Advanced Search
Article Contents

Particulate Amines in the Background Atmosphere of the Yangtze River Delta, China: Concentration, Size Distribution, and Sources


doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0274-0

  • Amines are important for new particle formation and subsequent growth in the atmosphere. Consequently, the processes involved are receiving more attention in recent years. Here, we conduct a field observation in order to investigate the atmospheric particulate amines at a background site in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) during the summer of 2018. Four amines in PM2.5, i.e., methylamine (MA), dimethylamine (DMA), diethylamine (DEA), and trimethylamine (TMA), were collected, twice daily and analyzed. During the campaign, our measurements found the concentrations of MA, DMA, DEA, and TMA of 15.0 ± 15.0, 6.3 ± 6.9, 20.4 ± 30.1, and 4.0 ± 5.9 ng m–3, respectively, and the four amines correlated well with each other. The concentration of amines appear to be independent of whether they were collected during the day or night. Both MA and DMA exhibited a bimodal size distribution that had peaks at 0.67 and 1.1 μm, suggesting amines preferably distribute on submicron particles. Boundary layer height (BLH), relative humidity, and pH of aerosols were found have a negative relationship with amines, while aerosol liquid water content (ALWC) was found to have a positive relationship with amines. The PMF (positive matrix factorization) source apportionment results showed that the main source of amines in Chongming Island was of anthropogenic origin such as industrial and biomass emission, followed by marine sources including sea salt and marine biogenic sources. Given that the YRD region is still suffering from complex atmospheric pollution and that the knowledge on aerosol amines is still limited, more field studies are in urgent need for a better understanding of the pollution characteristics of amines.
    摘要: 有机胺在大气新粒子形成和增长过程中起着重要作用,近年来备受关注。为研究长三角地区大气有机胺的污染特征,于2018年夏季在长三角背景点地区进行了颗粒态有机胺的野外观测。结果表明观测期间细颗粒物上甲胺、二甲胺、二乙胺和三甲胺浓度分别为15.0±15.0、6.3±6.9、20.4±30.1和4.0±5.9 ng/m3,且四种有机胺互相相关。除二甲胺外,其余几种有机胺没有显著的昼夜差别。就不同粒径上浓度而言,甲胺和二甲胺呈双峰分布特征,但主要分布在07–1.1 μm粒径段,说明有机胺更倾向于分布于超细颗粒物上。边界层高度、相对湿度和颗粒物pH与有机胺浓度负相关,颗粒物液态水含量与有机胺浓度正相关。利用PMF源解析初步探究有机胺来源,发现包括生物质燃烧和工业排放在内的人为源是长三角背景点有机胺的主要来源,以海盐和海洋生物源在内的自然源也有较大贡献。目前,对大气有机胺的认知尚不充分,考虑到长三角地区大气污染的严重性和复杂性,希望未来有更多研究关注长三角地区有机胺污染特征。
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  The temporal variation of amines and other major pollutants during the campaign. Panel (a): measured amines including MA, DMA, DEA, and TMA; Panel (b): ${\rm {NH}}_4^+ $, PM2.5 and WSON. Two periods with continuous high PM2.5 concentrations were defined as EP1 and EP2, respectively.

    Figure 2.  The size distribution of amines and ${\rm {NO}}_3^- $, ${\rm {SO}}_4^{2-} $, and ${\rm {NH}}_4^+ $ in particulate form in Chongming Island

    Figure 3.  The relationship between particulate amines and BLH, the values below the detection limit and the two highest values of DEA were not included in the calculation. Blue dots show the measurement data and black lines show exponential fitting of the data. Red circles and vertical lines show the mean and one standard deviation of concentrations of amines, with each bin representing the 20th percentile of relative BLH values.

    Figure 4.  The 72 h backward trajectories starting from Chongming Island and the average Chl a data was obtained from https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/ in June (a), July (b), and August (c), respectively.

    Figure 5.  The six sources identified from PMF model in the present study.

    Figure 6.  The relative contribution of various sources of amines during the whole campaign, EP1, and EP2.

    Table 1.  Concentrations of measured amines in PM2.5, other major components of PM2.5, trace gas pollutants, and P value of diurnal and nocturnal difference. Data shown is the mean and standard deviation.

    SpeciesDiurnalNocturnalPDaily
    (a) Amines in PM2.5 (ng m−3)
    MA16.1±16.013.8±14.00.88615.0±15.0
    DMA6.8±5.45.9±8.30.0136.3±6.9
    DEA21.7±31.119.3±29.90.07520.4±30.1
    TMA3.4±4.94.6±6.80.1334.0±5.9
    Total47.7±41.443.6±47.00.13145.6±43.9
    (b) Other species in PM2.5 (µg m−3)
    PM2.532.5±19.734.5±23.00.49133.4±21.2
    WSTN2.5±2.03.9±3.60.0223.2±2.9
    WSON0.38±0.320.50±0.600.1910.44±0.48
    WSOC2.2±2.21.7±1.90.0571.9±2.0
    EC0.89±0.661.02±0.980.0080.95±0.83
    OC3.7±2.53.0±2.50.8863.3±2.5
    Levoglucosana8.0±9.416±220.01312±17
    F0.01±0.010.01±0.010.1850.01±0.01
    Cl0.22±0.200.40±0.400.0000.31±0.30
    ${\rm {NO}}_2^- $0.13±0.090.10±0.070.2550.11±0.08
    ${\rm {NO}}_3^- $2.3±2.35.0±5.90.0013.59±4.61
    ${\rm {SO}}_4^{2- }$5.9±3.45.9±3.30.9645.87±3.31
    Na+0.69±0.600.63±0.500.4910.65±0.50
    ${\rm {NH}}_4^+ $2.1±1.63.0±2.50.0362.5±2.1
    K+0.10±0.110.16±0.280.8860.13±0.21
    Mg2+0.10±0.050.09±0.050.0570.09±0.05
    Ca2+0.24±0.140.18±0.100.0220.21±0.13
    (c) Trace Gas pollutants (µg m−3)
    NH34.4±4.04.8±6.20.8094.6±5.1
    HF0.25±1.380.06±0.060.4630.16±0.98
    HCl0.31±1.180.13±0.040.0060.22±0.84
    HONO0.92±1.281.08±0.860.0491.07±1.35
    HNO30.51±1.460.19±0.180.0020.35±1.05
    SO22.0±2.01.2±0.80.0771.6±1.6
    O3117±47 64±250.00091±45
    Notes: a: the unit for this species was ng m−3.
    DownLoad: CSV
  • Bzdek, B. R., D. P. Ridge, and M. V. Johnston, 2010: Amine exchange into ammonium bisulfate and ammonium nitrate nuclei. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 3495−3503, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3495-2010.
    Calderón, S. M., N. D. Poor, and S. W. Campbell, 2007: Estimation of the particle and gas scavenging contributions to wet deposition of organic nitrogen. Atmos. Environ., 41, 4281−4290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.067.
    Chen, J. M., and Coauthors, 2017: A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China. Science of The Total Environment, 579, 1000−1034, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025.
    Dai, Q. L., and Coauthors, 2018: Chemical nature of PM2.5 and PM10 in Xi'an, China: Insights into primary emissions and secondary particle formation. Environmental Pollution, 240, 155−166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.111.
    Facchini, M. C., and Coauthors, 2008: Important source of marine secondary organic aerosol from biogenic amines. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9116−9121, https://doi.org/10.1021/es8018385.
    Ge, S. S., and Coauthors, 2019: Abundant NH3 in China enhances atmospheric HONO production by promoting the heterogeneous reaction of SO2 with NO2. Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 14 339−14 347, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04196.
    Ge, X. L., A. S. Wexler, and S. L. Clegg, 2011a: Atmospheric amines—Part I. A review. Atmos. Environ., 45, 524−546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.012.
    Ge, X. L., A. S. Wexler, and S. L. Clegg, 2011b: Atmospheric amines—Part II. Thermodynamic properties and gas/particle partitioning. Atmos. Environ., 45, 561−577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.013.
    General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China and Standardization Administration of China, 2012: GB 3095−2012 Ambient air quality standard. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing.
    Greim, H., D. Bury, H.-J. Klimisch, M. Oeben-Negele, and K. Ziegler-Skylakakis, 1998: Toxicity of aliphatic amines: Structure-activity relationship. Chemosphere, 36, 271−295, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00365-2.
    Hemmilä, M., and Coauthors, 2018: Amines in boreal forest air at SMEAR II station in Finland. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18, 6367−6380, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6367-2018.
    Hu, Q. J., P. R. Yu, Y. J. Zhu, K. Li, H. W. Gao, and X. H. Yao, 2015: Concentration, size distribution, and formation of trimethylaminium and dimethylaminium ions in atmospheric particles over marginal seas of China. J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 3487−3498, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0393.1.
    Huang, X. F., C. R. Deng, G. S. Zhuang, J. Lin, and M. X. Xiao, 2016: Quantitative analysis of aliphatic amines in urban aerosols based on online derivatization and high performance liquid chromatography. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 18, 796−801, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EM00197A.
    Jaeckels, J. M., M.-S. Bae, and J. J. Schauer, 2007: Positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis of molecular marker measurements to quantify the sources of organic aerosols. Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5763−5769, https://doi.org/10.1021/es062536b.
    Kieloaho, A.-J., H. Hellén, H. Hakola, H. E. Manninen, T. Nieminen, M. Kulmala, and M. Pihlatie, 2013: Gas-phase alkylamines in a boreal Scots pine forest air. Atmos. Environ., 80, 369−377, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.019.
    Kupiainen, O., I. K. Ortega, T. Kurtén, and H. Vehkamäki, 2012: Amine substitution into sulfuric acid - ammonia clusters. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12, 3591−3599, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3591-2012.
    Li, F., H.-Y. Liu, C.-H. Xue, X.-Q. Xin, J. Xu, Y.-G. Chang, Y. Xue, and L.-A. Yin, 2009: Simultaneous determination of dimethylamine, trimethylamine and trimethylamine-n-oxide in aquatic products extracts by ion chromatography with non-suppressed conductivity detection. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216, 5924−5926, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.06.038.
    Li, H., and Coauthors, 2020: Influence of atmospheric conditions on sulfuric acid-dimethylamine-ammonia-based new particle formation. Chemosphere, 245, 125554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125554.
    Lidbury, I., J. C. Murrell, and Y. Chen, 2014: Trimethylamine N-oxide metabolism by abundant marine heterotrophic bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 2710−2715, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317834111.
    Liu, F., Q. Zhang, R. J. van der A, B. Zheng, D. Tong, L. Yan, Y. X. Zheng, and K. B. He, 2016: Recent reduction in NOx emissions over China: Synthesis of satellite observations and emission inventories. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 114002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114002.
    Liu, F. X., and Coauthors, 2017: Concentration, size distribution and dry deposition of amines in atmospheric particles of urban Guangzhou, China. Atmos. Environ., 171, 279−288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.016.
    Liu, F. X., and Coauthors, 2018: Gas-to-particle partitioning of atmospheric amines observed at a mountain site in southern China. Atmos. Environ., 195, 1−11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.038.
    Liu, X. G., and Coauthors, 2013: Formation and evolution mechanism of regional haze: A case study in the megacity Beijing, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 4501−4514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4501-2013.
    Liu, Z., and Coauthors, 2020: Size‐resolved mixing states and sources of amine‐containing particles in the East China Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 125(18), e2020JD033162, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033162.
    Lu, Z. J., Q. Y. Liu, Y. Xiong, F. Huang, J. B. Zhou, and J. J. Schauer, 2018: A hybrid source apportionment strategy using positive matrix factorization (PMF) and molecular marker chemical mass balance (MM-CMB) models. Environmental Pollution, 238, 39−51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.091.
    Müller, C., Y. Iinuma, J. Karstensen, D. van Pinxteren, S. Lehmann, T. Gnauk, and H. Herrmann, 2009: Seasonal variation of aliphatic amines in marine sub-micrometer particles at the Cape Verde islands. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 9587−9597, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9587-2009.
    Neff, J. C., E. A. Holland, F. J. Dentener, W. H. McDowell, and K. M. Russell, 2002: The origin, composition and rates of organic nitrogen deposition: A missing piece of the nitrogen cycle? Biogeochemistry, 57, 99−136, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015791622742.
    Nielsen, C. J., H. Herrmann, and C. Weller, 2012: Atmospheric chemistry and environmental impact of the use of amines in carbon capture and storage (CCS). Chemical Society Reviews, 41, 6684−6704, https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35059A.
    Pachon, J. E., R. J. Weber, X. L. Zhang, J. A. Mulholland, and A. G. Russell, 2013: Revising the use of potassium (K) in the source apportionment of PM2.5. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 4, 14−21, https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2013.002.
    Pan, B. B., S. K. Lam, A. Mosier, Y. Q. Luo, and D. L. Chen, 2016: Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies: A global synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 232, 283−289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.019.
    Pankow, J. F., 2015: Phase considerations in the gas/particle partitioning of organic amines in the atmosphere. Atmos. Environ., 122, 448−453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.056.
    Schade, G. W., and P. J. Crutzen, 1995: Emission of aliphatic amines from animal husbandry and their reactions: Potential source of N2O and HCN. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 22, 319−346, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00696641.
    Sellegri, K., M. Hanke, B. Umann, F. Arnold, and M. Kulmala, 2005: Measurements of organic gases during aerosol formation events in the boreal forest atmosphere during QUEST. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5, 373−384, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-373-2005.
    Shen, W. C., and Coauthors, 2017: C1-C2 alkyl aminiums in urban aerosols: Insights from ambient and fuel combustion emission measurements in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China. Environmental Pollution, 230, 12−21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.034.
    Sorooshian, A., and Coauthors, 2009: On the link between ocean biota emissions, aerosol, and maritime clouds: Airborne, ground, and satellite measurements off the coast of California. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23, GB4007, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003464.
    Tang, X. C., and Coauthors, 2013: NO3 radical, OH radical and O3-initiated secondary aerosol formation from aliphatic amines. Atmos. Environ., 72, 105−112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.024.
    Tao, Y., X. N. Ye, S. Q. Jiang, X. Yang, J. M. Chen, Y. Y. Xie, and R. Y. Wang, 2016: Effects of amines on particle growth observed in new particle formation events. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 324−335, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024245.
    Tong, D., J. Y. Chen, D. D. Qin, Y. M. Ji, G. Y. Li, and T. C. An, 2020: Mechanism of atmospheric organic amines reacted with ozone and implications for the formation of secondary organic aerosols. Science of the Total Environment, 737, 139830, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139830.
    VandenBoer, T. C., M. Z. Markovic, A. Petroff, M. F. Czar, N. Borduas, and J. G. Murphy, 2012: Ion chromatographic separation and quantitation of alkyl methylamines and ethylamines in atmospheric gas and particulate matter using preconcentration and suppressed conductivity detection. Journal of Chromatography A, 1252, 74−83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.062.
    Wang, G. H., K. Kawamura, S. C. Lee, K. Ho, and J. J. Cao, 2006: Molecular, seasonal, and spatial distributions of organic aerosols from fourteen Chinese cities. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4619−4625, https://doi.org/10.1021/es060291x.
    Wang, G. H., K. Kawamura, M. J. Xie, S. Y. Hu, J. J. Cao, Z. S. An, J. G. Waston, and J. C. Chow, 2009: Organic molecular compositions and size distributions of Chinese summer and autumn aerosols from Nanjing: Characteristic haze event caused by wheat straw burning. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 6493−6499, https://doi.org/10.1021/es803086g.
    Wang, G. H., and Coauthors, 2012: Molecular distribution and stable carbon isotopic composition of dicarboxylic acids, ketocarboxylic acids, and α-dicarbonyls in size-resolved atmospheric particles from Xi’an City, China. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 4783−4791, https://doi.org/10.1021/es204322c.
    Wang, G. H., and Coauthors, 2016: Persistent sulfate formation from London Fog to Chinese haze. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 13 630−13 635, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113.
    Wang, G. H., and Coauthors, 2018: Particle acidity and sulfate production during severe haze events in China cannot be reliably inferred by assuming a mixture of inorganic salts. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18, 10 123−10 132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10123-2018.
    Wang, L., V. Lal, A. F. Khalizov, and R. Y. Zhang, 2010: Heterogeneous chemistry of alkylamines with sulfuric acid: Implications for atmospheric formation of alkylaminium sulfates. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 2461−2465, https://doi.org/10.1021/es9036868.
    Wang, X. P., G. H. Wang, Y. N. Xie, C. Wu, G. Y. Xue, Y. B. Chen, and Z. J. Ding, 2020: Chemical characterization and source apportionment of water-soluble inorganic ions of summertime atmospheric PM2.5 in Background of Yangtze River Delta Region. Research of Environmental Sciences, 33, 1366−1375, https://doi.org/10.13198∕j.issn.1001-6929.2019.12.08. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Xie, H., L. M. Feng, Q. J. Hu, Y. J. Zhu, H. W. Gao, Y. Gao, and X. H. Yao, 2018: Concentration and size distribution of water-extracted dimethylaminium and trimethylaminium in atmospheric particles during nine campaigns - Implications for sources, phase states and formation pathways. Science of the Total Environment, 631−632, 130−141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.303.
    Xie, Y., and Coauthors, 2020: Nitrate-dominated PM2.5 and elevation of particle pH observed in urban Beijing during the winter of 2017. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 5019−5033, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5019-2020.
    Xue, G. Y., and Coauthors, 2020: Pollution characteristics and source apportionment of n-Alkanes and PAHs in Summertime PM2.5 at Background Site of Yangtze River Delta. Environmental Science, 41, 554−563, https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201908019. (in Chinese with English abstract
    You, Y., and Coauthors, 2014: Atmospheric amines and ammonia measured with a chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, 12 181−12 194, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12181-2014.
    Yu, L., and Coauthors, 2013: Characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in an urban environment in Beijing. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 13, 574−583, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.07.0192.
    Yu, P. R., Q. J. Hu, K. Li, Y. J. Zhu, X. H. Liu, H. W. Gao, and X. H. Yao, 2016: Characteristics of dimethylaminium and trimethylaminium in atmospheric particles ranging from supermicron to nanometer sizes over eutrophic marginal seas of China and oligotrophic open oceans. Science of the Total Environment, 572, 813−824, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.114.
    Zahardis, J., S. Geddes, and G. A. Petrucci, 2008: The ozonolysis of primary aliphatic amines in fine particles. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8, 1181−1194, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1181-2008.
    Zhang, Q., K. B. He, and H. Huo, 2012: Cleaning China's air. Nature, 484, 161−162, https://doi.org/10.1038/484161a.
    Zhang, R., and Coauthors, 2013: Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing: Seasonal perspective. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 7053−7074, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013.
    Zhang, Y. X., J. J. Schauer, Y. H. Zhang, L. M. Zeng, Y. J. Wei, Y. Liu, and M. Shao, 2008: Characteristics of particulate carbon emissions from real-world Chinese coal combustion. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5068−5073, https://doi.org/10.1021/es7022576.
    Zheng, J., and Coauthors, 2015: Measurement of atmospheric amines and ammonia using the high resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Atmos. Environ., 102, 249−259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.002.
    Zhou, S. Q., H. W. Li, T. J. Yang, Y. Chen, C. R. Deng, Y. H. Gao, C. P. and Chen, J. Xu, 2019: Characteristics and sources of aerosol aminiums over the eastern coast of China: Insights from the integrated observations in a coastal city, adjacent island and surrounding marginal seas. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19, 10 447−10 467, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10447-2019.
  • [1] Zhixuan TONG, Yingying YAN, Shaofei KONG, Jintai LIN, Nan CHEN, Bo ZHU, Jing MA, Tianliang ZHAO, Shihua QI, 2024: Distribution and Formation Causes of PM2.5 and O3 Double High Pollution Events in China during 2013–20, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3156-9
    [2] Lan GAO, Xu YUE, Xiaoyan MENG, Li DU, Yadong LEI, Chenguang TIAN, Liang QIU, 2020: Comparison of Ozone and PM2.5 Concentrations over Urban, Suburban, and Background Sites in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 1297-1309.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0054-2
    [3] Chuwei LIU, Zhongwei HUANG, Jianping HUANG, Chunsheng LIANG, Lei DING, Xinbo LIAN, Xiaoyue LIU, Li Zhang, Danfeng WANG, 2022: Comparison of PM2.5 and CO2 Concentrations in Large Cities of China during the COVID-19 Lockdown, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 861-875.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1281-x
    [4] Qiuyan DU, Chun ZHAO, Jiawang FENG, Zining YANG, Jiamin XU, Jun GU, Mingshuai ZHANG, Mingyue XU, Shengfu LIN, 2024: Seasonal Characteristics of Forecasting Uncertainties in Surface PM2.5 Concentration Associated with Forecast Lead Time over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 801-816.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3060-3
    [5] Zexuan WANG, Hongmei XU, Rong FENG, Yunxuan GU, Jian SUN, Suixin LIU, Ningning ZHANG, Dan LI, Tao WANG, Linli QU, Steven Sai Hang HO, Zhenxing SHEN, Junji CAO, 2023: Characteristics of PM2.5 and Its Reactive Oxygen Species in Heating Energy Transition and Estimation of Its Impact on the Environment and Health in China—A Case Study in the Fenwei Plain, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 1175-1186.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-2249-1
    [6] YANG Yongjie, WANG Yuesi, HUANG Weiwei, HU Bo, WEN Tianxue, ZHAO Yanan, 2010: Size Distributions and Elemental Compositions of Particulate Matter on Clear, Hazy and Foggy days in Beijing, China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 663-675.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-8197-1
    [7] Roeland Cornelis JANSEN, SHI Yang, CHEN Jianmin, HU YunJie, XU Chang, HONG Shengmao, LI Jiao, ZHANG Min, 2014: Using Hourly Measurements to Explore the Role of Secondary Inorganic Aerosol in PM2.5 during Haze and Fog in Hangzhou, China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 1427-1434.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4042-2
    [8] Jingjiao PU, Honghui XU, Bo YAO, Yan YU, Yujun JIANG, Qianli MA, Liqu CHEN, 2020: Estimate of Hydrofluorocarbon Emissions for 2012–16 in the Yangtze River Delta, China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 576-585.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-9242-3
    [9] Liang ZHANG, Bin ZHU, Jinhui GAO, Hanqing KANG, 2017: Impact of Taihu Lake on City Ozone in the Yangtze River Delta, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 226-234.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-6099-6
    [10] Nan WANG, Zhenhao LING, Xuejiao DENG, Tao DENG, Xiaopu LYU, Tingyuan LI, Xiaorong GAO, Xi CHEN, 2018: Source Contributions to PM2.5 under Unfavorable Weather Conditions in Guangzhou City, China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 1145-1159.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-7212-9
    [11] Xiao HAN, Meigen ZHANG, 2021: The Interannual Variation of Transboundary Contributions from Chinese Emissions of PM2.5 to South Korea, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 701-706.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1003-4
    [12] B. S. K. REDDY, K. R. KUMAR, G. BALAKRISHNAIAH, K. R. GOPAL, R. R. REDDY, V. SIVAKUMAR, S. Md. ARAFATH, A. P. LINGASWAMY, S. PAVANKUMARI, K. UMADEVI, Y. N. AHAMMED, 2013: Ground-Based In Situ Measurements of Near-Surface Aerosol Mass Concentration over Anantapur: Heterogeneity in Source Impacts, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 235-246.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-1234-5
    [13] Zhang Renjian, Wang Mingxing, Fu Jianzhong, 2001: Preliminary Research on the Size Distribution of???Aerosols in Beijing, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 225-230.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-001-0015-3
    [14] Qian LU, Jian RAO, Chunhua SHI, Dong GUO, Ji WANG, Zhuoqi LIANG, Tian WANG, 2022: Observational Subseasonal Variability of the PM2.5 Concentration in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area during the January 2021 Sudden Stratospheric Warming, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1623-1636.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1393-y
    [15] Wenjing HUANG, Timothy J. GRIFFIS, Cheng HU, Wei XIAO, Xuhui LEE, 2021: Seasonal Variations of CH4 Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China Are Driven by Agricultural Activities, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1537-1551.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0383-9
    [16] Xinyu ZHANG, Zhicong YIN, Huijun WANG, Mingkeng DUAN, 2021: Monthly Variations of Atmospheric Circulations Associated with Haze Pollution in the Yangtze River Delta and North China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 569-580.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0227-z
    [17] Hongyan LUO, Xiao TANG, Huangjian WU, Lei KONG, Qian WU, Kai CAO, Yating SONG, Xuechun LUO, Yao WANG, Jiang ZHU, Zifa WANG, 2022: The Impact of the Numbers of Monitoring Stations on the National and Regional Air Quality Assessment in China During 2013–18, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1709-1720.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1346-5
    [18] Zhe WANG, Zifa WANG, Zhiyin ZOU, Xueshun CHEN, Huangjian WU, Wending WANG, Hang SU, Fang LI, Wenru XU, Zhihua LIU, Jiaojun ZHU, 2024: Severe Global Environmental Issues Caused by Canada’s Record-Breaking Wildfires in 2023, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 565-571.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3241-0
    [19] YU Xingna, ZHU Bin, YIN Yan, FAN Shuxian, CHEN Aijun, 2011: Seasonal Variation of Columnar Aerosol Optical Properties in Yangtze River Delta in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 1326-1335.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0158-9
    [20] LIU Dameng, GAO Shaopeng, AN Xianghua, 2008: Distribution and Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Atmospheric Particulate Matter PM2.5 in Beijing, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 25, 297-305.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-008-0297-9
  • ESM-200274.pdf

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 17 August 2020
Manuscript revised: 17 November 2020
Manuscript accepted: 03 January 2021
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Particulate Amines in the Background Atmosphere of the Yangtze River Delta, China: Concentration, Size Distribution, and Sources

    Corresponding author: Gehui WANG, ghwang@geo.ecnu.edu.cn
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science of the Ministry of Education, School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • 2. School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • 3. Institute of Eco-Chongming, Shanghai 200062, China

Abstract: Amines are important for new particle formation and subsequent growth in the atmosphere. Consequently, the processes involved are receiving more attention in recent years. Here, we conduct a field observation in order to investigate the atmospheric particulate amines at a background site in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) during the summer of 2018. Four amines in PM2.5, i.e., methylamine (MA), dimethylamine (DMA), diethylamine (DEA), and trimethylamine (TMA), were collected, twice daily and analyzed. During the campaign, our measurements found the concentrations of MA, DMA, DEA, and TMA of 15.0 ± 15.0, 6.3 ± 6.9, 20.4 ± 30.1, and 4.0 ± 5.9 ng m–3, respectively, and the four amines correlated well with each other. The concentration of amines appear to be independent of whether they were collected during the day or night. Both MA and DMA exhibited a bimodal size distribution that had peaks at 0.67 and 1.1 μm, suggesting amines preferably distribute on submicron particles. Boundary layer height (BLH), relative humidity, and pH of aerosols were found have a negative relationship with amines, while aerosol liquid water content (ALWC) was found to have a positive relationship with amines. The PMF (positive matrix factorization) source apportionment results showed that the main source of amines in Chongming Island was of anthropogenic origin such as industrial and biomass emission, followed by marine sources including sea salt and marine biogenic sources. Given that the YRD region is still suffering from complex atmospheric pollution and that the knowledge on aerosol amines is still limited, more field studies are in urgent need for a better understanding of the pollution characteristics of amines.

摘要: 有机胺在大气新粒子形成和增长过程中起着重要作用,近年来备受关注。为研究长三角地区大气有机胺的污染特征,于2018年夏季在长三角背景点地区进行了颗粒态有机胺的野外观测。结果表明观测期间细颗粒物上甲胺、二甲胺、二乙胺和三甲胺浓度分别为15.0±15.0、6.3±6.9、20.4±30.1和4.0±5.9 ng/m3,且四种有机胺互相相关。除二甲胺外,其余几种有机胺没有显著的昼夜差别。就不同粒径上浓度而言,甲胺和二甲胺呈双峰分布特征,但主要分布在07–1.1 μm粒径段,说明有机胺更倾向于分布于超细颗粒物上。边界层高度、相对湿度和颗粒物pH与有机胺浓度负相关,颗粒物液态水含量与有机胺浓度正相关。利用PMF源解析初步探究有机胺来源,发现包括生物质燃烧和工业排放在内的人为源是长三角背景点有机胺的主要来源,以海盐和海洋生物源在内的自然源也有较大贡献。目前,对大气有机胺的认知尚不充分,考虑到长三角地区大气污染的严重性和复杂性,希望未来有更多研究关注长三角地区有机胺污染特征。

    • Amines with low molecular weight could be emitted from both natural (e.g. vegetation and ocean) and anthropogenic sources (e.g. industry and fossil fuel combustion), and are ubiquitous in the atmosphere (Schade and Crutzen, 1995; Ge et al., 2011a). It was estimated that about one third of the total reduced nitrogen in the atmosphere is represented by atmospheric amines (Neff et al., 2002). Amines, especially those with lower molecular weight, could affect the characteristics of atmospheric aerosols through acid-base neutralization, displacement reactions involving ammonium, partitioning into aerosol aqueous phase, and reaction with oxidants (Sellegri et al., 2005; Zahardis et al., 2008; Bzdek et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2010, 2018; Tang et al., 2013). Moreover, increasing evidence from both laboratory simulations and field observations have proved that amines play an important role in new particle formation and growth, thus affecting the chemistry of atmospheric aerosols (Liu et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020). It was well recognized that the acid–base reaction or heterogeneous reaction of amines in particles could contribute significantly to secondary organic aerosols (SOA) formation in the atmosphere (Ge et al., 2011b; Kupiainen et al., 2012; Pankow, 2015). In addition, some amines such as aromatic amines and aliphatic amines could pose severe hazards upon human health through inhalation, ingestion, absorption through the skin, and the formation of toxic compounds (Greim et al., 1998; Ge et al., 2011a). Although amines are crucial to both on atmosphere chemistry and human health, current knowledge of atmospheric amines is still limited.

      Previous studies had measured atmospheric amines in urban, rural, coastal and marine areas (Kieloaho et al., 2013; Shen et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019). It is recognized that in coastal regions and marine areas, the main sources of amines are biological activities on the ocean surface, rather than industry and combustion sources (Facchini et al., 2008; Müller et al., 2009), which is different from urban areas (Zhou et al., 2019) where industrial sources dominate (Shen et al., 2017). For example, higher DEA and TMA were observed on the days with stronger biological activities compared to the days with reduced biological activities in the North Atlantic. Additionally, the mass fraction of amines in WSON (water-soluble organic nitrogen) also increased on the days with stronger biological activities (Facchini et al., 2008). In fact, DEA and TMA could be emitted from marine sources as gaseous species and then partition to particle phase (Yu et al., 2016). To date, studies on particulate amines are still rare, especially field studies in coastal and rural areas. The pollution levels, influencing factors, and size distributions of amines have yet to be fully investigated (Xie et al., 2018). Considering the importance of amines in atmospheric chemistry, it is essential to conduct additional measurements on amines in different environments and/or seasons.

      The Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China is one of the most developed regions in the world and is suffering from complex atmospheric air pollution, although China had taken strong action to reduce pollutant emissions (Zhang et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017; Ge et al., 2019). Chongming Island, which is located in a rural section of the YRD, near East China Sea, has less local industry and is usually considered as a background site of YRD region (Wang et al., 2020). As a rural and coastal site that is displaced from mainland, the atmosphere of Chongming Island could be influenced by local marine emissions and/or transport from nearby cities. Nowadays, the Chinese government is trying to build Chongming Island into the largest Eco-Island in the world, so special attention has been paid to its atmosphere. In this study, field observations were conducted to investigate the particulate amines at Chongming Island during the summer of 2018. The concentrations of four amines in the PM2.5 category, including methylamine (MA), dimethylamine (DMA), diethylamine (DEA), and trimethylamine (TMA), were determined from 30 May to 15 August, and their size distributions were also documented. The main objectives of this study were to investigate: 1) concentration levels of atmospheric amines in the background region of the YRD in summer; 2) their size distribution characteristics; 3) the impact of environmental factors on particulate amines; and 4) the potential sources of the particulate amines in the background atmosphere of YRD. The results of this study could help researchers to better understand the atmospheric behavior of amines, which is valuable for policy makers to build a world-class Eco-Island.

    2.   Methods
    • The field measurement was conducted at the Wetland Ecological Observation Station of East China Normal University, which is located in Chongming Island (31°44'03"N, 121°12'39"E). The observation station is near the Yangtze River and East China Sea and surrounded by farmlands and native plants, in the absence of local industrial sources. The location of the sample site in the present study is shown in Fig. S1 in the electronic supplementary material (ESM).

      The warm season observational period was conducted from 30 May to 15 August 2018. Diurnal (0700−1900 LST; LST = UTC + 8) and nocturnal (1950−0650 LST) PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm) samples were collected by using a high-volume sampler (TISCH, Tianhong, China) equipped with a pre-baked quartz filter (Whatman). The field operation yielded 147 valid PM2.5 samples noting that several samples were discarded due to unexpected damage to the filter.

      In order to investigate the size distribution of atmospheric amines, size-segregated samples were also collected during the observation period using a nine stage Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (28.3 L min–1, Anderson, Thermo Electron Corporation, USA) and 80 mm quartz filters. The cutoff points of the size-segregated samplers were 0.43, 0.67, 1.1, 2.1, 3.3, 4.7, 5.8 and 9.0 μm, respectively. The flow rate of the sampler was calibrated before and after each sampling cycle. Each set of size-segregated samples was collected based on a 3-day duration. Finally, a total of 3 sets of samples were obtained during the study period, which was from 5 to 8 June, from 8 to 11 June, and from 14 to 17 June, respectively.

      Trace gas pollutants including NH3, HONO, SO2, and HNO3 were measured by an online-IC system called IGAC (In-situ Gases and Aerosol Composition monitor, Fortelice International Co., Ltd.). The detailed information about the measurement of trace gas pollutants can be found in our previous study (Xie et al., 2020). The concentration of ozone, O3, was continuously measured using a real-time monitor (49i, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. USA). All of the trace gas pollutants were measured hourly and average values were calculated to fit the same interval with PM2.5 samples for further analysis.

    • PM2.5 filters were gravimetrically measured using a high precision digital balance (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). The filters were conditioned in a desiccator for at least 24 hours with a temperature of 25°C−30°C and a relative humidity of 45%−55% before weighing. The concentrations of WSTN (water-soluble total nitrogen), WSOC (water-soluble organic carbon), and WSON (water-soluble organic nitrogen) were measured using a TOC-L CPH analyzer (Shimadzu, Japan). The EC (element carbon) and OC (organic carbon) in the filter samples were measured by the DRI Model 2001 carbon analyzer following the IMPROVE thermal/optical reflectance (TOR) protocol.

      PM2.5 and size-segregated sample filters were placed into a polypropylene jar (Nelgene) with 15 mL of ultrapure water, for a 60 min ultrasonic extraction prior to another 60 min oscillation in a shake bed. Then, the extract was filtered through a 0.45 μm PTFE filter before the amine and ion measurement. An ion chromatograph (IC-940 Professional, Metrohm) was used for the detection of amines and other ions. The column Supp5-150/4.0 was used to determine the anions, including Cl, ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $, ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $, ${\rm{NO}}_2^- $, and F and the column C 6-150/4.0 was used to determine cations including Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $ and amines. Amines were measured using the IC (Ion chromatographic) method widely used in previous research (Li et al., 2009; VandenBoer et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2016). Four amines including MA, DMA, DEA, and TMA were detected in the present study. The detection limits for MA, DMA, DEA and TMA were 1.36, 0.41, 1.51, and 0.98 ng m–3, respectively.

    • The 1 h resolution meteorological data for the Xisha water source station located at Chongming Island was obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/isd, last access: 15 August 2018). Meteorological data including temperature (T), relative humility (RH), Wind speed (WS), precipitation, and visibility was obtained together. The planetary boundary layer height (BLH) of the sample site during the sampling period was extracted from NCEP’s Global Data Assimilation System 1.0 (GDAS 1.0) with a 3-h time interval. Average values of meteorological data and BLH were calculated to fit the same interval with PM2.5 sampling- for further analysis. Chl a data during the sampling period, was obtained from https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/.

    • The filters were baked at 550°C for at least 4 hours before sampling. Field and procedure blanks were analyzed along with the samples, and the values of the blanks were subtracted from the sample results.

      The PMF model was used to identify the potential source of amines. The principles of the PMF model can be found elsewhere (Jaeckels et al., 2007; Yu et al., 2013). The PM2.5 particles included in the identification were: total amines; MA; DMA; DEA; TMA; EC; OC; WSOC; WSON; Na+; K+; Mg2+;Ca2+; ${\rm{NH}}_4^+$; Cl; ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $; and ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $.

      The data presented in this study was analyzed using the SPSS 23.0 instrument (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) prior to applying a Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z test and a Spearman correlation, noting a significance level of 0.05.

    3.   Results and discussion
    • The concentrations of the measured amines in PM2.5, and other major components of PM2.5, trace gas pollutants, and the P values of diurnal and nocturnal difference are provided in Table 1. It should be noted that the concentration of TMA in about 25% of the samples were under the detection limit, thus a zero was used in these cases for the purpose of calculating the mean value of TMA. The average concentrations of MA, DMA, DEA, and TMA (mean ± standard deviation) were: 15.0 ± 15.0; 6.3 ± 6.9; 20.4 ± 30.1; and 4.0 ± 5.9 ng m–3, respectively. The relative abundance of amines followed a decreasing trend of DEA > MA > DMA > TMA, but the difference between DMA and TMA was not significant (P > 0.05). The total amines concentration (sum of the four measured amines) during the sampling period was 45.6 ± 43.9 ng m–3 with a range of 34.4 to 328 ng m–3. The four measured amines were found to be significantly correlated with each other (P < 0.05). Specially, TMA was usually considered as the precursor of DMA in seawater (Lidbury et al., 2014), which is consistent with the robust relationship between these two amines in the present study (Table S1 in the ESM). Our results are also consistent with the premise that the sources of these two amines might be partially from marine sources (Yu et al., 2016). The nitrogen in the total amines contributed to WSON with a range of 0.005 to 0.33 (mean: 0.03), and the mean value of mass ratio of amines/WSOC was 0.04. Although the mass fraction of amines was not very high in WSON and WSOC, they were also an important contributor of SOA (Facchini et al., 2008). Apart from DMA, other measured amines did not show significant differences between diurnal and nocturnal values. DEA and MA were higher in day time, but the differences were not significant. Similar to the total amines, WSON and OC did not exhibit significantly different behavior between their diurnal and nocturnal values, which is opposite to the behavior of NH4+, WSTN, and EC.

      SpeciesDiurnalNocturnalPDaily
      (a) Amines in PM2.5 (ng m−3)
      MA16.1±16.013.8±14.00.88615.0±15.0
      DMA6.8±5.45.9±8.30.0136.3±6.9
      DEA21.7±31.119.3±29.90.07520.4±30.1
      TMA3.4±4.94.6±6.80.1334.0±5.9
      Total47.7±41.443.6±47.00.13145.6±43.9
      (b) Other species in PM2.5 (µg m−3)
      PM2.532.5±19.734.5±23.00.49133.4±21.2
      WSTN2.5±2.03.9±3.60.0223.2±2.9
      WSON0.38±0.320.50±0.600.1910.44±0.48
      WSOC2.2±2.21.7±1.90.0571.9±2.0
      EC0.89±0.661.02±0.980.0080.95±0.83
      OC3.7±2.53.0±2.50.8863.3±2.5
      Levoglucosana8.0±9.416±220.01312±17
      F0.01±0.010.01±0.010.1850.01±0.01
      Cl0.22±0.200.40±0.400.0000.31±0.30
      ${\rm {NO}}_2^- $0.13±0.090.10±0.070.2550.11±0.08
      ${\rm {NO}}_3^- $2.3±2.35.0±5.90.0013.59±4.61
      ${\rm {SO}}_4^{2- }$5.9±3.45.9±3.30.9645.87±3.31
      Na+0.69±0.600.63±0.500.4910.65±0.50
      ${\rm {NH}}_4^+ $2.1±1.63.0±2.50.0362.5±2.1
      K+0.10±0.110.16±0.280.8860.13±0.21
      Mg2+0.10±0.050.09±0.050.0570.09±0.05
      Ca2+0.24±0.140.18±0.100.0220.21±0.13
      (c) Trace Gas pollutants (µg m−3)
      NH34.4±4.04.8±6.20.8094.6±5.1
      HF0.25±1.380.06±0.060.4630.16±0.98
      HCl0.31±1.180.13±0.040.0060.22±0.84
      HONO0.92±1.281.08±0.860.0491.07±1.35
      HNO30.51±1.460.19±0.180.0020.35±1.05
      SO22.0±2.01.2±0.80.0771.6±1.6
      O3117±47 64±250.00091±45
      Notes: a: the unit for this species was ng m−3.

      Table 1.  Concentrations of measured amines in PM2.5, other major components of PM2.5, trace gas pollutants, and P value of diurnal and nocturnal difference. Data shown is the mean and standard deviation.

      Table S1 in the ESM provides the Spearman correlation between amines and other components. In most cases, MA, DMA, and DEA showed better correlations with other pollutants than TMA. Significantly positive correlations were found between amines and PM2.5, WSTN, WSON and WSOC, which is to be expected as the measured amines were organic compounds bounded to PM2.5. Amines were also found to be correlated with secondary inorganic components including ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $, ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $, and ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $ and K+, as well as levoglucosan, which is a key tracer of a biomass burning plume (Pachon et al., 2013), indicating that anthropogenic activities such as biomass burning were the possible sources of amines in the study site (Zheng et al., 2015). Amines were also positively correlated with the trace gas pollutants such as SO2, NH3, HNO3, HCl, and HONO, consistent with the strong correlation between amines and SO2 that was previously reported (Shen et al., 2017). Interestingly, MA, DMA, and DEA positively correlated with O3, which was considered to be a species with oxidizing capacity (Ge et al., 2011a). Previous studies reported contradictory conclusions on the relationship between amines and O3. For example, in Shen et al. (2017), MA and DMA, were found to be positively correlated with O3 in urban Nanjing, consistent with the present study, but Zhou et al. (2019) found a negative correlation between amines and O3 in urban Shanghai in summer of 2013, and no correlations were found in other seasons. Generally, amines in gaseous phase could be oxidized by oxidants such as O3 and OH radical (Ge et al., 2011a; Nielsen et al., 2012; Tong et al., 2020), while the amines in particle phase might fail to show a negative correlation with O3.

    • Previous studies had conducted several field observations of particulate amines in urban, rural, coastal, forest, and marine areas in summer, which were summarized and provided in Table S2 in the ESM. Generally, our measurement of DMA was 6.3 ± 6.9 ng m–3, lower than those measured in urban Shanghai (Tao et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2019), urban Nanjing (Shen et al., 2017), and urban Guangzhou (Liu et al., 2017), and urban Tampa Bay in the USA (Calderón et al., 2007). This result could be explained if the primary source of DMA was a consequence of anthropogenic activities, which was less pronounced in the study site compared to the urban areas, which have a greater presence of industry emissions (Zhou et al., 2019). Recall, that the DMA in our study was also lower than other studies that were conducted in marine and coastal areas (Sorooshian et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019), which is to be expected since the site in the present study was a background site away from industry sources, and the biological activities in the study site were weaker than a coastal site. For MA, the concentration in our study was lower than that measured in urban Guangzhou (Liu et al., 2013), but higher than those measured in urban Shanghai (Tao et al., 2016) and forest regions (Hemmilä et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2018). The result here might indicate that compared to DMA, the origin of MA is more strongly tied to biological activities instead of to industrial emissions in Chongming Island. The sum of DEA and TMA (TMDEA) was used for comparison in this study in an effort to be consistent with previous studies. In this study, the concentration of TMDEA was 24.2 ± 30.7 ng m–3, significantly higher than a summer study in 2013 (1.7 ± 1.6 ng m–3), but lower than another summer study in 2013 (38.8 ± 17.0 ng m–3), which were both conducted in urban Shanghai (Tao et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2019). The notable concentration differences between these two urban studies is likely attributed to in the distances between the sampling sites and industry sources. (Tao et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2019). Interestingly, the TMDEA in the present study was higher than urban and forest observations but comparable with or lower than those measured in a marine environment. (Sorooshian et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2015; Hemmilä et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2018; Xie et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019). As mentioned above, DEA and TMA could be emitted from marine sources (Yu et al., 2016), the results here indicate that a marine source is possible for these two particular amines (DEA and TMA), which is consistent with the findings of previous studies (Yu et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2019).

    • Figure 1 shows the temporal variation of major pollutants, including the four measured amines (Fig. 1a), PM2.5, ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $, and WSON (Fig. 1b), during the sampling period. Large temporal variations in the amines were observed in the present study. For example, the MA ranged from 0 to 90 ng m–3, with a COV (Coefficient of Variation) of 100%. It was clearly indicated in Fig. 1 that the amines had similar temporal variation to PM2.5, ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $, and WSON, which is consistent with the strong correlation among these pollutants (Table S1 in the ESM). According to the national ambient standard of China, the observation periods at the Chongming Island with a daily PM2.5 concentration that exceeded 35 μg m–3 were defined as a polluted period (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China and Standardization Administration of China, 2012) and those below 35 μg m–3 were considered to be clean periods. In the present study, the concentrations of MA, DMA, DEA, and TMA in the polluted periods were 26.8 ± 18.3, 10.1 ± 9.1, 40.6 ± 42.4, and 5.8 ± 8.2 ng m–3, respectively (corresponding PM2.5 concentration: 53.7 ± 21.3 μg m–3), which is significantly higher than that of 8.2 ± 6.1, 4.2 ± 4.0, 8.8 ± 6.4, and 3.0 ± 3.7 ng m–3 in the clean periods, respectively (P < 0.05, corresponding PM2.5 concentration: 21.5 ± 8.0 μg m–3). During this campaign, continuous high PM2.5 concentrations were observed during two periods (From 30 May to 7 June, and from 25 July to 1 August), and we defined these two periods as EP1 and EP2 for a further analysis of their potential sources (see Fig. 1). In these two polluted periods, much higher concentrations of amines in EP1 and EP2 were found compared to that observed during clean periods (see Fig. S2 in the ESM). Although MA and DMA in EP1 were lower than EP2, the concentrations of DEA and TMA in EP1 were higher than that observed in EP2, which indicated a potential difference regarding the sources of these amines for these two periods. In addition, the mean values of the molar ratio of nitrogen in amines to WSON in EP1 and EP2 were 0.05 and 0.04, higher than the ratios during the whole campaign (0.03), but similar to the ratios of the amine concentrations. In contrast to this, the mass ratio of total amines to WSOC was unchanged in EP1 (0.04) but decreased accordingly in EP2 (0.02) compared to the average value of the whole sampling period (0.04), suggesting a higher mass fraction of other organic components compared to amines in EP2.

      Figure 1.  The temporal variation of amines and other major pollutants during the campaign. Panel (a): measured amines including MA, DMA, DEA, and TMA; Panel (b): ${\rm {NH}}_4^+ $, PM2.5 and WSON. Two periods with continuous high PM2.5 concentrations were defined as EP1 and EP2, respectively.

    • In order to explore the size distribution of amines in PM2.5, size-segregated samples were collected and measured. It should be noted that DEA and TMA in some size bins were below the detection limit, thus only MA and DMA were used for analyzing their size distributions. Figures 2a-b showed the size distributions of MA, DMA, ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $, ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $, and ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $, respectively. The amines in the fine aerosol category (< 2.1 μm) contributed to more than 50% of the total mass. The result of size distributions showed that both MA and DMA exhibit a bimodal distribution pattern with a larger peak at 0.67−1.1 μm and a smaller peak at 4.7−5.8 μm, respectively. The major peak diameter between 0.7 and 1.1 μm was close to the results found in urban Nanjing and Shanghai, which were 0.56−1.0 μm (Tao et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2017), but amines in these urban studies exhibited a unimodal distribution, which probably indicates differential sources of and processes related to amines in Chongming Island compared to that of urban aerosols. The size distributions of amines in marine aerosols were observed to have a bimodal distribution, suggesting the size distribution of amines was different in variable environments (Yu et al., 2016). Similar to amines, ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $ in the present study also exhibited a bimodal distribution, while concentrations of ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $ in the peak diameter bins of 0.67−1.1 and 3.3−5.8 μm almost contributed equally to the total, which was different from amines. ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $ and ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $ exhibited a unimodal distribution in this study, suggesting that the processes amines experienced were different from that of ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $ and ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $ in the coastal site. In this study, MA and DMA were found to be strongly correlated with ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-} $ in the coarse mode (>2.1 μm) (R2 = 0.7 and 0.5, respectively). In a high temperature environment, NH4NO3 was unstable and NH3 was more easily able to volatilize into the atmosphere (Dai et al., 2018). This differed from the behavior of (NH4)2SO4, which might be the reason why ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $ shared a similar size distribution with ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $ but not with ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $. As a group of alkaline substances and with higher alkalinity than ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $, amines were more likely to combine with ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $ rather than ${\rm{NH}}_4^+ $, which would explain the similar peak in the coarse modes that were observed for amines and ${\rm{NO}}_3^- $.

      Figure 2.  The size distribution of amines and ${\rm {NO}}_3^- $, ${\rm {SO}}_4^{2-} $, and ${\rm {NH}}_4^+ $ in particulate form in Chongming Island

    • Concentrations of atmospheric amines could be influenced by various factors, such as temperature (T), boundary layer height (BLH), oxidizing capacity of atmosphere, and relative humidity (Ge et al., 2011b; You et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2019). In this study, the relationship between amines and temperature was very weak, thus not discussed hereafter. Rather, we will discuss the impact of other factors such as boundary layer height (BLH), pH, aerosol liquid water content (ALWC) of aerosol, and relative humidity (RH) on the particulate amines.

    • As shown in Figs. 3a-d, three of the four measured amines (MA, DMA, and DEA) were found to have a significant negative correlation with BLH, with the notable exception of TMA. The possible reason for the weak relationship between TMA and BLH might be attributed to a difference of source for TMA compared to the other amines. BLH was also found to be positively correlated with wind speed although the correlation was marginally significant (Fig. S3 in the ESM), which suggests the possibility that the low wind speeds would result in substantial accumulation of fine particulate amines when the BLH was also low. Generally, a lower BLH is conducive to unfavorable diffusion conditions for amines in PM2.5, along with low wind speed, especially in winter (Liu et al., 2013). In this study, although the relationship between amines and BLH was weaker compared to a previous one-year study conducted in urban Shanghai (Zhou et al., 2019), BLH also showed a negative relationship with the amines.

      Figure 3.  The relationship between particulate amines and BLH, the values below the detection limit and the two highest values of DEA were not included in the calculation. Blue dots show the measurement data and black lines show exponential fitting of the data. Red circles and vertical lines show the mean and one standard deviation of concentrations of amines, with each bin representing the 20th percentile of relative BLH values.

    • Figure S4 in the ESM shows the relationship between amines and relative humidity (RH). It was found that the amines have a negative relationship with RH. For MA and TMA, although, the relationships were not significant, which was different from DMA, DEA, and total amines. Previous studies found that higher RH was favorable for the gas-to-particle conversion of amines, thus amines bounded to PM2.5 were positively correlated to RH (Yu et al., 2016). Theoretically, high RH favors the gas-to-particle conversion of amines, while in this study, a dependency of amines upon RH, especially for DMA and DEA, was observed, which could be explained by the potential deposition of amines which is to be expected in high RH environments.

    • Figure S5 in the ESM shows the relationships between total amines and pH and ALWC. The ALWC during the sampling period was 30.3 ± 35.6 µg m−3 and without significant day and night difference (P > 0.05). It was found that concentration of the total amines was positively correlated with ALWC (P < 0.05). As a group of water-soluble organics, high ALWC was favorable for amines partitioning into aerosols (Ge et al., 2011a), so it was not surprising to see a robust relationship between amines and ALWC. In the present study, the pH of aerosol during the campaign was 2.97 ± 1.10, indicating a strong acidity. The pH of aerosol was found to be negatively correlated with amines (Fig. S5 in the ESM), which was also an expected result, recalling that amines are alkaline substances. Theoretically, aerosols with low pH are favorable for amines partitioning into particles.

    • As mentioned above, TMDEA (DEA+TMA) in Chongming Island was significantly higher than most urban areas, which implied marine sources contributed to these two particular amines substantially. This is not surprising since DEA and TMA could be emitted from a marine source in a gas phase before transitioning to a particle phase (Yu et al., 2016). Figures 4 a-c shows the backward trajectories starting from Chongming Island for the clean days (PM2.5 < 35 μg m–3) in different sampling months, it clearly suggested that during the sampling period, the majority of air masses predominantly originated from the East China Sea. Consistent with the above discussion, a marine source is a likely and essential origin for amines, especially during clean days when air masses are predominantly transported from marine areas.

      Figure 4.  The 72 h backward trajectories starting from Chongming Island and the average Chl a data was obtained from https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/ in June (a), July (b), and August (c), respectively.

    • As mentioned above, amines were strongly correlated with SNA, indicating that anthropogenic sources were also crucial for amines. Specially, DMA was proven to have a unique effect on new particle formation. Results in the present study also indicated that the air pollution in Chongming Island was possibly attributed to amines, especially during polluted days. Amines including DMA and MA could be emitted from coal or biomass combustion with emission factors at a level of 20 mg kg–1 (Shen et al., 2017). In the present study, the amines were also found to be significantly positively correlated with K+ and levoglucosan, indicating that biomass burning was a potential source of amines in Chongming Island. As an Eco-Island, Chongming Island has limited local industry, but the local, rural residents also burn biomass for cooking, which might be a source for the aerosol amines. This is consistent with previous studies; and, since the study site was not very far away from the mainland, it could also be influenced by air mass transport from the surrounding mainland such as Jiangsu province and Shanghai (Wang et al., 2020; Xue et al., 2020). Figure S6 shows the backward trajectories starting from Chongming Island in EP1 and EP2. As seen in Fig. S6 in the ESM, the majority of air mass originated from the mainland such as the YRD region and Shandong province in EP1 and EP2, which is dramatically different from the backwards trajectories for the clean days (Figs. 4a-c). Thus, during the polluted periods, the amines in Chongming Island were mostly derived from anthropogenic sources transported from the mainland. This result was consistent with our previous studies conducted on the same site and during the same periods, which focused on PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) and inorganic ions (Wang et al., 2020; Xue et al., 2020), and also similar to a previous cruise campaign in the East China Sea (Liu et al., 2020).

    • In this study, the PMF was used to investigate the source apportionment of amines, thus, the total variable was set to be total amines. Finally, six sources were identified and shown in Figs. 5a-f. Generally, secondary sulfate, secondary nitrate, and secondary ammonia sources are identified based upon their high contributions of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonia, although some sources directly emitted sulfate, nitrate, and ammonia (Zhang et al., 2008; Pan et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2018). In this study, factor 1 was characterized by ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $ and ${\rm {NH}}_4^+ $. The higher contribution of ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $ compared to ${\rm {NO}}_3^- $ indicated factor 1 was involved with regional transport of fossil fuel emission such as from Shandong province. Factor 2 was characterized by K+, EC, OC and WSOC (Zhang et al., 2013), which indicated factor 2 was involved with regional transport of biomass burning. Factor 3 was characterized by ${\rm {NO}}_3^- $ and ${\rm {NH}}_4^+ $, in consideration that NH4NO3 was not stable via regional transport, factor 3 most likely involved local fossil fuel emission from urban Shanghai. Factor 4 was sea salt since it was characterized by Na+ and Mg2+. Factor 5 was clearly indicative of the local biomass burning emissions as it was characterized by levoglucosan, K+ and Cl that are concomitantly enriched only within the fresh smoke from biomass burning (Wang et al., 2006, 2009, 2012; Lu et al., 2018). Factor 6 was most likely indicative of a marine biogenic source as it was characterized by TMA (Yu et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2019).

      Figure 5.  The six sources identified from PMF model in the present study.

      Figures 6a-c displays the relative contribution attributed to the above various sources on amines during the whole campaign of, EP1, and EP2. It was clearly indicated that the marine source (sea salt and biogenic source) in EP1 and EP2 was lower than the average value during the whole campaign, which was consistent with the results mentioned above. We also found the anthropogenic sources to be the dominant source of amines on the Chongming Island, from both local biomass and fossil fuel burning in addition to pollution transported from other provinces.

      Figure 6.  The relative contribution of various sources of amines during the whole campaign, EP1, and EP2.

    4.   Conclusion
    • In the present study, a field observation was conducted in Chongming Island to measure the pollution characteristics of aerosol amines. We found that the average daily concentrations of MA, DMA, DEA, and TMA were 15.0 ± 15.0, 6.3 ± 6.9, 22.3 ± 38.0, and 4.0 ± 5.9 ng m–3, respectively and that the concentrations of the four amines correlated well with each other. Furthermore, the difference between day and night concentrations was usually not significant. Generally, higher concentrations of amines were observed during the polluted days compared to those during the clean days. The size distribution of amines in our study exhibited a bimodal distribution that maximized between 0.67 and 1.1 μm, which was similar to previous studies. There were multiple factors that seemed to influence amine concentration. Our study showed that the relationship between amines and RH and O3 might be different from some previous urban studies, which can likely be attributed to potential differences in environmental processes and source. Analysis of PMF results suggest amines in the study site were dominated by anthropogenic sources. Given the essential role that amines play in the atmosphere, the knowledge gap concerning the nature of atmospheric amines was in urgent need to be filled since it has not yet been fully investigated.

      Acknowledgements. This work was financially supported by National Key R&D Plan, Ministry of Science and Technology of China—“Mechanism and chemical process characterization of atmospheric particulate matter multi-isotope fractionation” (Grant No. 2017YFC0212703), the program from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41773117), and the program of Happiness Flower Plan of East China Normal University of China.

      Electronic supplementary material: Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007//s00376-021-0274-0.

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return