Advanced Search
Article Contents

An Improved Method for Correction of Air Temperature Measured Using Different Radiation Shields

Fund Project:

doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-3129-0

  • The variation of air temperature measurement errors using two different radiation shields (DTR502B Vaisala, Finland, and HYTFZ01, Huayun Tongda Satcom, China) was studied. Datasets were collected in the field at the Daxing weather station in Beijing from June 2011 to May 2012. Most air temperature values obtained with these two commonly used radiation shields were lower than the reference records obtained with the new Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) Stevenson screen. In most cases, the air temperature errors when using the two devices were smaller on overcast and rainy days than on sunny days; and smaller when using the imported rather than the Chinese shield. The measured errors changed sharply at sunrise and sunset, and reached maxima at noon. Their diurnal variation characteristics were, naturally, related to changes in solar radiation. The relationships between the record errors, global radiation, and wind speed were nonlinear. An improved correction method was proposed based on the approach described by Nakamura and Mahrt (2005) (NM05), in which the impact of the solar zenith angle (SZA) on the temperature error is considered and extreme errors due to changes in SZA can be corrected effectively. Measurement errors were reduced significantly after correction by either method for both shields. The error reduction rate using the improved correction method for the Chinese and imported shields were 3.3% and 40.4% higher than those using the NM05 method, respectively.
  • Albrecht, F., 1927:Thermometer zur Messung der wahren Lufttem-peratur. Meteor. Z., 24, 420-424.
    Albrecht, F., 1934:Ȕber die Einwirkung der Strahling auf frei aufgestellte elektrische Thermometer. Verȍff. Pruss. Meteor. Inst., 402, 76-82.
    Anderson, S. P., M. F. Baumgartner, 1998:Radiative heating errors in naturally ventilated air temperature measurements made from buoys. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15, 157-173.
    Arck, M., D. Scherer, 2001:A physically based method for correcting temperature data measured by naturally ventilated sensors over snow. J. Glaciol., 47(159), 665-670.
    China Meteorological Administration (CMA), 2003:Specifications for Surface Meteorological Observation. China Meteorological Press, Beijing, 151 pp. (in Chinese)
    Erell, E., V. Leal, E. Maldonado, 2005:Measurement of air temperature in the presence of a large radiant flux: An assessment of passively ventilated thermometer screens. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 114(2), 205-231.
    Fuchs, M., C. B. Tanner, 1965:Radiation shield for air temperature thermometers. J. Appl. Meteor., 4(4), 544-547.
    Georges, C., G. Kaser, 2002:Ventilated and unventilated air temperature measurements for glacier-climate studies on a tropical high mountain site. J. Geophys. Res., 107(D24), 4775, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002503.
    Gill, G. C., 1983: Comparison testing of selected naturally ventilated solar radiation shield. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Data Buoy Office Technical Report, 38 pp.
    Huwald, H., C. W. Higgins, M. O. Boldi, E. Bou-Zeid, M. Lehning, M. B. Parlange, 2009:Albedo effect on radiative errors in air temperature measurements. Water Resour. Res., 45, W08431, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007600.
    Long, C. N., Y. Shi, 2008:An automated quality assessment and control algorithm for surface radiation measurements. The Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2, 23-37.
    Lundquist, J. D., B. Huggett, 2008:Evergreen trees as inexpensive radiation shield for temperature sensors. Water Resour. Res., 44, W00D04, doi: 10.1029/2008WR006979.
    Mauder, M., R. L. Desjardins, Z. L. Gao, R. van Haarlem, 2008:Errors of naturally ventilated air temperature measurements in a spatial observation network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 2145-2151.
    Nakamura, R., L. Mahrt, 2005:Air temperature measurement errors in naturally ventilated radiation shields. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 1046-1058.
    Richardson, S. J., F. V. Brock, S. R. Semmer, C. Jirak, 1999:Minimizing errors associated with multiplate radiation shields. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16, 1862-1872.
    Robert, K., 2010:Accurate temperature measurements in a naturally-aspirated radiation shield. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 134(2), 181-193.
    Tanner, B. D., E. Swiatek, C. Maughan, 1996:Field comparison of naturally ventilated and aspirated radiations shield for weather station air temperature measurements. Proc. the 22d Conf. on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 227-230.
    Wang, X. L., Y. J. Han, 2008:Research on radiation shield of temperature and humidity probes. Meteorological, Hydrological and Marine Instrument, 25(3), 68-71. (in Chinese)
    Whiteman, C. D., J. M. Hubbe, W. J. Shaw, 2000:Evaluation of an inexpensive temperature data logger for meteorological applications. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 77-81.
    Wu, X. J., W. H. LȔ, H. Y. Xing, Y. Q. Zou, 2011:Research on temperature channel calibration of data-acquisition unit of automatic weather station.Proc. the 10th International Conf. on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, Chengdu, China, 194-197.
  • [1] Xiaoxu TIAN, Xiaolei ZOU, Shengpeng YANG, 2018: A Limb Correction Method for the Microwave Temperature Sounder 2 and Its Applications, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 1547-1552.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-8092-8
    [2] Wang Bin, Ji Zhongzhen, 1993: An Improved Splitting Method, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 10, 447-452.  doi: 10.1007/BF02656969
    [3] Hao LUO, Yong HAN, Chunsong LU, Jun YANG, Yonghua WU, 2019: Characteristics of Surface Solar Radiation under Different Air Pollution Conditions over Nanjing, China: Observation and Simulation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 1047-1059.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-019-9010-4
    [4] XUE Hai-Le, SHEN Xue-Shun, CHOU Ji-Fan, 2013: A Forecast Error Correction Method in Numerical Weather Prediction by Using Recent Multiple-time Evolution Data, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1249-1259.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2274-1
    [5] Chuan GAO, Xinrong WU, Rong-Hua ZHANG, 2016: Testing a Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Method Using an Improved Intermediate Coupled Model for ENSO Analysis and Prediction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 875-888.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-5249-1
    [6] Haoxin ZHANG, Naiming YUAN, Zhuguo MA, Yu HUANG, 2021: Understanding the Soil Temperature Variability at Different Depths: Effects of Surface Air Temperature, Snow Cover, and the Soil Memory, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 493-503.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0074-y
    [7] LI Nan, WEI Ming, TANG Xiaowen, PAN Yujie, 2007: An Improved Velocity Volume Processing Method, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 893-906.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-0893-0
    [8] Guangcan CHEN, Yunfei FU, 2021: Optimal Gridding Process for GMI Brightness Temperature Using the Backus−Gilbert Method, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1945-1957.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0358-x
    [9] CHEN Hong, LIN Zhaohui, 2006: A Correction Method Suitable for Dynamical Seasonal Prediction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 23, 425-430.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-006-0425-3
    [10] SHUN Liu, QIU Chongjian, XU Qin, ZHANG Pengfei, GAO Jidong, SHAO Aimei, 2005: An Improved Method for Doppler Wind and Thermodynamic Retrievals, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 22, 90-102.  doi: 10.1007/BF02930872
    [11] ZHONG Lingzhi, LIU Liping, DENG Min, ZHOU Xiuji, 2012: Retrieving Microphysical Properties and Air Motion of Cirrus Clouds Based on the Doppler Moments Method Using Cloud Radar, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 611-622.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0112-x
    [12] Jianfeng WANG, Ricardo M. FONSECA, Kendall RUTLEDGE, Javier MARTÍN-TORRES, Jun YU, 2020: A Hybrid Statistical-Dynamical Downscaling of Air Temperature over Scandinavia Using the WRF Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 57-74.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-019-9091-0
    [13] XUE Haile, SHEN Xueshun, CHOU Jifan, 2015: An Online Model Correction Method Based on an Inverse Problem: Part II——Systematic Model Error Correction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1493-1503.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-4262-0
    [14] Lei HAN, Mingxuan CHEN, Kangkai CHEN, Haonan CHEN, Yanbiao ZHANG, Bing LU, Linye SONG, Rui QIN, 2021: A Deep Learning Method for Bias Correction of ECMWF 24–240 h Forecasts, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1444-1459.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0215-y
    [15] CAO Yunchang, CHEN Yongqi, LI Pingwha, 2006: Wet Refractivity Tomography with an Improved Kalman-Filter Method, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 23, 693-699.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-006-0693-y
    [16] JIANG Hui, YIN Yan, YANG Lei, YANG Shaozhong, SU Hang, CHEN Kui, 2014: The Characteristics of Atmospheric Ice Nuclei Measured at Different Altitudes in the Huangshan Mountains in Southeast China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 396-406.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3048-5
    [17] Bohua Huang, James L. Kinter III, Paul S. Schopf, 2002: Ocean Data Assimilation Using Intermittent Analyses and Continuous Model Error Correction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 965-992.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0059-z
    [18] Lin Zhaohui, Zeng Qingcun, 1997: Simulation of East Asian Summer Monsoon by Using an Improved AGCM, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 14, 513-526.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-997-0069-y
    [19] Wushao Lin, Lei Bi, 2024: Optical modeling of sea salt aerosols using in situ measured size distributions and the impact of larger size particles, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-024-3351-3
    [20] XUE Haile, SHEN Xueshun, CHOU Jifan, 2015: An Online Model Correction Method Based on an Inverse Problem: Part I——Model Error Estimation by Iteration, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1329-1340.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-4261-1

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 18 June 2013
Manuscript revised: 11 May 2014
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

An Improved Method for Correction of Air Temperature Measured Using Different Radiation Shields

    Corresponding author: CHENG Xinghong, cxingh@cma.gov.cn
  • 1. Public Meteorological Service Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081;
  • 2. Support Center for Atmospheric Observing Technology, Beijing Meteorological Bureau, Beijing 100089;
  • 3. Beijing Observatory Station, Beijing Meteorological Bureau, Beijing 100089;
  • 4. Daxing District Bureau of Meteorology, Beijing Meteorological Bureau, Beijing 100089
Fund Project:  This work was financially supported by the Meteorological Key Technology Integration and Application Project funded by the China Meteorological Administration (Grant No. CAMGJ2012M01), the Special Fund of Beijing Meteorological Bureau (Grant No. 2011BMBKYZX04), and the Nation Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41275114). The authors wish to thank the reviewers who provided useful and constructive revision suggestions.

Abstract: The variation of air temperature measurement errors using two different radiation shields (DTR502B Vaisala, Finland, and HYTFZ01, Huayun Tongda Satcom, China) was studied. Datasets were collected in the field at the Daxing weather station in Beijing from June 2011 to May 2012. Most air temperature values obtained with these two commonly used radiation shields were lower than the reference records obtained with the new Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) Stevenson screen. In most cases, the air temperature errors when using the two devices were smaller on overcast and rainy days than on sunny days; and smaller when using the imported rather than the Chinese shield. The measured errors changed sharply at sunrise and sunset, and reached maxima at noon. Their diurnal variation characteristics were, naturally, related to changes in solar radiation. The relationships between the record errors, global radiation, and wind speed were nonlinear. An improved correction method was proposed based on the approach described by Nakamura and Mahrt (2005) (NM05), in which the impact of the solar zenith angle (SZA) on the temperature error is considered and extreme errors due to changes in SZA can be corrected effectively. Measurement errors were reduced significantly after correction by either method for both shields. The error reduction rate using the improved correction method for the Chinese and imported shields were 3.3% and 40.4% higher than those using the NM05 method, respectively.

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint