongfeng, QIAN Yongfu, FU Congbin, 2010: The Role of Land--sea Distribution and Orography in the Asian Monsoon. Part I: Land--sea Distribution, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 403-420.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9005-7
    [8] Wang Yunfeng, Wu Rongsheng, Pan Yinong, 2000: Evolution and Frontogenesis of an Imbalanced Flow —the Influence of Vapor Distribution and Orographic Forcing, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 17, 256-274.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-000-0008-7
    [9] Zou Han, Zhou Libo, Jian Yongxiao, Liu Yu, 2002: An Observational Study on the Vertical Distribution and Synoptic Variation of Ozone in the Arctic, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 855-862.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0050-8
    [10] HU Banghui, YANG Xiuqun, TAN Yanke, WANG Yongqing, FAN Yong, 2010: A New Method for Calculating the Wind Speed Distribution of a Moving Tropical Cyclone, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 69-79.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-7209-5
    [11] YUE Caijun, GAO Shouting, LIU Lu, LI Xiaofan, 2015: A Diagnostic Study of the Asymmetric Distribution of Rainfall during the Landfall of Typhoon Haitang (2005), ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1419-1430.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-4246-0
    [12] Yahao WU, Liping LIU, 2017: Statistical Characteristics of Raindrop Size Distribution in the Tibetan Plateau and Southern China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 727-736.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-5235-7
    [13] Lu YANG, Jianfang FEI, Xiaogang HUANG, Xiaoping CHENG, Xiangrong YANG, Juli DING, Wenli SHI, 2016: Asymmetric Distribution of Convection in Tropical Cyclones over the Western North Pacific Ocean, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 1306-1321.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-5277-x
    [14] Long WEN, Kun ZHAO, Mengyao WANG, Guifu ZHANG, 2019: Seasonal Variations of Observed Raindrop Size Distribution in East China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 346-362.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-8107-5
    [15] Zuohao CAO, Da-Lin ZHANG, 2005: Sensitivity of Cyclone Tracks to the Initial Moisture Distribution: A Moist Potential Vorticity Perspective, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 22, 807-820.  doi: 10.1007/BF02918681
    [16] ZHANG Zhongshi, WANG Huijun, GUO Zhengtang, JIANG Dabang, 2006: Impact of Topography and Land-Sea Distribution on East Asian Paleoenvironmental Patterns, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 23, 258-266.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-006-0258-0
    [17] HU Yongyun, 2007: Probability Distribution Function of a Forced Passive Tracer in the Lower Stratosphere, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 163-180.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-0163-1
    [18] Wang Mingxing, John W. Winchester, Lü Weixiu, Ren Lixin, Hong Zhongxiang, 1986: METEOROLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL CONTROLS ON THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF BEIJING SUMMER COARSE AND FINE AEROSOLS, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 3, 432-442.  doi: 10.1007/BF02657933
    [19] Lei Xiao’en, Jia Xinyuan, Yuan Suzhen, Luo Qiren, Chen Silong, Xu Yu, 1987: A NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF ACID PRECIPITATION IN CHONGQING AREA OF CHINA, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 4, 313-322.  doi: 10.1007/BF02663601
    [20] Liu Jinli, Lin Longfu, 1994: Microwave Simulations of Precipitation Distribution with Two Radiative Transfer Models, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 11, 470-478.  doi: 10.1007/BF02658168

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 10 July 2011
Manuscript revised: 10 July 2011
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

A Comparison of Four Precipitation Distribution Models Used in Daily Stochastic Models

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment Research for Temperate East Asia (RCE-TEA), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, Institute of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,Center for Hydrosciences Research, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,Applied Hydrometeorological Research Institute, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044,Linyi Meteorological Bureau, Shandong Province, Linyi 276004

Abstract: Stochastic weather generators are statistical models that produce random numbers that resemble the observed weather data on which they have been fitted; they are widely used in meteorological and hydrological simulations. For modeling daily precipitation in weather generators, first-order Markov chain--dependent exponential, gamma, mixed-exponential, and lognormal distributions can be used. To examine the performance of these four distributions for precipitation simulation, they were fitted to observed data collected at 10 stations in the watershed of Yishu River. The parameters of these models were estimated using a maximum-likelihood technique performed using genetic algorithms. Parameters for each calendar month and the Fourier series describing parameters for the whole year were estimated separately. Bayesian information criterion, simulated monthly mean, maximum daily value, and variance were tested and compared to evaluate the fitness and performance of these models. The results indicate that the lognormal and mixed-exponential distributions give smaller BICs, but their stochastic simulations have overestimation and underestimation respectively, while the gamma and exponential distributions give larger BICs, but their stochastic simulations produced monthly mean precipitation very well. When these distributions were fitted using Fourier series, they all underestimated the above statistics for the months of June, July and August.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return