Advanced Search
Article Contents

Handling error propagation in sequential data assimilation using an evolutionary strategy

Fund Project:

doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2115-7

  • An evolutionary strategy-based error parameterization method that searches for the most ideal error adjustment factors was developed to obtain better assimilation results. Numerical experiments were designed using some classical nonlinear models (i.e., the Lorenz-63 model and the Lorenz-96 model). Crossover and mutation error adjustment factors of evolutionary strategy were investigated in four aspects: the initial conditions of the Lorenz model, ensemble sizes, observation covariance, and the observation intervals. The search for error adjustment factors is usually performed using trial-and-error methods. To solve this difficult problem, a new data assimilation system coupled with genetic algorithms was developed. The method was tested in some simplified model frameworks, and the results are encouraging. The evolutionary strategy-based error handling methods performed robustly under both perfect and imperfect model scenarios in the Lorenz-96 model. However, the application of the methodology to more complex atmospheric or land surface models remains to be tested.
    摘要: An evolutionary strategy-based error parameterization method that searches for the most ideal error adjustment factors was developed to obtain better assimilation results. Numerical experiments were designed using some classical nonlinear models (i.e., the Lorenz-63 model and the Lorenz-96 model). Crossover and mutation error adjustment factors of evolutionary strategy were investigated in four aspects: the initial conditions of the Lorenz model, ensemble sizes, observation covariance, and the observation intervals. The search for error adjustment factors is usually performed using trial-and-error methods. To solve this difficult problem, a new data assimilation system coupled with genetic algorithms was developed. The method was tested in some simplified model frameworks, and the results are encouraging. The evolutionary strategy-based error handling methods performed robustly under both perfect and imperfect model scenarios in the Lorenz-96 model. However, the application of the methodology to more complex atmospheric or land surface models remains to be tested.
  • Anderson, J. L., 2007: Exploring the need for localization in ensemble data assimilation using a hierarchical ensemble filter. Physica D, 230, 99–111.
    Anderson, J. L., and S. L. Anderson, 1999: A Monte Carlo implementation of the non-linear filtering problem to produce ensemble assimilation and forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 2741–2758.
    Back, T., U. Hammel, and H.-P. Schwefel. 1997: Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state. IEEE Transactions On Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 3–17.
    Bai, Y. L, and X. Li, 2011: Evolutionary Algorithm-Based Error Parametrization Methods for Data Assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 2668–2685.
    Bishop, C. H., B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2001: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 420–436.
    Dee, D. P. 1995: On-line estimation of error covariance parameters for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 1128–1145.
    Dee, D. P., and A. M. da Silva, 1999: Maximum-likelihood estimation of forecast and observation error covariance parameters. Part I: Metholodgy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 1822–1834.
    Evensen, G., 2007: Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 279pp.
    Fogel, D. B., 2006: Evolutionary Computation: Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence ( The third edition)??John, Whily & Sons, New Jersey, 273pp.
    Greybush, S. J., E. Kalnay, T. Miyoshi, K. Ide, and B. R. Hunt, 2011: Balance and ensemble Kalman filter localization techniques. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 511–522.
    Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, and C. Snyder, 2005: Accounting for the error due to unresolved scales in ensemble data assimilation: A comparison of different approaches. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 3132–3147.
    Houtekamer, P. L., and H. L. Mitchell, 2001: A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon.Wea. Rev., 129, 123–137.
    Jazwinski, A. H., 1970: Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory. Academic Press, 376pp.
    Kalnay, E., H. Li., T. Miyoshi., S.-C Yang, and J. Ballabrera Poy, 2007: 4D-Var or ensemble Kalman Filter? Tellus A, 59, 758–773.
    Khare, S. P., J. L. Anderson, T. J. Hour, and D. Nychka, 2008: An investigation into the application of an ensemble Kalman smoother to high-dimensional geophysical systems. Tellus A, 60, 97–112.
    Lee, Y. H., S. K. Park, and D. E. Chang, 2006: Parameter estimation using the genetic algorithm and its impact on quantitative precipitation forecast. Annales Geophosicae, 24, 3185–3189.
    Li, H., E. Kalnay, T. Miyoshi, and C. M. Danforth, 2009: Accounting for model errors in ensemble data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3407–3419.
    Li, X., and Coauthors, 2007: Development of a Chinese land data assimilation system: Its progress and prospects. Progress in Nature Science., 17, 881–892.
    Liang, X., X. G. Zheng, S. P. Zhang, G. C. Wu, Y. J. Dai, and Y. Li, 2011: Maximum likelihood estimation of inflation factors on forecast error covariance matrix for ensemble Kalman filter assimilation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., doi: 10.1002/qj.912.
    Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141.
    Lorenz, E. N., 1996: Predictability: A problem partly solved. Proc. Semi-nar on Predictability, Volume 1, reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 1–19.
    NG, G.-H., D. Mclaughlin, D. Entekhabi, and A. Ahanin. 2011: The role of model dynamic in ensemble Kalman filter performance for chaotic systems. Tellus A, 63, 958–977.
    Rechenberg, I., 1965: Cybernetic solution path of an experimental problem??Tech. Rep. Library translation No. 1122, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, Hants., UK.
    Reichle, R. H., 2008: Data Assimilation methods in the Earth Science. Advances in Water Resources, 31, 1411–1418.
    Schwefel, H.-P., 1981: Numerical optimization of computer models, Wiley, New York, 389pp.
    Tian, X., and Z. Xie, 2012: Implementations of a square-root ensemble analysis and a hybrid localisation into the POD-based ensemble 4dvar. Tellus A, 64, 1–19.
    Tian, X., Z. Xie, and Q. Sun, 2011: A POD-based ensemble four-dimensional variational assimilation method. Tellus A, 63, 805–816.
    Wang, B., J. J. Liu, S. D. Wang, W. Cheng, J. Liu, C. S. Liu, Q. N. Xiao, and Y.-H. Kuo, 2010: An economical approach to four-dimensional variational data assimilation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27(4), 715–727, doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9122-3.
    Whitaker, J. S., T. M. Hamill, X. Wei, Y. Song, and Z. Toth, 2008: Ensemble data assimilation with NCEP global forecast system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 463–482.
    Whitley, D., 2001: An overview of evolutionary algorithms: Practical issues and common pitfalls. Information and Software Technology, 43, 817–831.
    Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and J. Sun, 2004: Impacts of initial estimate and observation availability on convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 1238–1253.
    Zheng, X. G., 2009: An adaptive estimation of forecast error covariance parameters for Kalman filtering data assimilation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26(1), 154–160, doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-0154-5.
  • [1] ZHENG Xiaogu, WU Guocan, ZHANG Shupeng, LIANG Xiao, DAI Yongjiu, LI Yong, , 2013: Using Analysis State to Construct a Forecast Error Covariance Matrix in Ensemble Kalman Filter Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1303-1312.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2133-5
    [2] Bohua Huang, James L. Kinter III, Paul S. Schopf, 2002: Ocean Data Assimilation Using Intermittent Analyses and Continuous Model Error Correction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 965-992.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0059-z
    [3] FU Weiwei, ZHOU Guangqing, WANG Huijun, 2004: Ocean Data Assimilation with Background Error Covariance Derived from OGCM Outputs, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 181-192.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915704
    [4] Xiaogu ZHENG, 2009: An Adaptive Estimation of Forecast Error Covariance Parameters for Kalman Filtering Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 26, 154-160.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-0154-5
    [5] LIU Juanjuan, WANG Bin, WANG Shudong, 2010: The Structure of Background-error Covariance in a Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System: Single-point Experiment, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 1303-1310.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9067-6
    [6] GAO Feng*, Peter P. CHILDS, Xiang-Yu HUANG, Neil A. JACOBS, and Jinzhong MIN, 2014: A Relocation-based Initialization Scheme to Improve Track-forecasting of Tropical Cyclones, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 27-36.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2254-5
    [7] Zhiyong MENG, Eugene E. CLOTHIAUX, 2022: Contributions of Fuqing ZHANG to Predictability, Data Assimilation, and Dynamics of High Impact Weather: A Tribute, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 676-683.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1362-x
    [8] Yong LI, Siming LI, Yao SHENG, Luheng WANG, 2018: Data Assimilation Method Based on the Constraints of Confidence Region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 334-345.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-7045-y
    [9] Tao SUN, Yaodeng CHEN, Deming MENG, Haiqin CHEN, 2021: Background Error Covariance Statistics of Hydrometeor Control Variables Based on Gaussian Transform, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 831-844.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0271-3
    [10] Banglin ZHANG, Vijay TALLAPRAGADA, Fuzhong WENG, Jason SIPPEL, Zaizhong MA, 2015: Use of Incremental Analysis Updates in 4D-Var Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1575-1582.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5041-7
    [11] Jidong GAO, Keith BREWSTER, Ming XUE, 2006: A Comparison of the Radar Ray Path Equations and Approximations for Use in Radar Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 23, 190-198.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-006-0190-3
    [12] Fuqing ZHANG, Meng ZHANG, James A. HANSEN, 2009: Coupling Ensemble Kalman Filter with Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 26, 1-8.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-0001-8
    [13] Ting WANG, Jianfang FEI, Xiaoping CHENG, Xiaogang HUANG, Jian ZHONG, 2018: Estimating the Correlated Observation-Error Characteristics of the Chinese FengYun Microwave Temperature Sounder and Microwave Humidity Sounder, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 1428-1441.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-8014-9
    [14] Xiaoli XIA, Jinzhong MIN, Feifei SHEN, Yuanbing WANG, Chun YANG, 2019: Aerosol Data Assimilation Using Data from Fengyun-3A and MODIS: Application to a Dust Storm over East Asia in 2011, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 1-14.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-8075-9
    [15] Guifu ZHANG, Jidong GAO, Muyun DU, 2021: Parameterized Forward Operators for Simulation and Assimilation of Polarimetric Radar Data with Numerical Weather Predictions, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 737-754.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0289-6
    [16] Yaodeng CHEN, Jie SHEN, Shuiyong FAN, Deming MENG, Cheng WANG, 2020: Characteristics of Fengyun-4A Satellite Atmospheric Motion Vectors and Their Impacts on Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 1222-1238.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0080-0
    [17] HOU Tuanjie, Fanyou KONG, CHEN Xunlai, LEI Hengchi, HU Zhaoxia, 2015: Evaluation of Radar and Automatic Weather Station Data Assimilation for a Heavy Rainfall Event in Southern China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 967-978.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4155-7
    [18] Chaoqun MA, Tijian WANG, Zengliang ZANG, Zhijin LI, 2018: Comparisons of Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation and Model Output Statistics in Improving Atmospheric Chemistry Forecasts, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 813-825.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-7179-y
    [19] Ji-Hyun HA, Hyung-Woo KIM, Dong-Kyou LEE, 2011: Observation and Numerical Simulations with Radar and Surface Data Assimilation for Heavy Rainfall over Central Korea, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 573-590.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-0035-y
    [20] YAN Changxiang, ZHU Jiang, ZHOU Guangqing, 2007: Impacts of XBT, TAO, Altimetry and ARGO Observations on the Tropical Pacific Ocean Data ssimilationImpacts of XBT, TAO, Altimetry and ARGO Observations on the Tropical Pacific Ocean Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 383-398.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-0383-4

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 28 May 2012
Manuscript revised: 04 September 2012
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Handling error propagation in sequential data assimilation using an evolutionary strategy

    Corresponding author: BAI Yulong; 
  • 1. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000;
  • 2. College of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070
Fund Project:  We are very grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions and useful advice. This work is supported by the NSFC (National Science Foundation of China) project (Grant Nos. 41061038 and 40925004), project Land Surface Modeling and Data Assimilation Research (Grant No. 2009AA122104) from the National High Technology Research and One Hundred Person Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Multi-sensor Hydrological Data Assimilation for Key Hydrological Variables in Cold and Arid Regions (Grant No. 29Y127D01).

Abstract: An evolutionary strategy-based error parameterization method that searches for the most ideal error adjustment factors was developed to obtain better assimilation results. Numerical experiments were designed using some classical nonlinear models (i.e., the Lorenz-63 model and the Lorenz-96 model). Crossover and mutation error adjustment factors of evolutionary strategy were investigated in four aspects: the initial conditions of the Lorenz model, ensemble sizes, observation covariance, and the observation intervals. The search for error adjustment factors is usually performed using trial-and-error methods. To solve this difficult problem, a new data assimilation system coupled with genetic algorithms was developed. The method was tested in some simplified model frameworks, and the results are encouraging. The evolutionary strategy-based error handling methods performed robustly under both perfect and imperfect model scenarios in the Lorenz-96 model. However, the application of the methodology to more complex atmospheric or land surface models remains to be tested.

摘要: An evolutionary strategy-based error parameterization method that searches for the most ideal error adjustment factors was developed to obtain better assimilation results. Numerical experiments were designed using some classical nonlinear models (i.e., the Lorenz-63 model and the Lorenz-96 model). Crossover and mutation error adjustment factors of evolutionary strategy were investigated in four aspects: the initial conditions of the Lorenz model, ensemble sizes, observation covariance, and the observation intervals. The search for error adjustment factors is usually performed using trial-and-error methods. To solve this difficult problem, a new data assimilation system coupled with genetic algorithms was developed. The method was tested in some simplified model frameworks, and the results are encouraging. The evolutionary strategy-based error handling methods performed robustly under both perfect and imperfect model scenarios in the Lorenz-96 model. However, the application of the methodology to more complex atmospheric or land surface models remains to be tested.

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint