Advanced Search
Article Contents

A New Weighting Function for Estimating Microwave Sounding Unit Channel 4 Temperature Trends Simulated by CMIP5 Climate Models


doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2152-x

  • A new static microwave sounding unit (MSU) channel 4 weighting function is obtained from using Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5) historical multimodel simulations as inputs into the fast Radiative Transfer Model for TOVS (RTTOV v10). For the same CMIP5 model simulations, it is demonstrated that the computed MSU channel 4 brightness temperature (T4) trends in the lower stratosphere over both the globe and the tropics using the proposed weighting function are equivalent to those calculated by RTTOV, but show more cooling than those computed using the traditional UAH (University of Alabama at Huntsville) or RSS (Remote Sensing Systems in Santa Rosa, California) static weighting functions. The new static weighting function not only reduces the computational cost, but also reveals reasons why trends using a radiative transfer model are different from those using a traditional static weighting function. This study also shows that CMIP5 model simulated T4 trends using the traditional UAH or RSS static weighting functions show less cooling than satellite observations over the globe and the tropics. Although not completely removed, this difference can be reduced using the proposed weighting function to some extent, especially over the tropics. This work aims to explore the reasons for the trend differences and to see to what extent they are related to the inaccurate weighting functions. This would also help distinguish other sources for trend errors and thus better understand the climate change in the lower stratosphere.
  • [1] Hai ZHI, Rong-Hua ZHANG, Pengfei LIN, Peng YU, 2019: Interannual Salinity Variability in the Tropical Pacific in CMIP5 Simulations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 378-396.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-7309-1
    [2] WU Renguang, CHEN Jiepeng, and WEN Zhiping, 2013: PrecipitationSurface Temperature Relationship in the IPCC CMIP5 Models, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 766-778.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2130-8
    [3] RAO Jian, REN Rongcai, YANG Yang, 2015: Parallel Comparison of the Northern Winter Stratospheric Circulation in Reanalysis and in CMIP5 Models, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 952-996.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4192-2
    [4] REN Rongcai, YANG Yang, 2012: Changes in Winter Stratospheric Circulation in CMIP5 Scenarios Simulated by the Climate System Model FGOALS-s2, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 1374-1389.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-1184-y
    [5] Shang-Min LONG, Kai-Ming HU, Gen LI, Gang HUANG, Xia QU, 2021: Surface Temperature Changes Projected by FGOALS Models under Low Warming Scenarios in CMIP5 and CMIP6, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 203-220.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0177-5
    [6] Xiaolei CHEN, Yimin LIU, Guoxiong WU, 2017: Understanding the Surface Temperature Cold Bias in CMIP5 AGCMs over the Tibetan Plateau, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 1447-1460.  doi: 10.1007s00376-017-6326-9
    [7] LIU Yonghe, FENG Jinming, MA Zhuguo, 2014: An Analysis of Historical and Future Temperature Fluctuations over China Based on CMIP5 Simulations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 457-467.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3093-0
    [8] TIAN Di, GUO Yan*, DONG Wenjie, 2015: Future Changes and Uncertainties in Temperature and Precipitation over China Based on CMIP5 Models, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 487-496.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4102-7
    [9] DONG Siyan, XU Ying, ZHOU Botao, SHI Ying, 2015: Assessment of Indices of Temperature Extremes Simulated by Multiple CMIP5 Models over China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1077-1091.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-4152-5
    [10] Ying XU, Xuejie GAO, Filippo GIORGI, Botao ZHOU, Ying SHI, Jie WU, Yongxiang ZHANG, 2018: Projected Changes in Temperature and Precipitation Extremes over China as Measured by 50-yr Return Values and Periods Based on a CMIP5 Ensemble, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 376-388.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-6269-1
    [11] HU Yongyun, TAO Lijun, and LIU Jiping, 2013: Poleward Expansion of the Hadley Circulation in CMIP5 Simulations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 790-795.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2187-4
    [12] JI Mingxia, HUANG Jianping, XIE Yongkun, LIU Jun, 2015: Comparison of Dryland Climate Change in Observations and CMIP5 Simulations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1565-1574.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-4267-8
    [13] FENG Jinming, WEI Ting, DONG Wenjie, WU Qizhong, and WANG Yongli, 2014: CMIP5/AMIP GCM Simulations of East Asian Summer Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 836-850.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3131-y
    [14] SONG Yi, YU Yongqiang, LIN Pengfei, 2014: The Hiatus and Accelerated Warming Decades in CMIP5 Simulations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 1316-1330.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-3265-6
    [15] FENG Juan, LI Jianping, ZHU Jianlei, LI Fei, SUN Cheng, 2015: Simulation of the Equatorially Asymmetric Mode of the Hadley Circulation in CMIP5 Models, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1129-1142.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-4157-0
    [16] HU Wenting, WU Renguang, 2015: Relationship between South China Sea Precipitation Variability and Tropical Indo-Pacific SST Anomalies in IPCC CMIP5 Models during Spring-to-Summer Transition, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1308-1318.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-4250-4
    [17] Dabang JIANG, Dan HU, Zhiping TIAN, Xianmei LANG, 2020: Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models in Simulating Climate over China and the East Asian Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 1102-1118.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-2034-y
    [18] ZHANG Jie, Laurent LI, ZHOU Tianjun, XIN Xiaoge, 2013: Evaluation of Spring Persistent Rainfall over East Asia in CMIP3/CMIP5 AGCM Simulations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1587-1600.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2139-7
    [19] Yuanxin LIU, Lijing CHENG, Yuying PAN, Zhetao TAN, John ABRAHAM, Bin ZHANG, Jiang ZHU, Junqiang SONG, 2022: How Well Do CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models Simulate the Climatological Seasonal Variations in Ocean Salinity?, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1650-1672.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1381-2
    [20] Rong FENG, Wansuo DUAN, 2018: Investigating the Initial Errors that Cause Predictability Barriers for Indian Ocean Dipole Events Using CMIP5 Model Outputs, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 1305-1320.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-7214-7

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 13 July 2012
Manuscript revised: 28 November 2012
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

A New Weighting Function for Estimating Microwave Sounding Unit Channel 4 Temperature Trends Simulated by CMIP5 Climate Models

    Corresponding author: ZHENG Xiaogu; 
  • 1. College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • 2. College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000

Abstract: A new static microwave sounding unit (MSU) channel 4 weighting function is obtained from using Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5) historical multimodel simulations as inputs into the fast Radiative Transfer Model for TOVS (RTTOV v10). For the same CMIP5 model simulations, it is demonstrated that the computed MSU channel 4 brightness temperature (T4) trends in the lower stratosphere over both the globe and the tropics using the proposed weighting function are equivalent to those calculated by RTTOV, but show more cooling than those computed using the traditional UAH (University of Alabama at Huntsville) or RSS (Remote Sensing Systems in Santa Rosa, California) static weighting functions. The new static weighting function not only reduces the computational cost, but also reveals reasons why trends using a radiative transfer model are different from those using a traditional static weighting function. This study also shows that CMIP5 model simulated T4 trends using the traditional UAH or RSS static weighting functions show less cooling than satellite observations over the globe and the tropics. Although not completely removed, this difference can be reduced using the proposed weighting function to some extent, especially over the tropics. This work aims to explore the reasons for the trend differences and to see to what extent they are related to the inaccurate weighting functions. This would also help distinguish other sources for trend errors and thus better understand the climate change in the lower stratosphere.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return