Advanced Search
Article Contents

A Statistical Linkage between Extreme Cold Wave Events in Southern China and Sea Ice Extent in the Barents-Kara Seas from 1289 to 2017


doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2227-2

  • Arctic sea ice loss and the associated enhanced warming has been related to midlatitude weather and climate changes through modulate meridional temperature gradients linked to circulation. However, contrasting lines of evidence result in low confidence in the influence of Arctic warming on midlatitude climate. This study examines the additional perspectives that palaeoclimate evidence provides on the decadal relationship between autumn sea ice extent (SIE) in the Barents–Kara (B–K) Seas and extreme cold wave events (ECWEs) in southern China. Reconstruction of the winter Cold Index and SIE in the B–K Seas from 1289 to 2017 shows that a significant anti-phase relationship occurred during most periods of decreasing SIE, indicating that cold winters are more likely in low SIE years due to the “bridge” role of the North Atlantic Oscillation and Siberian High. It is confirmed that the recent increase in ECWEs in southern China is closely related to the sea ice decline in the B–K Seas. However, our results show that the linkage is unstable, especially in high SIE periods, and it is probably modulated by atmospheric internal variability.
    摘要: 北极是影响东亚冬季天气和气候的关键区域之一。部分研究认为北极巴伦支海-喀拉海(B-K海)是冬春季极端冷空气南下造成中国强寒潮事件发生的关键海区,但目前对这一规律和触发机制还存在争议。原因之一是北极海冰年际变率大,对这一关键区海冰长期变化与中国历史时期气候的关系缺乏清晰的认识。本研究利用历史文献记录重建了1289-1911年华南地区冬季强寒潮指数序列,并通过与基于冰芯和树轮代用指标重建的秋季B-K海海冰范围序列进行统计分析,从历史角度研究了1289-2017年秋季B-K海海冰范围变化与我国冬季极端寒潮事件的关联。研究结果表明:B-K海海冰范围与华南冬季极端寒潮事件呈负相关,北大西洋涛动和西伯利亚高压在其中扮演“桥梁作用”。然而在年代际尺度上这种关系并不稳定,主要表现为秋季海冰范围快速减小时期冬季出现极端寒潮的频次更大,负相关更为显著,而海冰范围偏高时期二者相关关系减弱,这可能受到大气内部变率的调控。
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  The geographical range of provinces/province-level municipalities included in the strong cold wave records used for this study (blue filled area).

    Figure 2.  Daily temperature time series (gray lines) for southern China (22°–35°N, 107°–124°E) in winter (December, January, and February) during 1872–2017. The red line is the average time series. The blue line and yellow line are the temperatures less than one and two standard deviations, respectively. The black line is the temperature time series in 2016, and the green shading represents the timing of the “boss level” cold wave event.

    Figure 3.  The annual (black line) and decadal (10-year running average, orange line) changes of the average anomaly, extremum, and cooling indices (a–c), extreme anomaly, extremum, and cooling indices (d–f), cumulative anomaly, extremum, and cooling days (g–i) during 1872–2017. The dotted lines represent the linear trend during 1872–2017 (blue) and after the late 1980s (red).

    Figure 4.  The correlations between the indices of ECWEs and autumn SIE in the B–K Seas, the winter NAOI, and the SHI during the period 1981–2017. (a), (b), and (c) represent the average anomaly index, average extremum index, and average cooling index, respectively; (d), (e), and (f) represent the extreme anomaly index, extreme extremum index, and extreme cooling index, respectively; (g), (h), and (i) represent the cumulative anomaly days, cumulative extremum days, and cumulative cooling days, respectively. The shaded bands indicate the 95% confidence interval.

    Figure 5.  The reconstructed (a) and normalized (b) time series of the CI from 1289 to 1911. The red dotted lines in (a) are used to distinguish the Yuan, Ming, and Qing dynasties. The red dotted line in (b) represents one standard deviation.

    Figure 6.  The annual (grey line), 10-year (orange line), and 30-year (green line) running average time series of the normalized CI from 1289–1911. The red dotted lines are used to distinguish the Yuan, Ming, and Qing dynasties.

    Figure 7.  The proportion of ECWEs under high/low autumn SIE of the B–K Seas during 1289–2017 (a), 1289–1850 (b), 1850–2017 (c), and 1981–2017 (d).

    Figure 8.  Probability density function of the CI under high/low autumn SIE in the B–K Seas during 1289–2017 (a), 1289–1850 (b), 1850–2017 (c), and 1981–2017 (d).

    Figure 9.  Time series of the 10-yr (a) and 30-yr (b) average CI, autumn B–K Seas SIE, the SHI, and the NAOI during 1289–2017.

    Table 1.  Reconstructed cold periods of Chinese Dynasties from 1289 to 1911.

    DynastyCold Period 1Cold Period 2Reference
    Yuan1320s−1340sThis Study
    1300s−1390sWang et al.,1998
    1320s-1340sGe et al., 2003
    Ming1480s−1520s1620s−1644This Study
    1500−15201571−1644Zhang, 1980
    1470−15191550−1644Wang and Wang, 1990
    1491−15201621−1644Zhao and Ye, 1996
    1450s−1510s1560s−1644Wang et al., 1998
    1430−15291610−1644Chen and Shi, 2002
    1411−15001500−1644Ge et al., 2003
    1490−15191620−1644Han, 2003
    Qing1650s−1690s1840s−1890sThis Study
    1640s−1690s1831-1900Zhang and Gong, 1979
    1644−1690s1790s−1890sWang et al., 1998
    1670−17101810−1840Chen et al., 2005
    1650−16991850−1899Ge, 2011
    DownLoad: CSV
  • Ayarzagüena, B., and J. A. Screen, 2016: Future Arctic sea ice loss reduces severity of cold air outbreaks in midlatitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2801−2809, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068092.
    Barnes, E. A., 2013: Revisiting the evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in midlatitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4734−4739, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50880.
    Barnes, E. A., and J. A. Screen, 2015: The impact of Arctic warming on the midlatitude jet-stream: Can it? Has it? Will it? WIREs Climate Change, 6, 277−286, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.337.
    Chen, J. Q., and Y. F. Shi, 2002: Comparison of the winter temperature in the Yangtze Delta in the last 1 000a with the record in Guliya ice core. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 24(1), 32−39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Chen, X., J. Liu, and S. M. Wang, 2005: Climate simulation of Little Ice Age over Eastern Asia. Scientia Meteorologica Sinica, 25(1), 1−8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Cheung, H. H. N., N. Keenlyside, N. E. Omrani, and W. Zhou, 2018: Remarkable link between projected uncertainties of Arctic sea-ice decline and winter Eurasian climate. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35, 38−51, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7156-5.
    Cheung, H. H. N., W. Zhou, M. Y. T. Leung, C. M. Shun, S. M. Lee, and H. W. Tong, 2016: A strong phase reversal of the Arctic Oscillation in midwinter 2015/2016: Role of the stratospheric polar vortex and tropospheric blocking. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 121(22), 13 443−13 457, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025288.
    Chripko, S., R. Msadek, E. Sanchez-Gomez, L. Terray, L. Bessières, and M. P. Moine, 2021: Impact of reduced arctic sea ice on northern hemisphere climate and weather in autumn and winter. J. Climate, 34(14), 5847−5867, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0515.1.
    Cohen, J. L., J. C. Furtado, M. A. Barlow, V. A. Alexeev, and J. E. Cherry, 2012: Arctic warming, increasing snow cover and widespread boreal winter cooling. Environmental Research Letters, 7(1), 014007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014007.
    Cohen, J., and Coauthors, 2014: Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nature Geoscience, 7(9), 627−637, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2234.
    Dai, A. G., and M. R. Song, 2020: Little influence of Arctic amplification on mid-latitude climate. Nature Climate Change, 10, 231−237, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0694-3.
    Dai, G. K., C. X. Li, Z. Han, D. H. Luo, and Y. Yao, 2022: The nature and predictability of the east Asian extreme cold events of 2020/21. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 566−575, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1057-3.
    D'Arrigo, R., G. Jacoby, R. Wilson, and F. Panagiotopoulos, 2005: A reconstructed Siberian High index since AD 1599 from Eurasian and North American tree rings. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(5), L05705, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022271.
    Deser, C., L. T. Sun, R. A. Tomas, and J. Screen, 2016: Does ocean coupling matter for the northern extratropical response to projected Arctic sea ice loss? Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2149−2157, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067792.
    Ding, L. L., Q. S. Ge, J. Y. Zheng, and Z. X. Hao, 2016: Variations in annual winter mean temperature in South China since 1736. Boreas, 45(2), 252−259, https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12144.
    Francis, J. A., and S. J. Vavrus, 2012: Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39(6), L06801, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051000.
    Ge, Q., J. Zheng, X. Fang, Z. Man, X. Zhang, P. Zhang, and W. C. Wang, 2003: Winter half-year temperature reconstruction for the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River and Yangtze River, China, during the past 2000 years. The Holocene, 13(6), 933−940, https://doi.org/10.1191/0959683603hl680rr.
    Ge, Q. S., 2011: The Climate Change in China during the Past Dynasties. Science Press, 61−665. (in Chinese)
    Gong, D. Y., and S. W. Wang, 1999: Long-term variability of the Siberian High and the possible connection to global warming. Acta Geographica Sinica, 54(2), 125−133, https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1999.02.004. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Gong, Z. Q., G. L. Feng, F. M. Ren, and J. P. Li, 2014: A regional extreme low temperature event and its main atmospheric contributing factors. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 117(1), 195−206, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00704-013-0997-7.
    Han, Z. Q., 2003: A study on abnormal warm and cold winters in the area of the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Changjiang River during the Ming and Qing Dynasty (1440−1899). Collections of Essays on Chinese Historical Geography, 18(2), 41−49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Hao, Z. X., J. Y. Zheng, Q. S. Ge, and W. C. Wang, 2012: Winter temperature variations over the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River since 1736 AD. Climate of the Past, 8(3), 1023−1030, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1023-2012.
    Herring, S. C., A. Hoell, M. P. Hoerling, J. P. Kossin, C. J. Schreck III, and P. A. Stott, 2016: Introduction to explaining extreme events of 2015 from a climate perspective. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, S1−S3, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0313.1.
    Honda, M., J. Inoue, and S. Yamane, 2009: Influence of low Arctic sea-ice minima on anomalously cold Eurasian winters. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L08707, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl037079.
    Inoue, J., M. E. Hori, and K. Takaya, 2012: The role of Barents Sea ice in the wintertime cyclone track and emergence of a warm-Arctic cold-Siberian anomaly. J. Climate, 25(7), 2561−2568, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00449.1.
    Kim, B.-M., S.-W. Son, S.-K. Min, J.-H. Jeong, S.-J. Kim, X. D. Zhang, T. Shim, and J.-H. Yoon, 2014: Weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by Arctic sea-ice loss. Nature Communications, 5, 4646, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5646.
    Kretschmer, M., G. Zappa, and T. G. Shepherd, 2020: The role of Barents–Kara sea ice loss in projected polar vortex changes. Weather and Climate Dynamics, 1(2), 715−730, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-715-2020.
    Kretschmer, M., D. Coumou, J. F. Donges, and J. Runge, 2016: Using causal effect networks to analyze different arctic drivers of midlatitude winter circulation. J. Climate, 29(11), 4069−4081, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0654.1.
    Kretschmer, M., D. Coumou, L. Agel, M. Barlow, E. Tziperman, and J. Cohen, 2018: More-persistent weak stratospheric polar vortex states linked to cold extremes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99(1), 49−60, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0259.1.
    Kug, J. S., J. H. Jeong, Y. S. Jang, B. M. Kim, C. K. Folland, S. K. Min, and S. W. Son, 2015: Two distinct influences of Arctic warming on cold winters over North America and East Asia. Nature Geoscience, 8(10), 759−762, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2517.
    Li, J. P., T. J. Xie, X. X. Tang, H. Wang, C. Sun, J. Feng, F. Zheng, and R. Q. Ding, 2022: Influence of the NAO on wintertime surface air temperature over East Asia: Multidecadal variability and decadal prediction. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 625−642, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1075-1.
    Liu, J. P., J. A. Curry, H. J. Wang, M. R. Song, and R. M. Horton, 2012: Impact of declining Arctic sea ice on winter snowfall. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(11), 4074−4079, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114910109.
    Luo, B. H., D. H. Luo, L. X. Wu, L. H. Zhong, and I. Simmonds, 2017: Atmospheric circulation patterns which promote winter Arctic sea ice decline. Environmental Research Letters, 12, 054017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa69d0.
    Luo, D. H., Y. Q. Xiao, Y. Yao, A. G. Dai, I. Simmonds, and C. L. E. Franzke, 2016: Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic-cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification. J. Climate, 29, 3925−3947, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1.
    Luo, D. H., X. D. Chen, J. Overland, I. Simmonds, Y. T. Wu, and P. F. Zhang, 2019: Weakened potential vorticity barrier linked to recent winter Arctic sea ice loss and midlatitude cold extremes. J. Climate, 32, 4235−4261, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0449.1.
    Ma, S. M., and C. W. Zhu, 2019: Extreme cold wave over East Asia in January 2016: A possible response to the larger internal atmospheric variability induced by Arctic warming. J. Climate, 32(4), 1203−1216, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0234.1.
    Martineau, P., G. Chen, and D. A. Burrows, 2017: Wave events: Climatology, trends, and relationship to Northern Hemisphere winter blocking and weather extremes. J. Climate, 30, 5675−5697, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0692.1.
    McCusker, K. E., J. C. Fyfe, and M. Sigmond, 2016: Twenty-five winters of unexpected Eurasian cooling unlikely due to Arctic sea-ice loss. Nature Geoscience, 9, 838−842, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2820.
    Mori, M., M. Watanabe, H. Shiogama, J. Inoue, and M. Kimoto, 2014: Robust Arctic sea-ice influence on the frequent Eurasian cold winters in past decades. Nature Geoscience, 7(12), 869−873, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2277.
    Mu, M., D. H. Luo, and F. Zheng, 2022: Preface to the special issue on extreme cold events from East Asia to North America in winter 2020/21. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39(4), 543−545, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1004-3.
    Nakamura, T., K. Yamazaki, K. Iwamoto, M. Honda, Y. Miyoshi, Y. Ogawa, and J. Ukita, 2015: A negative phase shift of the winter AO/NAO due to the recent Arctic sea-ice reduction in late autumn. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 120, 3209−3227, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022848.
    Nakamura, T., K. Yamazaki, K. Iwamoto, M. Honda, Y. Miyoshi, Y. Ogawa, Y. Tomikawa, and J. Ukita, 2016: The stratospheric pathway for Arctic impacts on midlatitude climate. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3494−3501, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068330.
    Ou, T. H., D. L. Chen, J. H. Jeong, H. W. Linderholm, and T. J. Zhou, 2015: Changes in winter cold surges over southeast China: 1961 to 2012. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 51(1), 29−37, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-014-0057-y.
    Overland, J., J. A. Francis, R. Hall, E. Hanna, S. J. Kim, and T. Vihma, 2015: The melting Arctic and midlatitude weather patterns: Are they connected? J. Climate, 28(20), 7917−7932, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00822.1.
    Peings, Y., Z. M. Labe, and G. Magnusdottir, 2021: Are 100 ensemble members enough to capture the remote atmospheric response to + 2°C Arctic sea ice loss? J. Climate, 34(10), 3751−3769, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0613.1.
    Qian, C., and Coauthors, 2018: Human influence on the record-breaking cold event in January of 2016 in Eastern China. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99(1), S118−S122, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0095.1.
    Santolaria-Otín, M., J. García-Serrano, M. Ménégoz, and J. Bech, 2020: On the observed connection between Arctic sea ice and Eurasian snow in relation to the winter North Atlantic Oscillation. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 124010, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abad57.
    Smith, D. M., and Coauthors, 2022: Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss. Nature Communications, 13(1), 727, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-022-28283-Y.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2017: Processes for occurrence of strong cold events over Eastern China. J. Climate, 30, 9247−9266, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0857.1.
    Sun, L. T., J. Perlwitz, and M. Hoerling, 2016: What caused the recent "warm Arctic, cold continents" trend pattern in winter temperatures? Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 5345−5352, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069024.
    Sun, L. T., C. Deser, I. Simpson, and M. Sigmond, 2022: Uncertainty in the winter tropospheric response to Arctic Sea ice loss: The role of stratospheric polar vortex internal variability. J. Climate, 35(10), 3109−3130, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0543.1.
    Sung, M. K., S. H. Kim, B. M. Kim, and Y. S. Choi, 2018: Interdecadal variability of the warm Arctic and cold Eurasia pattern and its North Atlantic origin. J. Climate, 31, 5793−5810, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0562.1.
    Tan, Q. X., 1987: The Historical Atlas of China (7) (8). SinoMaps Press, 1−144, 1−120. (in Chinese)
    Tang, Q. H., X. J. Zhang, X. H. Yang, and J. A. Francis, 2013: Cold winter extremes in northern continents linked to Arctic sea ice loss. Environmental Research Letters, 8(1), 014036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014036.
    Trouet, V., J. Esper, N. E. Graham, A. Baker, J. D. Scourse, and D. C. Frank, 2009: Persistent positive North Atlantic Oscillation mode dominated the medieval climate anomaly. Science, 324(5923), 78−80, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166349.
    Wang, S. W., 2008: Climatological aspects of severe winters in China. Advances in Climate Change Research, 4(2), 68−72. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Wang, S. W., and R. S. Wang, 1990: Variations of seasonal and annual temperatures during 1470−1979 AD in eastern China. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 48(1), 26−35. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Wang, S. W., J. L. Ye, and D. Y. Gong, 1998: Climate in China during the Little Ice Age. Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 54−64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Wang, S. W., D. Y. Gong, and Z. H. Chen, 1999: Serious climatic disasters of China during the past 100 years. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology, 10(S1), 43−53, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.1999.z1.006. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Whan, K., F. Zwiers, and J. Sillmann, 2016: The influence of atmospheric blocking on extreme winter minimum temperatures in North America. J. Climate, 29, 4361−4381, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0493.1.
    Wu, B. Y., and J. Wang, 2002: Winter Arctic Oscillation, Siberian high and East Asian winter monsoon. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1897, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015373.
    Wu, B. Y., J. Z. Su, and R. H. Zhang, 2011: Effects of autumn-winter arctic sea ice on winter Siberian high. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56, 3220−3228, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4696-4.
    Wu, Y. T., and K. L. Smith, 2016: Response of Northern Hemisphere midlatitude circulation to Arctic amplification in a simple atmospheric general circulation model. J. Climate, 29, 2041−2058, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0602.1.
    Xie, T. J., J. P. Li, C. Sun, R. Q. Ding, K. C. Wang, C. F. Zhao, and J. Feng, 2019: NAO implicated as a predictor of the surface air temperature multidecadal variability over East Asia. Climate Dyn., 53(1-2), 895−905, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04624-4.
    Xu, X. P., S. P. He, Y. Q. Gao, T. Furevik, H. J. Wang, F. Li, and F. Ogawa, 2019: Strengthened linkage between midlatitudes and Arctic in boreal winter. Climate Dyn., 53(7), 3971−3983, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04764-7.
    Yamaguchi, J., Y. Kanno, G. X. Chen, and T. Iwasaki, 2019: Cold air mass analysis of the record-breaking cold surge event over East Asia in January 2016. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 97, 275−293, https://doi.org/10.2151/JMSJ.2019-015.
    Yan, J. H., H. L. Liu, J. Y. Zheng, Z. X. Hao, Q. S. Ge, and H. Fu, 2014: The extreme cold winter of 1620 in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Progress in Geography, 33(6), 835−840, https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.06.012. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Yang, X. Y., X. J. Yuan, and M. Ting, 2016: Dynamical link between the Barents–Kara sea ice and the Arctic Oscillation. J. Climate, 29(14), 5103−5122, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0669.1.
    Yao, Y., D. H. Luo, A. G. Dai, and S. B. Feldstein, 2016: The positive North Atlantic oscillation with downstream blocking and middle east snowstorms: Impacts of the North Atlantic jet. J. Climate, 29, 1853−1876, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0350.1.
    Yao, Y., D. H. Luo, A. G. Dai, and I. Simmonds, 2017: Increased quasi stationarity and persistence of winter Ural blocking and Eurasian extreme cold events in response to arctic warming. Part I: Insights from observational analyses. J. Climate, 30, 3549−3568, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0261.1.
    Zhang, D. E., 1980: The several characteristics of winter temperature change in the southern China during past 500 years. Chinese Science Bulletin, 25(6), 270−272. (in Chinese)
    Zhang, D. E., 2005: The sorting and latest applications of historical climate documentary records of China. Science & Technology Review, 23(8), 17−19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Zhang, D. E., 2013: A Compendium of Chinese Meteorological Records of the Last 3, 000 Years. 2nd ed. Jiangsu Education Press. (in Chinese)
    Zhang, D. E., L. H. Wang, and X. Sun, 2003: Reconstruction of grid precipitation anomaly in eastern China from historical documents: New study on Chinese historical climate records. Quaternary Sciences, 23(2), 177−183. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Zhang, P. Y., and G. F. Gong, 1979: Some characteristics of climatic fluctuations in China since 16th century. Acta Geographica Sinica, 34(3), 238−247, https://doi.org/10.11821/xb197903005. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Zhang, P. F., Y. T. Wu, and K. L. Smith, 2018a: Prolonged effect of the stratospheric pathway in linking Barents-Kara Sea sea ice variability to the midlatitude circulation in a simplified model. Climate Dyn., 50, 527−539, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3624-y.
    Zhang, P. F., Y. T. Wu, I. R. Simpson, K. L. Smith, X. D. Zhang, B. De, and P. Callaghan, 2018b: A stratospheric pathway linking a colder Siberia to Barents-Kara Sea sea ice loss. Science Advances, 4, eaat6025, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat6025.
    Zhang, X. D., Y. F. Fu, Z. Y. Guan, H. Tang, G. M. Wang, Z. M. Wang, P. L. Wu, and X. Q. Yang, 2020: Influence of Arctic warming amplification on Eurasian winter extreme weather and climate: Consensus, open questions, and debates. Journal of the Meteorological Sciences, 40, 596−604, https://doi.org/10.3969/2020jms.0079. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Zhao, W. L., and Y. Y. Ye, 1996: Preliminary study of climate change during the last 500 years in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Hydrology, (5): 19−23. (in Chinese)
    Zheng, F., and Coauthors, 2022: The 2020/21 extremely cold winter in China influenced by the synergistic effect of La Niña and warm Arctic. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 546−552, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1033-y.
    Zheng, J. Y., Z. X. Hao, X. Q. Fang, and Q. S. Ge, 2014: Changing characteristics of extreme climate events during past 2000 years in China. Progress in Geography, 33(1), 3−12, https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.01.001. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Zheng, J. Y., Y. Liu, Z. X. Hao, X. Z. Zhang, X. Ma, H. L. Liu, and Q. S. Ge, 2018: Winter temperatures of southern China reconstructed from phenological cold/warm events recorded in historical documents over the past 500 years. Quaternary International, 479, 42−47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.08.033.
  • [1] Qian YANG, Shichang KANG, Haipeng YU, Yaoxian YANG, 2023: Impact of the Shrinkage of Arctic Sea Ice on Eurasian Snow Cover Changes in 1979–2021, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 2183-2194.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2272-x
    [2] WANG Jia, GUO Yufu, 2004: Possible Impacts of Barents Sea Ice on the Eurasian Atmospheric Circulation and the Rainfall of East China in the Beginning of Summer, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 662-674.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915733
    [3] Jing-Bei PENG, Cholaw BUEH, Zuo-Wei XIE, 2021: Extensive Cold-Precipitation-Freezing Events in Southern China and Their Circulation Characteristics, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 81-97.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0117-4
    [4] T. C. LEE, H. S. CHAN, E. W. L. GINN, M. C. WONG, 2011: Long-Term Trends in Extreme Temperatures in Hong Kong and Southern China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 147-157.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9160-x
    [5] Tianbao XU, Zhicong YIN, Xiaoqing MA, Yanyan HUANG, Huijun WANG, 2023: Hybrid Seasonal Prediction of Meridional Temperature Gradient Associated with “Warm Arctic–Cold Eurasia”, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 1649-1661.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2226-3
    [6] Yang LIU, Jingyun ZHENG, Zhixin HAO, Xuezhen ZHANG, 2017: Unprecedented Warming Revealed from Multi-proxy Reconstruction of Temperature in Southern China for the Past 160 Years, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 977-982.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-6228-x
    [7] Lu FENG, Hui XIAO, Xiantong LIU, Sheng HU, Huiqi LI, Liusi XIAO, Xiao HAO, 2023: Precipitation Microphysical Characteristics of Typhoon Ewiniar (2018) before and after Its Final Landfall over Southern China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 1005-1020.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-2135-x
    [8] Tido SEMMLER, Thomas JUNG, Marta A. KASPER, Soumia SERRAR, 2018: Using NWP to Assess the Influence of the Arctic Atmosphere on Midlatitude Weather and Climate, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 5-13.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-6290-4
    [9] James E. OVERLAND, Muyin WANG, Thomas J. BALLINGER, 2018: Recent Increased Warming of the Alaskan Marine Arctic Due to Midlatitude Linkages, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 75-84.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-7026-1
    [10] Gian A. VILLAMIL-OTERO, Jing ZHANG, Juanxiong HE, Xiangdong ZHANG, 2018: Role of Extratropical Cyclones in the Recently Observed Increase in Poleward Moisture Transport into the Arctic Ocean, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 85-94.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-7116-0
    [11] Qinghua YANG, Jiping LIU, Matti LEPPÄRANTA, Qizhen SUN, Rongbin LI, Lin ZHANG, Thomas JUNG, Ruibo LEI, Zhanhai ZHANG, Ming LI, Jiechen ZHAO, Jingjing CHENG, 2016: Albedo of Coastal Landfast Sea Ice in Prydz Bay, Antarctica: Observations and Parameterization, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 535-543.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5114-7
    [12] Xinrong WU, Shaoqing ZHANG, Zhengyu LIU, 2016: Implementation of a One-Dimensional Enthalpy Sea-Ice Model in a Simple Pycnocline Prediction Model for Sea-Ice Data Assimilation Studies, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 193-207.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5099-2
    [13] Emily A. FOGARTY, James B. ELSNER, Thomas H. JAGGER, Kam-biu LIU, Kin-sheun LOUIE, 2006: Variations in Typhoon Landfalls over China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 23, 665-677.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-006-0665-2
    [14] Yuyang GUO, Yongqiang YU, Pengfei LIN, Hailong LIU, Bian HE, Qing BAO, Bo AN, Shuwen ZHAO, Lijuan HUA, 2020: Simulation and Improvements of Oceanic Circulation and Sea Ice by the Coupled Climate System Model FGOALS-f3-L, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 1133-1148.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0006-x
    [15] Xiaoran DONG, Yafei NIE, Jinfei WANG, Hao LUO, Yuchun GAO, Yun WANG, Jiping LIU, Dake CHEN, Qinghua YANG, 2024: Deep Learning Shows Promise for Seasonal Prediction of Antarctic Sea Ice in a Rapid Decline Scenario, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-024-3380-y
    [16] Zou Han, Zhou Libo, Jian Yongxiao, Liu Yu, 2002: An Observational Study on the Vertical Distribution and Synoptic Variation of Ozone in the Arctic, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 855-862.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0050-8
    [17] LIU Xiying, ZHANG Xuehong, YU Yongqiang, YU Rucong, 2004: Mean Climatic Characteristics in High Northern Latitudes in an Ocean-Sea Ice-Atmosphere Coupled Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 236-244.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915710
    [18] Yang LU, Xiaochun WANG, Jihai DONG, 2021: Melt Pond Scheme Parameter Estimation Using an Adjoint Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1525-1536.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0305-x
    [19] Fei ZHENG, Ji-Ping LIU, Xiang-Hui FANG, Mi-Rong SONG, Chao-Yuan YANG, Yuan YUAN, Ke-Xin LI, Ji WANG, Jiang ZHU, 2022: The Predictability of Ocean Environments that Contributed to the 2020/21 Extreme Cold Events in China: 2020/21 La Niña and 2020 Arctic Sea Ice Loss, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 658-672.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1130-y
    [20] Xiao DONG, Jiangbo JIN, Hailong LIU, He ZHANG, Minghua ZHANG, Pengfei LIN, Qingcun ZENG, Guangqing ZHOU, Yongqiang YU, Mirong SONG, Zhaohui LIN, Ruxu LIAN, Xin GAO, Juanxiong HE, Dongling ZHANG, Kangjun CHEN, 2021: CAS-ESM2.0 Model Datasets for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1 (OMIP1), ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 307-316.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0150-3

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 17 August 2022
Manuscript revised: 28 January 2023
Manuscript accepted: 02 February 2023
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

A Statistical Linkage between Extreme Cold Wave Events in Southern China and Sea Ice Extent in the Barents-Kara Seas from 1289 to 2017

    Corresponding author: Cunde XIAO, cdxiao@bnu.edu.cn
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 4. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract: Arctic sea ice loss and the associated enhanced warming has been related to midlatitude weather and climate changes through modulate meridional temperature gradients linked to circulation. However, contrasting lines of evidence result in low confidence in the influence of Arctic warming on midlatitude climate. This study examines the additional perspectives that palaeoclimate evidence provides on the decadal relationship between autumn sea ice extent (SIE) in the Barents–Kara (B–K) Seas and extreme cold wave events (ECWEs) in southern China. Reconstruction of the winter Cold Index and SIE in the B–K Seas from 1289 to 2017 shows that a significant anti-phase relationship occurred during most periods of decreasing SIE, indicating that cold winters are more likely in low SIE years due to the “bridge” role of the North Atlantic Oscillation and Siberian High. It is confirmed that the recent increase in ECWEs in southern China is closely related to the sea ice decline in the B–K Seas. However, our results show that the linkage is unstable, especially in high SIE periods, and it is probably modulated by atmospheric internal variability.

摘要: 北极是影响东亚冬季天气和气候的关键区域之一。部分研究认为北极巴伦支海-喀拉海(B-K海)是冬春季极端冷空气南下造成中国强寒潮事件发生的关键海区,但目前对这一规律和触发机制还存在争议。原因之一是北极海冰年际变率大,对这一关键区海冰长期变化与中国历史时期气候的关系缺乏清晰的认识。本研究利用历史文献记录重建了1289-1911年华南地区冬季强寒潮指数序列,并通过与基于冰芯和树轮代用指标重建的秋季B-K海海冰范围序列进行统计分析,从历史角度研究了1289-2017年秋季B-K海海冰范围变化与我国冬季极端寒潮事件的关联。研究结果表明:B-K海海冰范围与华南冬季极端寒潮事件呈负相关,北大西洋涛动和西伯利亚高压在其中扮演“桥梁作用”。然而在年代际尺度上这种关系并不稳定,主要表现为秋季海冰范围快速减小时期冬季出现极端寒潮的频次更大,负相关更为显著,而海冰范围偏高时期二者相关关系减弱,这可能受到大气内部变率的调控。

    • Extreme cold events over East Asia are some of the most frequent climate disasters in winter. Accumulated evidence implies that extreme cold waves have become more severe and frequent over the midlatitudes in recent years. For example, record-breaking low temperatures and strong blizzards affected many regions in East Asia during the 2010/11 winter (Gong et al., 2014). A strong cold event, commonly known as a “boss level” cold wave, affected East Asia in January 2016, with many observation stations setting their lowest daily temperature records (Cheung et al., 2016; Song and Wu, 2017; Qian et al., 2018; Ma and Zhu, 2019; Yamaguchi et al., 2019). Moreover, three extreme cold air invasion events from December 2020 to mid-January 2021 resulted in drastic temperature drops in China (Dai et al., 2022; Zheng et al., 2022).

      Some studies have suggested that the frequent cold extremes occurring in Eurasia, North America, and East Asia (Francis and Vavrus, 2012; Liu et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2013; Cohen et al., 2014; Mori et al., 2014; Kug et al., 2015; Overland et al., 2015; Cheung et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020) are associated with the loss of Arctic sea ice through the promotion of more blocking events and the subsequent intrusions of Arctic air into the midlatitudes. The frequent outbreaks of cold extremes in recent years are related to the rapid ice retreat in the Barents–Kara (B–K) Seas, which triggers adjustments in the atmospheric circulation that affect regions at midlatitudes through the Arctic Oscillation (AO)/North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and/or Siberian High (SH) (e.g., Honda, et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011; Inoue et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2013; Cheung et al., 2018). However, some studies have argued that the frequent occurrence of the midlatitude cold extremes is due to internal variability and has no causal relationship with the Arctic sea ice retreat (Barnes, 2013; Barnes and Screen, 2015; McCusker et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2016). Scientists have noticed that the determination of whether a decline of Arctic sea ice significantly influences midlatitude weather may depend on the time scale (Mu et al., 2022). Previous studies have pointed out that the impact of Arctic sea ice decline on the midlatitude atmospheric circulation and associated cold extremes is less important to the long-term trend or on interdecadal time scales, while it is evident on the interannual and seasonal time scales (Luo et al., 2016; Dai and Song, 2020). However, due to the short record of observed data, large uncertainty still exists about whether Arctic sea ice influences midlatitude cold extremes.

      There are abundant historical documents and paleoclimatic data that can provide a rich base of data for the study of extreme winter cold waves in China. Most of the proxies have high spatial and temporal resolutions and clear climatic indications. Ge et al. (2003) quantitatively reconstructed the winter temperature time series in eastern China during the last 2000 years using cold and warm records from historical documents. By examining the characteristics of cold winters in eastern China during the historical period, Wang (2008) found that the winter of 2008 was the coldest one since 1977, and 7% of the winters met the threshold of severe (winter temperature anomaly reaches –2.5°C) winters during the period 1880–2007. Hao et al. (2012) and Ding et al. (2016) reconstructed the temperature time series since 1736 of the area downstream of the Yangtze River and southern China by using the record of “Rain and Snow Scale” and other ancient literature records from the Qing Dynasty. Based on historical records of the southern extents of frost events, freezing events, snow, snowfall days, and first/late frost dates, Zheng et al. (2018) reconstructed the winter temperature time series for southern China over the past 500 years. Yan et al. (2014) reconstructed the winter temperature time series since 1645 with 5-year resolution for northern China based on records of abnormal frost and snow disasters in the local Chronicles of the Qing Dynasty.

      Most previous studies were focused on the average temperature in winter; few of them referred to winter extreme cold events. Zheng et al. (2014) investigated 76 extreme cold events that occurred from 1500 to 1950, most of which were more significant than those occurring after 1950. However, extreme cold event reconstructions still have large uncertainties about them because of different proxies and reconstruction criterion and inconsistent time periods. In this study we investigate the influence of Arctic sea ice on midlatitude extreme cold events from a historical perspective. Based on historical documents, we reconstruct the time series of the winter extreme cold index of southern China to examine its relationship with Arctic sea ice under different climatic backgrounds during the past ~700 years. We further discuss the possible mechanisms associated with atmospheric circulation. This study helps advance our understanding of how Arctic sea ice change contributes to the occurrence of extreme cold events in China.

    2.   Data and method
    • Extreme cold events in China were extracted from “A Compendium of Chinese Meteorological Records of the Last 3000 years” (Zhang, 2013), which was quoted from 48 ancient Chinese books subjected to systematic collection and rectification. More than 8000 historical documents were studied, and over 200 000 weather-related records were evaluated. All the records in the compendium have been geographically verified to ensure that the documented locations are generally consistent with the current administrative provinces (Zhang et al., 2003; Zhang, 2005). The ancient site names have been translated to their present-day names based on “The Historical Atlas of China” (Tan, 1987). In this study, the historical period is selected from 1289 to 1911, covering the dynasties of Yuan, Ming, and Qing. We focus on extreme cold wave events (ECWEs) by referring to the “boss level” cold wave in 2016; ECWEs are characterized by extreme intensity, wide influential range, long duration, and often a tendency to move south of the “Qinling-Huaihe Line” to affect southern China. Therefore, we collected the historical records of 10 provinces/province-level municipalities including Anhui, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hunan, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Fujian, Hubei, Guangdong, and Guangxi (Fig. 1). The records selected for this study were also compared with the climate records of the historical Chinese dynasties and other related references (e.g., Gong and Wang 1999; Wang et al., 1999; Wang, 2008; Hao et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2014; Zheng et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2016).

      Figure 1.  The geographical range of provinces/province-level municipalities included in the strong cold wave records used for this study (blue filled area).

    • ECWEs during the instrumental period (1872–2017) were estimated from reanalysis data. Daily average 2-m temperatures were extracted from the NCEP-DOE reanalysis 2 (1979 to present, https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis2.html) and NOAA-CIRES-DOE Twentieth Century Reanalysis (20CR) Version 2 (1871–2012, https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.20thC_ReanV2.html). The NOAA-CIRES-DOE data was used to estimate the ECWEs from 1872 to 1979, and NCEP-DOE data was used to estimate the ECWEs from 1980 to 2017. In this study, the domain of 22°–35°N, 107°–124°E was selected to represent southern China and to coincide with the area covered by the historical records. Winter season refers to the period from December to February of the following year.

    • The B–K Seas are considered to be a key area affecting cold winter extremes over Eurasia and east Asia because the sea ice decline in this region can increase the quasi-stationarity and persistence of Ural blocking (Yao et al., 2017), which favors Eurasian cold extremes by reducing the meridional background potential vorticity gradient (Luo et al., 2019). The autumn sea ice extent (SIE) over the B–K Seas from 1289 to 1993 reconstructed by Zhang et al. (2018b) was used here to investigate correlations with the occurrence of extreme cold events in southern China. The observed SIE data from 1981 to 2017 was obtained from the National Snow & Ice Data Center (http://nsidc.org/data/masie).

      The SH index (SHI) and NAO index (NAOI) were used to understand the potential connection between sea ice and cold events. Both the observed and reconstructed data were applied. The observed winter SHI was calculated by the averaged sea level pressure in the domain 40°–60°N, 80°–120°E, and the long-term time series from 1599–1980 was obtained from the reconstruction by D'Arrigo et al. (2005). The observed NAOI was obtained from HURRELL (https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/hurrell-north-atlantic-oscillation-nao-index-station-based). The reconstructed NAOI came from Trouet et al. (2009), which cover the period 1049–1995.

    • In order to quantify cold event records contained in literature into intensity levels of ECWEs, we marked the contents in the historical documents according to the following five criteria: “snow and snow freeze for more than 10 days”, “snow depth description”, “river and lake freeze”, “livestock/crop freeze to death”, and “human freeze to death”. By referring to the method of quantifying events in the historical record into cold degrees by Wang and Wang (1990), we recorded the cold event intensity of each year. Level 0 denotes normal winter descriptions, such as “heavy snow in January”, “heavy snow”, etc; Level 1 represents general abnormal cold, which meets about two of the above five criteria; Level 2 refers to extreme cold of a heavier degree, which generally satisfies more than two of the above criteria.

      Although using the five criteria allowed us to classify the ECWEs, their cold wave intensity still could not be defined due to the incompleteness, inhomogeneity, and irregularity of ancient literature. Some weather condition descriptions were too brief to evaluate the actual ECWE intensity in the given year. For the sake of uniformity, some simple records were classified as Level 0. Finally, the chronology of the occurrence year and corresponding intensity of the ECWEs in the history of 10 provinces/province-level municipalities in southern China was built.

      In order to ensure uniformity of results, the same statistical standard was adopted for all regions. However, for similar cold wave events, their intensities were usually recorded using different descriptions depending on the region. For example, descriptions of river or lake freezes usually corresponded to different cold degrees between Guangdong and Anhui provinces. In general, cold waves arriving to Guangdong, Guangxi, and Fujian provinces were more severe. Therefore, we increased the weight of cold wave records from Guangdong, Guangxi, and Fujian by a factor of 0.5. The intensity of an ECWE was usually defined as the average between all the areas where it was recorded. But this ignored the important fact that more places with ECWE records also means a higher probability of an ECWE occurring in a given year. Therefore, in order to characterize the intensity of ECWEs more realistically, we consider the number of areas with records as one of the impact factors and define the strong Cold Index as:

      where $ {X}_{i} $ represents the intensity of the ECWEs and n denotes the number of regions where ECWEs were recorded. Compared with the arithmetic average $ \left[\right(\sum _{i}{X}_{i})/n]\frac{}{} $, the weight coefficient of $ [n/({\mathrm{log}}_{2}n+1\left)\right] $ can constrain the increase of n within a reasonable range. A higher n indicates a greater likelihood, intensity, and extent of an ECWE.

    3.   Results
    • Barnes (2013) reported that the correlation between Arctic sea ice and midlatitude cold winter events largely depends on the choice of analysis method and definition of extreme weather climate events. Ayarzagüena and Screen (2016) found that the frequency and duration of cold air outbreaks were not stable with Arctic sea ice, and their results were very sensitive to the definition standard of a cold air outbreak; the adoption of different definitions of ECWEs led to completely different conclusions. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the definition of ECWEs in depth. Previous studies have defined strong cold events in terms of the temperature being less than 1.5 times the standard deviation with respect to the local climate state (Tang et al., 2013; Ou et al., 2015). Gong and Wang (1999) analyzed anomalously cold winters in China based on a threshold of 1.3 standard deviations (extreme cold events that occur one time every 10 years). Based on the criterion of temperature being lower than the climate state by 1.5 standard deviations, Song and Wu (2017) calculated 37 ECWEs during the winters of 1979–2016 in the south (20°–40°N, 100°–120°E) of China.

      This study attempts to define a criterion for strong cold wave outbreaks that have occurred frequently in recent years by referring to the "boss level" cold wave which impacted East Asia in January 2016. As shown in Fig. 2, the "boss level" cold wave event in 2016 is an extremely rare event, which is characterized by being greater than two standard deviations below the climate state. With reference to the "boss level," we used three indicators to extract the ECWEs in the instrumental period, including the degree of temperature anomaly (less than two standard deviations), extreme low temperature (≤3°C), and cooling rate of daily temperature (≥3.5°C). Their time series were standardized and defined as: anomaly index, extremum index, and cooling index.

      Figure 2.  Daily temperature time series (gray lines) for southern China (22°–35°N, 107°–124°E) in winter (December, January, and February) during 1872–2017. The red line is the average time series. The blue line and yellow line are the temperatures less than one and two standard deviations, respectively. The black line is the temperature time series in 2016, and the green shading represents the timing of the “boss level” cold wave event.

      The annual time series were further analyzed using three methods: the first method is averaging the indices; the second method is calculating the extreme index values; and the third method is counting the cumulative days of ECWEs in each year. Thus, nine indices can indicate the intensity of the ECWEs in detail. They are average anomaly index (Fig. 3a), average extremum index (Fig. 3b), average cooling index (Fig. 3c), extreme anomaly index (Fig. 3d), extreme extremum index (Fig. 3e), extreme cooling index (Fig. 3f), cumulative anomaly days (Fig. 3g), cumulative extremum days (Fig. 3h), and cumulative cooling days (Fig. 3i). The results show significant increasing trends (blue lines) and decadal changes (orange lines) in all indices from 1872 to 2017. Their decadal variabilities suggest a larger increase after the late 1980s (red lines), indicating an increase in the intensity and frequency of ECWEs in southern China thereafter.

      Figure 3.  The annual (black line) and decadal (10-year running average, orange line) changes of the average anomaly, extremum, and cooling indices (a–c), extreme anomaly, extremum, and cooling indices (d–f), cumulative anomaly, extremum, and cooling days (g–i) during 1872–2017. The dotted lines represent the linear trend during 1872–2017 (blue) and after the late 1980s (red).

      To investigate the relationship between the ECWEs, Arctic sea ice, and atmospheric circulation, the above ECWE indices were respectively analyzed against B–K SIE, the NAOI, and the SHI during 1981–2017 when sea ice satellite observations were available. As shown in Fig. 4, the average indices have no significant correlations with B–K SIE, the NAOI, or the SHI (Fig. 4a-c). The extreme anomaly index showed a positive correlation with the SHI (r = 0.42, at the 95% confidence level) (Fig. 4d). The extreme extremum index showed a negative correlation with SIE (r = –0.28, at the 90% confidence level) and a positive correlation with the SHI (r = 0.40, at the 95% confidence level) (Fig. 4e). The cumulative anomaly days showed a negative correlation with SIE (r = –0.36, at the 95% confidence level) and a positive correlation with the SHI (r = 0.55, at the 95% confidence level) (Fig. 4g). The cumulative extremum days showed a negative correlation with SIE (r = –0.31, at the 90% confidence level) and a positive correlation with the SHI (r = 0.43, at the 95% confidence level) (Fig. 4h).

      Figure 4.  The correlations between the indices of ECWEs and autumn SIE in the B–K Seas, the winter NAOI, and the SHI during the period 1981–2017. (a), (b), and (c) represent the average anomaly index, average extremum index, and average cooling index, respectively; (d), (e), and (f) represent the extreme anomaly index, extreme extremum index, and extreme cooling index, respectively; (g), (h), and (i) represent the cumulative anomaly days, cumulative extremum days, and cumulative cooling days, respectively. The shaded bands indicate the 95% confidence interval.

      The above results indicate that the extreme intensity and frequency of ECWEs are significantly correlated with the SIE of the B–K Seas and SH, while being slightly correlated with the average state of ECWEs. No significant correlations were found between the NAO and any of the indices. Due to the highest correlation being with both the SIE and the SHI, the cumulative anomaly days is normalized and further calculated as the Cold Index (CI) since it can characterize both the intensity and frequency of ECWEs.

    • Based on the Chinese meteorological records of the past 3000 years, we further reconstructed the sequence of the CI from 1289 to 1911 (Fig. 5a). Due to the uneven temporal distribution of ancient records, there are considerable discrepancies in the record amounts of different time periods. For example, there are more records from the mid- to late- Ming dynasty to the Qing dynasty than from before the early Ming dynasty. It is therefore difficult to determine whether a period of relatively low CI is caused by a lack of records. To avoid the heterogeneity of temporal distribution, we assumed that the number of ancient records is constant in each dynasty, thus, the CI is subject to subsection normalization in accordance with the dynasty (Fig. 5b). A running average of 10 years and 30 years, respectively, for the CI (Fig. 6) showed four distinct cold periods between 1289–1911. These periods were the late Yuan dynasty (around the 1340s), mid-Ming dynasty (around the 1500s), late Ming and early Qing dynasty (around the 1640s), and late Qing dynasty (around the 1870s). This agrees well with previous studies (Table 1).

      Figure 5.  The reconstructed (a) and normalized (b) time series of the CI from 1289 to 1911. The red dotted lines in (a) are used to distinguish the Yuan, Ming, and Qing dynasties. The red dotted line in (b) represents one standard deviation.

      Figure 6.  The annual (grey line), 10-year (orange line), and 30-year (green line) running average time series of the normalized CI from 1289–1911. The red dotted lines are used to distinguish the Yuan, Ming, and Qing dynasties.

      DynastyCold Period 1Cold Period 2Reference
      Yuan1320s−1340sThis Study
      1300s−1390sWang et al.,1998
      1320s-1340sGe et al., 2003
      Ming1480s−1520s1620s−1644This Study
      1500−15201571−1644Zhang, 1980
      1470−15191550−1644Wang and Wang, 1990
      1491−15201621−1644Zhao and Ye, 1996
      1450s−1510s1560s−1644Wang et al., 1998
      1430−15291610−1644Chen and Shi, 2002
      1411−15001500−1644Ge et al., 2003
      1490−15191620−1644Han, 2003
      Qing1650s−1690s1840s−1890sThis Study
      1640s−1690s1831-1900Zhang and Gong, 1979
      1644−1690s1790s−1890sWang et al., 1998
      1670−17101810−1840Chen et al., 2005
      1650−16991850−1899Ge, 2011

      Table 1.  Reconstructed cold periods of Chinese Dynasties from 1289 to 1911.

      Figure 6 shows that ECWEs occurred frequently and intensely during the 1320s–1340s, which has been previously identified as a typical cold period; Ge et al. (2003) took this period as a sign of the onset of the Little Ice Age in China. Then, in the early Ming dynasty, winters were warm and ECWEs occurred less frequently. Next, there was a strong cold wave frequency phase during the mid-15th century (from about the 1440s to the 1460s), which agrees with the results of Ge et al. (2003) that suggest a cold period during the 1440s–1470s. This was followed by two distinct cold periods during the 1480s–1520s and 1620s–1640s. The early and late Qing dynasty also included two distinct cold periods during the 1650s–1700s and 1860s–1890s, corresponding to the findings of other studies (see Table 1). However, there are some differences that may be related to the different objectives and purposes of each study. It should be noted that this study focuses on the intensity and frequency of ECWEs, while most previous studies have focused on the average temperature in winter.

    • Climate and weather events are phenomena on two different scales. But statistical explanations can be given for which extreme weather events tend to occur in which climate states. In the previous part of this study, a long time history of ECWEs is developed, and it is further analyzed in the following sections by addressing the question: Do ECWEs occur more or less frequently under certain climate states such as periods with high SIE or low SIE? The correlation analysis in section 3.1.1 suggests that the CI is significantly and negatively related to the autumn SIE in the B–K Seas during the instrumental period. This implies that when the autumn SIE was low, there were more frequent occurrences of ECWEs in southern China. This relationship during periods of different climatic backgrounds needs further investigation. In this section, we evaluate the frequency of ECWEs under high/low SIE for the whole study period (1289–2017), before (1289–1850) and after (1850–2017) the industrial revolution, and the period with rapid sea ice reduction (1981–2017). The CI record that covers the whole study period was segmentally standardized and spliced with the reconstructed CI from 1289 to 1911 and the instrumental-based CI from 1912 to 2017.

      To quantify the frequency of ECWEs in the abnormally high or low SIE year, the reconstructed autumn SIE time series derived from Zhang et al. (2018b) was firstly normalized and detrended. The years with standardized SIE lower (higher) than 0 were defined as years of low (high) SIE. Meanwhile the anomalous strength of the CI is estimated using four criteria: the CI exceeding 0.75, 1, 1.5, and 2 standard deviations respectively. Accordingly, the proportion of strong cold winters occurring during the years of high or low SIE was determined. The results show that the proportion of strong cold winters occurring in low SIE years is higher than that in high SIE years (Fig. 7). Especially in the period from 1981 to 2017 (Fig. 7d), the proportions of strong cold winters of all four magnitudes are higher than the average for the whole study period (1289–2017) (Fig. 7a). In addition, all strong cold events above 1.5 and 2 standard deviations occur in the low SIE years. These results further show that the frequency of strong cold winters has increased since the 1850s, except for the 0.75-std magnitude (Fig. 7c), suggesting that the proportion of cold winters occurring in low SIE years has generally increased.

      Figure 7.  The proportion of ECWEs under high/low autumn SIE of the B–K Seas during 1289–2017 (a), 1289–1850 (b), 1850–2017 (c), and 1981–2017 (d).

      All probability density functions for the CI during four periods show their extreme cold tails shift to the right in response to low SIE compared to high SIE (Fig. 8). The shifts during 1289–2017 (Fig. 8a), 1289–1850 (Fig. 8b), and 1850–2017 (Fig. 8c) are weak, while the shift during 1981–2017 (Fig. 8d) is the most significant. The CI in low SIE years is, on average, 0.61 higher than in high SIE years during the period 1981–2017, 0.06 higher during the period 1850–2017, and showing no obvious change before 1850 and during the whole study period. Moreover, in low SIE years during 1981–2017, an increase in variability accompanied by a warm tail shift also leads to more warm events, which may be related to an increased interannual variability. These results imply an increase in the probability of extreme events, especially cold events, as well as an increase in the absolute value of the extremes’ response to low SIE in the continuous reduction period of SIE between 1981 to 2017.

      Figure 8.  Probability density function of the CI under high/low autumn SIE in the B–K Seas during 1289–2017 (a), 1289–1850 (b), 1850–2017 (c), and 1981–2017 (d).

      Figure 9 further shows that autumn SIE was negatively correlated with the CI in most periods, especially after the end of the 18th century. The periods with an out-of-phase relationship between SIE and the CI account for 71.4% of the 10-year average series (Fig. 9a). The above results confirm that sea ice melting in the Arctic is usually accompanied by a greater frequency of strong cold winters in southern China, suggesting that the substantial reduction of the B–K Seas SIE can explain, to some extent, the frequency of extreme cold winter events that have occurred in southern China in recent years. Next, we focus on the decadal changes of EWCEs in the context of different sea ice states and the possible linkage with the atmospheric circulation.

      Figure 9.  Time series of the 10-yr (a) and 30-yr (b) average CI, autumn B–K Seas SIE, the SHI, and the NAOI during 1289–2017.

    • Previous studies have suggested that the cooling in the midlatitudes is promoted by changes in atmospheric circulation involving a negative phase of the NAO and/or a strengthening of the SH (e.g., Deser et al., 2016; Chripko et al., 2021). The relationships between ECWEs, SIE, the NAOI, and the SHI during the instrumental period have been explored in section 3.1.1. The results suggest that the extreme intensity and the frequency of ECWEs are significantly correlated with the B–K Seas SIE and the SH but weakly correlated with the NAO on the interannual time scale. These relationships were further estimated combining the proxy-based reconstructions focusing on the context of different sea ice changes. According to the trends of SIE in the B–K Seas extracted from Zhang et al. (2018b), SIE change in the B–K Seas can be divided into four periods (Fig. 9a). In the T1 period from the late 13th century to the early 19th century, SIE is in a high-fluctuation state with a slight upward trend in the context of the Little Ice Age. From the 19th century onwards, the SIE enters a period of retreat (T2) and accelerates in the mid-19th century, afterwards reaching a trough around the 1930s, followed by a period of rebound (T3), but then entering another period of rapid retreat (T4) after the 1970s.

      The results suggest that the relationships between the autumn SIE and the winter CI, NAOI, and SHI are not stable. Specifically, during the T4 period of rapid sea ice retreat, the CI shows a weak increasing trend and an in-phase change with the SH and an out-of-phase change with the NAO on the decadal time scale (Fig. 9). However, it seems more complex in the T2 period when the SIE continues to decrease before 1900 and the CI shows two extreme peaks accompanying the positive NAO and negative SH. After 1910, the SIE decreased at a greater rate, but the CI and SH showed a small upward trend; the NAO was in a positive phase. During the T3 period of SIE increase, the CI exhibited an increasing trend accompanied by a negative NAO and positive SH. During the T1 state before 1850, the SIE and the CI showed a roughly inverse variation. Meanwhile, we find that the negative correlation between SIE and the CI weakens during the expansion of SIE, such as in the late 14th and mid-late 17th centuries with a significantly negative NAO.

      Our results suggest that the out-of-phase relationship between ECWEs and the B–K Seas SIE is unstable on the decadal time scale, even though it is investigated in the instrumental period. Meanwhile, the linkages with atmospheric circulation were also found to be unstable, which is in agreement with other recent studies (e.g., Xu et al., 2019; Dai and Song, 2020; Smith et al., 2022). During most periods with decreasing SIE, ECWEs occurred frequently and were probably contributed by a plausible atmospheric bridge between the midlatitudes and the Arctic. The percentage of ECWEs happening in low SIE periods is much higher than that in high SIE periods, especially during 1981–2017. However, in the periods with more ECWEs, the B–K Seas SIE is not always at a low level. It is inferred that in these cases the atmospheric bridge is probably destroyed due to the internal atmospheric variability on the decadal time scale (Sung et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2019). It is likely that the internal variability of the atmospheric circulation weakened the influence of sea ice because a strong NAO (weak SH) is not conducive to cold air being transported southward (Zheng et al., 2022). In addition, recent studies have reported that the stratospheric internal variability is associated with large uncertainty in the tropospheric circulation response to sea ice loss and can completely obscure the forced NAO circulation response and associated impacts on air temperatures over the midlatitudes (Smith et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022).

    4.   Summary and discussion
    • In this paper we have investigated the statistical relationship between autumn sea ice changes in the B–K Seas and winter ECWEs in southern China based on observed and reconstructed data of SIE and the CI from 1289 to 2017. A strong anti-phase relationship between autumn B–K Seas SIE and the winter CI was found during the instrumental period (1981–2017). Autumn B–K Seas SIE has experienced a rapidly decreasing trend and winter extreme cold events have occurred frequently in recent years. Before that, the relationship was not stable and showed a strong correlation in the low-SIE period and a weak correlation in the high-SIE period. The evaluation of the frequency of ECWEs in different periods shows ECWEs shifting toward being more frequent and more serious in low-SIE years compared to high-SIE years. This response to low SIE was amplified, especially in the continuous reduction period of SIE between 1981 to 2017. Some studies have identified an influence mechanism linking Arctic sea ice to cold wave events in Eurasia and east Asia through the “bridge” role of atmospheric circulation associated with the NAO and SH. Through comparing SIE, the CI, the NAOI, and the SHI, we found that the atmospheric bridge was not always stable either.

      During most periods of autumn B–K Seas sea ice melting, the SIE showed an anti-phase correlation with both the SHI and CI, and an in-phase correlation with the NAO. The negative trend in the NAO over the past two decades has been linked to the reduction of sea ice in the B–K Seas (Cohen et al., 2012; Nakamura et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). Reduction of Arctic SIE can also significantly strengthen and reinforce the presence of the SH (Wu and Wang, 2002; Wu et al., 2011). The circulation changes over the Ural–Siberian region are also suggested to provide a link between B–K Seas sea ice and the NAO (Santolaria-Otín et al., 2020). Optimal circulation, such as Ural Blocking concurring with the positive phase of the NAO, can favor the intrusion of midlatitude North Atlantic moisture and water vapor into the B–K Seas region (Luo et al., 2017). A negative NAO and a strengthened SH are conducive to storm tracks shifting equatorward and cold air moving southward, directly resulting in frequent winter extreme cold events across Eurasia (Herring et al., 2016; Whan et al., 2016; Yao et al., 2016; Martineau et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2022). In addition, recent studies have revealed that the “stratospheric pathway” may play an important role in the atmospheric circulation response to observed sea ice loss in the B–K Seas (Nakamura et al., 2016; Wu and Smith, 2016; Zhang et al., 2018a, b). It is suggested that a weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex (Kretschmer et al., 2020) and its increased variability (Kretschmer et al., 2016) related to the enhanced sea ice loss in the B-K Seas would induce a negative NAO, the warm Arctic–cold continents pattern (Kim et al., 2014), and an increase in cold-air outbreaks in the midlatitudes (Kretschmer et al., 2018). Therefore, the “bridge” role of atmospheric circulation is supported by the above mechanism during the lower autumn B–K Seas SIE period.

      However, ECWEs do not always occur during low-SIE periods. When SIE expands in the B–K Seas, more ECWEs will also occur if the NAO is in a strong negative phase on the decadal time scale. There is observational evidence that a strong negative NAO can lead to more cold winters in East Asia on the multidecadal time scale via the ocean–atmospheric bridge mechanism (Xie et al., 2019; Li et al., 2022). The modulation of a strong NAO likely weakens the negative relationship between SIE and the CI. The strength of the Arctic–midlatitude linkage on the decadal time scale is inferred to be associated with the internal atmospheric variability. This is supported by recent multimodel simulations that suggest the internal variability in the polar stratosphere may be a source of noise that increases the uncertainty in the response of tropospheric atmospheric circulation to Arctic sea ice loss (Peings et al., 2021; Smith et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022).

      This study implies that the effect of autumn B–K Seas SIE on extreme winter cold events in southern China is more significant when SIE retreats. The contribution by sea ice would be partially offset by the atmospheric internal variability when SIE expands. Palaeoclimate data helps to overcome known limitations in observations and model simulations of the influence of the Arctic on midlatitude climate and demonstrates that the linkages might change between different climate contexts. The results may be influenced by the inevitable uncertainty associated with the limited data used for the reconstructions. The extension of quantitative proxy-based records with enough accuracy and comparisons with climate models are needed to provide enough evidence to understand the mechanism and draw robust conclusions in the future.

      Acknowledgements. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42101142), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA19070103) and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (Grant No. 2022QNRC001).

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return