Advanced Search
Article Contents

Recent Advances in Understanding Multi-scale Climate Variability of the Asian Monsoon


doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2266-8

  • Studies of the multi-scale climate variability of the Asian monsoon are essential to an advanced understanding of the physical processes of the global climate system. In this paper, the progress achieved in this field is systematically reviewed, with a focus on the past several years. The achievements are summarized into the following topics: (1) the onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon; (2) the East Asian summer monsoon; (3) the East Asian winter monsoon; and (4) the Indian summer monsoon. Specifically, new results are highlighted, including the advanced or delayed local monsoon onset tending to be synchronized over the Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Indochina Peninsula, and South China Sea; the basic features of the record-breaking mei-yu in 2020, which have been extensively investigated with an emphasis on the role of multi-scale processes; the recovery of the East Asian winter monsoon intensity after the early 2000s in the presence of continuing greenhouse gas emissions, which is believed to have been dominated by internal climate variability (mostly the Arctic Oscillation); and the accelerated warming over South Asia, which exceeded the tropical Indian Ocean warming, is considered to be the main driver of the Indian summer monsoon rainfall recovery since 1999. A brief summary is provided in the final section along with some further discussion on future research directions regarding our understanding of the Asian monsoon variability.
    摘要: 对于深入理解全球气候系统的物理过程而言,针对亚洲季风的多时间尺度气候变率研究是极其重要的。本文系统地回顾了近年来在亚洲季风方面所取得的研究进展,主要包括以下四个方面:(1)中国南海夏季风的爆发;(2)东亚夏季风;(3)东亚冬季风;(4)印度夏季风。这些关于亚洲季风的研究揭示出一些新的现象,并阐明了可能的物理机制,主要包括:亚洲夏季风爆发的主导模态呈现出爆发的同步性,即阿拉伯海、孟加拉湾、中南半岛、中国南海等地的夏季风爆发会同时爆发偏早或同时爆发偏晚;2020年出现的“暴力梅”事件,尤其是不同时间尺度因子对于这次超强梅雨有协同作用;东亚冬季风强度在21世纪初期之后出现年代际增强,这可能与北极涛动等气候系统内部变率有关;印度夏季风降水强度在1999年之后有明显增加趋势,这可能与增强的海陆热力差异以及南亚地区的快速增暖有关。此外,本文最后还提供了一些未来的可能研究方向并进行了相关讨论。
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Schematic of the dominant mode of the tropical ASM onset, featuring coherent variations of local monsoon onset. This mode can be attributed to both atmospheric internal processes (BSISO1) and external forcings (Tibetan Plateau, ENSO, and IPO).

    Figure 2.  Schematic of the multi-timescale (from interdecadal to synoptic) factors influencing the super mei-yu in 2020.

    Figure 3.  Time series of the (a) EASM northern boundary index (bars) from 1979–2021 with the corresponding 9-yr running mean (black line), and (b) its regressed summer (June–August) precipitation pattern (units: mm d−1). (c, d) As in (a, b) but for the EASM intensity index. The dotted areas in (b, d) denote where the regressed anomalies are significant at the 95% confidence level, and the red lines represent the climatological mean position of the EASM northern boundary. The northern boundary index and intensity index of the EASM were calculated based on the definitions proposed by Chen et al. (2018) and Wang and Fan (1999), respectively.

    Figure 4.  Two pathways for the impacts of Tibetan Plateau summer snow anomalies on East Asian summer rainfall. One is a midlatitude atmospheric wave pattern associated with western Tibetan Plateau snow anomalies, and the other is tropical Indo-western Pacific vertical circulation triggered by southern Tibetan Plateau snow anomalies.

    Figure 5.  (a) Climatological winter (December–January–February, DJF) mean 1000-hPa horizontal winds (vectors; units: m s−1) and SAT (color shading; units: °C). The blue dashed line indicates the 0°C isotherm. (b) Standardized DJF-mean EAWM index [bars; defined by Chen et al. (2000)] during 1979–2021. The black dashed line is the nine-point running average of the EAWM index. The red solid line is the low-frequency component of the EAWM index filtered by ensemble empirical mode decomposition (Wu and Huang, 2009). (c) As in (b) but for the area-mean SAT anomaly within 20°–50°N and 100°–140°E [box in (a)]. The data used in this figure are from NCEP–DOE Reanalysis II for the period 1979–2021.

    Figure 6.  Schematic of the possible roles of tropical Indian Ocean precipitation anomalies in the effects of ENSO on the EAWM. El Niño is typically accompanied by positive and negative precipitation anomalies in the tropical eastern and western Indian Ocean during early winter. This dipole precipitation anomaly, especially the eastern part, forces a Rossby wave train that propagates toward the pole. This Rossby wave train has an anomalous positive height center over Japan, leading to a weakening of the East Asian trough and hence a weakening of the EAWM.

  • Abdillah, M. R., Y. Kanno, and T. Iwasaki, 2017: Tropical-extratropical interactions associated with East Asian cold air outbreaks. Part I: Interannual variability. J. Climate, 30, 2989−3007, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0152.1.
    Ahmad, A., S. L. Li, F. F. Luo, and Y. Q. Gao, 2022: The unstable connection between Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and Indian Summer Monsoon in CESM-LE. Climate Dyn., 58, 1525−1537, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00382-021-05976-6.
    Ai, Y., N. Jiang, W. H. Qian, J. C.-H. Leung, and Y. Y. Chen, 2022: Strengthened regulation of the onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon by the Northwest Indian Ocean warming in the past decade. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 943−952, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1364-8.
    Allen R. J., and C. S. Zender, 2011: Forcing of the arctic oscillation by Eurasian snow cover. J. Climate, 24, 6528−6539, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4157.1.
    An, X. D., L. F. Sheng, Q. Liu, C. Li, Y. Gao, and J. P. Li, 2020: The combined effect of two westerly jet waveguides on heavy haze in the North China Plain in November and December 2015. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 4667−4680, https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/20/4667/2020/.
    An, X. D., W. Chen, S. Fu, P. Hu, C. Li, and L. F. Sheng, 2022: Possible dynamic mechanisms of high- and low-latitude wave trains over Eurasia and their impacts on air pollution over the North China Plain in Early Winter. J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD036732, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036732.
    Ashok, K., Z. Y. Guan, and T. Yamagata, 2001: Impact of the Indian Ocean Dipole on the relationship between the Indian monsoon rainfall and ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4499−4502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013294.
    Ashok, K., Z. Y. Guan, N. H. Saji, and T. Yamagata, 2004: Individual and combined influences of ENSO and the Indian Ocean Dipole on the Indian summer monsoon. J. Climate, 17, 3141−3155, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3141:IACIOE>2.0.CO;2.
    Ayantika, D. C., R. Krishnan, M. Singh, P. Swapna, N. Sandeep, A. G. Prajeesh, and R. Vellore, 2021: Understanding the combined effects of global warming and anthropogenic aerosol forcing on the South Asian monsoon. Climate Dyn., 56, 1643−1662, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05551-5.
    Barnett, T. P., L. Dümenil, U. Schlese, E. Roeckner, and M. Latif, 1989: The effect of Eurasian snow cover on regional and global climate variations. J. Atmos. Sci., 46(5), 661−686, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<0661:TEOESC>2.0.CO;2.
    Bombardi, R. J., J. L. Kinter III, and O. W. Frauenfeld, 2019: A global gridded dataset of the characteristics of the rainy and dry seasons. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 1315−1328, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0177.1.
    Bombardi, R. J., V. Moron, and J. S. Goodnight, 2020: Detection, variability, and predictability of monsoon onset and withdrawal dates: A review. International Journal of Climatology, 40, 641−667, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6264.
    Borah, P., V. Venugopal, J. Sukhatme, P. Muddebihal, and B. N. Goswami, 2019: Role of the North Atlantic in Indian Monsoon Droughts. Available from https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.10013.
    Cai, Y. N., Z. S. Chen, and Y. Du, 2022: The role of Indian Ocean warming on extreme rainfall in central China during early summer 2020: Without significant El Niño influence. Climate Dyn., 59, 951−960, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06165-9.
    Cen, S. X., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, L. Wang, Y. Y. Liu, and J. L. Huangfu, 2022: Weakened influence of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on the zonal shift of the South Asian High after the early 1980s. International Journal of Climatology, 42, 7583−7597, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7666.
    Chang, C. P., M. M. Lu, and S. Wang, 2011: The East Asian winter monsoon. The Global Monsoon System: Research and Forecast. 2nd ed, C. P. Chang et al., Eds., World Scientific, 99−109, https://doi.org/10.1142/8109.
    Chen, J., W. Huang, L. Y. Jin, J. H. Chen, S. Q. Chen, and F. H. Chen, 2018: A climatological northern boundary index for the East Asian summer monsoon and its interannual variability. Science China Earth Sciences, 61, 13−22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-017-9122-x.
    Chen, J. Q., and S. Bordoni, 2014: Orographic effects of the Tibetan Plateau on the East Asian summer monsoon: An energetic perspective. J. Climate, 27(8), 3052−3072, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00479.1.
    Chen, W., H. F. Graf, and R. H. Huang, 2000: The interannual variability of East Asian winter monsoon and its relation to the summer monsoon. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 17, 48−60, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-000-0042-5.
    Chen, W., L. Wang, Y. K. Xue, and S. F. Sun, 2009: Variabilities of the spring river runoff system in East China and their relations to precipitation and sea surface temperature. International Journal of Climatology, 29, 1381−1394, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1785.
    Chen, W., J. Feng, and R. G. Wu, 2013: Roles of ENSO and PDO in the Link of the East Asian Winter Monsoon to the following Summer Monsoon. J. Climate, 26, 622−635, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00021.1.
    Chen, W., L. Wang, J. Feng, Z. P. Wen, T. J. Ma, X. Q. Yang, and C. H. Wang, 2019: Recent progress in studies of the variabilities and mechanisms of the East Asian Monsoon in a changing climate. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 887−901, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8230-y.
    Chen, W., and Coauthors, 2021a: East Asian monsoon variability and its association with China’s climate under global warming. Climate and Ecological Environment Evolution in China 2021: The Science Basis, D. H. Qin and P. M. Zhai, Eds., Science Press. (in Chinese)
    Chen, W., P. Hu, and J. L. Huangfu, 2022a: Multi-scale climate variations and mechanisms of the onset and withdrawal of the South China Sea summer monsoon. Science China Earth Sciences, 65, 1030−1046, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-021-9902-5.
    Chen, X. D., A. G. Dai, Z. P. Wen, and Y. Y. Song, 2021b: Contributions of Arctic sea‐ice loss and East Siberian atmospheric blocking to 2020 record‐breaking Meiyu‐Baiu rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092748, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092748.
    Chen, X. D., Z. P. Wen, Y. Y. Song, and Y. Y. Guo, 2022b: Causes of extreme 2020 Meiyu-Baiu rainfall: A study of combined effect of Indian Ocean and Arctic. Climate Dyn., 59, 3485−3501, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00382-022-06279-0.
    Chou, C., D. Ryu, M.-H. Lo, H.-W. Wey, and H. M. Malano, 2018: Irrigation-induced land-atmosphere feedbacks and their impacts on Indian Summer Monsoon. J. Climate, 31, 8785−8801, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0762.1.
    Chowdary, J. S., A. B. Bandgar, C. Gnanaseelan, and J. J. Luo, 2015: Role of tropical Indian Ocean Air-Sea interactions in modulating Indian summer monsoon in a coupled model. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 16, 170−176, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.561.
    Chowdary, J. S., K. M. Hu, G. Srinivas, Y. Kosaka, L. Wang, and K. K. Rao, 2019: The Eurasian Jet streams as conduits for East Asian monsoon variability. Current Climate Change Reports, 5, 233−244, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00134-x.
    Chu, Q. C., T. Lian, D. K. Chen, X. J. Wang, J. Feng, G. L. Feng, S. L. Qu, and Z. P. Zhang, 2022: The role of El Niño in the extreme Mei-Yu rainfall in 2020. Atmospheric Research, 266, 105965, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105965.
    Crétat, J., P. Terray, S. Masson, K. P. Sooraj, and M. K. Roxy, 2017: Indian Ocean and Indian summer monsoon: Relationships without ENSO in ocean-atmosphere coupled simulations. Climate Dyn., 49, 1429−1448, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3387-x.
    Dai, A. G., and J. C. Deng, 2022: Recent Eurasian winter cooling partly caused by internal multidecadal variability amplified by Arctic sea ice-air interactions. Climate Dyn., 58, 3261−3277, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06095-y.
    Dandi, R. A., J. S. Chowdary, P. A. Pillai, N. S. S. Sidhan, K. Koteswararao, and S. Ramakrishna, 2020: Impact of El Niño Modoki on Indian summer monsoon rainfall: Role of western north Pacific circulation in observations and CMIP5 models. International Journal of Climatology, 40, 2117−2133, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6322.
    Deng, K. Q., S. Yang, D. J. Gu, A. L. Lin, and C. H. Li, 2020: Record-breaking heat wave in southern China and delayed onset of South China Sea summer monsoon driven by the Pacific subtropical high. Climate Dyn., 54, 3751−3764, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05203-8.
    Ding, L. D., T. Li, and Y. Sun, 2021a: Subseasonal and synoptic variabilities of precipitation over the Yangtze River Basin in the summer of 2020. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2108−2124, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1133-8.
    Ding, Q. H., and B. Wang, 2005: Circumglobal teleconnection in the northern Hemisphere summer. J. Climate, 18, 3483−3505, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3473.1.
    Ding, Q. H., and B. Wang, 2007: Intraseasonal teleconnection between the summer Eurasian wave train and the Indian monsoon. J. Climate, 20, 3751−3767, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4221.1.
    Ding, S. Y., B. Y. Wu, and W. Chen, 2021b: Dominant characteristics of early autumn arctic Sea Ice variability and its impact on Winter Eurasian Climate. J. Climate, 34, 1825−1846, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0834.1.
    Ding, Y. H., 1994: Monsoons over China. Springer, 420 pp, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8302-2.
    Ding, Y. H., 2007: The variability of the Asian summer monsoon. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85B, 21−54, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85B.21.
    Ding, Y. H., and T. N. Krishnamurti, 1987: Heat budget of the Siberian high and the winter monsoon. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 2428−2449, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<2428:HBOTSH>2.0.CO;2.
    Ding, Y. H., and J. C. L. Chan, 2005: The East Asian summer monsoon: An overview. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 89, 117−142, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0125-z.
    Ding, Y. H., and Coauthors, 2014: Interdecadal variability of the East Asian winter monsoon and its possible links to global climate change. J. Meteor. Res., 28, 693−713, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-014-4046-y.
    Ding, Y. H., Y. J. Liu, Y. F. Song, and J. Zhang, 2015: From MONEX to the global monsoon: A review of monsoon system research. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32, 10−31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-0008-7.
    Ding, Y. H., P. Liang, Y. J. Liu, and Y. C. Zhang, 2020: Multiscale variability of Meiyu and its prediction: A new review. J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JD031496, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031496.
    Ding, Y. H., Y. Y. Liu, and Z.-Z. Hu, 2021c: The record-breaking mei-yu in 2020 and associated atmospheric circulation and tropical SST anomalies. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1980−1993, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0361-2.
    Dong, Z. Z., and L. Wang, 2022: Quasi-biweekly oscillation over the western North Pacific in boreal winter and its influence on the central North American air temperature. J. Climate, 35(6), 1901−1913, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0531.1.
    Duan, A. M., and G.-X. Wu, 2005: Role of the Tibetan Plateau thermal forcing in the summer climate patterns over subtropical Asia. Climate Dyn., 24(7−8), 793−807, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0488-8.
    Duan, A. M., Z. X. Xiao, and Z. Q. Wang, 2018: Impacts of the Tibetan Plateau winter/spring snow depth and surface heat source on Asian summer monsoon: A review. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 42, 755−766, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1801.17247. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Enomoto, T., B. J. Hoskins, and Y. Matsuda, 2003: The formation mechanism of the Bonin high in August. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 157−178, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.01.211.
    Fan, F. X., R. P. Lin, X. H. Fang, F. Xue, F. Zheng, and J. Zhu, 2021: Influence of the eastern Pacific and Central Pacific types of ENSO on the South Asian summer monsoon. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 12−28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0055-1.
    Feba, F., K. Ashok, and M. Ravichandran, 2019: Role of changed Indo-Pacific atmospheric circulation in the recent disconnect between the Indian summer monsoon and ENSO. Climate Dyn., 52, 1461−1470, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4207-2.
    Feng, J., and W. Chen, 2021: Roles of the North Indian Ocean SST and tropical North Atlantic SST in the latitudinal extension of the anomalous western North Pacific anticyclone during the El Niño decaying summer. J. Climate, 34, 8503−8517, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0802.1.
    Feng, J., and W. Chen, 2022: Respective and combined Impacts of North Indian Ocean and tropical North Atlantic SST anomalies on the subseasonal evolution of anomalous western North Pacific anticyclones. J. Climate, 35, 5623−5636, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0799.1.
    Fu, S. M., H. Tang, J. H. Sun, T. B. Zhao, and W. L. Li, 2022: Historical rankings and vortices’ activities of the extreme Mei-Yu seasons: Contrast 2020 to previous Mei-Yu seasons. Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL096590, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL096590.
    Ge, Z.-A., L. Chen, T. Li, and L. Wang, 2022: How frequently will the persistent heavy rainfall over the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Basin in Summer 2020 happen under global warming. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1673−1692, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1351-8.
    Gong, H. N., L. Wang, W. Chen, and R. G. Wu, 2019a: Attribution of the East Asian winter temperature trends during 1979-2018: Role of external forcing and internal variability. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10 874−10 881, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084154.
    Gong, H. N., L. Wang, W. Chen, and R. G. Wu, 2019b: Time‐varying contribution of internal dynamics to wintertime land temperature trends over the northern Hemisphere. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14 674−14 682, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086220.
    Gong, H. N., L. Wang, W. Chen, and R. G. Wu, 2021: Evolution of the East Asian winter land temperature trends during 1961-2018: Role of internal variability and external forcing. Environmental Research Letters, 16, 024015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd586.
    Goswami, B. N., M. S. Madhusoodanan, C. P. Neema, and D. Sengupta, 2006: A physical mechanism for North Atlantic SST influence on the Indian summer monsoon. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024803.
    Gu, W., L. Wang, Z.-Z. Hu, K. M. Hu, and Y. Li, 2018: Interannual variations of the first rainy season precipitation over South China. J. Climate, 31, 623−640, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0284.1.
    Guo, Y. Y., R. J. Zhang, Z. P. Wen, J. C. Li, C. Zhang, and Z. J. Zhou, 2021: Understanding the role of SST anomaly in extreme rainfall of 2020 Meiyu season from an interdecadal perspective. Science China Earth Sciences, 64, 1619−1632, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-020-9762-0.
    Ha, K.-J., Y.-W. Seo, J.-Y. Lee, R. Kripalani, and K.-S. Yun, 2018: Linkages between the South and East Asian summer monsoons: A review and revisit. Climate Dyn., 51, 4207−4227, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3773-z.
    He, J. H., and Z. W. Zhu, 2015: The relation of South China Sea monsoon onset with the subsequent rainfall over the subtropical East Asia. International Journal of Climatology, 35, 4547−4556, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4305.
    He, J. H., H. Lin, and Z. W. Wu, 2011: Another look at influences of the Madden-Julian Oscillation on the wintertime East Asian weather. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D03109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014787.
    He, J. H., J. H. Ju, Z. P. Wen, J. M. Lü, and Q. H. Jin, 2007: A review of recent advances in research on Asian monsoon in China. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 24, 972−992, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-007-0972-2.
    He, S. P., 2013: Reduction of the East Asian winter monsoon interannual variability after the mid-1980s and possible cause. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58, 1331−1338, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5468-5.
    Hrudya, P. H., H. Varikoden, R. Vishnu, and J. Kuttippurath, 2020: Changes in ENSO-monsoon relations from early to recent decades during onset, peak and withdrawal phases of Indian summer monsoon. Climate Dyn., 55, 1457−1471, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05335-x.
    Hrudya, P. P. V. H., H. Varikoden, and R. N. Vishnu, 2021: Changes in the relationship between Indian Ocean dipole and Indian summer monsoon rainfall in early and recent multidecadal epochs during different phases of monsoon. International Journal of Climatology, 41, E305−E318, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6685.
    Hsu, H.-H., T. J. Zhou, and J. Matsumoto, 2014: East Asian, Indochina and western North Pacific summer monsoon-an update. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 50, 45−68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-014-0027-4.
    Hu, D., A. M. Duan, and P. Zhang, 2022a: Association between regional summer monsoon onset in South Asia and Tibetan Plateau thermal forcing. Climate Dyn., 59, 1115−1132, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06174-8.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, R. P. Huang, and D. Nath, 2018: On the weakening relationship between the South China Sea summer monsoon onset and cross-equatorial flow after the Late 1990s. International Journal of Climatology, 38, 3202−3208, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5472.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, and S. F. Chen, 2019a: Interdecadal change in the South China Sea summer monsoon withdrawal around the mid-2000s. Climate Dyn., 52, 6053−6064, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4494-7.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, and R. P. Huang, 2019b: Interannual variability and triggers of the South China Sea summer monsoon withdrawal. Climate Dyn., 53, 4355−4372, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04790-5.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, R. P. Huang, and D. Nath, 2019c: Climatological characteristics of the synoptic changes accompanying South China Sea summer monsoon withdrawal. International Journal of Climatology, 39, 596−612, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5828.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, and R. P. Huang, 2020a: Statistical analysis of the impacts of intra-seasonal oscillations on the South China Sea summer monsoon withdrawal. International Journal of Climatology, 40, 1919−1927, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6284.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, Y. Y. Liu, and R. P. Huang, 2020b: Extremely early summer monsoon onset in the South China Sea in 2019 following an El Niño event. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 1877−1890, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0317.1.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, Y. Y. Liu, R. P. Huang, and S. R. Dong, 2020c: Relationship between the South China Sea summer monsoon withdrawal and September–October rainfall over southern China. Climate Dyn., 54, 713−726, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05026-2.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, Y. Y. Liu, L. Wang, and R. P. Huang, 2020d: Impact of the September silk road pattern on the South China Sea summer monsoon withdrawal. International Journal of Climatology, 40, 6361−6368, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6585.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, Y. Y. Liu, L. Wang, and R. P. Huang, 2021: Impact of the March arctic oscillation on the South China Sea summer monsoon onset. International Journal of Climatology, 41, E3239−E3248, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6920.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, L. Wang, and Y. Y. Liu, 2022b: The weakening relationship between ENSO and the South China Sea summer monsoon onset in recent decades. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 443−455, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1208-6.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, Z. B. Li, S. F. Chen, L. Wang, and Y. Y. Liu, 2022c: Close linkage of the South China Sea Summer monsoon onset and extreme rainfall in may over Southeast Asia: Role of the synoptic-scale systems. J. Climate, 35, 4347−4362, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0740.1.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, Y. Y. Liu, L. Wang, and R. P. Huang, 2022d: The leading mode and factors for coherent variations among the subsystems of tropical Asian summer monsoon onset. J. Climate, 35(5), 1597−1612, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0101.1.
    Hu, P., W. Chen, L. Wang, S. F. Chen, Y. Y. Liu, and L. Y. Chen. 2022e: Revisiting the ENSO–monsoonal rainfall relationship: New insights based on an objective determination of the Asian summer monsoon duration. Environmental Research Letters, 17(10): 104050, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac97ad.
    Huang, G., 2004: An index measuring the interannual variation of the East Asian summer monsoon—The EAP index. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 21, 41−52, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915679.
    Huang, M., J. D. Li, G. Zeng, and Y. K. Xie, 2020a: Regional characteristics of cloud radiative effects before and after the South China Sea summer monsoon onset. J. Meteor. Res., 34, 1167−1182, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-0018-6.
    Huang, R. H., and F. Y. Sun, 1992: Impacts of the tropical western Pacific on the East Asian summer monsoon. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 70, 243−256, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.70.1B_243.
    Huang, R. H., L. T. Zhou, and W. Chen, 2003: The progresses of recent studies on the variabilities of the East Asian monsoon and their causes. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 20, 55−69, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342050.
    Huang, R. H., W. Chen, B. L. Yang, and R. H. Zhang, 2004: Recent advances in studies of the interaction between the East Asian winter and summer monsoons and ENSO cycle. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 21, 407−424, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915568.
    Huang, R. H., L. Gu, L. T. Zhou, and S. S. Wu, 2006: Impact of the thermal state of the tropical western Pacific on onset date and process of the South China Sea summer monsoon. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 23, 909−924, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-006-0909-1.
    Huang, R. H., J. L. Chen, L. Wang, and Z. D. Lin, 2012: Characteristics, processes, and causes of the Spatio-temporal variabilities of the East Asian monsoon system. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29, 910−942, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2015-x.
    Huang, R. H., Y. Liu, Z. C. Du, J. L. Chen, and J. L. Huangfu, 2017: Differences and links between the East Asian and South Asian summer monsoon systems: Characteristics and variability. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1204−1218, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7008-3.
    Huang, X., and Coauthors, 2020b: The recent decline and recovery of Indian Summer monsoon rainfall: Relative roles of external forcing and internal variability. J. Climate, 33, 5035−5060, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0833.1.
    Huangfu, J. L., R. H. Huang, and W. Chen, 2017: Relationship between the South China Sea summer monsoon onset and tropical cyclone genesis over the western North Pacific. International Journal of Climatology, 37, 5206−5210, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5141.
    Jang, Y.-S., J.-S. Kug, and B.-M. Kim, 2019: How well do current climate models simulate the linkage between Arctic warming and extratropical cold winters. Climate Dyn., 53, 4005−4018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04765-6.
    Jeong, J. H., and C. H. Ho, 2005: Changes in occurrence of cold surges over east Asia in association with Arctic Oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L14704, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023024.
    Jeong, Y. C., S. W. Yeh, Y. K. Lim, A. Santoso, and G. J. Wang, 2022: Indian Ocean warming as key driver of long-term positive trend of Arctic Oscillation. npj Clim Atmos Sci, 5, 56, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00279-x.
    Jiang, J. L., Y. M. Liu, J. Y. Mao, J. P. Li, S. W. Zhao, and Y. Q. Yu, 2022: Three types of positive Indian Ocean Dipoles and their relationships with the South Asian Summer Monsoon. J. Climate, 35, 405−424, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0089.1.
    Jiang, N., and C. W. Zhu, 2021: Seasonal forecast of South China Sea summer monsoon onset disturbed by cold tongue La Niña in the past decade. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 147−155, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0090-y.
    Jiang, X. W., Z. Y. Wang, and Z. N. Li, 2018: Signature of the South China Sea summer monsoon onset on spring-to-summer transition of rainfall in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin. Climate Dyn., 51, 3785−3796, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4110-x.
    Jiao, Y., R. G. Wu, and L. Song, 2019: Individual and combined impacts of two Eurasian wave trains on intraseasonal East Asian winter monsoon variability. J. Geophys. Res., 124, 4530−4548, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029953.
    Jiao, Y, and R. G. Wu, 2019, Propagation and influence on tropical precipitation of intraseasonal variation over mid-latitude East Asia in boreal winter. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 12(3), 155−161.
    Jin, Q. J., and C. E. Wang, 2017: A revival of Indian summer monsoon rainfall since 2002. Nature Climate Change, 7, 587−594, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3348.
    Joshi, M. K., and F. Kucharski, 2017: Impact of Interdecadal Pacific oscillation on Indian summer monsoon rainfall: An assessment from CMIP5 climate models. Climate Dyn., 48, 2375−2391, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3210-8.
    Kang, L. H., W. Chen, and K. Wei, 2006: The interdecadal variation of winter temperature in China and its relation to the anomalies in atmospheric general circulation. Climatic and Environmental Research, 11, 330−339, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9585.2006.03.009. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Kim, S., H. Y. Son, and J. S. Kug, 2018: Relative roles of equatorial central Pacific and western North Pacific precipitation anomalies in ENSO teleconnection over the North Pacific. Climate Dyn., 51, 4345−4355, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3779-6.
    Kong, W. W., and J. C. H. Chiang, 2020: Interaction of the westerlies with the Tibetan Plateau in determining the Mei-Yu termination. J. Climate, 33(1), 339−363, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0319.1.
    Kosaka, Y., 2021: Chapter 13 - Coupling of the Indian, western North Pacific, and East Asian summer monsoons. Indian Summer Monsoon Variability, J. Chowdary, A. Parekh, and C. Gnanaseelan, Eds., Elsevier, 263−286, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822402-1.00002-8.
    Kosaka, Y., and S.-P. Xie, 2013: Recent global-warming hiatus tied to equatorial Pacific surface cooling. Nature, 501, 403−407, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12534.
    Kripalani, R., K.-J. Ha, C.-H. Ho, J.-H. Oh, B. Preethi, M. Mujumdar, and A. Prabhu, 2022: Erratic Asian summer monsoon 2020: COVID-19 lockdown initiatives possible cause for these episodes. Climate Dyn., 59, 1339−1352, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06042-x.
    Krishnamurthy, L., and V. Krishnamurthy, 2014: Influence of PDO on South Asian summer monsoon and monsoon-ENSO relation. Climate Dyn., 42, 2397−2410, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1856-z.
    Krishnamurthy, L., and V. Krishnamurthy, 2016: Teleconnections of Indian monsoon rainfall with AMO and Atlantic tripole. Climate Dyn., 46, 2269−2285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2701-3.
    Krishnamurthy, V., and B. N. Goswami, 2000: Indian monsoon-ENSO relationship on interdecadal timescale. J. Climate, 13, 579−595, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<0579:IMEROI>2.0.CO;2.
    Krishnaswamy, J., S. Vaidyanathan, B. Rajagopalan, M. Bonell, M. Sankaran, R. S. Bhalla, and S. Badiger, 2015: Non-stationary and non-linear influence of ENSO and Indian Ocean Dipole on the variability of Indian monsoon rainfall and extreme rain events. Climate Dyn., 45, 175−184, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2288-0.
    Kucharski, F., A. Bracco, J. H. Yoo, and F. Molteni, 2007: Low-frequency variability of the Indian monsoon-ENSO relationship and the tropical Atlantic: The “Weakening” of the 1980s and 1990s. J. Climate, 20, 4255−4266, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4254.1.
    Kucharski, F., A. Bracco, J. H. Yoo, and F. Molteni, 2008: Atlantic forced component of the Indian monsoon interannual variability. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L04706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL033037.
    Kucharski, F., A. Bracco, J. H. Yoo, A. M. Tompkins, L. Feudale, P. Ruti, and A. Dell'Aquila, 2009: A Gill-Matsuno-type mechanism explains the tropical Atlantic influence on African and Indian monsoon rainfall. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 569−579, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.406.
    Kug, J.-S., J.-H. Jeong, Y.-S. Jang, B.-M. Kim, C. K. Folland, S.-K. Min, and S.-W. Son, 2015: Two distinct influences of Arctic warming on cold winters over North America and East Asia. Nature Geoscience, 8, 759−762, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2517.
    Kumar, K. K., B. Rajagopalan, and M. A. Cane, 1999: On the weakening relationship between the Indian monsoon and ENSO. Science, 284, 2156−2159, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5423.2156.
    Kumar, K. K., B. Rajagopalan, M. Hoerling, G. Bates, and M. Cane, 2006: Unraveling the mystery of Indian monsoon failure during El Niño. Science, 314, 115−119, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131152.
    Kumar, P. K., and A. Singh, 2021: Increase in summer monsoon rainfall over the northeast India during El Niño years since 1600. Climate Dyn., 57, 851−863, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05743-7.
    Lee, S.-S., J.-E. Chu, A. Timmermann, E.-S. Chung, and J.-Y. Lee, 2021: East Asian climate response to COVID-19 lockdown measures in China. Scientific Reports, 11, 16852, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96007-1.
    Li, L., C. W. Zhu, R. H. Zhang, and B. Q. Liu, 2021a: Roles of the Tibetan Plateau vortices in the record Meiyu rainfall in 2020. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 22, e1017, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1017.
    Li, X. Q., M. F. Ting, C. H. Li, and N. Henderson, 2015: Mechanisms of Asian summer monsoon changes in response to anthropogenic forcing in CMIP5 Models. J. Climate, 28, 4107−4125, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00559.1.
    Li, Z. B., Y. Sun, T. Li, W. Chen, and Y. H. Ding, 2021b: Projections of South Asian summer monsoon under global warming from 1.5°C to 5°C. J. Climate, 34, 7913−7926, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0547.1.
    Li, Z. H., Y. L. Luo, Y. Du, and J. C. L. Chan, 2020: Statistical characteristics of pre-summer rainfall over South China and associated synoptic conditions. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 98, 213−233, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2020-012.
    Liang, P., Z.-Z. Hu, Y. H. Ding, and Q. W. Qian, 2021: The extreme Mei-yu season in 2020: Role of the madden-Julian oscillation and the cooperative influence of the pacific and Indian Oceans. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2040−2054, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1078-y.
    Lin, A. L., and R. H. Zhang, 2020: Climate shift of the South China Sea summer monsoon onset in 1993/1994 and its physical causes. Climate Dyn., 54, 1819−1827, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05086-4.
    Lin, Z. D., R. Y. Lu, and R. G. Wu, 2017: Weakened impact of the Indian early summer monsoon on North China rainfall around the late 1970s: Role of basic-state change. J. Climate, 30, 7991−8005, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0036.1.
    Liu, B. Q., and C. W. Zhu, 2019: Extremely Late Onset of the 2018 South China Sea summer monsoon following a La Niña event: Effects of triple SST anomaly mode in the North Atlantic and a weaker Mongolian cyclone. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2956−2963, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081718.
    Liu, B. Q., and C. W. Zhu, 2020: Boosting effect of tropical cyclone “Fani” on the onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon in 2019. J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JD031891, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031891.
    Liu, B. Q., and C. W. Zhu, 2021: Subseasonal-to-seasonal predictability of onset dates of South China Sea summer monsoon: A perspective of meridional temperature gradient. J. Climate, 34, 5601−5616, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0696.1.
    Liu, B. Q., Y. H. Yan, C. W. Zhu, S. M. Ma, and J. Y. Li, 2020: Record‐breaking Meiyu rainfall around the Yangtze River in 2020 regulated by the subseasonal phase transition of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090342, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090342.
    Liu, B. Q., Y. M. Liu, G. X. Wu, J. H. Yan, J. H. He, and S. L. Ren, 2015: Asian summer monsoon onset barrier and its formation mechanism. Climate Dyn., 45, 711−726, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2296-0.
    Liu, Y., and R. H. Huang, 2019: Linkages between the South and East Asian monsoon water vapor transport during boreal summer. J. Climate, 32, 4509−4524, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0498.1.
    Lu, C. H., Y. Sun, and X. B. Zhang, 2022: The 2020 Record-Breaking Mei-yu in the Yangtze River valley of China: The role of anthropogenic forcing and atmospheric circulation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 103, S98−S104, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0161.1.
    Lu, R. Y., and Z. D. Lin, 2009: Role of subtropical precipitation anomalies in maintaining the summertime meridional teleconnection over the western North Pacific and East Asia. J. Climate, 22, 2058−2072, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2444.1.
    Luo, F. F., S. L. Li, and T. Furevik, 2011: The connection between the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and the Indian Summer Monsoon in Bergen Climate Model Version 2.0. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D19117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015848.
    Luo, F. F., S. L. Li, Y. Q. Gao, N. Keenlyside, L. Svendsen, and T. Furevik, 2018a: The connection between the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation and the Indian summer monsoon in CMIP5 models. Climate Dyn., 51, 3023−3039, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-4062-6.
    Luo, F. F., S. L. Li, Y. Q. Gao, L. Svendsen, T. Furevik, and N. Keenlyside, 2018b: The connection between the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and the Indian summer monsoon since the industrial revolution is intrinsic to the climate system. Environmental Research Letters, 13, 094020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aade11.
    Luo, F. F., S. L. Li, and T. Furevik, 2018c: Weaker connection between the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and Indian summer rainfall since the mid-1990s. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., 11, 37−43, https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2018.1394779.
    Luo, Y. L., R. D. Xia, and J. C. L. Chan, 2020: Characteristics, physical mechanisms, and prediction of pre-summer rainfall over South China: Research progress during 2008−2019. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 98, 19−42, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2020-002.
    Ma, T. J., and W. Chen, 2021: Climate variability of the East Asian winter monsoon and associated extratropical–tropical interaction: A review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1504, 44−62, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14620.
    Ma, T. J., W. Chen, J. L. Huangfu, L. Song, and Q. Y. Cai, 2021: The observed influence of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in the lower equatorial stratosphere on the East Asian winter monsoon during early boreal winter. International Journal of Climatology, 41, 6254−6269, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7192.
    Ma, T. J., W. Chen, H. N. Gong, P. Hu, Y. Jiao, X. D. An, and L. Wang, 2022a: Linkage of strong intraseasonal events of the East Asian winter monsoon to the tropical convections over the western Pacific. Remote Sensing, 14, 2993, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14132993.
    Ma, T. J., and Coauthors, 2022b: Different ENSO teleconnections over East Asia in early and late winter: Role of precipitation anomalies in the tropical Indian Ocean and far western Pacific. J. Climate, 35, 4319−4335, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0805.1.
    Ma, Y. Y., Z. Y. Hu, X. H. Meng, F. Liu, and W. J. Dong, 2022c: Was the record‐breaking Mei-yu of 2020 enhanced by regional climate change. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 103, S76−S82, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0187.1.
    Maharana, P., R. Agnihotri, and A. P. Dimri, 2021: Changing Indian monsoon rainfall patterns under the recent warming period 2001−2018. Climate Dyn., 57, 2581−2593, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05823-8.
    Mahendra, N., J. S. Chowdary, P. Darshana, P. Sunitha, A. Parekh, and C. Gnanaseelan, 2021: Interdecadal modulation of interannual ENSO-Indian summer monsoon rainfall teleconnections in observations and CMIP6 models: Regional patterns. International Journal of Climatology, 41, 2528−2552, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6973.
    Malik, A., S. Brönnimann, A. Stickler, C. C. Raible, S. Muthers, J. Anet, E. Rozanov, and W. Schmutz, 2017: Decadal to multi-decadal scale variability of Indian summer monsoon rainfall in the coupled ocean-atmosphere-chemistry climate model SOCOL-MPIOM. Climate Dyn., 49, 3551−3572, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3529-9.
    Martin, G. M., A. Chevuturi, R. E. Comer, N. J. Dunstone, A. A. Scaife, and D. Q. Zhang, 2019: Predictability of South China Sea summer monsoon onset. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 253−260, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-018-8100-z.
    McIntyre, M. E., and T. N. Palmer, 1983: Breaking planetary waves in the stratosphere. Nature, 305, 593−600, https://doi.org/10.1038/305593a0.
    Miao, J. P., and T. Wang, 2020: Decadal variations of the East Asian winter monsoon in recent decades. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 21, e960, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.960.
    Miao, J. P., and D. B. Jiang, 2021: Multidecadal variations in the East Asian Winter Monsoon and their relationship with the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation since 1850. J. Climate, 34, 7525−7539, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0073.1.
    Miao, J. P., T. Wang, H. J. Wang, Y. L. Zhu, and J. Q. Sun, 2018: Interdecadal weakening of the East Asian winter monsoon in the Mid-1980s: The roles of external forcings. J. Climate, 31, 8985−9000, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0868.1.
    Nair, P. J., A. Chakraborty, H. Varikoden, P. A. Francis, and J. Kuttippurath, 2018: The local and global climate forcings induced inhomogeneity of Indian rainfall. Sci. Rep., 8, 6026, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24021-x.
    Nitta, T., 1987: Convective activities in the tropical western Pacific and their impact on the Northern Hemisphere summer circulation. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 65, 373−390, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.65.3_373.
    Niu, R. Y., P. M. Zhai, and G. R. Tan, 2021: Anomalous features of extreme Meiyu in 2020 over the Yangtze-Huai River Basin and attribution to large-scale circulations. J. Meteor. Res., 35, 799−814, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-021-1018-x.
    Ordoñez, P., D. Gallego, P. Ribera, C. Peña-Ortiz, and R. García-Herrera, 2016: Tracking the Indian summer monsoon onset back to the preinstrument period. J. Climate, 29, 8115−8127, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0788.1.
    Pan, X., T. Li, Y. Sun, and Z. W. Zhu, 2021: Cause of extreme heavy and persistent rainfall over Yangtze River in summer 2020. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1994−2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0433-3.
    Pandey, P., S. Dwivedi, B. N. Goswami, and F. Kucharski, 2020: A new perspective on ENSO-Indian summer monsoon rainfall relationship in a warming environment. Climate Dyn., 55, 3307−3326, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05452-7.
    Park, H.-L., K.-H. Seo, B.-M. Kim, J.-Y. Kim, and S.-Y. S. Wang, 2021: Dominant wintertime surface air temperature modes in the northern Hemisphere extratropics. Climate Dyn., 56, 687−698, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05478-x.
    Paul, S., S. Ghosh, R. Oglesby, A. Pathak, A. Chandrasekharan, and R. Ramsankaran, 2016: Weakening of Indian summer monsoon rainfall due to changes in land use land cover. Scientific Reports, 6, 32177, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32177.
    Piao, J. L., W. Chen, K. Wei, Y. Liu, H.-F. Graf, J.-B. Ahn, and A. Pogoreltsev, 2017: An abrupt rainfall decrease over the Asian inland plateau region around 1999 and the possible underlying mechanism. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 34, 456−468, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6136-5.
    Piao, J. L., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, and K. Wei, 2018a: Intensified impact of North Atlantic oscillation in May on subsequent July Asian Inland Plateau precipitation since the late 1970s. International Journal of Climatology, 38, 2605−2612, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5332.
    Piao, J. L., W. Chen, Q. Zhang, and P. Hu, 2018b: Comparison of moisture transport between Siberia and Northeast Asia on Annual and Interannual time scales. J. Climate, 31, 7645−7660, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0763.1.
    Piao, J. L., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, H. N. Gong, and Q. Zhang, 2020: Summer water vapor Sources in Northeast Asia and East Siberia revealed by a moisture-tracing atmospheric model. J. Climate, 33, 3883−3899, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0516.1.
    Piao, J. L., W. Chen, and S. F. Chen, 2021a: Water vapour transport changes associated with the interdecadal decrease in the summer rainfall over Northeast Asia around the late-1990s. International Journal of Climatology, 41, E1469−E1482, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6780.
    Piao, J. L., W. Chen, and S. F. Chen, 2021b: Sources of the internal variability-generated uncertainties in the projection of Northeast Asian summer precipitation. Climate Dyn., 56, 1783−1797, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05557-z.
    Piao, J. L., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, H. N. Gong, and L. Wang, 2021c: Mean states and future projections of precipitation over the monsoon transitional zone in China in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Climatic Change, 169, 35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03286-8.
    Piao, J. L., W. Chen, L. Wang, and S. F. Chen, 2022: Future projections of precipitation, surface temperatures and drought events over the monsoon transitional zone in China from bias-corrected CMIP6 models. International Journal of Climatology, 42, 1203−1219, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7297.
    Pottapinjara, V., M. S. Girishkumar, M. Ravichandran, and R. Murtugudde, 2014: Influence of the Atlantic zonal mode on monsoon depressions in the Bay of Bengal during boreal summer. J. Geophys. Res., 119, 6456−6469, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021494.
    Pottapinjara, V., M. K. Roxy, M. S. Girishkumar, K. Ashok, S. Joseph, M. Ravichandran, and R. Murtugudde, 2021: Simulation of interannual relationship between the Atlantic zonal mode and Indian summer monsoon in CFSv2. Climate Dyn., 57, 353−373, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05712-0.
    Preethi, B., M. Mujumdar, A. Prabhu, and R. Kripalani, 2017: Variability and teleconnections of South and East Asian summer monsoons in present and future projections of CMIP5 climate models. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 53, 305−325, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-017-0034-3.
    Qiao, S. B., and Coauthors, 2021: The longest 2020 Meiyu season over the past 60 years: Subseasonal perspective and its predictions. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093596, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093596.
    Rajesh, P. V., and B. N. Goswami, 2020: Four-dimensional structure and sub-seasonal regulation of the Indian summer monsoon multi-decadal mode. Climate Dyn., 55, 2645−2666, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05407-y.
    Ramage, C. S., 1971: Monsoon Meteorology. Academic Press, 296 pp.
    Roxy, M. K., 2017: Land warming revives monsoon. Nature Climate Change, 7, 549−550, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3356.
    Roxy, M. K., K. Ritika, P. Terray, R. Murtugudde, K. Ashok, and B. N. Goswami, 2015: Drying of Indian subcontinent by rapid Indian Ocean warming and a weakening land-sea thermal gradient. Nature Communications, 6, 7423, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8423.
    Roy, I., R. G. Tedeschi, and M. Collins, 2019: ENSO teleconnections to the Indian summer monsoon under changing climate. International Journal of Climatology, 39, 3031−3042, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5999.
    Sabeerali, C. T., R. S. Ajayamohan, H. K. Bangalath, and N. Chen, 2019: Atlantic zonal mode: An emerging source of Indian Summer Monsoon variability in a warming world. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4460−4467, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082379.
    Samanta, D., B. Rajagopalan, K. B. Karnauskas, L. Zhang, and N. F. Goodkin, 2020: La Niña's diminishing fingerprint on the Central Indian summer monsoon. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086237, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086237.
    Sandeep, N., P. Swapna, R. Krishnan, R. Farneti, A. G. Prajeesh, D. C. Ayantika, and S. Manmeet, 2020: South Asian monsoon response to weakening of Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in a warming climate. Climate Dyn., 54, 3507−3524, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05180-y.
    Schulte, J., F. Policelli, and B. Zaitchik, 2021: A continuum approach to understanding changes in the ENSO–Indian monsoon relationship. J. Climate, 34, 1549−1561, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0027.1.
    Seetha, C. J., H. Varikoden, C. A. Babu, and J. Kuttippurath, 2020: Significant changes in the ENSO-monsoon relationship and associated circulation features on multidecadal timescale. Climate Dyn., 54, 1491−1506, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05071-x.
    Seok, S.-H., and K.-H. Seo, 2021: Sensitivity of East Asian summer monsoon precipitation to the location of the Tibetan Plateau. J. Climate, 34(22), 8829−8840, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0154.1.
    Shindell, D. T., R. L. Miller, G. A. Schmidt, and L. Pandolfo, 1999: Simulation of recent northern winter climate trends by greenhouse-gas forcing. Nature, 399, 452−455, https://doi.org/10.1038/20905.
    Son, J.-H., K.-H. Seo, and B. Wang, 2019: Dynamical control of the Tibetan Plateau on the East Asian summer monsoon. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46(13), 7672−7679, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083104.
    Son, J.-H., K.-H. Seo, and B. Wang, 2020: How does the Tibetan Plateau dynamically affect downstream monsoon precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47(23), e2020GL090543, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090543.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2017: Processes for occurrence of strong cold events over eastern China. J. Climate, 30, 9247−9266, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0857.1.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2018: Comparison of intraseasonal East Asian Winter cold temperature anomalies in positive and negative phases of the arctic oscillation. J. Geophys. Res., 123, 8518−8537, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028343.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2019a: Impacts of MJO convection over the maritime continent on eastern China cold temperatures. J. Climate, 32, 3429−3449, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0545.1.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2019b: Different cooperation of the arctic oscillation and the Madden-Julian oscillation in the East Asian cold events during early and late winter. J. Geophys. Res., 124, 4913−4931, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030388.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2019c: Combined effects of the MJO and the arctic oscillation on the intraseasonal eastern China winter temperature variations. J. Climate, 32, 2295−2311, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0625.1.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2019d: Precursory signals of East Asian winter cold anomalies in stratospheric planetary wave pattern. Climate Dyn., 52, 5965−5983, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4491-x.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2020: Modulation of the QBO on the MJO-related surface air temperature anomalies over Eurasia during boreal winter. Climate Dyn., 54, 2419−2431, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05122-8.
    Song, L., and R. G. Wu, 2021: Two types of rossby wave breaking events and their influences on East Asian winter temperature. J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2020JD033917, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033917.
    Song, L. Y., S. F. Chen, W. Chen, J. P. Guo, C. L. Cheng, and Y. Wang, 2022: Distinct evolutions of haze pollution from winter to the following spring over the North China Plain: Role of the North Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 1669−1688, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1669-2022.
    Srinivas, G., J. S. Chowdary, Y. Kosaka, C. Gnanaseelan, A. Parekh, and K. V. S. R. Prasad, 2018: Influence of the Pacific–Japan pattern on Indian summer monsoon rainfall. J. Climate, 31, 3943−3958, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0408.1.
    Srivastava, G., A. Chakraborty, and R. S. Nanjundiah, 2020: Multidecadal variations in ENSO-Indian summer monsoon relationship at sub-seasonal timescales. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 140, 1299−1314, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03122-6.
    Stephan, C. C., N. P. Klingaman, and A. G. Turner. 2019: A mechanism for the recently increased interdecadal variability of the Silk Road pattern. J. Climate, 32(3), 717−736, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0405.1.
    Sun, J. H., Y. C. Zhang, R. X. Liu, S. M. Fu, and F. Y. Tian, 2019: A review of research on warm-sector heavy rainfall in China. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1299−1307, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-9021-1.
    Sun, J. Q., and J. Ming, 2019: Possible mechanism for the weakening relationship between Indian and central East Asian summer rainfall after the late 1970s: Role of the mid-to-high-latitude atmospheric circulation. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 131, 517−524, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-018-0586-5.
    Takaya, Y., I. Ishikawa, C. Kobayashi, H. Endo, and T. Ose, 2020: Enhanced Meiyu‐Baiu rainfall in early summer 2020: Aftermath of the 2019 super IOD event. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090671, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090671.
    Tang, S. L., J.-J. Luo, J. Y. He, J. Y. Wu, Y. Zhou, and W. S. Ying, 2021: Toward understanding the extreme floods over Yangtze River valley in June–July 2020: Role of tropical oceans. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2023−2039, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1036-8.
    Tao, S. Y., and L. X. Chen, 1987: A review of recent research on the East Asian summer monsoon in China. Monsoon Meteorology, C. P. Chang and T. N. Krishnamurti, Eds., Oxford University Press, 60−92.
    Terray, P., K. P. Sooraj, S. Masson, and C. Prodhomme, 2021: Anatomy of the Indian Summer Monsoon and ENSO relationships in state-of-the-art CGCMs: Role of the tropical Indian Ocean. Climate Dyn., 56, 329−356, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05484-z.
    Tian, B. Q., and K. Fan, 2020: Different prediction skill for the East Asian winter monsoon in the early and late winter season. Climate Dyn., 54, 1523−1538, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05068-6.
    Torrence, C., and P. J. Webster, 1999: Interdecadal changes in the ENSO-monsoon system. J. Climate, 12, 2679−2690, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2679:ICITEM>2.0.CO;2.
    Ummenhofer, C. C., A. Sen Gupta, Y. Li, A. S. Taschetto, and M. H. England, 2011: Multi-decadal modulation of the El Niño–Indian monsoon relationship by Indian Ocean variability. Environmental Research Letters, 6, 034006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034006.
    Varikoden, H., and V. Revadekar, 2020: On the extreme rainfall events during the southwest monsoon season in Northeast regions of the Indian subcontinent. Meteorological Applications, 27, e1822, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1822.
    Varikoden, H., J. V. Revadekar, J. Kuttippurath, and C. A. Babu, 2019: Contrasting trends in southwest monsoon rainfall over the western Ghats region of India. Climate Dyn., 52, 4557−4566, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4397-7.
    Varikoden, H., P. P. V. H. Hrudya, R. N. Vishnu, and J. Kuttippurath, 2022: Changes in the ENSO-ISMR relationship in the historical and future projection periods based on coupled models. International Journal of Climatology, 42, 2225−2245, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7362.
    Vibhute, A., S. Halder, P. Singh, A. Parekh, J. S. Chowdary, and C. Gnanaseelan, 2020: Decadal variability of tropical Indian Ocean sea surface temperature and its impact on the Indian summer monsoon. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 141, 551−566, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03216-1.
    Vittal, H., G. Villarini, and W. Zhang, 2020: Early prediction of the Indian summer monsoon rainfall by the Atlantic Meridional Mode. Climate Dyn., 54, 2337−2346, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05117-0.
    Wang, B., and Z. Fan, 1999: Choice of South Asian summer monsoon indices. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 629−638, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0629:COSASM>2.0.CO;2.
    Wang, B., and Y. Kajikawa, 2015: Reply to “Comments on ‘Interdecadal Change of the South China Sea Summer Monsoon Onset’”. J. Climate, 28, 9036−9039, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0173.1.
    Wang, B., and LinHo, 2002: Rainy season of the Asian–Pacific summer monsoon. J. Climate, 15, 386−398, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0386:RSOTAP>2.0.CO;2.
    Wang, B., F. Huang, Z. W. Wu, J. Yang, X. H. Fu, and K. Kikuchi, 2009a: Multi-scale climate variability of the South China Sea monsoon: A review. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 47, 15−37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2008.09.004.
    Wang, H. J., J. H. Sun, S. M. Fu, and Y. C. Zhang, 2021a: Typical circulation patterns and associated mechanisms for persistent heavy rainfall events over Yangtze-Huaihe River Valley during 1981-2020. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2167−2182, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1194-8.
    Wang, H., S. P. Xie, Y. Kosaka, Q. Y. Liu, and Y. Du, 2019: Dynamics of Asian summer monsoon response to anthropogenic aerosol forcing. J. Climate, 32, 843−858, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0386.1.
    Wang, L., and W. Chen, 2014: An intensity index for the East Asian winter monsoon. J. Climate, 27, 2361−2374, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00086.1.
    Wang, L., and M.-M. Lu, 2017: The East Asian winter monsoon. The Global Monsoon System: Research and Forecast. 3rd ed, C. P. Chang et al., Eds., 51−61, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813200913_0005.
    Wang, L., R. H. Huang, L. Gu, W. Chen, and L. H. Kang, 2009b: Interdecadal variations of the East Asian winter monsoon and their association with quasi-stationary planetary wave activity. J. Climate, 22, 4860−4872, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2973.1.
    Wang, L., W. Chen, G. Huang, and G. Zeng, 2017a: Changes of the transitional climate zone in East Asia: Past and future. Climate Dyn., 49, 1463−1477, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3400-4.
    Wang, L., P. Q. Xu, W. Chen, and Y. Liu, 2017b: Interdecadal variations of the Silk Road pattern. J. Climate, 30(24), 9915−9932, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0340.1.
    Wang, L., H. N. Gong, and X. Q. Lan, 2021b: Interdecadal variation of the Arctic Oscillation and its influence on climate. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 44, 50−60, https://doi.org/10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.20201030001. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Wang, L., P. Q. Xu, and J. S. Chowdary, 2021c: Teleconnection along the Asian Jet stream and its association with the Asian summer monsoon. Indian Summer Monsoon Variability: El Niño-Teleconnections and Beyond, J. Chowdary et al., Eds., Elsevier, 287−298, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822402-1.00009-0.
    Wang, L., C. Zheng, and Y. Y. Liu, 2021d: Understanding the East Asian winter monsoon in 2018 from the intraseasonal perspective. Climate Dynamics, 57, 2053−2062, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05793-x.
    Wang, Q. L., L. Wang, G. Huang, J. L. Piao, and C. Chotamonsak, 2021e: Temporal and spatial variation of the transitional climate zone in summer during 1961−2018. International Journal of Climatology, 41, 1633−1648, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6902.
    Wang, Q. L., G. Huang, L. Wang, J. L. Piao, T. J. Ma, P. Hu, C. Chotamonsak, and A. Limsakul, 2023: Mechanism of the summer rainfall variation in Transitional Climate Zone in East Asia from the perspective of moisture supply during 1979−2010 based on the Lagrangian method. Climate Dyn., 60, 1225−1238, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06344-8.
    Wang, S., and W. Chen, 2022: Impact of internal variability on recent opposite trends in wintertime temperature over the Barents–Kara Seas and central Eurasia. Climate Dyn., 58, 2941−2956, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06077-0.
    Wang, S., D. Nath, W. Chen, and T. J. Ma, 2020: CMIP5 model simulations of warm Arctic-cold Eurasia pattern in winter surface air temperature anomalies. Climate Dyn., 54, 4499−4513, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05241-2.
    Wang, Y. M., S. L. Li, and D. H. Luo, 2009c: Seasonal response of Asian monsoonal climate to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D02112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010929.
    Wang, Z. B., R. G.Wu, S.-F. Chen, G. Huang, G. Liu, and L.-H. Zhu, 2018: Influence of western Tibetan Plateau summer snow cover on East Asian summer rainfall. J. Geophys. Res., 123(5), 2371−2386, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028016.
    Wei, K., C. J. Ouyang, H. T. Duan, Y. L. Li, M. X. Chen, J. Ma, H. C. An, and S. Zhou, 2020a: Reflections on the catastrophic 2020 Yangtze River basin flooding in southern China. The Innovation, 1, 100038, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100038.
    Wei, W., L. Wang, Q. L. Chen, and Y. Y. Liu, 2014a: Interannual variations of early and late winter temperatures in China and Their Linkage. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 38, 524−536, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1401.13320. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Wei, W., L. Wang, Q. L. Chen, Y. Y. Liu, and Z. Li, 2020b: Definition of Early and Late winter and associated interannual variations of surface air temperature in China. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 44, 122−137, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1904.18238. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Wei, W., R. H. Zhang, M. Wen, X. Y. Rong, and T. Li, 2014b: Impact of Indian summer monsoon on the South Asian High and its influence on summer rainfall over China. Climate Dyn., 43, 1257−1269, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1938-y.
    Wei, W., R. H. Zhang, M. Wen, B.-J. Kim, and J.-C. Nam, 2015: Interannual variation of the South Asian high and its relation with Indian and East Asian summer monsoon rainfall. J. Climate, 28, 2623−2634, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00454.1.
    Wei, W., R. H. Zhang, S. Yang, W. H. Li, and M. Wen, 2019: Quasi-biweekly oscillation of the South Asian high and its role in connecting the Indian and East Asian summer rainfalls. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14 742−14 750, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086180.
    Woo, S., G. P. Singh, J.-H. Oh, and K.-M. Lee, 2019: Possible teleconnections between East and South Asian summer monsoon precipitation in projected future climate change. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 131, 375−387, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-017-0573-2.
    Wu, G. X., and Coauthors, 2007: The influence of mechanical and thermal forcing by the Tibetan Plateau on Asian climate. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8(4), 770−789, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM609.1.
    Wu, N. G., X. Ding, Z. P. Wen, G. X. Chen, Z. Y. Meng, L. X. Lin, and J. Z. Min, 2020: Contrasting frontal and warm-sector heavy rainfalls over South China during the early-summer rainy season. Atmos. Res., 235, 104693, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104693.
    Wu, R., and Y. Jiao, 2017: The impacts of the Indian summer rainfall on North China summer rainfall. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 53, 195−206, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-017-0013-8.
    Wu, R. G., 2017: Relationship between Indian and East Asian summer rainfall variations. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 34, 4−15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6216-6.
    Wu, R. G., K. M. Hu, and Z. D. Lin, 2018: Perspectives on the non-stationarity of the relationship between Indian and East Asian summer rainfall variations. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., 11, 104−111, https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2018.1387758.
    Wu, X. F., and J. Y. Mao, 2019: Decadal Changes in interannual dependence of the bay of Bengal summer monsoon onset on ENSO modulated by the pacific decadal oscillation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1404−1416, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-9043-8.
    Wu, Z. H., and N. E. Huang, 2009: Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 1, 1−41, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000047.
    Xia, R. D., Y. L. Luo, D.-L. Zhang, M. X. Li, X. H. Bao, and J. S. Sun, 2021: On the diurnal cycle of heavy rainfall over the Sichuan basin during 10-18 August 2020. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2183−2200, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1118-7.
    Xiang, B. Q., and B. Wang, 2013: Mechanisms for the advanced Asian summer monsoon onset since the mid-to-late 1990s. J. Climate, 26, 1993−2009, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00445.1.
    Xiao, X., W. Chen, G. Z. Fan, and D. W. Zhou, 2016: Possible external forcing factors for the interdecadal change in the East Asian winter monsoon around the late 1990s. Climatic and Environmental Research, 21, 197−209, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2015.15169. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Xiao, Z. X., and A. M. Duan, 2016: Impacts of Tibetan Plateau snow cover on the interannual variability of the East Asian summer monsoon. J. Climate, 29(23), 8495−8514, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0029.1.
    Xing, N., J. P. Li, and L. N. Wang, 2016: Effect of the early and late onset of summer monsoon over the Bay of Bengal on Asian precipitation in May. Climate Dyn., 47, 1961−1970, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2944-z.
    Xu, L., and Z.-L. Li, 2021: Impacts of the wave train along the Asian Jet on the South China Sea summer monsoon onset. Atmosphere, 12, 1227, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091227.
    Xu, M., H. M. Xu, J. Ma, and J. C. Deng, 2022: Impact of Pacific Decadal Oscillation on interannual relationship between El Niño and South China Sea summer monsoon onset. International Journal of Climatology, 42, 2739−2753, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7388.
    Xu, P. Q., L. Wang, W. Chen, J. Feng, and Y. Y. Liu, 2019: Structural changes in the Pacific–Japan pattern in the late 1990s. J. Climate, 32, 607−621, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0123.1.
    Xue, X., and W. Chen, 2019: Distinguishing interannual variations and possible impacted factors for the northern and southern mode of South Asia High. Climate Dyn., 53, 4937−4959, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04837-7.
    Xue, X., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, and D. W. Zhou, 2015: Modulation of the connection between boreal winter ENSO and the South Asian high in the following summer by the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation. J. Geophys. Res., 120, 7393−7411, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023260.
    Xue, X., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, S. S. Sun, and S. S. Hou, 2021: Distinct impacts of two types of South Asian highs on East Asian summer rainfall. International Journal of Climatology, 41(S1), E2718−E2740, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6876.
    Xue, X., W. Chen, and S. F. Chen, 2022: Distinct impacts of two types of South Asian high on the connection of the summer rainfall over India and North China. International Journal of Climatology, 42, 8056−8072, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7692.
    Yang, L. N., and B. Y. Wu, 2013: Interdecadal variations of the East Asian winter surface air temperature and possible causes. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58, 3969−3977, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5911-2.
    Yang, S., R. G. Wu, M. Q. Jian, J. Huang, X. M. Hu, Z. Q. Wang, and X. W. Jiang, 2021: Climate Change in Southeast Asia and Surrounding Areas. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8225-7.
    Yang, X.-Y., X. J. Yuan, and M. F. Ting, 2016: Dynamical link between the Barents–Kara Sea Ice and the Arctic oscillation. J. Climate, 29, 5103−5122, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0669.1.
    Yang, Y., and Coauthors, 2022: Abrupt emissions reductions during COVID-19 contributed to record summer rainfall in China. Nature Communications, 13, 959, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28537-9.
    Yasunari, T., A. Kitoh, and T. Tokioka, 1991: Local and remote responses to excessive snow mass over Eurasia appearing in the northern spring and summer climate-A study with the MRI·GCM. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 69(4), 473−487, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.69.4_473.
    You, J. L., M. Q. Jian, S. Gao, and J. J. Cai, 2021: Interdecadal change of the winter-spring tropospheric temperature over Asia and its impact on the South China Sea summer monsoon onset. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 599447, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.599447.
    Yu, R., Z. H. Jiang, and H. Y. Ma, 2016: A numerical study on the impact of urban land-use change over eastern China on the onset of the South China Sea monsoon. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 40, 504−514, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1504.15116. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Yu, T. T., J. Feng, and W. Chen, 2020: Evaluation of CMIP5 models in simulating the respective impacts of East Asian winter monsoon and ENSO on the western North Pacific anomalous anticyclone. International Journal of Climatology, 40, 805−821, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6240.
    Yu, T. T., W. Chen, J. Feng, K. M. Hu, L. Song, and P. Hu, 2021: Roles of ENSO in the link of the East Asian summer monsoon to the ensuing winter monsoon. J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2020JD033994, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033994.
    Yuan, F., and W. Chen, 2013: Roles of the tropical convective activities over different regions in the earlier onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon after 1993. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 113, 175−185, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0776-x.
    Yuan, F., W. Chen, and W. Zhou, 2012: Analysis of the role played by circulation in the persistent precipitation over South China in June 2010. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29, 769−781, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2018-7.
    Yun, K. S., and A. Timmermann, 2018: Decadal monsoon-ENSO relationships reexamined. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2014−2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076912.
    Zeng, W. X., G. X. Chen, L. Q. Bai, Q. Liu, and Z. P. Wen, 2022: Multiscale processes of heavy rainfall over East Asia in summer 2020: Diurnal cycle in response to synoptic disturbances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 1355−1376, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0308.1.
    Zeng, Z. J., Y. Y. Guo, and Z. P. Wen, 2021: Interdecadal change in the relationship between the bay of Bengal summer monsoon and South China Sea summer monsoon onset. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 610982, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.610982.
    Zhang, R., and T. L. Delworth, 2006: Impact of Atlantic multidecadal oscillations on India/Sahel rainfall and Atlantic hurricanes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17712, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026267.
    Zhang, R. H., A. Sumi, and M. Kimoto, 1996: Impact of El Nino on the East Asian monsoon: A diagnostic study of the '86/87 and '91/92 events. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 74, 49−62, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.74.1_49.
    Zhang, R. H., Q. Y. Min, and J. Z. Su, 2017: Impact of El Niño on atmospheric circulations over East Asia and rainfall in China: Role of the anomalous western North Pacific anticyclone. Science China Earth Sciences, 60, 1124−1132, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-9026-x.
    Zhang, W. J., Z. C. Huang, F. Jiang, M. F. Stuecker, G. S. Chen, and F. F. Jin, 2021: Exceptionally persistent Madden‐Julian Oscillation activity contributes to the extreme 2020 East Asian summer monsoon rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091588, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091588.
    Zhao, W., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, S. L. Yao, and D. Nath, 2019a: Inter‐annual variations of precipitation over the monsoon transitional zone in China during August–September: Role of sea surface temperature anomalies over the tropical Pacific and North Atlantic. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 20, e872, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.872.
    Zhao, W., S. F. Chen, W. Chen, S. L. Yao, D. Nath, and B. Yu, 2019b: Interannual variations of the rainy season withdrawal of the monsoon transitional zone in China. Climate Dyn., 53, 2031−2046, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04762-9.
    Zhao, W., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, D. Nath, and L. Wang, 2020a: Interdecadal change in the impact of North Atlantic SST on August rainfall over the monsoon transitional belt in China around the late 1990s. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 140, 503−516, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03102-w.
    Zhao, W., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, S. L. Yao, and D. Nath, 2020b: Combined impact of tropical central‐eastern Pacific and North Atlantic sea surface temperature on precipitation variation in monsoon transitional zone over China during August–September. International Journal of Climatology, 40, 1316−1327, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6231.
    Zhao, W., W. Chen, S. F. Chen, H. N. Gong, and T. J. Ma, 2021: Roles of anthropogenic forcings in the observed trend of decreasing late-summer precipitation over the East Asian transitional climate zone. Scientific Reports, 11, 4935, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-021-84470-9.
    Zhao, W., and Coauthors, 2022a: Distinct Impacts of ENSO on Haze pollution in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region between early and late winters. J. Climate, 35, 687−704, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0459.1.
    Zhao, Y. H., J. B. Cheng, G. L. Feng, R. Zhi, Z. H. Zheng, and Z. P. Zhang, 2022b: Analysis of the atmospheric direct dynamic source for the westerly extended WPSH and record-breaking Plum Rain in 2020. Climate Dyn., 59, 1233−1251, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06186-4.
    Zheng, F., and Coauthors, 2022: The 2020/21 Extremely cold winter in China influenced by the synergistic effect of La Niña and Warm Arctic. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 546−552, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1033-y.
    Zheng, J. Y., and C. Z. Wang, 2021: Influences of three oceans on record-breaking rainfall over the Yangtze River Valley in June 2020. Science China Earth Sciences, 64, 1607−1618, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-020-9758-9.
    Zhong, W. G., and Z. W. Wu, 2022: Subseasonal variations of Eurasian wintertime surface air temperature: Two distinct leading modes. Climate Dyn., 59, 85−108, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06118-8.
    Zhou, F. L., R. H. Zhang, and J. P. Han, 2020: Influences of the East Asian summer rainfall on circumglobal teleconnection. J. Climate, 33, 5213−5221, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0325.1.
    Zhou, W., J. C. L. Chan, W. Chen, J. Ling, J. G. Pinto, and Y. P. Shao, 2009: Synoptic-scale controls of persistent low temperature and icy weather over southern China in January 2008. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3978−3991, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2952.1.
    Zhou, Z.-Q., S.-P. Xie, and R. Zhang, 2021: Historic Yangtze flooding of 2020 tied to extreme Indian Ocean conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118, e2022255118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022255118.
    Zhu, Z. W., and T. Li, 2017: Empirical prediction of the onset dates of South China Sea summer monsoon. Climate Dyn., 48, 1633−1645, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3164-x.
  • [1] FENG Juan*, CHEN Wen, 2014: Interference of the East Asian Winter Monsoon in the Impact of ENSO on the East Asian Summer Monsoon in Decaying Phases, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 344-354.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3118-8
    [2] LIU Xiangwen, WU Tongwen, YANG Song, LI Qiaoping, CHENG Yanjie, LIANG Xiaoyun, FANG Yongjie, JIE Weihua, NIE Suping, 2014: Relationships between Interannual and Intraseasonal Variations of the Asian-Western Pacific Summer Monsoon Hindcasted by BCC_CSM1.1(m), ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 1051-1064.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-3192-6
    [3] MAN Wenmin, and ZHOU Tianjun, 2014: Regional-scale Surface Air Temperature and East Asian Summer Monsoon Changes during the Last Millennium Simulated by the FGOALS-gl Climate System Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 765-778.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3123-y
    [4] YAN Hongming, YANG Hui, YUAN Yuan, LI Chongyin, 2011: Relationship Between East Asian Winter Monsoon and Summer Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 28, 1345-1356.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0014-y
    [5] Wen CHEN, Lin WANG, Juan FENG, Zhiping WEN, Tiaojiao MA, Xiuqun YANG, Chenghai WANG, 2019: Recent Progress in Studies of the Variabilities and Mechanisms of the East Asian Monsoon in a Changing Climate, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 887-901.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-019-8230-y
    [6] FENG Jinming, WEI Ting, DONG Wenjie, WU Qizhong, and WANG Yongli, 2014: CMIP5/AMIP GCM Simulations of East Asian Summer Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 836-850.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3131-y
    [7] Kai Chi WONG, Senfeng LIU, Andrew G. TURNER, Reinhard K. SCHIEMANN, 2018: Different Asian Monsoon Rainfall Responses to Idealized Orography Sensitivity Experiments in the HadGEM3-GA6 and FGOALS-FAMIL Global Climate Models, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 1049-1062.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-7269-5
    [8] SU Tonghua, XUE Feng*, ZHANG He, 2014: Simulating the Intraseasonal Variation of the East Asian Summer Monsoon by IAP AGCM4.0, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 570-580.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3029-8
    [9] Chen Wen, Hans-F. Graf, Huang Ronghui, 2000: The Interannual Variability of East Asian Winter Monsoon and Its Relation to the Summer Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 17, 48-60.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-000-0042-5
    [10] LI Fei, WANG Huijun, 2012: Predictability of the East Asian Winter Monsoon Interannual Variability as Indicated by the DEMETER CGCMS, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 441-454.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-1115-3
    [11] HAN Jinping, WANG Huijun, 2007: Interdecadal Variability of the East Asian Summer Monsoon in an AGCM, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 808-818.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-0808-0
    [12] Yang AI, Ning JIANG, Weihong QIAN, Jeremy Cheuk-Hin LEUNG, Yanying CHEN, 2022: Strengthened Regulation of the Onset of the South China Sea Summer Monsoon by the Northwest Indian Ocean Warming in the Past Decade, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 943-952.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1364-8
    [13] WANG Zaizhi, WU Guoxiong, WU Tongwen, YU Rucong, 2004: Simulation of Asian Monsoon Seasonal Variations with Climate Model R42L9/LASG, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 879-889.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915590
    [14] Hoffman H. N. CHEUNG, Wen ZHOU, 2016: Simple Metrics for Representing East Asian Winter Monsoon Variability: Urals Blocking and Western Pacific Teleconnection Patterns, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 695-705.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5204-6
    [15] WU Bingyi, 2005: Weakening of Indian Summer Monsoon in Recent Decades, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 22, 21-29.  doi: 10.1007/BF02930866
    [16] Ning JIANG, Congwen ZHU, 2021: Seasonal Forecast of South China Sea Summer Monsoon Onset Disturbed by Cold Tongue La Niña in the Past Decade, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 147-155.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0090-y
    [17] ZENG Gang, SUN Zhaobo, Wei-Chyung WANG, MIN Jinzhong, 2007: Interdecadal Variability of the East Asian Summer Monsoon and Associated Atmospheric Circulations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 915-926.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-0915-y
    [18] Yanying CHEN, Ning JIANG, Yang AI, Kang XU, Longjiang MAO, 2023: Influences of MJO-induced Tropical Cyclones on the Circulation-Convection Inconsistency for the 2021 South China Sea Summer Monsoon Onset, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 262-272.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-2103-5
    [19] Yuli ZHANG, Chuanxi LIU, Yi LIU, Rui YANG, 2019: Intraseasonal Oscillation of Tropospheric Ozone over the Indian Summer Monsoon Region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 36, 417-430.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-8113-7
    [20] Ronghui HUANG, Yong LIU, Zhencai DU, Jilong CHEN, Jingliang HUANGFU, 2017: Differences and Links between the East Asian and South Asian Summer Monsoon Systems: Characteristics and Variability, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 1204-1218.  doi: 10.1007/ s00376-017-7008-3

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 18 September 2022
Manuscript revised: 15 January 2023
Manuscript accepted: 20 February 2023
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Recent Advances in Understanding Multi-scale Climate Variability of the Asian Monsoon

    Corresponding author: Wen CHEN, chenwen-dq@ynu.edu.cn
  • 1. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
  • 2. Center for Monsoon System Research, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • 3. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
  • 4. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Abstract: Studies of the multi-scale climate variability of the Asian monsoon are essential to an advanced understanding of the physical processes of the global climate system. In this paper, the progress achieved in this field is systematically reviewed, with a focus on the past several years. The achievements are summarized into the following topics: (1) the onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon; (2) the East Asian summer monsoon; (3) the East Asian winter monsoon; and (4) the Indian summer monsoon. Specifically, new results are highlighted, including the advanced or delayed local monsoon onset tending to be synchronized over the Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Indochina Peninsula, and South China Sea; the basic features of the record-breaking mei-yu in 2020, which have been extensively investigated with an emphasis on the role of multi-scale processes; the recovery of the East Asian winter monsoon intensity after the early 2000s in the presence of continuing greenhouse gas emissions, which is believed to have been dominated by internal climate variability (mostly the Arctic Oscillation); and the accelerated warming over South Asia, which exceeded the tropical Indian Ocean warming, is considered to be the main driver of the Indian summer monsoon rainfall recovery since 1999. A brief summary is provided in the final section along with some further discussion on future research directions regarding our understanding of the Asian monsoon variability.

摘要: 对于深入理解全球气候系统的物理过程而言,针对亚洲季风的多时间尺度气候变率研究是极其重要的。本文系统地回顾了近年来在亚洲季风方面所取得的研究进展,主要包括以下四个方面:(1)中国南海夏季风的爆发;(2)东亚夏季风;(3)东亚冬季风;(4)印度夏季风。这些关于亚洲季风的研究揭示出一些新的现象,并阐明了可能的物理机制,主要包括:亚洲夏季风爆发的主导模态呈现出爆发的同步性,即阿拉伯海、孟加拉湾、中南半岛、中国南海等地的夏季风爆发会同时爆发偏早或同时爆发偏晚;2020年出现的“暴力梅”事件,尤其是不同时间尺度因子对于这次超强梅雨有协同作用;东亚冬季风强度在21世纪初期之后出现年代际增强,这可能与北极涛动等气候系统内部变率有关;印度夏季风降水强度在1999年之后有明显增加趋势,这可能与增强的海陆热力差异以及南亚地区的快速增暖有关。此外,本文最后还提供了一些未来的可能研究方向并进行了相关讨论。

    • Monsoon is a phenomenon of the annual cycle involving large differences in both wind and precipitation between summer and winter (e.g., Ramage, 1971; Huang et al., 2003). For example, East Asia features strong southerly winds and abundant rainfall in summer and strong northerly winds and little rainfall in winter (Chen et al., 2019). Changes in monsoon intensity are crucial for people living in monsoon regions because water resources, agricultural harvests, transportation, and human lives are often affected by the natural hazards associated with anomalous monsoon activity. Hence, research on monsoon variability and its factors of influence has long been a top priority for Chinese meteorologists, and significant progress has been made over the past several decades (e.g., Tao and Chen, 1987; Ding, 1994; Zhang et al., 1996, 2017; Huang et al., 2004, 2012; He et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2013; Ding et al., 2015; Xue et al., 2015).

      The Asian monsoon, which includes the East Asian and South Asian monsoon subsystems, is an important component of the global climate system (e.g., Tao and Chen, 1987). The East Asian summer monsoon (EASM) normally bursts in mid-May over the South China Sea (SCS) and propagates to North China, Korea and Japan in late July, featuring a typical summer rainband elongating zonally from the SCS to the Pacific. The onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon (SCSSM) signifies the start of the rainy season over East Asia. The northern boundary of the EASM is located in the transitional climate belt between the humid tropics and the arid midlatitudes, and this transition area has suffered from frequent meteorological disasters in recent decades due to the extremely fragile ecosystem with high sensitivity to climate change. In addition to research on monsoon intensity, numerous studies have been conducted in recent years on the SCSSM onset and the EASM northern boundary or transitional zone in East Asia. Attention has also been paid to the links between the EASM and the South Asian or Indian summer monsoon (ISM) in terms of both onset and intensity. Regarding the East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM), the work of many meteorologists has contributed to a better understanding of its variations across multiple time scales, including intraseasonal, interannual and interdecadal time scales. Moreover, the Asian summer monsoon (ASM) system is highly complex, with distinct spatial features over tropical South Asia and subtropical East Asia. Many achievements have been made in our understanding of the processes of the ISM variability in recent years, too.

      This paper reviews recent advances in our understanding of the multi-scale climate variability of the Asian monsoon, with a main focus on the past several years. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the progress that has been made on the SCSSM onset. Research achievements with respect to the EASM and EAWM are presented in sections 3 and 4, respectively. Section 5 summarizes the advancements in research on the ISM. And finally, section 6 provides a summary along with some suggestions for future research to address the unresolved scientific issues regarding our understanding of the Asian monsoon.

    2.   South China Sea summer monsoon onset
    • As the pivot of the entire Asian–Australian monsoon system, the SCSSM imposes substantial ecological and socioeconomic impacts worldwide via atmospheric teleconnections (Wang et al., 2009a; Yang et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022a). The onset of the SCSSM marks the large-scale adjustment of the atmospheric circulation from the cold- to warm-season type (Chen et al., 2022a; Hu et al., 2022c), accompanied by the beginning of the major wet season (Hu et al., 2020b; Luo et al., 2020) and distinct changes in cloud and radiative features (Huang et al., 2020a). The recent review by Chen et al. (2022a) summarized the multi-scale variations of the SCSSM onset, including the interdecadal, interannual, intraseasonal, and synoptic scales. As a complement to Chen et al. (2022a), this part mainly focuses on research advances in the last few years.

    • Climatologically, the onset of the tropical ASM consists of three different stages: monsoon onset over the Bay of Bengal and Indochina Peninsula in late April to early May; over the SCS and Arabian Sea in mid-May; and over the Indian subcontinent in late May to early June (Xiang and Wang, 2013; Liu et al., 2015; Bombardi et al., 2019, 2020; Hu et al., 2020a, 2021, 2022c). Most previous studies have mainly focused on the local monsoon onset of different sub-systems. However, recent studies have revealed that these local monsoon onsets are not independent, but instead closely connected to each other (Xing et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2021; Zeng et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2022a, c). For example, the monsoon onset over the Bay of Bengal exhibits an in-phase variation with that over the Arabian Sea (Hu et al., 2022a), India (Xing et al., 2016), and the SCS (Zeng et al., 2021), and the local monsoon onset over the Arabian Sea and India are also highly correlated (Hu et al., 2022a). As reviewed by Chen et al. (2022a), many studies have revealed the synchronized advancement of the tropical ASM onset after the mid-to-late 1990s. Based on the monthly mean rainfall and low-level winds in May, Hu et al. (2022c) revealed that the dominant mode of tropical ASM onset is characterized by coherent variations of local monsoon onset, i.e., the local monsoon onset tends to be synchronously advanced or delayed over the Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Indochina Peninsula, and SCS.

      The synchronized variation of local monsoon onsets can be attributed to both atmospheric internal processes and external forcings (Fig. 1). For example, accompanying an advanced monsoon onset over the Bay of Bengal, strong convective activity and latent heating appears therein, which is conducive to the breakdown and withdrawal of the subtropical high. As such, the monsoon onset over India and the SCS also tends to be earlier (Xing et al., 2016). Additionally, a synchronized delay of tropical ASM onset is more likely to occur during the easterly phase of the 30–80-day oscillation (Hu et al., 2022c). The spatial scale of the 30–80-day oscillation is greater than that of the ASM sub-systems (i.e., the Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, and SCS), and its timescale is longer than that of the local monsoon onset (i.e., in pentads or days). Thus, the 30–80-day oscillation is large enough to act as the background condition for the tropical ASM onset (Hu et al., 2022c).

      Figure 1.  Schematic of the dominant mode of the tropical ASM onset, featuring coherent variations of local monsoon onset. This mode can be attributed to both atmospheric internal processes (BSISO1) and external forcings (Tibetan Plateau, ENSO, and IPO).

      External forcings like the Tibetan Plateau’s thermal condition, the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO) also play important roles in the simultaneously delayed or advanced tropical ASM onset. Based on observational datasets and model simulations, Hu et al. (2022a) revealed that the diabatic heating over the Tibetan Plateau leads to a westward movement of the South Asian high, which is favorable for a synchronized advanced monsoon onset over the Arabian Sea and India. ENSO is recognized as the most important interannual factor modulating the tropical ASM onset (Hu et al., 2022b, and references therein), and a preceding winter El Niño event tends to be followed by delayed monsoon onset over the Bay of Bengal (Wu and Mao, 2019), Indochina Peninsula (Hsu et al., 2014), SCS (Martin et al., 2019), and India (Ordoñez et al., 2016). Xiang and Wang (2013) investigated the interdecadal advanced tropical ASM onset after the mid-to-late 1990s. Their results revealed that the equatorial Rossby wave response to the La Niña-like mean state change can explain this advanced ASM onset (Xiang and Wang, 2013), which is associated with the positive-to-negative phase transition of IPO. Hu et al. (2022c) noticed that another interdecadal change in the ASM onset might have occurred after 2013/14. This recent delayed tropical ASM onset may also be attributable to the IPO, which exhibited a negative-to-positive phase transition in the early 2010s. In addition to the equatorial Rossby wave mechanisms mentioned by Xiang and Wang (2013), Hu et al. (2022c) suggested that the IPO may modulate the tropical ASM onset via a midlatitude Rossby wave train.

    • In a recent review paper, Chen et al. (2022a) summarized the interdecadal change in the SCSSM onset around the mid-to-late 1990s. The mean SCSSM onset date has advanced by about half a month, which is not a local phenomenon but an integral part of the interdecadal advancement of the large-scale tropical ASM onset (Chen et al., 2022a; Hu et al., 2022c). The interdecadal advancement of SCSSM onset is directly related to northwestward-propagating tropical disturbances, including vigorous tropical cyclone activities and enhanced intraseasonal oscillations (Hu et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2022a). Meanwhile, the primary source of this interdecadal shift is speculated to be the warm sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies in the western North Pacific (WNP; Yuan and Chen, 2013; Wang and Kajikawa, 2015; Chen et al., 2022a). However, some recent studies have provided other additional perspectives. For example, based on model simulations, Yu et al. (2016) suggested that the interdecadal advancement of SCSSM onset can be partly attributed to the urbanization of eastern China. Compared to previous studies focusing on the WNP, Lin and Zhang (2020) emphasized the important role of low-level zonal wind anomalies around Kalimantan Island, which is a response to the warm SST anomalies in the equatorial western Pacific. Apart from the tropical pathways like westward-propagating equatorial Rossby waves (Wang and Kajikawa, 2015; Chen et al., 2022a), the Pacific Ocean can also modulate the tropical ASM onset via the eastward-propagating Rossby wave train (Hu et al., 2022c). In addition to the tropical atmosphere and oceans, You et al. (2021) revealed that the warming in the mid-upper troposphere over subtropical East Asia can enhance the meridional temperature gradient, which was favorable for the interdecadal advancement of SCSSM onset in the mid-1990s. Moreover, some recent studies have suggested that the average date of SCSSM onset may have been delayed again in the early 2010s (Jiang and Zhu, 2021; Ai et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2022c). This recently delayed SCSSM onset may be attributable to the negative-to-positive phase transition of the IPO (Hu et al., 2022c) and the interdecadal warming of the tropical Indian Ocean (Ai et al., 2022). However, due to the relatively short time period, the robustness and mechanisms of the early-2010s interdecadal change in SCSSM onset still need further investigation.

      In addition to the interdecadal changes in the mean monsoon onset date, recent studies have also investigated the interdecadal change in the relationship between ENSO and SCSSM onset. Traditionally, ENSO is considered to be the most important factor controlling the SCSSM onset, and a preceding El Niño (La Niña) tends to be followed by a delayed (advanced) SCSSM onset (Zhu and Li, 2017; Martin et al., 2019). However, this relationship has broken down in recent years. For example, after the 2017/18 La Niña event, the SCSSM onset in 2018 was extremely late (Liu and Zhu, 2019; Deng et al., 2020); and after the 2018/19 El Niño event, the SCSSM onset in 2020 was extremely early (Hu et al., 2020a; Liu and Zhu, 2020). Several perspectives have been put forward to explain the recently weakened relationship between ENSO and SCSSM onset, including the interdecadal background changes (Hu et al., 2022c; Xu et al., 2022), ENSO diversity (Jiang and Zhu, 2021; Hu et al., 2022b), interference of other types of interannual variabilities (Ai et al., 2022; Cen et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2022b), and impacts of intraseasonal oscillations (Liu and Zhu, 2021; Hu et al., 2022b). Some studies have noted that the ENSO–SCSSM onset relationship is related to the background conditions, like the IPO or PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillation; Hu et al., 2022c; Xu et al., 2022). Namely, the impacts of ENSO on the SCSSM onset are strong only during positive PDO phases (Xu et al., 2022). The modulation effects of the PDO on the ENSO–SCSSM onset linkage take place through affecting the anomalous WNP anticyclone (Xu et al., 2022). Jiang and Zhu (2021) suggested that the frequent occurrence of “cold tongue” La Niña is vital, but this perspective cannot explain the extremely early monsoon onset in 2019 following an El Niño event. Hu et al. (2022b) revealed that the anomalous Walker circulation associated with ENSO has been much weaker in recent years, and has thus been unable to deliver ENSO signals to the SCSSM onset. The changes in Walker circulation are closely related to the diversity of ENSO; namely, the frequent occurrence of central Pacific ENSO in recent years (Hu et al., 2022b). In addition, in recent years, the SCSSM onset has become more dominated by other SST signals, like the Northwest Indian Ocean (Ai et al., 2022) and the Victoria mode of North Pacific (Hu et al., 2022b). The Northwest Indian Ocean may modulate the SCSSM onset via suppressing the seasonal convection over the SCS and inducing eastward-propagating convective activities (Ai et al., 2022). The Victoria mode is the second empirical orthogonal function (EOF) mode of the extratropical Pacific Ocean SST (Ding et al., 2015), and can modulate the SCSSM onset via the large-scale divergent circulation (Hu et al., 2022b). Lastly, the influences of ENSO on the SCSSM onset may be contaminated by intraseasonal oscillation. For example, the vigorous quasi-biweekly oscillation in recent years may have disrupted the SCSSM onset from the slow-varying seasonal march modulated by ENSO (Liu and Zhu, 2021; Hu et al., 2022b), which may also have resulted in the weakened relationship between ENSO and SCSSM onset.

    • The onset of the SCSSM is not only characterized by steady changes in low-level zonal winds (from easterly to westerly), but also by sudden bursts of monsoonal convection (Chen et al., 2022a). One important application of the SCSSM onset is that it can be used to predict summertime rainfall anomalies. For example, corresponding to a late SCSSM onset, the total summer rainfall over subtropical East Asia (lower reaches of the Yangtze River valley and southern Japan) tends to increase (Huang et al., 2006; He and Zhu, 2015). This connection can be understood through two perspectives: the water vapor transport associated with the WNP anticyclone and the Pacific–Japan (PJ) pattern (Chen et al., 2022a). However, SCSSM onset mainly occurs in May (Hu et al., 2020a, 2022c; Chen et al., 2022a), and thus it has a much greater impact on the climate anomalies in early summer than in peak summer. Jiang et al. (2018) noticed that, accompanying a late SCSSM onset, there appears to be increased rainfall in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin in May. However, these previous studies on the connections between SCSSM onset and rainfall anomalies mainly focused on the monthly or seasonal mean rainfall (He and Zhu, 2015; Jiang et al., 2018), and little attention was paid to extreme rainfall. In comparison, some recent studies have investigated the relationship between SCSSM onset and extreme rainfall over southern China and Southeast Asia.

      Rainfall over southern China exhibits a typical double-peak evolution, with a major peak in mid-June and a second peak in mid-August (Sun et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2020b; Luo et al., 2020). As such, the rainy seasons in southern China can be classified into two distinct parts: the rainy season from April to June, known as the first rainy season or pre-summer flooding season; and the rainy season from July to September, known as the second rainy season or post-flooding season (Gu et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2020b; Luo et al., 2020). Recent studies have revealed that the SCSSM onset can greatly affect the rainfall properties of the first rainy season. Wu et al. (2020) revealed that the frequency of warm-sector heavy rainfall increases markedly from April to June, which is closely related to SCSSM onset. In contrast, the occurrence of frontal heavy rainfall exhibits less monthly variation during the first rainy season (Wu et al., 2020). In addition to the occurrence frequency, Li et al. (2020) reported that rainfall intensifies over southern China after the SCSSM onset, irrespective of the duration, which results from the favorable thermodynamic environment. Further details of related studies can be found in the recent review paper by Luo et al. (2020) and are therefore not repeated here.

      In addition to the heavy rainfall over southern China, a recent study by Hu et al. (2022d) investigated the close linkage between the SCSSM onset and extreme rainfall over Southeast Asia in May. Usually, an early SCSSM onset is accompanied by a higher chance of extreme rainfall over Southeast Asia. The intensity of tropical synoptic-scale systems is thought to play an important role in this linkage (Hu et al. 2022d). Accompanying an advanced SCSSM onset, the anomalous low-level cyclone over the SCS and the Philippine Sea increases the mid-troposphere humidity via moisture transport and the Ekman pumping effect. Besides, the barotropic energy conversion associated with this anomalous cyclone promotes the development of tropical synoptic-scale systems (Huangfu et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2022d). The combined effects of increased moisture and enhanced tropical disturbances can result in an increase in the occurrence of extreme rainfall in Southeast Asia.

    3.   East Asian summer monsoon
    • The EASM can affect not only the East Asian countries of China, Japan and Korea, but also other parts of the globe including India and North America through teleconnections (Srinivas et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2020; Kosaka, 2021). In this section, we review several important issues, including the contributions of multi-scale factors to the super mei-yu in 2020, the close linkage between the summer monsoon rainfall in South Asia and East Asia, the climate variations over the EASM transitional zone, and the impacts of the Tibetan Plateau on the EASM.

    • In early summer (from mid-June to mid-July), the convergence of monsoonal warm–humid airmass and cold airmass from mid and high latitudes creates a quasi-stationary front over East Asia (extending from central-eastern China to Japan), which is known as mei-yu in China, baiu in Japan, and changma in Korea (Ding, 2007; Ding et al., 2020). The variabilities of this planetary-scale mei-yu front can affect not only local regions including the Yangtze River valley and Japan (Ding et al., 2020), but also the global climate through teleconnections such as the PJ pattern (Nitta, 1987; Lu and Lin, 2009; Xu et al., 2019) and the circumglobal teleconnection pattern (Ding and Wang, 2005; Zhou et al., 2020). The recent review by Ding et al. (2020) summarizes the multi-scale variabilities of the mei-yu and the related factors of influence.

      In June–July 2020, a record-breaking mei-yu hit East Asia, which was characterized by a one-week-earlier onset, a half-month-later withdrawal, an extremely long duration, the strongest mean rainfall intensity, and frequent heavy rainstorm processes (Ding et al., 2021c; Niu et al., 2021). For example, the mei-yu season in 2020 lasted for 62 days, which was twice the climatological length. The accumulated rainfall reached 759.2 mm, which broke the record stretching back to the 1960s, and 18 national meteorological stations in China broke their historical records for daily rainfall (Ding et al., 2021c; Niu et al., 2021). More than 63 million people were affected by the floods, landslides and urban waterlogging associated with this super mei-yu, with 142 people reported dead or missing. The direct economic cost was estimated to be more than 178 billion RMB (Wei et al., 2020a; Ding et al., 2021c; Ge et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2022c). This super mei-yu was directly linked to anomalous circulation in the tropical and extratropical regions. On the one hand, an anomalous anticyclone was evident over the WNP during June–July, which transported abundant moisture to subtropical East Asia (Ding et al., 2021c; Wang et al., 2021b; Chen et al., 2022b) and excited the PJ pattern, thus affecting the mei-yu rainfall (Ding et al., 2021c; Qiao et al., 2021). On the other hand, the mid- and high-latitude circulation featured a “two ridge–one trough” pattern, and the excessive atmospheric blockings brought cold airmasses into the mei-yu region (Ding et al., 2021c; Qiao et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021a). The above circulation anomalies can be attributed to the combined effects of the atmosphere, ocean, and sea ice. Figure 2 summarizes in detail the contributions of these factors to the super mei-yu, which we discuss in depth in the next two paragraphs, including climate variabilities on the interannual–interdecadal timescales (e.g., SST and sea ice) and subseasonal timescales [e.g., the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) and synoptic disturbances].

      Figure 2.  Schematic of the multi-timescale (from interdecadal to synoptic) factors influencing the super mei-yu in 2020.

      Unlike the extreme mei-yu in 1998, the super mei-yu in 2020 was not preceded by a strong El Niño event (Chen et al., 2021b; Cai et al., 2022). However, a very strong Indian Ocean dipole (IOD) was observed in the preceding autumn of 2019 (Takaya et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2021). The combination of the 2019 IOD event and the decadal warming trend of the Indian Ocean resulted in a strong Indian Ocean warming in the early summer of 2020 (Guo et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022b). The warming Indian Ocean excited equatorial Kelvin waves to the east, which is regarded as the major contributor to the anomalous cyclone over the WNP (Takaya et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021b, 2022b; Ding et al., 2021b; Tang et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021; Cai et al., 2022). In addition, several studies have suggested that the developing La Niña in the equatorial central-eastern Pacific (Ding et al., 2021c; Chu et al., 2022), warming in the Maritime Continent (Tang et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022b), and the warm SST anomalies in the tropical Atlantic Ocean (Feng and Chen, 2021, 2022; Tang et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021b; Zheng and Wang, 2021) also contributed to the anomalous WNP anticyclone. Specifically, the cold SST anomalies in the central-eastern Pacific excited an equatorial Rossby wave response and reinforced the WNP anticyclone (Pan et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2021), the active convections over the Maritime Continent promoted the WNP anticyclone via the local meridional circulation (Chu et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2022b), and the Atlantic Ocean modulated the WNP anticyclone through an equatorial Kelvin wave response and the mass flow (Wang et al., 2021b). Note that the warm SST anomalies in the WNP seem to be a consequence of the anomalous anticyclone rather than its cause. In addition to the tropical oceans, Chen et al. (2021a) and Chen et al. (2022b) mainly emphasized the role of extremely low Arctic sea ice in the late spring and early summer, which mainly affected the super mei-yu via modulation of the atmospheric blockings and related cold-air activity. Interestingly, several studies have also revealed the impacts of reduced aerosols in the COVID-19 pandemic on the super mei-yu (Kripalani et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022).

      Apart from the above interannual variabilities and interdecadal backgrounds, some studies have also emphasized the prominent roles of high-frequency variabilities, including intraseasonal oscillations, synoptic-scale disturbances, mesoscale vortices, and the diurnal cycle. For example, Liang et al. (2021) and Zhang et al. (2021) noticed that an active phase of the MJO persisted in the Indian Ocean throughout June and July, and that the teleconnection associated with this MJO facilitated the super mei-yu in 2020. Ding et al. (2021a, c) revealed that the super mei-yu in 2020 exhibited remarkable quasi-biweekly oscillation, which may have been linked to the atmospheric blockings (Chen et al., 2021a, 2022b) and intraseasonal WNP anticyclone (Wang et al., 2021b). The midlatitude Rossby wave train associated with the phase transition of the North Atlantic Oscillation is also believed to have been important, which is also on the intraseasonal timescale (Liu et al., 2020; Qiao et al., 2021). As for the synoptic- and mesoscale, the eastward movement of troughs (Ding et al., 2021a) and Tibetan Plateau vortices (Li et al., 2021a; Fu et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2022c) are regarded as prominent rainfall producers of this super mei-yu. Zeng et al. (2022) and Xia et al. (2021) investigated the diurnal cycles of the super mei-yu.

    • The ASM system includes two separate yet closely related subsystems: the EASM and the South Asian summer monsoon (SASM). The EASM and SASM are different in many aspects (Roxy et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2017; Wu, 2017). For example, the SASM is related to the meridional land–sea thermal contrast, while the EASM is mainly associated with the zonal land–sea thermal contrast. As such, the SASM circulation is characterized by strong vertical easterly shear (i.e., easterly winds above westerly winds), while the EASM circulation features obvious vertical westerly shear (i.e., westerly winds throughout the troposphere). This may partly explain why the SASM region is dominated by cumulus clouds while the EASM region is a mix of cumulus and stratiform clouds (Huang et al., 2017). Despite the above differences, the SASM and EASM are also closely linked to each other. Many studies have shown that the summer monsoon rainfall over South Asia is positively correlated with that over northern China and negatively correlated with that over the Yangtze River basin and southern Japan (Wei et al., 2014b, 2015, 2019; Wu, 2017; Wu and Jiao, 2017; Stephan et al., 2019; Xue et al., 2022). In a previous review paper, Wu (2017) summarized two pathways of the linkage between the SASM and EASM on the interannual timescale. The “south pathway” is via the moisture transport over the low latitudes that involves the East Asia–Pacific (EAP) pattern (Huang and Sun, 1992; Huang, 2004) or PJ pattern (Nitta, 1987; Xu et al., 2019) and the movement of the western North Pacific subtropical high. Meanwhile, the “north pathway” is through the extratropical Silk Road pattern (SRP; Enomoto et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2017b, 2021c; Chowdary et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2020d) or the circumglobal teleconnection (CGT) pattern (Ding and Wang, 2005; Zhou et al., 2020) along the subtropical westerly jet, which is associated with the displacement of the South Asian high (Wei et al., 2014b, 2015, 2019; Xue and Chen, 2019; Xue et al., 2021). At the end of the review paper, Wu (2017) raised several important issues that were not well understood at that time. Subsequent works have further investigated these issues of the SASM–EASM linkage, including the impacts of ENSO and regional SST anomalies (Wu and Jiao, 2017; Ha et al., 2018; Liu and Huang, 2019), climate model performances (Preethi et al., 2017; Wu and Jiao, 2017; Woo et al., 2019), the linkage on the intraseasonal timescale (Wei et al., 2019), and the non-stationarity of the linkage (Lin et al., 2017; Wu and Jiao, 2017; Wu et al., 2018; Sun and Ming, 2019; Stephan et al., 2019; Cen et al., 2022).

      The connection between the SASM and EASM is not stationary, undergoing significant interdecadal changes. For example, the correlation between the summer rainfall in South Asia and northern China is rather strong before the 1970s but very weak in recent years (Wu, 2017; Wu and Jiao, 2017). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this interdecadal weakening relationship, which include external forcing such as SST, atmospheric internal variabilities, and stochastic processes. After removing the ENSO signal by partial correlation analysis, the interdecadal changes between summer rainfall over South Asia and northern China are still evident. As such, ENSO may make little contribution to the long-term change in this relationship (Wu, 2017; Wu and Jiao, 2017; Wu et al., 2018). This speculation was partly supported by an AGCM simulation forced by climatological SST and sea ice. The correlation between the SASM and northern China rainfall also exhibited remarkable interdecadal changes in the absence of ENSO (Wu et al., 2018). As such, the atmospheric internal variabilities may play important roles in the connection between the SASM and EASM. The forcing and the basic states are the two most important factors in determining atmospheric teleconnection. Regarding the forcing over South Asia, Wu and Jiao (2017) suggested that a combination of larger South Asian rainfall anomalies and more positive South Asian rainfall anomaly years may contribute to a stronger linkage between the SASM and northern China. This is because a higher mean rainfall background is favorable for a stronger dynamic response (Wu and Jiao, 2017). In addition to the forcing applied by heating, the atmospheric basic state is also very prominent. Lin et al. (2017) revealed that, after the 1970s, the subtropical westerly jet over East Asia shifted northward, which led to an increase in the wavelength of the stationary Rossby wave train (i.e., SRP/CGT). As such, the portion of the wave train over East Asia shifted eastward, and the anomalous anticyclone in the upper level also displaced eastward. This resulted in the eastward movement of rainfall anomalies from northern China to the Yellow Sea, and thus a weakening relationship between the SASM and northern China rainfall anomalies. A recent study by Xue et al. (2022) also indicated the movements of the westerly jet and the South Asian high are vital for the linkage between the SASM and northern China. In addition, Sun and Ming (2019) reported that mid- and high-latitude disturbances can also disrupt the connection between the SASM and the EASM. The summer North Atlantic Oscillation can affect the atmospheric circulation south of Lake Baikal, which is closely linked to central East Asian summer rainfall in recent years. When the signals of the circulation anomalies south of the Lake Baikal are removed, the linkage between the SASM and EASM becomes significant again after the 1970s. Last but not least, Monte Carlo simulations (Wu and Jiao, 2017; Wu et al., 2018) suggest the possibility that the interdecadal changes in the SASM and EASM linkage being due to stochastic processes cannot be excluded.

      In the review paper by Wu (2017), the SASM was considered a more active influencing factor, while the EASM was regarded as a passive recipient of influences. However, some recent studies have revealed the impacts and feedbacks of the EASM on the SASM. The EAP/PJ pattern is a dominant mode of the EASM variability (Nitta, 1987; Huang and Sun, 1992; Huang, 2004; Xu et al., 2019), which describes the out-of-phase variations of rainfall anomalies over the subtropical region (i.e., mei-yu) and tropical region (i.e., the monsoon trough). Based on observational analysis and model simulations, Srinivas et al. (2018) and Kosaka (2021) revealed the impacts of the PJ pattern on the SASM rainfall. These impacts include the atmospheric pathway and the oceanic pathway. When the PJ pattern is characterized by an anomalous anticyclone in the subtropics (e.g., Japan) and a cyclone over the tropics (e.g., WNP), the westward-extending anomalous cyclone and westerly winds can modulate the vertical motion via Ekman pumping effects. As such, the rainfall increases in central-eastern India but decreases in southern India (Srinivas et al., 2018; Kosaka, 2021). Such rainfall and circulation patterns resemble the first coupled mode between the vertically integrated water vapor transport over the SASM and EASM regions extracted by singular value decomposition (Liu and Huang, 2019). Apart from the atmospheric pathway, the anomalous westerly winds associated with the PJ pattern can reinforce the monsoonal southwesterly winds, thereby cooling the SST in the northern Indian Ocean. These cold SST anomalies can in turn change the evaporation and atmospheric circulation, which is the oceanic pathway of the PJ pattern affecting the SASM (Srinivas et al., 2018; Kosaka, 2021). In addition to the low-level circulation mentioned above, the South Asian high in the upper level is also vital for the linkage between the SASM and EASM. While previous studies mainly emphasized the impacts of latent heating over the SASM region on the displacement of the South Asian high (Wei et al., 2014b; Wu, 2017), some recent studies have revealed that the latent heating over the EASM region (e.g., Yangtze River valley and south of Japan) can also affect the location of the South Asian high (Wei et al., 2015, 2019; Zhou et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021a), thus creating feedback to the rainfall over the SASM region. The displacement of the South Asian high is closely linked to the CGT pattern, which is a zonal wavenumber-5 teleconnection pattern in the upper troposphere. There are close interactions between the SASM and the CGT pattern (Ding and Wang, 2005, 2007). On the one hand, the SASM rainfall may excite a downstream Rossby wave train extending to East Asia and North America. On the other hand, the wave train excited in the jet exit region of the North Atlantic may affect the intensity and rainfall of the SASM (Ding and Wang, 2005, 2007). Recently, Zhou et al. (2020) revealed that the latent heating associated with the EASM can stimulate an upper-tropospheric teleconnection that resembles the CGT pattern. As such, the impacts and feedbacks of the EASM on the SASM may also be achieved by the CGT pattern.

    • In addition to intensity changes, the advancement of the EASM system can also exert a substantial influence on dry–wet conditions over a vast area of East Asia (Fig. 3). The EASM usually begins in southern China in May, and then marches northward in two stages before reaching its northernmost position in late July (Wang and LinHo, 2002; Ding and Chan, 2005; Chen et al., 2009; Yuan et al., 2012). The northernmost position of the EASM exhibits significant spatial fluctuations from year to year, thus forming a southwest–northeast-oriented belt between the arid and humid climate zone—the monsoon transitional zone (MTZ; Wang et al., 2017a, 2021e; Piao et al., 2021c; Zhao et al., 2021; Piao et al., 2022). The MTZ extends from the east of the Tibetan Plateau to Northeast China, and mainly covers semi-arid climate zones with rather low annual total precipitation amounts. Due to the scarcity of water resources, the MTZ is extremely sensitive and vulnerable to climate variability, especially to precipitation changes. Far from oceanic moisture sources, the formation of precipitation here is closely related local land processes, with the available water vapor contributed greatly by evaporation, according to methods under both Eulerian (Piao et al., 2018a, 2020) and Lagrangian frameworks (Wang et al., 2023).

      Figure 3.  Time series of the (a) EASM northern boundary index (bars) from 1979–2021 with the corresponding 9-yr running mean (black line), and (b) its regressed summer (June–August) precipitation pattern (units: mm d−1). (c, d) As in (a, b) but for the EASM intensity index. The dotted areas in (b, d) denote where the regressed anomalies are significant at the 95% confidence level, and the red lines represent the climatological mean position of the EASM northern boundary. The northern boundary index and intensity index of the EASM were calculated based on the definitions proposed by Chen et al. (2018) and Wang and Fan (1999), respectively.

      Considering that more than half of the annual total precipitation occurs in the summertime, several studies have mainly focused on summer precipitation variations and revealed their connections with SST anomalies over the tropical Pacific and northern Atlantic (Piao et al., 2017, 2018b; Zhao et al., 2019a, b). For example, it has been suggested that SST anomalies over the tropical central-eastern Pacific (TCEP) and tropical Northern Atlantic (TNA) can exert combined impacts on the interannual variation of summer precipitation via triggering an atmospheric wave train over Eurasia (Zhao et al., 2019b, 2020a, b); and only when opposite-sign SST anomalies appear over the TCEP and TNA are they both significantly correlated with the precipitation variation over the MTZ. This is because in opposite-sign (same-sign) cases, atmospheric anomalies induced by the TCEP SST anomalies are amplified (weakened) by those generated by the TNA SST changes (Zhao et al., 2020b). In addition to interannual variations, summer precipitation over the MTZ underwent remarkable interdecadal decreases in the late 1990s, along with prolonged drought conditions (Piao et al., 2017, 2021a). Observational results and sensitivity experiments show that the SST warming in the North Atlantic played an important role in this interdecadal change via inducing a wave-like teleconnection pattern from western Europe to Asia (Piao et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017a).

      Subsequent studies have projected future changes in precipitation over the MTZ and analyzed the main influencing factors (Piao et al., 2021b, c, 2022). The precipitation amount is expected to increase throughout the year according to both CMIP5 and CMIP6 model simulations, with the most significant changes identified in summer (Piao et al., 2021c, 2022). Moisture budget analysis suggests that changes in vertical moisture advection and evaporation together dominate the precipitation increases, with the former factor playing a more important role. It is worth noting that changes in vertical moisture advection are mainly controlled by dynamic effects associated with atmospheric changes in CMIP6, but thermodynamic components related to humidity increase in CMIP5. This inconsistency between CMIP5 and CMIP6 results might be caused by the stronger warming gradient between the mid- high latitudes and the tropics projected in CMIP6 (Piao et al., 2021c). Based on 40-member ensemble projections of the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Community Climate System Model, version 3, Piao et al. (2021b) further indicated that the projected precipitation increases are under the combined impacts from external forcing and internal atmospheric variability. The internal atmospheric variability mainly holds dominant modes resembling those associated with the Arctic Oscillation (AO) and Polar-Eurasian pattern, causing large model spread via modulating vertical motions and water vapor transport over the MTZ.

    • The Tibetan Plateau exerts a large impact on the EASM through orographic effects and interactions with the westerlies (e.g., Wu et al., 2007; Chen and Bordoni, 2014; Son et al., 2019, 2020; Kong and Chiang, 2020; Seok and Seo, 2021). As an elevated heat source and sink in the middle troposphere, the anomalous thermal state of the Tibetan Plateau modulates the land–sea thermal contrast and affects the climate over Asia (Duan and Wu, 2005; Wu et al., 2007). Snow anomalies over the Tibetan Plateau can induce anomalous heating or cooling in the atmospheric column through the snow-albedo effect and the snow-hydrological effect (Barnett et al., 1989; Yasunari et al., 1991). Consequently, Tibetan Plateau snow anomalies affect the atmospheric circulation and weather and climate in neighboring and remote regions. There have been numerous studies of the impacts of Tibetan Plateau snow anomalies on the EASM (e.g., Duan et al., 2018). Earlier studies focused mostly on the influence of the cold season (autumn–winter–spring) snow anomalies over the central-eastern Tibetan Plateau based on station snow observations. Utilizing satellite snow data, recent studies have detected the influence of the summer snow over the western Tibetan Plateau on the East Asian summer rainfall (e.g., Xiao and Duan, 2016; Wang et al., 2018).

      Wang et al. (2018) summarized two pathways for the impacts of Tibetan Plateau summer snow anomalies on East Asian summer rainfall (Fig. 4). One is through a midlatitude atmospheric wave pattern induced by western Tibetan Plateau snow anomalies. More snow cover over the western Tibetan Plateau excites an upper-level wave pattern that extends to Northeast China (Fig. 4a). The anomalous southwesterlies to the south of an anomalous cyclone bring more moisture from the lower latitudes, leading to a band of excessive rainfall extending from the mid-to-lower Yangtze River to Japan. The other is through the tropical Indo-western Pacific vertical circulation triggered by southern Tibetan Plateau snow anomalies (Fig. 4b). Anomalous cooling accompanying more snow cover over the southern Tibetan Plateau induces more convection through anomalous meridional overturning circulation. Anomalous convection over the Indian Ocean causes anomalous zonal overturning circulation with anomalous upper-level westerlies over the tropical Indian Ocean and anomalous upper-level convergence over the WNP. The suppressed convection over the WNP induces a meridional atmospheric circulation anomaly pattern with an anomalous lower-level cyclone over East Asia, inducing more rainfall extending from the middle-lower Yangtze River to Japan. When the amount of western and southern Tibetan Plateau snow is more than normal, their consistent impacts lead to more precipitation over the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and subtropical WNP, and less precipitation over the northern Indian Ocean and tropical WNP (Wang et al., 2018).

      Figure 4.  Two pathways for the impacts of Tibetan Plateau summer snow anomalies on East Asian summer rainfall. One is a midlatitude atmospheric wave pattern associated with western Tibetan Plateau snow anomalies, and the other is tropical Indo-western Pacific vertical circulation triggered by southern Tibetan Plateau snow anomalies.

    4.   The East Asian winter monsoon
    • The EAWM is an essential component of the global monsoon system in boreal winter and has widespread impacts on the weather and climate in the Asia-Pacific region and beyond (Fig. 5a; e.g., Chen et al., 2000; Chang et al., 2011; Wang and Lu, 2017; Yu et al., 2020; Ma and Chen, 2021). Its variations range from synoptic to interdecadal timescales and beyond, causing cold snaps, snowstorms, and haze in East Asia and strong tropical–extratropical interactions via the transportation of cold airmasses (e.g., Wang et al., 2009b; Zhou et al., 2009; Wang and Chen, 2014; Ding et al., 2014; Abdillah et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2022). This section reviews three aspects of recent EAWM studies: its interdecadal, long-term, and subseasonal variations.

      Figure 5.  (a) Climatological winter (December–January–February, DJF) mean 1000-hPa horizontal winds (vectors; units: m s−1) and SAT (color shading; units: °C). The blue dashed line indicates the 0°C isotherm. (b) Standardized DJF-mean EAWM index [bars; defined by Chen et al. (2000)] during 1979–2021. The black dashed line is the nine-point running average of the EAWM index. The red solid line is the low-frequency component of the EAWM index filtered by ensemble empirical mode decomposition (Wu and Huang, 2009). (c) As in (b) but for the area-mean SAT anomaly within 20°–50°N and 100°–140°E [box in (a)]. The data used in this figure are from NCEP–DOE Reanalysis II for the period 1979–2021.

    • The EAWM intensity has been found to have shifted from strong to weak around 1988 (Fig. 5b; Kang et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2009b; Miao et al., 2018; Miao and Wang, 2020; Miao and Jiang, 2021) and experienced significant strengthening after the early 21st century (Fig. 5b; Ding et al., 2014; Wang and Chen, 2014; Xiao et al., 2016). Accompanied by these decadal variations, the surface air temperature (SAT) over East Asia also experienced decadal fluctuations, with a significant warm period from the mid-1980s to the early 2000s and a cold period from the early 2000s to mid-2010s (Fig. 5c; Kang et al., 2006; Xiao et al., 2016). The weakening of the EAWM after the mid-1980s has been attributed to global warming because the East Asian wintertime SAT during this period shows a similar warming trend to the global mean SAT (e.g., Yang and Wu, 2013; Ding et al., 2014). However, the recovery of the EAWM intensity after the early 2000s in the presence of continuing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions suggests an essential role of internal climate variability in the interdecadal variations of the EAWM intensity (e.g., Gong et al., 2019a, b, 2021; Wang et al., 2021b). The latter is highly consistent with that of the AO, the dominant mode of internal atmospheric variability over the extratropical Northern Hemisphere for approximately 100 years (Wang et al., 2021b). An interdecadal change in the AO from a positive to a negative phase can induce widespread cooling in northern East Asia, which offsets the forced warming by more than 70% in northern East Asia during 1979–2018 (Gong et al., 2019a). This effect largely weakens the warming trend and even induces a cooling trend in some parts of northern East Asia, and is preceded by the multidecadal fluctuation of the internal component of autumn Arctic sea ice (Gong et al., 2021). The correlation coefficient between the AO and the internally induced winter SAT anomalies in northern East Asia is 0.9 when the variability shorter than 7 years is filtered out from the data. This means that the AO accounts for 81% of the total variance of the interdecadal change in internally induced SAT over northern East Asia (Gong et al., 2019a). Therefore, the AO is the most crucial internal climate variability determining the interdecadal fluctuation of the EAWM, especially for the northern part of East Asia. Although the AO is an atmospheric internal variability, external forcings can also exert an important influence on its long-term variations or trends. For example, some studies have revealed that an increase in GHGs can force a positive AO trend by strengthening the meridional temperature gradient (e.g., Shindell et al., 1999). It has also been suggested that the Arctic sea-ice loss or the increase in snow cover in the Eurasian continent may have contributed to the negative trend of the AO during 1980–2010 (e.g., Allen and Zender, 2011; Yang et al., 2016). In addition, the Indian Ocean warming has been documented as having played an important role in the positive trend of the AO from the late 1950s to the present day (Jeong et al., 2022). The external forcing of the long-term variations of the AO described above may be an important source of the interdecadal variations of the EAWM, which needs further investigation.

      In addition to the EAWM intensity, the EAWM amplitude of interannual variability has also experienced multidecadal changes, such as a weakening after the 1980s. This timing is roughly consistent with that of the interdecadal weakening of the EAWM intensity because the large-scale warming after the mid-1980s was favorable to a reduction in the land–sea thermal contrast and a weakening of the intensity of the EAWM on the interannual time scale (He, 2013). Nevertheless, the amplitude of the interannual variability of the Siberian high’s intensity in winter (December–February) did not weaken between 1958 and the present day. It was weak from the 1950s to the mid-1990s and became strong at the beginning of the 21st century, consistent with the interdecadal amplification of the EAWM intensity in the past two decades (e.g., Wang and Chen, 2014; Ding et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2021a). Also, the interdecadal enhancement of the interannual variability of the EAWM can be found not only in the Siberian high but also in other components of the EAWM. The underlying mechanism may involve the change in large-scale land–sea thermal contrast over East Asia since the mid-1990s. In fact, the phase changes of the interannual variability amplitudes of the land–sea thermal contrast index in the East Asian region are basically consistent with those of the Siberian high, which was weak from 1980 to the mid-1990s and strong afterward (Chen et al., 2021a). The land–sea thermal contrast is one of the most fundamental and direct reasons for the formation of the EAWM. Due to the large ocean heat capacity, the temperature increase in the Northwest Pacific SST was smaller than that of the land in East Asia against the background of global warming from 1980 to the mid-1990s. Therefore, the thermal gradient between the sea and the land was reduced and this led to the weakening of the amplitude of the EAWM interannual variability. However, the global temperature entered a warming stagnation phase that lasted for more than 10 years after the late-1990s (Kosaka and Xie, 2013). During this period, the warming over land in East Asia slowed but the tropical eastern Pacific cooled on an interdecadal scale. The strengthening of the trade winds caused by the anomaly made Pacific surface seawater accumulate in the western Pacific, which in turn caused a significant acceleration in the warming of the upper ocean in the Northwest Pacific, thereby enhancing the sea–land thermal contrast in East Asia. This effect may have led to an increase in the EAWM amplitude of its interannual variability. If the internal variability of the climate system and the global warming caused by GHGs are superimposed in-phase in the next 10 to 20 years, and the warming re-enters an accelerating stage, the EAWM intensity of the interannual variability will likely increase again in the future.

    • Subseasonal variation of the EAWM largely manifests as an occurrence of cold events or the development of cold anomalies over East Asia associated with wind anomalies (e.g., Wang et al., 2021d). Many studies have shown that changes in the mid–high-latitude circulation systems contribute to temperature anomalies over East Asia (Ding and Krishnamurti, 1987; Jeong and Ho, 2005; Song and Wu, 2017). The intraseasonal variability of the EAWM is dominated by two Rossby wave trains over North Atlantic–Eurasia, with one propagating along the polar front jet and the other along the subtropical westerly jet (Jiao et al., 2019; An et al., 2022). Both of these wave trains can generate an anomalous anticyclone/cyclone over Japan and thereby impact the low-level winds and air temperature over East Asia. Further studies have indicated that the air pollution over the North China Plain in winter is closely related to the anomalous anticyclone over Northeast Asia, and thus is influenced by the two Rossby wave trains (An et al., 2020; Song et al., 2022). A case study showed that the formation of severe haze over the North China Plain during November–December 2015 can be attributed to the combined effect of the two Rossby wave trains over Eurasia (An et al., 2020).

      Precursory signals have been detected in the stratosphere before the occurrence of cold events over East Asia. Song and Wu (2019d) found that changes in the stratospheric planetary wavenumber-1 are closely linked to cold anomalies over East Asia. The reflection of the planetary wavenumber-1 pattern leads to the downward propagation of stratospheric signals, which contributes to the development of the tropospheric Rossby wave train over Eurasia and thus leads to an enhancement of the Siberian high and cold anomalies over East Asia. Moreover, Rossby wave breaking, which is characterized by an irreversible overturning of the potential temperature contours on the tropopause (McIntyre and Palmer, 1983), has also been found to be associated with cold anomalies over East Asia. Song and Wu (2021) indicated that anticyclonic wave breaking over western Siberia accompanied by a positive AO phase contributes to the development of the Rossby wave train over Eurasia and thus a strengthening of the Siberian high, which then leads to cold anomalies over East Asia. Cyclonic wave breaking over the North Pacific is connected with a westward retrogression of North Pacific blocking, during which the Siberian high is intensified, also causing cold anomalies over East Asia.

      The EAWM has been shown to be influenced by tropical large-scale air–sea interaction. For example, it has been documented that the MJO can induce a poleward Rossby wave train and have an impact on the EAWM (Jeong et al., 2005; He et al., 2011). A previous study (Song and Wu, 2018) also indicated that both positive and negative phases of the AO can lead to cold events over East Asia but with differences in the location and extent of the cold anomalies. Another study found that the MJO-induced poleward Rossby wave train influencing East Asia can be modulated by the AO (Song and Wu, 2019a). The wave source over the Arabian Sea induced by the MJO convection is intensified by positive AO–related southeastward dispersion of wave energy, causing an enhancement of the poleward wave train triggered by phases 2 and 3 of the MJO, which leads to the development of an anomalous cyclone over midlatitude East Asia and cold anomalies there. The cooperative relationship of the MJO and the AO in influencing cold events over East Asia weakens in late winter in association with the weakened connection between the MJO and the AO, which is caused by the decrease in meridional heat fluxes and thus the weakened constructive interference with climatological stationary waves and decreasing of the poleward tropospheric eddy momentum and heat fluxes over the western Pacific (Song and Wu, 2019b). Moreover, the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) in the tropical stratosphere can modulate the MJO during boreal winter, meaning the MJO-related temperature anomalies over East Asia are different in easterly and westerly QBO phases (Song and Wu, 2020).

      Recent studies have also found that the intraseasonal variations of the EAWM show a close connection with tropical rainfall/convection over the western Pacific, which includes areas such as the SCS, the Maritime Continent, and the Philippine Sea (Jiao and Wu, 2019; Ma and Chen, 2021; Ma et al., 2022b). Statistical results show that the tropical convection over the western Pacific is enhanced for about six to eight days after the peak of strong intraseasonal EAWM events (Ma et al., 2022b). The anomalous convective heating over the Maritime Continent and the tropical Indian Ocean can also lead to the occurrence of cold events over East Asia (Song and Wu, 2019c). The anomalous tropical heating generates an anomalous overturning circulation cell, with ascending motion and convergence over the tropics and descending motion over Siberia, which contributes to radiative cooling over Siberia and a southeastward intrusion of the Siberian high, resulting in cold anomalies over East Asia. This can also generate a Rossby wave train that propagates toward North America, where it induces temperature changes (Dong and Wang, 2022).

      In addition, the ENSO–EAWM relationship has been found to be stronger during early winter (November–December) than late winter (January–February). This leads to a higher prediction skill for the EAWM in early winter than in late winter (Tian and Fan, 2020). The distinct ENSO–EAWM relationships between early and late winter have been suggested to be related to subseasonal changes in the teleconnections of ENSO over East Asia (Kim et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2022a). In early winter, El Niño is closely related to an anomalous anticyclone over Japan, which causes deceleration of the EAWM and a warmer East Asia (Fig. 6), with La Niña generally having opposite effects. In late winter, however, El Niño (La Niña) cannot induce a clear anticyclonic (cyclonic) anomaly over Japan, leading to weak impacts on the EAWM. Moreover, the early winter anomalous anticyclone/cyclone over Japan supports a strong impact of ENSO on haze pollution over the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region (Zhao et al., 2022a). The formation of the anomalous anticyclone/cyclone over Japan in early winter is related to two Rossby wave trains induced by ENSO. One propagates from the tropical Indian Ocean toward East Asia, and the other travels across the North Atlantic and Eurasia (An et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2022a). Numerical experiments suggest that the tropical Indian Ocean–East Asia wave train is mainly generated by precipitation heating in the tropical eastern Indian Ocean/western Pacific region (Fig. 6; Ma et al., 2022a).

      Figure 6.  Schematic of the possible roles of tropical Indian Ocean precipitation anomalies in the effects of ENSO on the EAWM. El Niño is typically accompanied by positive and negative precipitation anomalies in the tropical eastern and western Indian Ocean during early winter. This dipole precipitation anomaly, especially the eastern part, forces a Rossby wave train that propagates toward the pole. This Rossby wave train has an anomalous positive height center over Japan, leading to a weakening of the East Asian trough and hence a weakening of the EAWM.

      Zhong and Wu (2022) investigated the subseasonal variations of the winter SAT over Eurasia using a seasonal-reliant EOF analysis. The first EOF mode was characterized by a persistent SAT anomaly throughout winter, while the second mode was characterized by a reversal of the SAT anomaly from early winter (November–December) to late winter (January–February). Their results were consistent with previous studies that applied the same approach to the SAT from station observations in China (Wei et al., 2014a, 2020b). The underlying mechanism involves internal dynamic processes within the atmosphere that resemble the Scandinavian teleconnection, which is maintained by both dynamic and thermal forcing effects of transient waves and the dispersion of stationary waves from the North Atlantic to Eurasia (Wei et al., 2020b). In contrast, it is loosely related to atmospheric external forcing and implies relatively low predictability of the two modes.

    • The interannual variations of the EAWM have been studied extensively (e.g., Chen et al., 2019). Recent progress includes the impacts of Arctic sea ice (Ding et al., 2021b), the stratospheric QBO (Ma et al., 2021), and the COVID-19 pandemic on the winter climate. Arctic warming in the Barents–Kara Sea (BKS) region is closely connected to cold winters over East Asia (e.g., Kug et al., 2015; Jang et al., 2019). This warm BKS and cold East Asia SAT anomaly pattern is one of the dominant modes—namely, the third mode—of the winter SAT variability over the whole Northern Hemisphere extratropics (Park et al., 2021). The possible mechanism by which BKS warming is related to cooling in East Asia is suggested to take place through large-scale circulation patterns. BKS warming is accompanied by local development of an anomalous anticyclone and downstream development of an East Asian trough, which result in northerly flow and cold anomalies over East Asia (Kug et al., 2015). Jang et al. (2019) further showed that most current climate models can reasonably capture the above-mentioned warm BKS and cold East Asia relationship and the related physical processes. However, the causes of the close relationship remain controversial, with some suggesting it may be forced by Arctic sea-ice and SST anomalies, and others stating that it is contributed by internal atmospheric circulation (e.g., Wang et al., 2020; Dai and Deng, 2022; Wang and Chen, 2022).

      Autumn sea-ice variability in the East Siberian– Chukchi–Beaufort Sea has been found to have strengthened in the past two decades, with its loss favoring a colder winter, including in central-western Eurasia and northeastern China, via a persistent Arctic anticyclonic anomaly and enhanced winter monsoon. Reduced sea-ice loss is believed to promote enhanced upward propagation of quasi-stationary planetary waves and generate Eliassen–Palm flux convergence anomalies in both the upper troposphere and stratosphere, contributing to positive geopotential height anomalies in the Arctic (Ding et al., 2021b). In addition, previous studies have proposed that the QBO in the tropical stratosphere can affect tropospheric climate anomalies via three possible pathways—namely, the polar, subtropical, or tropical pathway. A recent study by Ma et al. (2021) showed that, during neutral ENSO winters (without El Niño or La Niña), the easterly phase of the QBO tends to be associated with a weakening of the EAWM through its effect on the subtropical westerly jet stream.

      In addition, the short-term reduction in anthropogenic aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic may have affected the local East Asian atmospheric circulation and climate (Lee et al., 2021). CESM simulations also suggest that the reduction in aerosols in eastern China may have led to surface warming there, albeit the simulated warming is much weaker than the observed one. It is suggested that the direct radiative effect of aerosol, i.e., an increase in downward shortwave radiation, plays a key role in surface warming. Moreover, the initial surface warming can further drive an anomalous cyclone that advects warm and moist air to eastern China (Lee et al., 2021).

    5.   The Indian summer monsoon
    • Anomalies of the ISM greatly affect the Indian subcontinent and neighboring regions. In this section, we review the long-term changes in the ISM rainfall and factors, the influences of the Pacific, Indian and Atlantic SST anomalies on the interannual and interdecadal variations of the ISM rainfall. The interdecadal changes in the ISM-SST relationship are also covered.

    • Changes in ISM rainfall have long been a concern in climatic studies. Research has shown that the ISM rainfall declined from 1950 to 1999 and recovered from 1999 to 2013 (e.g., Roxy et al., 2015; Jin and Wang, 2017; Roxy, 2017). The decline has been attributed to global warming, aerosol effects, deforestation, and a negative-to-positive phase transition of the IPO (Li et al., 2015; Paul et al., 2016; Chou et al., 2018). The accelerated warming over South Asia, which exceeded the tropical Indian Ocean warming, is considered to be the main driver of the ISM revival (Jin and Wang, 2017; Roxy, 2017).

      The changes in ISM rainfall display spatial features. Varikoden et al. (2019) found an increasing (decreasing) trend in summer monsoon rainfall in the northern (southern) Western Ghats. They attributed this contrasting trend to a shift in the low-level westerlies over the region. Varikoden and Revadekar (2020) identified an increase in high-intensity rain events and a decrease in low-intensity rain events in the northeast regions of India. Maharana et al. (2021) linked the ISM rainfall changes to the spatial distribution of temperature and moisture changes over the Indian subcontinent. The recent weakening of the southwesterly flow was followed by a reduced northward moisture transport, leading to reduced rainfall over the Indo-Gangetic Plain and northeastern India, while the strengthening of the southwesterly flow was followed by enhanced northward moisture transport and hence increased rainfall over northwestern India.

      The factors involved in these long-term ISM rainfall changes have been explored through observational analysis and numerical model experiments. Kumar and Singh (2021) suggested that the decadal trends in ISM rainfall over northeastern India and central India were controlled by long-term variations in the strength of El Niño events. Numerical experiments by Sandeep et al. (2020) showed that a weakening South Asian monsoon circulation is associated with a decline in the Atlantic Multidecadal Overturning Circulation, while precipitation exhibits contrasting responses that are dominated by a thermodynamic response. Through model simulations, Huang et al. (2020b) showed that the IPO contributed to the recent decline and recovery of ISM rainfall through moisture convergence anomalies associated with anomalous Walker circulation and meridional tropospheric temperature gradients along with the induced anomalous convection and zonal moisture advection. A positive-phase IPO appears to be related to decreased ISM rainfall through weakened Walker and Hadley circulations induced by warm SST anomalies over the TCEP, with the opposite occurring during negative phases of the IPO (Krishnamurthy and Krishnamurthy, 2014; Joshi and Kucharski, 2017).

      Numerical model simulations have been conducted to understand the changes in the ISM and the roles of anthropogenic forcing. Li et al. (2021b) investigated the changes in ISM circulation and precipitation based on a large-ensemble simulation of the Canadian Earth System Model, version 2. It was found that the increase in global mean surface temperature weakened the large-ensemble mean ISM circulation but enhanced the precipitation and precipitable water. The decreased upper-level land–sea thermal contrast, which altered the meridional pressure gradient and consequently the upper-level winds, was found to be the main thermal driver of the weakening of the ISM circulation. The increase in ISM precipitation was mainly due to the positive contribution of the thermodynamic component. Ayantika et al. (2021) conducted numerical experiments with the IITM Earth System Model, version 2, to examine the individual and combined effects of GHGs and anthropogenic aerosol forcing on the response of ISM precipitation. The GHG forcing simulation showed an intensification of ISM precipitation, whereas a decrease in ISM precipitation and weakening of monsoon circulation was simulated in response anthropogenic aerosol forcing. Wang et al. (2019) investigated the physical mechanisms of anthropogenic aerosol–induced monsoon changes by decomposing the atmospheric change into a direct atmospheric response to radiative forcing and an SST-mediated change. They showed that the SST-mediated change dominated the aerosol-induced ISM response, with contributions from both the north–south interhemispheric SST gradient and the local SST cooling pattern over the tropical Indian Ocean.

    • ENSO is an important driver of the ISM variability (e.g., Yun and Timmermann, 2018; Hu et al., 2022e). ENSO influences the ISM through the Walker circulation and Hadley circulation. Kumar and Singh (2021) found significant spatiotemporal variation in the response of the ISM to El Niño. They identified a strengthening of the ISM over northeastern India during El Niño events. Schulte et al. (2021) found that the ENSO–ISM rainfall relationship is influenced by the SST anomaly gradient across the Niño-3 region. Roy et al. (2019) analyzed the ENSO–ISM rainfall connection in CMIP5 model simulations and found that practically no influence can be detected in any parts of India for pure Modoki ENSO events. Dandi et al. (2020) found that rainfall anomalies are negative over the southern Indian Peninsula and positive over the central parts of India during El Niño Modoki years. The atmospheric circulation over the WNP acts as a factor in determining the ISM rainfall anomaly pattern during El Niño Modoki years.

      The ENSO–ISM relationship has experienced interdecadal changes in the past (Torrence and Webster, 1999; Krishnamurthy and Goswami, 2000; Kumar et al., 1999, 2006; Hu et al., 2022e), which, along with the plausible reasons why, continue to be a subject of recent studies (Feba et al., 2019; Roy et al., 2019; Dandi et al., 2020; Hrudya et al., 2020, 2021; Pandey et al., 2020; Samanta et al., 2020; Seetha et al., 2020; Schulte et al., 2021; Srivastava et al., 2020; Fan et al., 2021; Kumar and Singh, 2021; Mahendra et al., 2021; Varikoden et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2022e). Pandey et al. (2020) separated the ENSO–ISM rainfall relationship into a “long-term” component and a “short-term” component. They found that the change in the ENSO–ISM rainfall relationship is mainly in the “long-term” component, which changes with an increase in GHG forcing, whereas the “short-term” component does not change appreciably.

      The changes in the ENSO–ISM rainfall teleconnections display regional features. Mahendra et al. (2021) found that the ENSO teleconnection to rainfall over northern central India and the southern Indian Peninsula is stronger and more stable in all epochs, whereas the ENSO teleconnection to rainfall over central India and eastern central India has experienced large epochal changes. Seetha et al. (2020) found that the changes in the ENSO–ISM rainfall relationship are mostly pronounced in the ISM core zone. During 1931–1960, the effect of La Niña was more dominant owing to more La Niña events and larger Niño-3.4 SST anomalies. The rainfall during 1961–1990 and 1991–2015 was below normal because of strong El Niño events. These changes were associated with changes in the equatorial Walker and regional Hadley circulations, which modify the low-level monsoon winds and hence the moisture supply to the Indian subcontinent.

      The impacts of ENSO on ISM rainfall and their interdecadal changes display subseasonal dependence. Hrudya et al. (2020) compared the impacts of ENSO on ISM rainfall during the onset (June), peak (July–August) and withdrawal (September) phases for the period 1951–2015 and explored the changes in the ENSO–monsoon relationship from earlier decades (1951–1980) to more recent decades (1986–2015). They identified noticeable changes in the ENSO–ISM relationship from the earlier to more recent decades during all three phases. During El Niño events, rainfall increased over most of India in the more recent decades during the onset phase, but decreased during the peak and withdrawal phases. During La Niña events, rainfall decreased over the monsoon core zone of India during all three phases. Srivastava et al. (2020) investigated the impact of ENSO on ISM rainfall during July and August and detected significant changes at multidecadal timescales in the relationship between ENSO and ISM rainfall during July and August. While the impact of ENSO was strong in August and weak in July during 1948–1980, August rainfall showed a weaker relationship to ENSO than July rainfall during the post-1980s.

      The impacts of ENSO on the ISM appear to depend upon the equatorial Pacific SST anomaly pattern. Fan et al. (2021) found that the roles of the eastern Pacific (EP) and central Pacific (CP) types of ENSO on the ISM experienced notable multidecadal modulation in the late 1970s. They showed that CP-type ENSO plays a far more prominent role in producing anomalous ISM rainfall after the late 1970s, when the inverse relationship between EP-type ENSO and the ISM weakened dramatically. Samanta et al. (2020) showed that half of the reduction in ISM rainfall during post-1980 La Niña events can be attributed to changes in the spatial pattern and intensity of those events.

    • Another important factor of the ISM variability is the Indian Ocean SST anomalies (e.g., Ashok et al., 2001; Ummenhofer et al., 2011; Chowdary et al., 2015). Crétat et al (2017) studied the impact of the Indian Ocean on ISM rainfall by removing the influences of the Pacific Ocean in model simulations. They found that the ISM rainfall variability was barely modified by the Indian Ocean, and the Indian Ocean did not force the monsoon circulation in the absence of ENSO. Vibhute et al. (2020) explored the decadal variability of tropical Indian Ocean SST and its association with ISM rainfall variability. They found a two-year lag correlation between the decadal-scale tropical Indian Ocean SST and Indian rainfall over the monsoon core zone.

      The IOD is an important modulator of the variability of ISM rainfall (Ashok et al. 2004). Krishnaswamy et al. (2015) studied recent shifts in the impact of the IOD on ISM rainfall and found a strengthened impact of the IOD during the period 1942–2011. Then, in a subsequent study, Krishnaswamy et al. (2015) found that the influence of the IOD on mean ISM rainfall and extreme rainfall events has been strengthening in recent decades, but that of ENSO has been weakening. Hrudya et al. (2021) explored the changes in the IOD–ISM rainfall relationship from earlier (1951–1980) to more recent (1986–2015) decades during different phases of the ISM. Their analyses indicated that the IOD–ISM rainfall relationship strengthened during the withdrawal phase (September) over most of India in the more recent decades, but weakened during the onset phase (June). During the peak phase (July–August), the relationship changed from being out-of-phase (negative correlation) to in-phase (positive correlation) over most of the Indian subcontinent. During positive IOD events, an increase in rainfall over the Indian region was observed during all three phases in the more recent decades. During negative IOD events, a decrease in rainfall over the Indian subcontinent was observed during the peak and withdrawal phases.

      The relationship between ISM rainfall and the IOD depends upon the distribution of IOD SST anomalies. Jiang et al. (2022) identified differences in the relationship between the ISM and IOD events according to their SST anomaly pattern: Type-W IOD events, with stronger SST anomalies in the western pole, are associated with a weak ISM from May to summer; Type-E IOD events, with stronger SST anomalies in the eastern pole, are associated with a strong ISM; and Type-C events, with comparable SST anomalies in both poles, are synchronous with weak ISM anomalies.

      The role of the Indian Ocean in ISM rainfall may take place through its influence on the cycle of ENSO events. Through decoupled model experiments, Terray et al. (2021) found that the Indian Ocean feedback to ENSO accelerated El Niño shifting to La Niña and modulated the length of ENSO events. This Indian Ocean feedback was mostly active during the decaying phase of El Niño, which was accompanied by a basin-wide warming in the Indian Ocean.

    • Studies have demonstrated the influence of the Atlantic Niño or Atlantic zonal mode (AZM) on the ISM (Kucharski et al. 2007, 2008, 2009; Nair et al., 2018; Sabeerali et al., 2019). The SST anomalies associated with the AZM modify the low-level convergence over India and thereby the ISM rainfall. Pottapinjara et al. (2014) showed that a warm (cold) AZM event leads to a decrease (an increase) in the number of monsoon depressions over the Bay of Bengal and thereby reduces (enhances) rainfall over India. The AZM induces a Kelvin wave–like response in tropospheric temperature that propagates to the east to reach the Indian Ocean and modulates the mid-tropospheric land–sea thermal gradient and thereby the ISM (Pottapinjara et al., 2014). Pottapinjara et al. (2021) used the Coupled Forecast System, version 2, to examine how well the model simulates this AZM–ISM link. The model simulations showed a Matsuno–Gill-type response to a warm AZM SST anomaly, with anomalous descending motion and reduced rainfall over India. Sabeerali et al. (2019) identified a strengthening in the relationship between ISM rainfall and the AZM in recent decades, which they attributed to the increase in the eastern equatorial Atlantic Ocean SST anomalies.

      Recent studies have revealed an association between ISM rainfall and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) on multi-decadal timescales (Goswami et al., 2006; Zhang and Delworth, 2006; Wang et al., 2009c; Luo et al., 2011, 2018a, b; Krishnamurthy and Krishnamurthy, 2016). The AMO modulates the subseasonal change in the influences of North Atlantic SST anomalies on ISM rainfall (Borah et al., 2019; Rajesh and Goswami, 2020). The relationship between the ISM and the AMO is not stable over time (Malik et al., 2017). Luo et al. (2018c) detected a weakening of the ISM rainfall–AMO connection since the mid-1990s. Ahmad et al. (2022) investigated the AMO–ISM connection using CESM large-ensemble simulations and found an unstable connection in the 1800-year pre-industrial simulation, which they attributed to internal climatic processes. Their analysis suggests a substantial role played by subtropical WNP SSTs in modulating the link between the ISM and AMO.

      A link has been found between the spring Atlantic meridional mode (AMM) and ISM rainfall (Vittal et al., 2020). Vittal et al. (2020) showed that ISM rainfall increases (decreases) during positive (negative) phases of the AMM. During a positive phase of the spring AMM, positive SST anomalies in the tropical North Atlantic Ocean strengthen anomalies of cyclonic circulation and convection over the Sahel region, which in turn modulate the winds over the western Indian Ocean, thereby cooling the SST there and strengthening the monsoon circulation over India.

    6.   Summary and discussion
    • This paper reviews the multi-scale climate variations and mechanisms of the Asian monsoon, with an emphasis on the latest research progress in the past several years. Previous studies on the EASM were primarily devoted to its onset over the SCS and its intensity, whereas attention in recent years has also been paid to its seasonal evolution (i.e., monsoon onset, withdrawal, and that between). For example, recent studies have investigated the climatological (Hu et al., 2019b), interdecadal (Hu et al., 2019a), interannual (Hu et al., 2019b, 2020b, c), and intraseasonal (Hu et al., 2019c) variations of SCSSM withdrawal. Since Chen et al. (2022a) already reviewed the progress made in the onset and withdrawal of the SCSSM, we mainly focus here on more recent advances, especially regarding monsoon onset. Results indicate that the local monsoon onset tends to be synchronously advanced or delayed over the Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Indochina Peninsula, and SCS; and this synchronized variation of local monsoon onset can be attributed to both atmospheric internal processes (e.g., 30–80-day oscillation) and external forcings (e.g., ENSO, IPO, and the Tibetan Plateau thermal condition), depending on the time scale of the variations. Results also indicate that substantial achievements have been made in understanding the interdecadal change in the SCSSM onset around the mid-to-late 1990s. Moreover, it has been suggested that the average date of SCSSM onset was delayed again in the early 2010s. In addition, the relationship between SCSSM onset and extreme rainfall over southern China and Southeast Asia has been investigated.

      Among the achievements in research on SCSSM onset, a particularly interesting result is the weakened relationship between ENSO and SCSSM onset in recent years. Conventionally, ENSO is regarded as the most important predictor of SCSSM onset (Zhu and Li, 2017; Martin et al., 2019). However, the weakened relationship between ENSO and SCSSM onset has driven us to look for other factors that may be of influence. Recent studies have highlighted the extratropical factors affecting SCSSM onset, including the midlatitude Rossby wave train (Liu and Zhu, 2019; Deng et al., 2020; Xu and Li, 2021), AO (Hu et al., 2021), Victoria mode (Hu et al., 2022b), PDO (Hu et al., 2022c), and quasi-biweekly oscillation originated from the Tibetan Plateau (Liu and Zhu, 2021). These factors need to be taken into account to create a new forecasting model that can hopefully overcome forecast errors like those in 2018 (Liu and Zhu, 2020) and 2019 (Hu et al., 2020a).

      Regarding the EASM, the record-breaking mei-yu in 2020 has been extensively investigated, revealing the contributing factors at different time scales (interdecadal, interannual, subseasonal, synoptic, and diurnal). Among them, the warming Indian Ocean and the SST anomalies in both the tropical Pacific and Atlantic have been suggested as having contributed directly to this super mei-yu event. Also, the extremely low Arctic sea ice in late spring and early summer may have played a role. In addition to impacts from natural variability, the 2020 extreme summer rainfall might have been related to the reduction in aerosols during the COVID-19 pandemic. Besides, the link between the summer monsoon rainfall over East Asia and South Asia has been further investigated. Recent advances include understanding the non-stationary and intraseasonal variation of their linkage. It is worth mentioning that earlier studies considered the SASM as a more active influencing factor, with the EASM as a passive recipient of influences. However, recent results have also revealed the impacts and feedbacks of the EASM on the SASM, with several mechanisms proposed.

      In pace with the EASM reaching its northernmost position, the rainy season begins in the northern part of China, Korea, and Japan. A southward or northward shift of the summer monsoon northern boundary is often accompanied by summertime dry/wet climate anomalies in Northeast Asia. Since this summer monsoon northern boundary is generally located in the transitional climate belt between southern humid and northern arid regions, the MTZ has suffered from frequent meteorological disasters in recent decades due to the extremely fragile ecosystem with high sensitivity to climate change. Recent studies have investigated the summer precipitation variations and revealed the roles of SST anomalies over the tropical Pacific and North Atlantic on both interannual and interdecadal timescales. Moreover, future changes in MTZ precipitation have been projected, with its uncertainty analyzed by separating the external forcing and internal atmospheric variability. Preliminary observational studies have also found clear interdecadal changes in the EASM northern boundary over the past 70 years. However, climate model simulations suggest a northward extension of the EASM during the mid-Holocene and global warming scenarios (Piao et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2023). Hence, the issue of why the EASM northern boundary has not shown a persistent northward shift in the context of global warming should be addressed. Possible underlying mechanisms for the interdecadal variation in the EASM northern boundary also need to be investigated. It is commonly acknowledged that global warming will continue in the future even under a carbon-neutral scenario, posing a severe threat to ecological balance and sustainable development, especially over regions with fragile ecosystems and high sensitivity to climate change. Thus, further research on the interdecadal changes in the EASM northern boundary will not only advance our understanding of regional climate responses to global warming, but also provide important scientific support for national strategic decision-making in the short to medium term to address climate change.

      Regarding the EAWM, significant advances have been made, especially in studies on its interdecadal, long-term, and subseasonal variations. Results suggest that the recovery of EAWM intensity after the early-2000s in the presence of continuing GHG emissions was dominated by internal climate variability (mostly the AO). Moreover, the interannual variability of the EAWM has also been found to have experienced multidecadal changes. However, the mechanisms underlying these changes in the EAWM system, including the Siberian high, need further study in the future. On the subseasonal timescale, the wind variations over East Asia are associated with two Rossby wave trains propagating along the polar front jet and the subtropical jet, which have significant impacts on cold anomalies over this region. The influence of the MJO on the EAWM has been found to be modulated by both the AO and the QBO. The intraseasonal variations of the EAWM have also been shown to interact closely with tropical rainfall/convection over the western Pacific. The ENSO–EAWM relationship has been found to be stronger during early winter than late winter, and the mechanism is possibly related to subseasonal changes in the teleconnections of ENSO over East Asia.

      As an important component of the Asian monsoon, research on the ISM has a long history, and many achievements have been made in ISM research in recent years. Specifically, the ISM revival around the end of the last century attracts a wide range of interest. Results suggest that the accelerated warming over South Asia, which exceeds the tropical Indian Ocean warming, was the main driver of the ISM rainfall recovery. Possible factors behind long-term ISM rainfall changes have been explored through observational analysis and numerical model experiments. Additionally, numerous studies have further investigated the influences on the ISM from Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean, and Atlantic Ocean SST anomalies. In particular, the changes in the ENSO–ISM relationship and the plausible reasons have continued to be a key focus. Results indicate significant spatiotemporal variation in the ISM response to ENSO. Noticeable changes in the ENSO–ISM relationship have been identified from earlier to more recent decades during the onset, peak, and withdrawal phases. Similarly, the interdecadal changes of the relationship of the ISM with the IOD, AZM, and AMO have been explored. In addition, recent results show that the impacts of ENSO and the IOD on the ISM appear to depend upon the distribution of the equatorial Pacific and IOD SST anomaly pattern.

      During the past several years, significant advances have been achieved in understanding the variations of the Asian monsoon at different temporal and spatial scales. It is noteworthy that there are complex interactions across both of these scales. A detailed understanding of the changes in the Asian monsoon requires an integrated investigation of these interactions. Moreover, we still face great challenges in predicting and projecting the Asian monsoon successfully, which mainly involves the use of climate models. Obviously, more studies are needed to evaluate the simulation abilities of current models in terms of the interdecadal and intraseasonal variations in the Asian monsoon. Finally, relatively little attention has been paid to the evolution of the EAWM compared with that of the EASM. The changes in EAWM evolution should be emphasized in future studies, which would enrich our understanding of the whole seasonal march of the Asian monsoon.

      Acknowledgements. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions, which led to significant improvements to the original manuscript. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42230605 and 41721004).

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return