Advanced Search
Article Contents

Causes and Predictability of the 2021 Spring Southwestern China Severe Drought


doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1428-4

  • In the spring of 2021, southwestern China (SWC) experienced extreme drought, accompanied by the highest seasonal-mean temperature record since 1961. This drought event occurred in the decaying phase of a La Niña event with negative geopotential height anomalies over the Philippine Sea, which is distinct from the historical perspective. Historically, spring drought over SWC is often linked to El Niño and strong western North Pacific subtropical high. Here, we show that the extreme drought in the spring of 2021 may be mainly driven by the atmospheric internal variability and amplified by the warming trend. Specifically, the evaporation increase due to the high temperature accounts for about 30% of drought severity, with the contributions of its linear trend portion being nearly 20% and the interannual variability portion being about 10%. Since the sea surface temperature forcing from the tropical central and eastern Pacific played a minor role in the occurrence of drought, it is a challenge for a climate model to capture the 2021 SWC drought beyond one-month lead times.
    摘要: 我国西南地区位于青藏高原东南侧,在夏季风期间同时受到西南季风和东南季风的影响,表现出明显的旱季和雨季,而雨季开始前易发生干旱。2021春季我国西南地区再次经历了严重干旱,同时气温也达到1961年以来历史最高。从历史上看,西南春季干旱通常与厄尔尼诺现象和强大的西北太平洋副热带高压有关,而此次西南春旱是发生在拉尼娜事件的衰减阶段,菲律宾海附近为负位势高度距平,不利于西太副高偏强西伸。这样的大气环流和海温异常外强迫条件与历史上大多西南春旱发生时的气候条件有较大不同。进一步分析表明,2021年春季的西南春旱可能主要由大气内部变化驱动,而长期的变暖趋势则加强了干旱的极端程度。具体而言,长期变暖导致的蒸发增加约占干旱严重程度的30%,其线性趋势部分的贡献率接近20%,年际变化部分的贡献率约为10%。由于来自热带中东太平洋的海温强迫不是形成此次西南春旱事件的主要外强迫因子,这可能是气候模式在提前1个月以上不能准确预测出此次干旱的主要原因之一。
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Distributions of (a) precipitation (mm), (b) T2m (°C), (c) evaporation (mm), and (d) drought (difference of precipitation minus evaporation) anomalies in MAM 2021. Contour indicates the anomalies, and shading represents normalized anomalies. The green dashed rectangle is the region of SWC (97°–105°E, 21°–30°N). The grey shading denotes the Tibetan Plateau with the elevation exceeding 3000 m.

    Figure 2.  Time series of MAM (a) precipitation, (b) temperature, (c) evaporation, and (d) drought anomalies averaged over SWC from 1961 to 2021. Bars indicate the anomalies (left y-axis), grey curves represent the accumulated anomalies (right y-axis), and dashed bold lines are the linear trend of 1991–2021. Accumulative anomaly is the accumulation of individual year anomaly values starting from 1961. The superscript * and ** in the trend equations represent significance levels of 0.05 and 0.01 respectively, based on the t-test.

    Figure 3.  (a) Observed Z500 (gpm) & UV700 (m s−1), (b) linear trend components, and (c) detrended components in MAM 2021; (d) regressions of Z500 and UV700 onto negative detrended MAM precipitation in SWC. Blue dashed lines in (d) indicate the anomalies reaching the 0.05 significance level based on the t-test. The grey shading denotes the Tibetan Plateau with the elevation exceeding 3000 m.

    Figure 4.  (a) Observed q850 (shading, g kg−1) and ω500 (contour, –0.01 Pa s−1) anomalies in MAM 2021; (b) regressions of q850 (shading, g kg−1) and ω500 (contour, –0.01 Pa s−1) anomalies onto negative detrended MAM precipitation in SWC. The green dashed rectangle is the region of SWC, and the grey shading denotes the Tibetan Plateau with the elevation exceeding 3000 m.

    Figure 5.  (a) Observed SSTA (°C), (b) the linear trend component, and (c) the detrended component in MAM 2021; (d) regressions of detrended SSTA onto negative detrended MAM precipitation in SWC. Dashed lines indicate anomalies reaching the 0.05 significance level based on the t-test.

    Figure 6.  CFSv2 real-time forecasts of precipitation anomalies (mm) in spring 2021 with initial conditions in (a) February 2021, (b) January 2021, (c) December 2020, and (d) November 2020. The forecasts are 80-member ensemble mean. The blue dashed rectangle represents SWC, same as that in Fig. 1.

    Figure 7.  The means of five driest (left column) and five wettest (right column) members of CFSv2 real-time forecasts of precipitation anomalies (mm) in spring 2021 with initial conditions in (a) February 2021, (b) January 2021, (c) December 2020, and (d) November 2020.

    Table 1.  The contribution of evaporation to the spring drought in 2021

    EvaporationAnomaly (mm)Contribution (%)
    Total32.5330.0
    Trend component21.6019.9
    Detrended component10.9310.1
    Note: The total evaporation is further divided into a linear trend component since 1991 and a detrended component after removing the linear trend.
    DownLoad: CSV
  • Cao, J., W.-K. Zhang, and Y. Tao, 2017: Thermal configuration of the Bay of Bengal–Tibetan Plateau region and the May precipitation anomaly in Yunnan. J. Climate, 30, 9303−9319, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0802.1.
    Chang, C.-P., Z. Wang, J. H. Ju, and T. Li, 2004: On the relationship between western maritime continent monsoon rainfall and ENSO during northern winter. J. Climate, 17, 665−672, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0665:OTRBWM>2.0.CO;2.
    Chen, M. Y., P. P. Xie, J. E. Janowiak, and P. A. Arkin, 2002: Global land precipitation: A 50-yr monthly analysis based on gauge observations. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 3, 249−266, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0249:GLPAYM>2.0.CO;2.
    Ding, T., and H. Gao, 2020: The record-breaking extreme drought in Yunnan Province, Southwest China during spring-early summer of 2019 and possible causes. Journal of Meteorological Research, 34, 997−1012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-0032-8.
    Feng, L., T. Li, and W. D. Yu, 2014: Cause of severe droughts in Southwest China during 1951–2010. Climate Dyn., 43, 2033−2042, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2026-z.
    He, Y., R. W. Yang, J. Wen, and J. Cao, 2013: Influences of snow cover of the Northern Hemisphere on precipitation of Yunnan province in May. Plateau Meteorology, 32, 1712−1719. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Hersbach, H., and Coauthors, 2020: The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999−2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803.
    Hu, Z.-Z., A. Kumar, B. Jha, W. Q. Wang, B. H. Huang, and B. Y. Huang, 2012: An analysis of warm pool and cold tongue El Niños: Air-sea coupling processes, global influences, and recent trends. Climate Dyn., 38, 2017−2035, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1224-9.
    Hu, Z.-Z., A. Kumar, B. Jha, J. S. Zhu, and B. H. Huang, 2017: Persistence and predictions of the remarkable warm anomaly in the northeastern Pacific Ocean during 2014−2016. J. Climate, 30, 689−702, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0348.1.
    Hu, Z.-Z., A. Kumar, B. H. Huang, J. S. Zhu, M. L'Heureux, M. J. McPhaden, and J.-Y. Yu, 2020a: The interdecadal shift of ENSO properties in 1999/2000: A review. J. Climate, 33, 4441−4462, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0316.1.
    Hu, Z.-Z., A. Kumar, B. Jha, and B. Y. Huang, 2020b: How much of monthly mean precipitation variability over global land is associated with SST anomalies. Climate Dyn., 54, 701−712, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05023-5.
    Huang, B. Y., and Coauthors, 2017: Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature, version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J. Climate, 30, 8179−8205, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1.
    Jang, H.-Y., S.-W. Yeh, E.-C. Chang, and B.-M. Kim, 2016: Evidence of the observed change in the atmosphere-ocean interactions over the South China Sea during summer in a regional climate model. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 128, 639−648, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-016-0433-5.
    Jiang, W., Z. Q. Zhang, and Y. Y. Liu, 2016: Relationship between the dry-season precipitation in Southwest China and decadal changes of the western Pacific subtropical high since the 21st century. Meteorological Monthly, 42, 1335−1341, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2016.11.005. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Lau, N.-C., and M. J. Nath, 2003: Atmosphere-Ocean variations in the Indo-Pacific sector during ENSO episodes. J. Climate, 16, 3−20, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0003:AOVITI>2.0.CO;2.
    Li, X., Z.-Z. Hu, Y.-H. Tseng, Y. Liu, and P. Liang, 2022: A historical perspective of the La Niña Event in 2020/21. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., published on line. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035546.
    Liang, P., Z.-Z. Hu, Y. Y. Liu, X. Yuan, X. F. Li, and X. W. Jiang, 2019: Challenges in predicting and simulating summer rainfall in the eastern China. Climate Dyn., 52, 2217−2233, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4256-6.
    Liu, Y., E.-X. Zhao, W. Huang, D. Sun, and J.-H. Ju, 2007: Diagnostic analysis of the severe drought over Yunnan area in the early summer of 2005. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 23, 35−40, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4965.2007.01.006. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Liu, Y. Y., and H. Gao, 2021: Features and possible causes of climate anomalies in China in spring 2021. Meteorological Monthly, 47, 1277−1288, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2021.10.010. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Liu, Y. Y., Z. J. Ke, and Y. H. Ding, 2019: Predictability of East Asian summer monsoon in seasonal climate forecast models. International Journal of Climatology, 39, 5688−5701, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6180.
    Liu, Y. Y., Z.-Z. Hu, R. G. Wu, B. Jha, Q. P. Li, L. J. Chen, and J. H. Yan, 2021: Subseasonal prediction and predictability of summer rainfall over eastern China in BCC_AGCM2.2. Climate Dyn., 56, 2057−2069, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05574-y.
    Lu, C. H., J. Jiang, R. D. Chen, S. Ullah, R. Yu, F. C. Lott, S. F. B. Tett, and B. W. Dong, 2021: Anthropogenic influence on 2019 May−June extremely low precipitation in southwestern China. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 102, S97−S102, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0128.1.
    Lü, J. M., J. H. Ju, J. Z. Ren, and W. W. Gan, 2012: The influence of the Madden-Julian Oscillation activity anomalies on Yunnan’s extreme drought of 2009–2010. Science China Earth Sciences, 55, 98−112, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4348-1.
    McKee, T. B., N. J. Doesken, and J. Kleist, 1993: The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Proc. 8th Conf. on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 179−184.
    Palmer, W. C., 1965: Meteorological drought. Weather Bureau Research Paper 45, 58 pp.
    Qiu, J., 2010: China drought highlights future climate threats. Nature, 465, 142−143, https://doi.org/10.1038/465142a.
    Ren, J. Z., W. C. Zhang, Y. X. Wan, and Y. Chen, 2017: Advances in the research of Yunnan’s arid climate and extreme drought. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 7, 23−35, https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2017.71003.
    Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2014: The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J. Climate, 27, 2185−2208, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1.
    Sun, C. H., and S. Yang, 2012: Persistent severe drought in southern China during winter–spring 2011: Large-scale circulation patterns and possible impacting factors. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D10112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017500.
    Vicente-Serrano, S. M., S. Beguería, and J. I. López-Moreno, 2010a: A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J. Climate, 23, 1696−1718, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1.
    Vicente-Serrano, S. M., S. Beguería, J. I. López-Moreno, M. Angulo, and A. El Kenawy, 2010b: A new global 0.5° gridded dataset (1901−2006) of a multiscalar drought index: Comparison with current drought index datasets based on the Palmer drought severity index. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11, 1033−1043, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1224.1.
    Wang, B., R. G. Wu, and X. H. Fu, 2000: Pacific-East Asian teleconnection: How does ENSO affect East Asian climate? J. Climate, 13, 1517−1536, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1517:PEATHD>2.0.CO;2.
    Wang, L., W. Chen, W. Zhou, and G. Huang, 2015: Drought in southwest China: A review. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., 8, 339−344.
    Wang, S. S., J. P. Huang, and X. Yuan, 2021: Attribution of 2019 extreme spring-early summer hot drought over Yunnan in southwestern China. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 102, S91−S96, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0121.1.
    Wu, R. G., and B. Wang, 2000: Interannual variability of summer monsoon onset over the western North Pacific and the underlying processes. J. Climate, 13, 2483−2501, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<2483:IVOSMO>2.0.CO;2.
    Wu, R. G., Z.-Z. Hu, and B. P. Kirtman, 2003: Evolution of ENSO-related rainfall anomalies in East Asia. J. Climate, 16, 3742−3758, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3742:EOERAI>2.0.CO;2.
    Xue, Y., M. Y. Chen, A. Kumar, Z.-Z. Hu, and W. Q. Wang, 2013: Prediction skill and bias of tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures in the NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2. J. Climate, 26, 5358−5378, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00600.1.
    Yan, H.-M., X. Duan, and J.-G. Cheng, 2007: Study on a severe drought event over Yunnan in spring 2005. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 23, 300−306, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4965.2007.03.013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Yang, J., D. Y. Gong, W. S. Wang, M. Hu, and R. Mao, 2012: Extreme drought event of 2009/2010 over southwestern China. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 115, 173−184, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-011-0172-6.
    Yang, S., and Q. X. Li, 2014: Improvement in homogeneity analysis method and update of China precipitation data. Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis, 10, 276−281, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2014.04.008. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Yang, Y. L., Y. Du, H. S. Chen, and Y. S. Zhang, 2011: Influence of ENSO event on rainfall anomaly over Yunnan Province and its neighboring regions during late spring–early summer. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 35, 729−738, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2011.04.12. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Yeh, S.-W., J.-S. Kug, B. Dewitte, M.-H. Kwon, B. P. Kirtman, and F.-F. Jin, 2009: El Niño in a changing climate. Nature, 461, 511−514, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08316.
    Yu, J.-Y., and S. T. Kim, 2013: Identifying the types of major El Niño events since 1870. International Journal of Climatology, 33, 2105−2112, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3575.
    Yuan, X., L. Y. Wang, P. L. Wu, P. Ji, J. Sheffield, and M. Zhang, 2019: Anthropogenic shift towards higher risk of flash drought over China. Nature Communications, 10, 4661, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12692-7.
  • [1] Zhiyi ZHOU, Juan LI, Haishan CHEN, Zhiwei ZHU, 2023: Seasonal Prediction of Extreme High-Temperature Days in Southwestern China Based on the Physical Precursors, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 1212-1224.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-2075-5
    [2] Se-Hwan YANG, LI Chaofan, and LU Riyu, 2014: Predictability of Winter Rainfall in South China as Demonstrated by the Coupled Models of ENSEMBLES, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 779-786.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3172-2
    [3] Chaofan LI, Riyu LU, Philip E. BETT, Adam A. SCAIFE, Nicola MARTIN, 2018: Skillful Seasonal Forecasts of Summer Surface Air Temperature in Western China by Global Seasonal Forecast System Version 5, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 955-964.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-7291-7
    [4] Gang LI, Daoyong YANG, Xiaohua JIANG, Jing PAN, Yanke TAN, 2017: Diagnosis of Moist Vorticity and Moist Divergence for a Heavy Precipitation Event in Southwestern China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 88-100.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-6124-9
    [5] ZHU Benlu, LIN Wantao, ZHANG Yun, 2010: Analysis Study on Perturbation Energy and Predictability of Heavy Precipitation in South China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 382-392.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-8164-x
    [6] WU Wei, CHEN Jilong, HUANG Ronghui, 2013: Water Budgets of Tropical Cyclones: Three Case Studies, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 468-484.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2050-7
    [7] Xiaoran ZHUANG, Jinzhong MIN, Liu ZHANG, Shizhang WANG, Naigeng WU, Haonan ZHU, 2020: Insights into Convective-scale Predictability in East China: Error Growth Dynamics and Associated Impact on Precipitation of Warm-Season Convective Events, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 893-911.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-9269-5
    [8] Fei ZHENG, Ji-Ping LIU, Xiang-Hui FANG, Mi-Rong SONG, Chao-Yuan YANG, Yuan YUAN, Ke-Xin LI, Ji WANG, Jiang ZHU, 2022: The Predictability of Ocean Environments that Contributed to the 2020/21 Extreme Cold Events in China: 2020/21 La Niña and 2020 Arctic Sea Ice Loss, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 658-672.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1130-y
    [9] WANG Huijun, FAN Ke, SUN Jianqi, LI Shuanglin, LIN Zhaohui, ZHOU Guangqing, CHEN Lijuan, LANG Xianmei, LI Fang, ZHU Yali, CHEN Hong, ZHENG Fei, 2015: A Review of Seasonal Climate Prediction Research in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 149-168.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-0016-7
    [10] BEI Naifang, Fuqing ZHANG, 2014: Mesoscale Predictability of Moist Baroclinic Waves: Variable and Scale-dependent Error Growth, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 995-1008.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-3191-7
    [11] WANG Shaowu, ZHU Jinhong, CAI Jingning, 2004: Interdecadal Variability of Temperature and Precipitation in China since 1880, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 307-313.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915560
    [12] Wansuo DUAN, Lichao YANG, Mu MU, Bin WANG, Xueshun SHEN, Zhiyong MENG, Ruiqiang DING, 2023: Recent Advances in China on the Predictability of Weather and Climate, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 1521-1547.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2334-0
    [13] DUAN Wansuo, JIANG Zhina, XU Hui, 2007: Progress in Predictability Studies in China (2003--2006), ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 1086-1098.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-1086-6
    [14] JIE Weihua, WU Tongwen, WANG Jun, LI Weijing, LIU Xiangwen, 2014: Improvement of 6-15 Day Precipitation Forecasts Using a Time-Lagged Ensemble Method, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 293-304.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3037-8
    [15] LIU Ge, WU Renguang, ZHANG Yuanzhi, and NAN Sulan, 2014: The Summer Snow Cover Anomaly over the Tibetan Plateau and Its Association with Simultaneous Precipitation over the Mei-yu-Baiu region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 755-764.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3183-z
    [16] Ping LIANG, Zhiqi ZHANG, Yihui DING, Zeng-Zhen HU, Qi CHEN, 2024: The 2022 Extreme Heatwave in Shanghai, Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Valley: Combined Influences of Multiscale Variabilities, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 593-607.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3007-8
    [17] Guokun DAI, Chunxiang LI, Zhe HAN, Dehai LUO, Yao YAO, 2022: The Nature and Predictability of the East Asian Extreme Cold Events of 2020/21, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 566-575.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1057-3
    [18] WU Duochang, MENG Zhiyong, YAN Dachun, 2013: The Predictability of a Squall Line in South China on 23 April 2007, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 485-502.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2076-x
    [19] Hailong LIU, Pingxiang Chu, Yao Meng, Mengrong DING, Pengfei LIN, Ruiqiang Ding, Pengfei Wang, Weipeng ZHENG, 2024: The Predictability Limit of Oceanic Mesoscale Eddy Tracks in the South China Sea, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-024-3250-7
    [20] REN Guoyu, DING Yihui, ZHAO Zongci, ZHENG Jingyun, WU Tongwen, TANG Guoli, XU Ying, 2012: Recent Progress in Studies of Climate Change in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 958-977.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-1200-2

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 16 November 2021
Manuscript revised: 25 January 2022
Manuscript accepted: 14 March 2022
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Causes and Predictability of the 2021 Spring Southwestern China Severe Drought

    Corresponding author: Yunyun LIU, liuyuny@cma.gov.cn
  • 1. CMA Climate Studies Key Laboratory, National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education & Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
  • 3. Climate Prediction Center, NCEP/NOAA, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
  • 4. School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • 5. School of Hydrology and Water Resources, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Abstract: In the spring of 2021, southwestern China (SWC) experienced extreme drought, accompanied by the highest seasonal-mean temperature record since 1961. This drought event occurred in the decaying phase of a La Niña event with negative geopotential height anomalies over the Philippine Sea, which is distinct from the historical perspective. Historically, spring drought over SWC is often linked to El Niño and strong western North Pacific subtropical high. Here, we show that the extreme drought in the spring of 2021 may be mainly driven by the atmospheric internal variability and amplified by the warming trend. Specifically, the evaporation increase due to the high temperature accounts for about 30% of drought severity, with the contributions of its linear trend portion being nearly 20% and the interannual variability portion being about 10%. Since the sea surface temperature forcing from the tropical central and eastern Pacific played a minor role in the occurrence of drought, it is a challenge for a climate model to capture the 2021 SWC drought beyond one-month lead times.

摘要: 我国西南地区位于青藏高原东南侧,在夏季风期间同时受到西南季风和东南季风的影响,表现出明显的旱季和雨季,而雨季开始前易发生干旱。2021春季我国西南地区再次经历了严重干旱,同时气温也达到1961年以来历史最高。从历史上看,西南春季干旱通常与厄尔尼诺现象和强大的西北太平洋副热带高压有关,而此次西南春旱是发生在拉尼娜事件的衰减阶段,菲律宾海附近为负位势高度距平,不利于西太副高偏强西伸。这样的大气环流和海温异常外强迫条件与历史上大多西南春旱发生时的气候条件有较大不同。进一步分析表明,2021年春季的西南春旱可能主要由大气内部变化驱动,而长期的变暖趋势则加强了干旱的极端程度。具体而言,长期变暖导致的蒸发增加约占干旱严重程度的30%,其线性趋势部分的贡献率接近20%,年际变化部分的贡献率约为10%。由于来自热带中东太平洋的海温强迫不是形成此次西南春旱事件的主要外强迫因子,这可能是气候模式在提前1个月以上不能准确预测出此次干旱的主要原因之一。

    • Southwestern China (SWC), being located on the southeastern side of the Tibetan Plateau, is influenced by both southwesterly and southeasterly winds during the summer monsoon period, resulting in pronounced dry and rainy seasons in the annual cycle. Spring drought before the onset of the summer rainy season is common throughout SWC (Jiang et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2017), which poses a great threat to local ecology, agriculture, and economy. Spring precipitation in SWC has decreased during recent decades in the presence of persistent warming (Wang et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2021), accompanied by more frequent and severe droughts, especially since 2006 (Qiu, 2010; Wang et al., 2015; Ren et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2021). In the spring of 2021, SWC again experienced an extreme drought event, with an intensive precipitation deficit and the highest seasonal mean temperature record since 1961. According to the statistics reported by the Chinese government, this severe drought together with high temperatures damaged more than 640,000 hectares of crops with rice, corn, and potatoes (Liu and Gao, 2021).

      Previous research has explored the possible causes of drought in SWC (Wang et al., 2015; Ren et al., 2017). Studies have identified the roles of persistent external forcing, such as sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) in the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans (Yang et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2012, 2020a; Feng et al., 2014), tropical Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) (Lü et al., 2012), and anomalous snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere (He et al., 2013), on the SWC drought through changing the atmospheric variability. Atmospheric circulation anomalies, such as the westward shift and intensification of the western Pacific subtropical high (WPSH)(Yang et al., 2012), the weakened India-Burma trough (IBT) (Ding and Gao, 2020), and the northward shift of the midlatitude westerlies (Sun and Yang, 2012), have been shown to contribute directly to the precipitation deficit in SWC. Yan et al. (2007) noted the important roles of the sustained easterly anomaly at 850-hPa over the North Indian Ocean and the continuous enhancement and westward extension of WPSH. Liu et al. (2007) argued that delayed onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon, suppressed tropical convection, and intensified and southwestward extension of the WPSH were important factors for the severe drought in SWC in spring 2005. Historically, the precipitation deficit from spring to summer in SWC is often concurrent with El Niño (Yang et al., 2011). During an El Niño event, an anomalous easterly wind develops over the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal (BOB) in the lower troposphere accompanying by an anomalous anticyclone over the BOB and a stronger WPSH.

      However, it is still unclear to what extent the SSTA affects SWC drought, how robust the impacts of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and WPSH are on the spring droughts in SWC, and what is the predictability of the drought (Lu et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). Moreover, the effect of the warming trend on such droughts with high air temperature and associated high evaporation over SWC remains to be investigated. Our analysis reveals distinct features in the occurrence of the SWC drought in the spring of 2021 compared to the historical perspective. This study assesses the contribution of the warming trend to the SWC spring drought in 2021, analyzes the roles of anomalous atmospheric circula­tion and tropical SST, and explores the predictability of drought based on a state-of-the-art climate prediction model. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the data and methods used in this study. The characteristics, possible factors, contributions of the long-term trend and internal variability, and predictability of the extreme drought are addressed in section 3. Section 4 is a summary and discussion.

    2.   Data and methods
    • Observations of monthly mean near-surface air temperature at two meters above the surface (T2m), precipitation, and surface potential evaporation (pan evaporation) at 125 national meteorological stations of China were used in this work. The station data were rigorously quality-controlled and homogenized at the China National Meteorological Information Center (Yang and Li, 2014). In addition, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s grid precipitation reconstruction dataset with a 0.5° × 0.5° horizontal resolution (Chen et al., 2002), and the fifth-generation reanalysis dataset from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ERA5; Hersbach et al., 2020) with a 0.25° × 0.25° horizontal resolution were used in this work. Atmospheric variables analyzed in the present study include 500-hPa geopotential height (Z500) and vertical velocity (ω500), 850-hPa specific humidity (q850), and 700-hPa zonal and meridional winds (UV700) from ERA5. Monthly mean SST on a 2° × 2° resolution, which was extracted from NOAA Extended Reconstructed SST, version 5 (ERSSTv5; Huang et al., 2017), was used to examine the contribution of external/boundary forcing to this drought event.

      The Standard Precipitation Evaporation Index (SPEI) is defined as a monthly climatic water balance of precipitation minus evaporation, reflecting the meteorological drought severity (Vicente-Serrano et al., 2010a). SPEI was suggested to be more appropriate than other drought indices (Vicente-Serrano et al., 2010b), such as the Standard Precipitation Index (SPI, McKee et al., 1993) and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI, Palmer, 1965) due to the fact that SPEI is defined as the water balance (i.e., monthly precipitation minus evaporation) instead of precipitation itself. In this work, SPEI is used to represent the drought severity in MAM 2021.

      Moreover, the contribution of evaporation to drought is quantitatively identified through calculating the proportion of evaporation in drought ($ {C}_{\mathrm{E}},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{ }\;\mathrm{\%}) $, expressed as

      where P is the precipitation and E is the evaporation. The evaporation (E) is further divided into a linear trend component since 1991 and a detrended component after removing the linear trend. The former represents the warming trend and the latter represents the interannual variability. Then, the relative contributions of the linear trend and interannual variability of the evaporation are calculated based on the above equation.

      The real-time predictions from the NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2; Xue et al., 2013; Saha et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2017) were examined in this study to assess the predictability of this drought event. The real-time predictions include 80 members within the last 20 days of each month and four forecasts per day, out to 9 months.

      The present study focused on the spring (March−April−May, MAM) season covering the period of 1961–2021. Anomalies of all variables were defined as the deviations from the climatological mean of MAM for the period 1982–2010, being consistent with the CFSv2 hindcast period. Pearson correlation and linear regression were used in this study. The statistical significance of the correlation was estimated using the two-tailed Student’s t-test.

    3.   Results
    • The spring drought event in 2021 over SWC (mostly over Yunnan Province) was mainly confined to the region of 21°–30°N, 97°–105°E (Fig. 1). According to the spatial distribution of March-April-May (MAM) mean precipitation anomalies during 2021, precipitation was 30–180 mm less than the climatic mean in SWC, with a widespread deficit of rainfall over most of the Yunnan province, particularly in the western region (Fig. 1a). The area-averaged rainfall amount in MAM 2021 was unprecedentedly low with the value of 110 mm, about 80 mm less than the climate mean (190 mm), reaching –1.6 times the standard deviation of precipitation over the period (Fig. 2a). In addition, SWC suffered the warmest spring since 1961, with the temperature being 1°C higher than normal in most of SWC (Fig. 1b). The area-averaged T2m anomaly in MAM 2021 was ranked highest since 1961 (Fig. 2b), reaching 2.8 times the standard deviation.

      Figure 1.  Distributions of (a) precipitation (mm), (b) T2m (°C), (c) evaporation (mm), and (d) drought (difference of precipitation minus evaporation) anomalies in MAM 2021. Contour indicates the anomalies, and shading represents normalized anomalies. The green dashed rectangle is the region of SWC (97°–105°E, 21°–30°N). The grey shading denotes the Tibetan Plateau with the elevation exceeding 3000 m.

      Figure 2.  Time series of MAM (a) precipitation, (b) temperature, (c) evaporation, and (d) drought anomalies averaged over SWC from 1961 to 2021. Bars indicate the anomalies (left y-axis), grey curves represent the accumulated anomalies (right y-axis), and dashed bold lines are the linear trend of 1991–2021. Accumulative anomaly is the accumulation of individual year anomaly values starting from 1961. The superscript * and ** in the trend equations represent significance levels of 0.05 and 0.01 respectively, based on the t-test.

      Surface evaporation over SWC was 30–60 mm above the climatology (Fig. 1c) due to the high temperature (Fig. 1b). The regional average evaporation anomaly in MAM 2021 was extremely large, exceeding 2.8 standard deviations (Fig. 2c). Such abnormal evaporation amplified the drought severity in the region. Under the combined effect of precipitation deficit and high evaporation, a severe drought, as measured by precipitation minus evaporation, formed in SWC in spring 2021, covering most of Yunnan and southern Sichuan provinces (Fig. 1d).

      The accumulative anomalies of SWC temperature and evaporation reached the lowest value in 1990 (Figs. 2a, 2c). The temperature and evaporation showed significant linear increasing trends from 1991 to 2021 (p<0.01). Although the corresponding linear trend of precipitation is not significant, the drought characterized by the difference between precipitation and evaporation over SWC has increased in the recent 30 years, which is consistent with previous studies (Wang et al., 2015, 2021; Lu et al., 2021). Specifically, the precipitation and evaporation contributed about 70% and 30% to the 2021 spring drought, respectively. Among the total contribution, the linear trend component of the evaporation accounted for about 20% and its interannual variability was about 10% (Table 1).

      EvaporationAnomaly (mm)Contribution (%)
      Total32.5330.0
      Trend component21.6019.9
      Detrended component10.9310.1
      Note: The total evaporation is further divided into a linear trend component since 1991 and a detrended component after removing the linear trend.

      Table 1.  The contribution of evaporation to the spring drought in 2021

    • In the spring of 2021, easterly anomalies were located over the latitudes of 15°−20°N, and two anomalous anticyclones were present, one extending northeastward from the southeastern China to the mid-latitudes and the other located over the northern BOB-northeast India (Fig. 3a). The anticyclone over the northern BOB-northeast India weakened the India-Burma trough (IBT), impeding the water vapor transport from the BOB to the SWC region (Wang et al., 2015; Ren et al., 2017; Ding and Gao, 2020). In addition, the southward flow of cold air northeast of the Tibetan Plateau was weaker than normal, suppressing the cold-warm air convergence. As a result, anomalous descent and reduced low-level moisture were observed over the SWC (Fig. 4a), favoring a precipitation deficit. The anomalous anticyclone and descent led to an enhancement of downward shortwave radiation reaching the surface and an increase of surface temperature. Thus, SWC was characterized by high temperature and severe drought in MAM 2021 (Fig. 1).

      Figure 3.  (a) Observed Z500 (gpm) & UV700 (m s−1), (b) linear trend components, and (c) detrended components in MAM 2021; (d) regressions of Z500 and UV700 onto negative detrended MAM precipitation in SWC. Blue dashed lines in (d) indicate the anomalies reaching the 0.05 significance level based on the t-test. The grey shading denotes the Tibetan Plateau with the elevation exceeding 3000 m.

      Figure 4.  (a) Observed q850 (shading, g kg−1) and ω500 (contour, –0.01 Pa s−1) anomalies in MAM 2021; (b) regressions of q850 (shading, g kg−1) and ω500 (contour, –0.01 Pa s−1) anomalies onto negative detrended MAM precipitation in SWC. The green dashed rectangle is the region of SWC, and the grey shading denotes the Tibetan Plateau with the elevation exceeding 3000 m.

      The above anomalous atmospheric circulation pattern in MAM 2021 (Fig. 3a) is different from that during the record-breaking drought in MAM 2019. In MAM 2019, the low-latitude region was dominated by positive geopotential height anomalies, and WPSH was strengthened with its ridgeline shifting northward and extending westward. The intensification and westward shift of the WPSH weakened the southern branch of the IBT and led to extreme drought (Yang et al., 2012; Ding and Gao, 2020; Wang et al., 2021). In MAM 2021, however, there were negative geopotential height anomalies over the Philippine Sea (Fig. 3a).

      The positive geopotential height anomalies over the low-latitude region in MAM 2021 may be partially associated with the interdecadal variation and long-term trend (Fig. 3b). After removing the linear trend, the low-latitude area, especially the Philippine Sea, is still dominated by negative height anomalies (Fig. 3c). Historically, atmospheric circulation anomalies obtained by linear regression onto the negative detrended precipitation anomaly averaged over SWC shows the contribution of the interannual component (Fig. 3d). The two anomalous anticyclones over the northern BOB and southeastern coast of China led to upper-level divergence over SWC. Unlike that inferred from the regression pattern, anomalous anticyclones are located at higher latitudes, and the low latitude region is occupied by anomalous cyclones in MAM 2021 (Figs. 3a, d). This is accompanied by a difference in the anomalous vertical motion around the Philippines (Figs. 4a, b). The differences of anomalous circulation patterns in the low latitudes between MAM 2021 (Figs. 3c, 4a) and the regression pattern (Figs. 3d, 4b) imply a different role of the low-latitude atmospheric circulation in drought in MAM 2021 and historical events.

      The SWC extreme drought in 2021 occurred in the context of the decaying phase of a La Niña event (Fig. 5a; Li et al., 2022), under the warming trend of SST in the central and western Pacific (Figs. 5b, c). Especially, the linear warming trend of tropical SST near 150°E is the most pronounced, which may be due to the frequent occurrence of the central Pacific El Niño events in recent decades (Yeh et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2012, 2020a; Yu and Kim, 2013). However, in the regression of the SSTA onto the negative detrended MAM precipitation in SWC, the pattern of “west cold and east warm” SSTA, similar to the El Niño-like pattern, favors drought in SWC (Fig. 5d) (e.g., Feng et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2017; Ding and Gao, 2020). Nevertheless, the SST anomaly gradient between the equatorial and southern Indian Ocean shares some similarities though the distribution of SST anomalies that are dissimilar to the equatorial and northern Indian Ocean between the regressions and the observations (Figs. 5a, c, d). The possible role of the SST anomaly gradient in the drought in SWC in the spring of 2021 deserves further investigation.

      Figure 5.  (a) Observed SSTA (°C), (b) the linear trend component, and (c) the detrended component in MAM 2021; (d) regressions of detrended SSTA onto negative detrended MAM precipitation in SWC. Dashed lines indicate anomalies reaching the 0.05 significance level based on the t-test.

      From a historical perspective, the anticyclonic wind anomalies are located at lower latitudes (BOB and southeast coast of China), likely resulting from a combined effect of positive SST anomalies in the equatorial central-eastern Pacific and negative SST anomalies in the tropical western North Pacific (Figs. 3d, 5d) (Wang et al., 2000; Wu and Wang, 2000; Yang, 2011). In MAM 2021, however, the positive SST anomalies extending from the tropical western North Pacific to the mid-latitude North Pacific may be a factor for the cyclonic wind anomalies over the BOB and the Philippine Sea (Figs. 3c, 5c), which differs from the historical statistics. Associated with the above cyclonic wind anomalies, the anticyclonic wind anomalies are shifted northward, being located over the top of the BOB and southern China-Japan. The differences in the low-latitude wind anomalies may be partially related to the contribution of the warming trend in the 2021 event (Fig. 5b). Thus, the differences of the low-latitude circulation anomalies in MAM 2021 from those in historical records associated with spring SWC drought are consistent with those in the tropical SSTA and ENSO condition (Figs. 5a and 5d).

    • The differences in the atmospheric circulation and SST anomalies in MAM 2021 (Figs. 3a, 3c, 5a, 5c) from the historical perspective (Figs. 3d, 5d) imply that the SWC extreme spring drought in 2021 may be more likely caused by the atmospheric internal variability within the longer-term warming background. The SST forcing in the tropical central and eastern Pacific seems not to play a key role. That is confirmed by the real-time prediction of CFSv2.

      The ensemble means of the CFSv2 predictions appear unable to capture the precipitation deficit in SWC at the lead times beyond one month (Fig. 6). The precipitation deficit was predicted only in a small part of western SWC, with an obvious underestimation of the drought severity. Statistically, it has been suggested that only a small fraction of the interannual variability of precipitation in China is driven by the oceanic forcing, mostly associated with ENSO (Lau and Nath, 2003; Wu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2004; Jang et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019, 2021).

      Figure 6.  CFSv2 real-time forecasts of precipitation anomalies (mm) in spring 2021 with initial conditions in (a) February 2021, (b) January 2021, (c) December 2020, and (d) November 2020. The forecasts are 80-member ensemble mean. The blue dashed rectangle represents SWC, same as that in Fig. 1.

      To further reveal the role of the atmospheric internal dynamical processes in the 2021 spring drought in SWC, Figure 7 shows the ensemble means of the five driest and wettest ensemble members in the region. The selection is based on the precipitation anomalies averaged in the domain among the 80-members of the real-time forecasts of CFSv2 with different initial conditions. With the same boundary (SST) forcing, the differences of the subgroup averages (Fig. 7) are largely attributed to the contribution from the atmospheric internal variability. The ensemble means of the two subsets exhibit nearly opposite precipitation anomalies in SWC. This indicates that under the same boundary (SST) forcing, some ensemble members can capture the drought to some extent while other ensemble members cannot. This further suggests that this drought event may be largely driven by the atmospheric internal dynamical processes with low predictability, which is distinct from the historical perspective. In fact, this is an inherent feature of most extratropical land precipitation anomalies, and the predictability is consistently low for the seasonal-interannual (not the long-term tendency) aspect of the drought (Liang et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2020b; see CFSv2 prediction skill at (https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/NMME/archive/2021020800/current/images/skill_NMME_ensemble_prate_season1.png).

      Figure 7.  The means of five driest (left column) and five wettest (right column) members of CFSv2 real-time forecasts of precipitation anomalies (mm) in spring 2021 with initial conditions in (a) February 2021, (b) January 2021, (c) December 2020, and (d) November 2020.

    4.   Summary and discussion
    • In the spring of 2021, SWC experienced extreme meteorological drought, accompanied by high temperatures. The contribution of anomalously high temperature to the drought was mainly through increasing evaporation, which accounts for about 30% of the drought severity. Among the 30%, the contribution of its linear trend portion is nearly 20% and that of the interannual variability portion is about 10%. This implies a crucial role of the long-term warming trend in regional climate variability.

      Such an extreme event occurred in the decaying phase of a La Niña within the context of a long-term warming. Moreover, negative geopotential height anomalies were present east of the Philippine Sea. Those differ significantly from the historical perspective. Historically, spring drought in SWC is often linked to El Niño and strong WPSH. Our analyses indicate that the extreme drought in spring 2021 may be more likely driven by the atmospheric internal variability and amplified by the warming trend. The boundary forcing, such as SSTA in the tropical central and eastern Pacific, played a minor role.

      It is a challenge for a climate model to capture such an extreme drought event over SWC with the lead times beyond one month. This may be because this event was mainly caused by the atmospheric internal variability, which is poorly predicted. The boundary forcing (such as SST) played a minor role in the occurrence of drought, which is a common feature of extratropical land climate variability (e.g., Liang et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2020b).

      The present analysis indicates that the climatic conditions of the SWC spring drought in 2021 are distinct from the historical perspective. There were negative geopotential height and anomalous cyclone at the low latitude region of the western North Pacific, which are different from the regression pattern. However, the anomalous anticyclone still existed from the southeastern coast of China to southern Japan, but located much farther northward than that in El Niño years. In addition, the IBT was weaker than normal, which is similar to the circulation anomaly in 2019 that was related to an El Niño event. This may imply that there may be a nonlinear relationship between the SWC drought and the tropical Pacific SST anomalies: both El Niño and La Niña events can lead to the drought in SWC through different mechanisms. That deserves further investigation through diagnosis and model experiments.

      Acknowledgements. The authors appreciated the constructive comments and insightful suggestions from reviewers, which have helped us to improve the paper significantly. This work was jointly supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0605004), Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (Grant No. 2020B0301030004), National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant No. 42175056), the China Meteorological Administration Innovation and Development Project (CXFZ2022J031), and the Joint Open Project of KLME & CIC-FEMD, NUIST (Grant No. KLME202102).

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return