Advanced Search
Article Contents

A Four-Dimensional Variational System for Skillful Operational Prediction of Convective Storms


doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-6170-3

  • Chen X. C., K. Zhao, J. Z. Sun, B. W. Zhou, and W. C. Lee, 2016: Assimilating surface observations in a four-dimensional variational Doppler radar data assimilation system to improve the analysis and forecast of a squall line case. Adv. Atmos. Sci.,33(10), doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-5290-0.10.1007/s00376-016-5290-01fce16de8882bed0d338e98f2117c986http%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F304349214_Assimilating_Surface_Observations_in_a_Four-Dimensional_Variational_Doppler_Radar_Data_Assimilation_System_to_Improve_the_Analysis_and_Forecast_of_a_Squall_Line_Casehttp://www.researchgate.net/publication/304349214_Assimilating_Surface_Observations_in_a_Four-Dimensional_Variational_Doppler_Radar_Data_Assimilation_System_to_Improve_the_Analysis_and_Forecast_of_a_Squall_Line_Case
    Dawson, D. T., II, L. J. Wicker, E. R. Mansell, R. L. Tanamachi, 2012: Impact of the environmental low-level wind profile on ensemble forecasts of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg,Kansas, tornadic storm and associated mesocyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 696-716, doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00008.1.10.1175/MWR-D-11-00008.1da666f8db9627c827f463e46b80d7135http%3A%2F%2Fadsabs.harvard.edu%2Fabs%2F2012MWRv..140..696Dhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MWRv..140..696DNot Available
    Kalnay E., H. Li, T. Miyoshi, S.-C. Yang, and J. Ballabrera-Poy, 2007: 4-D-Var or ensemble Kalman filter. Tellus A, 59, 758- 773.10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00261.xeeaeb031663375c71249d7ee9fdd5858http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fdoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1600-0870.2007.00261.x%2Fcitedbyhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00261.x/citedbyABSTRACT We consider the relative advantages of two advanced data assimilation systems, 4-D-Var and ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), currently in use or under consideration for operational implementation. With the Lorenz model, we explore the impact of tuning assimilation parameters such as the assimilation window length and background error covariance in 4-D-Var, variance inflation in EnKF, and the effect of model errors and reduced observation coverage. For short assimilation windows EnKF gives more accurate analyses. Both systems reach similar levels of accuracy if long windows are used for 4-D-Var. For infrequent observations, when ensemble perturbations grow non-linearly and become non-Gaussian, 4-D-Var attains lower errors than EnKF. If the model is imperfect, the 4-D-Var with long windows requires weak constraint. Similar results are obtained with a quasi-geostrophic channel model. EnKF experiments made with the primitive equations SPEEDY model provide comparisons with 3-D-Var and guidance on model error and 鈥榦bservation localization鈥. Results obtained using operational models and both simulated and real observations indicate that currently EnKF is becoming competitive with 4-D-Var, and that the experience acquired with each of these methods can be used to improve the other. A table summarizes the pros and cons of the two methods.
    Schenkman A. D., M. Xue, A. Shapiro, K. Brewster, and J. D. Gao, 2011: The analysis and prediction of the 8-9 May 2007 Oklahoma tornadic mesoscale convective system by assimilating WSR-88D and CASA radar data using 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 224- 246.182a191f6387f27bd0454a0b6ed76247http%3A%2F%2Fadsabs.harvard.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fnph-data_query%3Fbibcode%3D2011MWRv..139..224S%26db_key%3DPHY%26link_type%3DABSTRACT%26high%3D12602http://xueshu.baidu.com/s?wd=paperuri%3A%286f6fdfe93c08e7720b569feb3e50daca%29&filter=sc_long_sign&tn=SE_xueshusource_2kduw22v&sc_vurl=http%3A%2F%2Fadsabs.harvard.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fnph-data_query%3Fbibcode%3D2011MWRv..139..224S%26db_key%3DPHY%26link_type%3DABSTRACT%26high%3D12602&ie=utf-8&sc_us=15673482078073305551
    Snook N., M. Xue, and Y. Jung, 2015: Multiscale EnKF assimilation of radar and conventional observations and ensemble forecasting for a tornadic mesoscale convective system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,143, 1035-1057, doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00262.1.10.1175/MWR-D-13-00262.1b70d2a68a3390c8d93eefd7254f44d4bhttp%3A%2F%2Fadsabs.harvard.edu%2Fabs%2F2015MWRv..143.1035Shttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MWRv..143.1035SNot Available
    Stensrud, D. J., Coauthors, 2009: Convective-scale warn-on-forecast system: A vision for 2020. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1487- 1499.10.1175/2009BAMS2795.1bb0329c3bf2699ef090d188cfd78df93http%3A%2F%2Fconnection.ebscohost.com%2Fc%2Farticles%2F45399304%2Fconvective-scale-warn-on-forecast-system-vision-2020http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/45399304/convective-scale-warn-on-forecast-system-vision-2020Abstract The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA's) National Weather Service (NWS) issues warnings for severe thunderstorms, tornadoes, and flash floods because these phenomena are a threat to life and property. These warnings are presently based upon either visual confirmation of the phenomena or the observational detection of proxy signatures that are largely based upon radar observations. Convective-scale weather warnings are unique in the NWS, having little reliance on direct numerical forecast guidance. Because increasing severe thunderstorm, tornado, and flash-flood warning lead times are a key NOAA strategic mission goal designed to reduce the loss of life, injury, and economic costs of these high-impact weather phenomena, a new warning paradigm is needed in which numerical model forecasts play a larger role in convective-scale warnings. This new paradigm shifts the warning process from warn on detection to warn on forecast, and it has the potential to dramatically increase warning lead times. A warn-on-forecast system is envisioned as a probabilistic convective-scale ensemble analysis and forecast system that assimilates in-storm observations into a high-resolution convection-resolving model ensemble. The building blocks needed for such a system are presently available, and initial research results clearly illustrate the value of radar observations to the production of accurate analyses of convective weather systems and improved forecasts. Although a number of scientific and cultural challenges still need to be overcome, the potential benefits are significant. A probabilistic convective-scale warn-on-forecast system is a vision worth pursuing.
    Stensrud, D. J., Coauthors, 2013: Progress and challenges with Warn-on-Forecast. Atmos. Res.,123, 2-16, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.004.10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.004c3691d105fd03a0114de3772f8be7f41http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS016980951200110Xhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016980951200110XThe current status and challenges associated with two aspects of Warn-on-Forecast鈥攁 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration research project exploring the use of a convective-scale ensemble analysis and forecast system to support hazardous weather warning operations鈥攁re outlined. These two project aspects are the production of a rapidly-updating assimilation system to incorporate data from multiple radars into a single analysis, and the ability of short-range ensemble forecasts of hazardous convective weather events to provide guidance that could be used to extend warning lead times for tornadoes, hailstorms, damaging windstorms and flash floods. Results indicate that a three-dimensional variational assimilation system, that blends observations from multiple radars into a single analysis, shows utility when evaluated by forecasters in the Hazardous Weather Testbed and may help increase confidence in a warning decision. The ability of short-range convective-scale ensemble forecasts to provide guidance that could be used in warning operations is explored for five events: two tornadic supercell thunderstorms, a macroburst, a damaging windstorm and a flash flood. Results show that the ensemble forecasts of the three individual severe thunderstorm events are very good, while the forecasts from the damaging windstorm and flash flood events, associated with mesoscale convective systems, are mixed. Important interactions between mesoscale and convective-scale features occur for the mesoscale convective system events that strongly influence the quality of the convective-scale forecasts. The development of a successful Warn-on-Forecast system will take many years and require the collaborative efforts of researchers and operational forecasters to succeed.
    Sun J. Z., N. A. Crook, 1997: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: Model development and simulated data experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1642- 1661.10.1175/1520-0469(1997)0542.0.CO;28b6a26dd-0480-497e-94f5-b3ac0e10a8d14d65fad43479cedc983061dbc7fe9168http%3A%2F%2Fadsabs.harvard.edu%2Fabs%2F1997jats...54.1642srefpaperuri:(3442f4439a64c47314ac768eea6c1f42)http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997jats...54.1642sThe purpose of the research reported in this paper is to develop a variational data analysis system that can be used to assimilate data from one or more Doppler radars. In the first part of this two-part study, the technique used in this analysis system is described and tested using data from a simulated warm rain convective storm. The analysis system applies the 4D variational data assimilation technique to a cloud-scale model with a warm rain parameterization scheme. The 3D wind, thermodynamical, and microphysical fields are determined by minimizing a cost function, defined by the difference between both radar observed radial velocities and reflectivities (or rainwater mixing ratio) and their model predictions. The adjoint of the numerical model is used to provide the sensitivity of the cost function with respect to the control variables.Experiments using data from a simulated convective storm demonstrated that the variational analysis system is able to retrieve the detailed structure of wind, thermodynamics, and microphysics using either dual-Doppler or single-Doppler information. However, less accurate velocity fields are obtained when single-Doppler data were used. In both cases, retrieving the temperature field is more difficult than the retrieval of the other fields. Results also show that assimilating the rainwater mixing ratio obtained from the reflectivity data results in a better performance of the retrieval procedure than directly assimilating the reflectivity. It is also found that the system is robust to variations in the Z-qrelation, but the microphysical retrieval is quite sensitive to parameters in the warm rain scheme. The technique is robust to random errors in radial velocity and calibration errors in reflectivity.
    Yussouf N., D. C. Dowell, L. J. Wicker, K. H. Knopfmeier, and D. M. Wheatley, 2015: Storm-scale data assimilation and ensemble forecasts for the 27 April 2011 severe weather outbreak in Alabama. Mon. Wea. Rev.,143, 3044-3066, doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00268.1.10.1175/MWR-D-14-00268.1cf1d2afc418811798f2295ae856758f3http%3A%2F%2Fadsabs.harvard.edu%2Fabs%2F2015MWRv..143.3044Yhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MWRv..143.3044YNot Available
  • [1] Hongqin ZHANG, Xiangjun TIAN, Wei CHENG, Lipeng JIANG, 2020: System of Multigrid Nonlinear Least-squares Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction (SNAP): System Formulation and Preliminary Evaluation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 1267-1284.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-9252-1
    [2] Chuan GAO, Xinrong WU, Rong-Hua ZHANG, 2016: Testing a Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Method Using an Improved Intermediate Coupled Model for ENSO Analysis and Prediction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 875-888.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-5249-1
    [3] LIU Juanjuan, WANG Bin, WANG Shudong, 2010: The Structure of Background-error Covariance in a Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System: Single-point Experiment, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 1303-1310.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9067-6
    [4] LIU Juan, WANG Bin, LIU Hailong, YU Yongqiang, 2008: A New Global Four-Dimensional Variational Ocean Data Assimilation System and Its Application, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 25, 680-691.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-008-0680-6
    [5] WANG Bin, LIU Juanjuan, WANG Shudong, CHENG Wei, LIU Juan, LIU Chengsi, Qingnong XIAO, Ying-Hwa KUO, 2010: An Economical Approach to Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 715-727.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9122-3
    [6] Fuqing ZHANG, Meng ZHANG, James A. HANSEN, 2009: Coupling Ensemble Kalman Filter with Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 26, 1-8.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-0001-8
    [7] Xingchao CHEN, Kun ZHAO, Juanzhen SUN, Bowen ZHOU, Wen-Chau LEE, 2016: Assimilating Surface Observations in a Four-Dimensional Variational Doppler Radar Data Assimilation System to Improve the Analysis and Forecast of a Squall Line Case, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 1106-1119.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-5290-0
    [8] ZHANG Lin, NI Yunqi, 2005: Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Experiments for a Heavy Rain Case During the 2002 IOP in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 22, 300-312.  doi: 10.1007/BF02918519
    [9] LIU Juanjuan, WANG Bin, 2011: Rainfall Assimilation Using a New Four-Dimensional Variational Method: A Single-Point Observation Experiment, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 735-742.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-0061-9
    [10] Fei Shiqiang, Tan Zhemin, 2001: On the Helicity Dynamics of Severe Convective Storms, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 67-86.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-001-0005-5
    [11] LIU Ye, YAN Changxiang, 2010: Application of a Recursive Filter to a Three-Dimensional Variational Ocean Data Assimilation System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 293-302.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-8112-9
    [12] Zhizhen XU, Jing CHEN, Mu MU, Guokun DAI, Yanan MA, 2022: A Nonlinear Representation of Model Uncertainty in a Convective-Scale Ensemble Prediction System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1432-1450.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1341-x
    [13] GE Cui, ZHANG Meigen, HAN Zhiwei, LIU Yanju, 2011: Episode Simulation of Asian Dust Storms with an Air Quality Modeling System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 511-520.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-0091-3
    [14] Chaofan LI, Riyu LU, Philip E. BETT, Adam A. SCAIFE, Nicola MARTIN, 2018: Skillful Seasonal Forecasts of Summer Surface Air Temperature in Western China by Global Seasonal Forecast System Version 5, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 955-964.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-7291-7
    [15] Zhu Baozhen, Chen Jiabin, Zhang Daomin, Li Zechun, Ge Aifen, 1984: AN OPERATIONAL 5-LAYER PRIMITIVE EQUATION MODEL FOR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE PREDICTION, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 1, 214-233.  doi: 10.1007/BF02678134
    [16] Niels BORMANN, David DUNCAN, Stephen ENGLISH, Sean HEALY, Katrin LONITZ, Keyi CHEN, Heather LAWRENCE, Qifeng LU, 2021: Growing Operational Use of FY-3 Data in the ECMWF System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1285-1298.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0207-3
    [17] Zhong Wenyi, Yang Peicai, 1986: THE TRANSITION OF A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL LORENZ SYSTEM, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 3, 289-301.  doi: 10.1007/BF02678650
    [18] Jing YANG, Gaopeng LU, Ningyu LIU, Haihua CUI, Yu WANG, Morris COHEN, 2017: Analysis of a Mesoscale Convective System that Produced a Single Sprite, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 258-271.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-6092-0
    [19] Hongli LI, Xiangde XU, 2017: Application of a Three-dimensional Variational Method for Radar Reflectivity Data Correction in a Mudslide-inducing Rainstorm Simulation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 469-481.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-6010-5
    [20] Chaoqun MA, Tijian WANG, Zengliang ZANG, Zhijin LI, 2018: Comparisons of Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation and Model Output Statistics in Improving Atmospheric Chemistry Forecasts, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 813-825.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-7179-y

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript accepted: 12 July 2016
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

A Four-Dimensional Variational System for Skillful Operational Prediction of Convective Storms

  • 1. Center for the Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072, USA
  • 2. Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Abstract: 

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return