Advanced Search
Article Contents

Westerlies Affecting the Seasonal Variation of Water Vapor Transport over the Tibetan Plateau Induced by Tropical Cyclones in the Bay of Bengal


doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3093-7

  • This study investigates the activity of tropical cyclones (TCs) in the Bay of Bengal (BOB) from 1979 to 2018 to discover the mechanism affecting the contribution rate to the meridional moisture budget anomaly (MMBA) over the southern boundary of the Tibetan Plateau (SBTP). May and October–December are the bimodal phases of BOB TC frequency, which decreases month by month from October to December and is relatively low in May. However, the contribution rate to the MMBA is the highest in May. The seasonal variation in the meridional position of the westerlies is the key factor affecting the contribution rate. The relatively southern (northern) position of the westerlies in November and December (May) results in a lower (higher) contribution rate to the MMBA. This mechanism is confirmed by the momentum equation. When water vapor enters the westerlies near the trough line, the resultant meridional acceleration is directed north. It follows that the farther north the trough is, and the farther north the water vapor can be transported. When water vapor enters the westerlies from the area near the ridge line, for Type-T (Type-R) TCs, water vapor enters the westerlies downstream of the trough (ridge). Consequently, the direction of the resultant meridional acceleration is directed south and the resultant zonal acceleration is directed east (west), which is not conducive to the northward transport of water vapor. This is especially the case if the trough or ridge is relatively south, as the water vapor may not cross the SBTP.
    摘要: 本文通过研究1979-2018年的孟加拉湾热带气旋活动,揭示了影响青藏高原南边界经向水汽收支贡献率的物理机制。5月和10-12月为孟加拉湾热带气旋频率的“双峰值期”,5月频率较低,10-12月逐月递减。虽然5月孟加拉湾热带气旋频率较低,但其经向水汽收支异常贡献率却最高。西风带经向位置的季节变化是关键的影响因子。11月和12月(5月)西风带位置相对偏南(偏北)导致其经向水汽收支异常较低(高)。通过动量方程验证了其物理机制。当水汽从靠近槽线区域进入西风带,经向合力方向向北。因此槽越偏北,水汽可以向北输送得越远。当水汽从靠近脊线区域进入西风带,对于槽前气旋(脊前气旋),水汽从槽(脊)前进入西风带,经向加速度方向向南,纬向加速度方向向东(西),不利于水汽向北输送。尤其是当槽或脊相对偏南,水汽可能无法越过青藏高原南边界。
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Annual variation of (a) frequency for weak and strong TCs and (b) for TCs with different tracks during 1979–2018.

    Figure 2.  (a) Annual variation of the average latitude of the southern boundary of the westerlies within the longitude of the SBTP and (b–e) the geopotential height (contours, dagpm) and wind field (vectors) at 300 hPa for the double-peak TC seasons during 1979–2018. The solid bold black line approximates the location of the southern boundary of the westerlies.

    Figure 3.  The geopotential height (contours, dagpm) and water vapor flux (vectors) at 300 hPa, and TC path (solid blue and red lines indicate weak and strong TC paths, respectively) for Type-T TC cases in (a–c) May, (d–f) October, (g–i) November and (j–l) December. The red circles represent the position of the TC center at the time shown in each plot.

    Figure 4.  The same as in Fig. 3, but for Type-R TC cases.

    Figure 5.  (Gm: a, d, g, j) Geopotential height (dagpm, blue lines), wind field (m s–1, vectors), TC path (bold blue and purple lines represent weak and strong TCs, respectively), and the meridional component of the pressure gradient force, (Am: b, e, h, k) Coriolis force, and (dv/dt: c, f, i, l) resultant acceleration for Type-T TC cases at 300 hPa. Red dots represent the position of the TC center at the time shown in each plot.

    Figure 6.  The same as in Fig. 5, but for the zonal component of the (Gz; a, d, g, j) pressure gradient force, (Az: b, e, h, k) Coriolis force, and (du/dt: c, f, i, l) resultant acceleration for Type-T TC cases.

    Figure 7.  The same as in Fig. 5, but for Type-R TC cases.

    Figure 8.  The same as in Fig. 6, but for Type-R TC cases.

    Figure 9.  Schematic diagram of the effect of the meridional position of the westerlies on the MMBA.

    Figure 10.  Components of the MMB (g s–1 cm–1) over the SBTP integrated from 500 to 100 hPa for different types of TC tracks during the double-peak TC seasons.

    Table 1.  The MMBA (g s–1 cm–1) over the SBTP integrated from 500 to 100 hPa during the double-peak TC seasons (values in parentheses represent the values of the MMBA divided by TC frequency).

    MMBA/TC frequency
    May Oct. Nov. Dec.
    All 29.76/26
    (1.14)
    29.94/52
    (0.58)
    18.91/43
    (0.44)
    4.86/23
    (0.21)
    North track 24.01/16
    (1.50)
    9.65/14
    (0.69)
    13.60/13
    (1.05)
    2.54/7
    (0.36)
    West track 3.75/20
    (0.19)
    1.51/20
    (0.08)
    0.00/11
    (0)
    Northwest track 2.27/5
    (0.45)
    10.35/14
    (0.74)
    1.66/6
    (0.28)
    2.32/5
    (0.46)
    Northeast track 3.48/5
    (0.70)
    6.19/4
    (1.55)
    2.14/4
    (0.53)
    DownLoad: CSV
  • Chen, G. H., and R. H. Huang, 2008: Influence of monsoon over the warm pool on interannual variation on tropical cyclone activity over the western North Pacific. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 25, 319−328, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-008-0319-7.
    Dai, W. J., 1974: The impact of Bay of Bengal tropical storms on Tibetan Plateau. Meteorological Monthly, 4 , 12−13, 22. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quar. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553−597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828.
    Dong, W. H., and Coauthors, 2016: Summer rainfall over the southwestern Tibetan Plateau controlled by deep convection over the Indian subcontinent. Nature Communications, 7, 10925, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10925.
    Dong, W. H., and Coauthors, 2018: Connections between a late summer snowstorm over the southwestern Tibetan Plateau and a concurrent Indian monsoon low-pressure system. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123 (24), 13 676−13 691, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029710.
    Feng, L., and T. J. Zhou, 2012: Water vapor transport for summer precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau: Multidata set analysis. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 117, D20114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017012.
    Gray, W. M., 1968: Global view of the origin of tropical disturbances and storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 96, 669−700, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1968)096<0669:GVOTOO>2.0.CO;2.
    Huang, G., X. Qu, and K. M. Hu, 2011: The impact of the tropical Indian Ocean on South Asian high in boreal summer. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28 (2), 421−432, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-9224-y.
    Islam, T., and R. E. Peterson, 2009: Climatology of landfalling tropical cyclones in Bangladesh 1877–2003. Natural Hazards, 48 (1), 115−135, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9252-4.
    Lakshani, W. A. E., and W. Zhou, 2023: Observed decadal shifts and trends in global tropical cyclone activities from 1980 to 2021. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., 16 (2), 100321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aosl.2022.100321.
    Li, R. C. Y., and W. Zhou, 2013: Modulation of western north Pacific tropical cyclone activity by the ISO. Part I: Genesis and intensity. J. Climate, 26 (9), 2904−2918, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00210.1.
    Li, R. C. Y., and W. Zhou, 2015: Interdecadal changes in summertime tropical cyclone precipitation over Southeast China during 1960−2009. J. Climate, 28 (4), 1494−1509, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00246.1.
    Li, R. C. Y., W. Zhou, J. C. L. Chan, and P. Huang, 2012a: Asymmetric modulation of western North Pacific cyclogenesis by the Madden-Julian Oscillation under ENSO conditions. J. Climate, 25 (15), 5374−5385, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00337.1.
    Li, R. C. Y., W. Zhou, and T. C. Lee, 2015: Climatological characteristics and observed trends of tropical cyclone-induced rainfall and their influences on long-term rainfall variations in Hong Kong. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143 (6), 2192−2206, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00332.1.
    Li, W.-W., C. Z. Wang, D. X. Wang, L. Yang, and Y. Deng, 2012b: Modulation of low-latitude west wind on abnormal track and intensity of tropical cyclone Nargis (2008) in the Bay of Bengal. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29, 407−421, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-011-0229-y.
    Li, Z., W. D. Yu, T. M. Li, V. S. N. Murty, and F. Tangang, 2013: Bimodal character of cyclone climatology in the Bay of Bengal modulated by monsoon seasonal cycle. J. Climate, 26 (3), 1033−1046, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00627.1.
    Lü, A. M., 2017: Review of researches on cyclonic storms over the Bay of Bengal. Journal of Marine Meteorology, 37 (2), 13−21, https://doi.org/10.19513/j.cnki.issn2096-3599.2017.02.002. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Qu, X., and G. Huang, 2012: Impacts of tropical Indian Ocean SST on the meridional displacement of East Asian jet in boreal summer. International Journal of Climatology, 32 (13), 2073−2080, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2378.
    Singh, O. P., T. M. A. Khan, and M. S. Rahman, 2000: Changes in the frequency of tropical cyclones over the North Indian Ocean. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 75, 11−20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s007030070011.
    Suo, M. Q., and Y. H. Ding, 2014: A case study on the effect of southern branch trough in the subtropical westerlies combined with storm over the Bay of Bengal on plateau snowstorm. Meteorological Monthly, 40 (9), 1033−1047, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2014.09.001. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Tu, S. F., J. C. L. Chan, J. J. Xu, and W. Zhou, 2022: Opposite changes in tropical cyclone rain rate during the recent El Niño and La Niña Years. Geophys. Res. Lett., 49 (6), e2021GL097412, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097412.
    Wang, C., and L. G. Wu, 2016: Interannual shift of the tropical upper-tropospheric trough and its influence on tropical cyclone formation over the western North Pacific. J. Climate, 29, 4203−4211, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0653.1.
    Wang, C., and L. G. Wu, 2018: Projection of North Pacific tropical upper-tropospheric trough in CMIP5 models: Implications for changes in tropical cyclone formation locations. J. Climate, 31, 761−774, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-02 92.1.
    Xiao, Z. X., and A. M. Duan, 2015: Can the tropical storms originated from the Bay of Bengal impact the precipitation and soil moisture over the Tibetan Plateau. Science China Earth Sciences, 58, 915−928, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-5028-8.
    Xie, S.-P., K. M. Hu, J. Hafner, H. Tokinaga, Y. Du, G. Huang, and T. Sampe, 2009: Indian Ocean capacitor effect on Indo-Western Pacific climate during the summer following El Niño. J. Climate, 22, 730−747, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2544.1.
    Yu, X. C., W. Zhou, and Y. Zhang, 2022: The decadal shift in TC-induced precipitation over China. Atmospheric Research, 274, 106186, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106186.
    Zhang, C., Q. H. Tang, and D. L. Chen, 2017: Recent changes in the moisture source of precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau. J. Climate, 30, 1807−1819, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0842.1.
    Zhang, Y., W. Zhou, E. C. H. Chow, and M. Y. T. Leung, 2019: Delayed impacts of the IOD: Cross-seasonal relationships between the IOD, Tibetan Plateau snow, and summer precipitation over the Yangtze-Huaihe River region. Climate Dyn., 53, 4077−4093, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04774-5.
    Zhou, X. L., Q. Xie, and L. Yang, 2022: Long-wave trough and ridge controlling of the water vapor transport to the Tibet Plateau by the tropical cyclones in the Bay of Bengal in May. Climate Dyn., 58, 711−728, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05930-6.
  • [1] LI Wei-Wei, WANG Chunzai, WANG Dongxiao, YANG Lei, DENG Yi, 2012: Modulation of Low-Latitude West Wind on Abnormal Track and Intensity of Tropical Cyclone Nargis (2008) in the Bay of Bengal, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 407-421.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0229-y
    [2] DONG Haiping, ZHAO Sixiong, ZENG Qingcun, 2007: A Study of Influencing Systems and Moisture Budget in a Heavy Rainfall in Low Latitude Plateau in China during Early Summer, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 485-502.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-0485-z
    [3] Chen Lianshou, Luo Zhexian, 2002: The Impact of the Eastward Shifting of Dipole Systems over Large-Scale Terrain on Tropical Cyclone Tracks, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 1069-1078.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0065-1
    [4] LIU Ge, WU Renguang, ZHANG Yuanzhi, and NAN Sulan, 2014: The Summer Snow Cover Anomaly over the Tibetan Plateau and Its Association with Simultaneous Precipitation over the Mei-yu-Baiu region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 755-764.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3183-z
    [5] D.M. CHATE, RT. . WAGHMARE, C.K. JENA, V. GOPALAKRISHNAN, P. MURUGAVEL, Sachin D. GHUDE, Rachana KULKARNI, P.C. S. DEVARA, 2018: Cloud Condensation Nuclei over the Bay of Bengal during the Indian Summer Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 218-223.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-6331-z
    [6] FENG Junqiao, HU Dunxin, YU Lejiang, 2013: Role of Western Pacific Oceanic Variability in the Onset of the Bay of Bengal Summer Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 219-234.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2040-9
    [7] Chengyan LIU, Zhaomin WANG, Bingrui LI, Chen CHENG, Ruibin XIA, 2017: On the Response of Subduction in the South Pacific to an Intensification of Westerlies and Heat Flux in an Eddy Permitting Ocean Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 521-531.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-6021-2
    [8] QIN Xiaohao, MU Mu, 2014: Can Adaptive Observations Improve Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts?, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 252-262.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3008-0
    [9] HUANG Hong, JIANG Yongqiang, CHEN Zhongyi, LUO Jian, WANG Xuezhong, 2014: Effect of Tropical Cyclone Intensity and Instability on the Evolution of Spiral Bands, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 1090-1100.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-3108-5
    [10] Chang-Hoi HO, Joo-Hong KIM, Hyeong-Seog KIM, Woosuk CHOI, Min-Hee LEE, Hee-Dong YOO, Tae-Ryong KIM, Sangwook PARK, 2013: Technical Note on a Track-pattern-based Model for Predicting Seasonal Tropical Cyclone Activity over the Western North Pacific, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1260-1274.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2237-6
    [11] YANG Kun, Toshio KOIKE, 2008: Satellite Monitoring of the Surface Water and Energy Budget in the Central Tibetan Plateau, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 25, 974-985.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-008-0974-8
    [12] Wu Aiming, Ni Yunqi, 1997: The Influence of Tibetan Plateau on the Interannual Variability of Atmospheric Circulation over Tropical Pacific, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 14, 69-80.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-997-0045-6
    [13] MA Zhanhong, FEI Jianfang, HUANG Xiaogang, CHENG Xiaoping, 2014: Impacts of the Lowest Model Level Height on Tropical Cyclone Intensity and Structure, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 421-434.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3044-9
    [14] Gudongze LI, Haoming CHEN, Mingyue XU, Chun ZHAO, Lei ZHONG, Rui LI, Yunfei FU, Yanhong GAO, 2022: Impacts of Topographic Complexity on Modeling Moisture Transport and Precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau in Summer, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1151-1166.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1409-7
    [15] Joshua TALIB, Omar V. MÜLLER, Emma J. BARTON, Christopher M. TAYLOR, Pier Luigi VIDALE, 2023: The Representation of Soil Moisture−Atmosphere Feedbacks across the Tibetan Plateau in CMIP6, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 2063-2081.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2296-2
    [16] GAO Feng*, Peter P. CHILDS, Xiang-Yu HUANG, Neil A. JACOBS, and Jinzhong MIN, 2014: A Relocation-based Initialization Scheme to Improve Track-forecasting of Tropical Cyclones, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 27-36.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2254-5
    [17] Xiaobin LIN, Zhiping WEN, Wen ZHOU, Renguang WU, Ruidan CHEN, 2017: Effects of Tropical Cyclone Activity on the Boundary Moisture Budget over the Eastern China Monsoon Region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 700-712.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017- 6191-6
    [18] SUN Li, SHEN Baizhu, SUI Bo, 2010: A Study on Water Vapor Transport and Budget of Heavy Rain in Northeast China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 1399-1414.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9087-2
    [19] Yizhe HAN, Dabang JIANG, Dong SI, Yaoming MA, Weiqiang MA, 2024: Time-lagged Effects of the Spring Atmospheric Heat Source over the Tibetan Plateau on Summer Precipitation in Northeast China during 1961–2020: Role of Soil Moisture, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2363-8
    [20] Peter SHERIDAN, Anlun XU, Jian LI, Kalli FURTADO, 2023: Use of Targeted Orographic Smoothing in Very High Resolution Simulations of a Downslope Windstorm and Rotor in a Sub-tropical Highland Location, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 2043-2062.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2298-0
  • ESM-230093-2.pdf

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 29 May 2023
Manuscript revised: 18 August 2023
Manuscript accepted: 09 October 2023
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Westerlies Affecting the Seasonal Variation of Water Vapor Transport over the Tibetan Plateau Induced by Tropical Cyclones in the Bay of Bengal

    Corresponding author: Wen ZHOU, wen_zhou@fudan.edu.cn
    Corresponding author: Lei YANG, leiyang@scsio.ac.cn
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Polar Atmosphere-ocean-ice System for Weather and Climate, Ministry of Education & Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences & Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
  • 2. School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
  • 3. Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academic Sciences, Sanya 572000, China
  • 4. State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academic Science, Guangzhou 510301, China
  • 5. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA

Abstract: This study investigates the activity of tropical cyclones (TCs) in the Bay of Bengal (BOB) from 1979 to 2018 to discover the mechanism affecting the contribution rate to the meridional moisture budget anomaly (MMBA) over the southern boundary of the Tibetan Plateau (SBTP). May and October–December are the bimodal phases of BOB TC frequency, which decreases month by month from October to December and is relatively low in May. However, the contribution rate to the MMBA is the highest in May. The seasonal variation in the meridional position of the westerlies is the key factor affecting the contribution rate. The relatively southern (northern) position of the westerlies in November and December (May) results in a lower (higher) contribution rate to the MMBA. This mechanism is confirmed by the momentum equation. When water vapor enters the westerlies near the trough line, the resultant meridional acceleration is directed north. It follows that the farther north the trough is, and the farther north the water vapor can be transported. When water vapor enters the westerlies from the area near the ridge line, for Type-T (Type-R) TCs, water vapor enters the westerlies downstream of the trough (ridge). Consequently, the direction of the resultant meridional acceleration is directed south and the resultant zonal acceleration is directed east (west), which is not conducive to the northward transport of water vapor. This is especially the case if the trough or ridge is relatively south, as the water vapor may not cross the SBTP.

摘要: 本文通过研究1979-2018年的孟加拉湾热带气旋活动,揭示了影响青藏高原南边界经向水汽收支贡献率的物理机制。5月和10-12月为孟加拉湾热带气旋频率的“双峰值期”,5月频率较低,10-12月逐月递减。虽然5月孟加拉湾热带气旋频率较低,但其经向水汽收支异常贡献率却最高。西风带经向位置的季节变化是关键的影响因子。11月和12月(5月)西风带位置相对偏南(偏北)导致其经向水汽收支异常较低(高)。通过动量方程验证了其物理机制。当水汽从靠近槽线区域进入西风带,经向合力方向向北。因此槽越偏北,水汽可以向北输送得越远。当水汽从靠近脊线区域进入西风带,对于槽前气旋(脊前气旋),水汽从槽(脊)前进入西风带,经向加速度方向向南,纬向加速度方向向东(西),不利于水汽向北输送。尤其是当槽或脊相对偏南,水汽可能无法越过青藏高原南边界。

    • The Bay of Bengal (BOB) is an important source of water vapor for the Tibetan Plateau (TP). In summer, the southwesterly monsoon and westerlies are the dominant weather systems for water vapor transport over the TP. The water vapor that originates in the Indian Ocean enters the TP mainly from its southern boundary, but it can also enter the TP from its western boundary if it is aided by westerly flow. Water vapor transport from the Indian Ocean to the TP follows two routes: an eastern route originating from the BOB and a western route originating from the Arabian Sea (Lü, 2017; Zhang et al., 2019). Regarding the mechanism by which water vapor enters the TP in summer, Xie et al. (2009) mentioned that when the sea surface temperature (SST) of the northern Indian Ocean is warm, the southwesterly monsoon from the Indian Ocean to the northwestern Pacific weakens, while the southwesterly and southeasterly monsoon in the western portion of the northwest Pacific subtropical high strengthens, resulting in significantly more precipitation in the southern TP. When the tropical Indian Ocean is warmer (cooler), the South Asian high strengthens (weakens) and moves southward (northward) (Huang et al., 2011). Warmer (cooler) SSTs in the tropical Indian Ocean correspond to a more southwardly (northwardly) displaced position of the East Asian jet stream axis in summer (Qu and Huang, 2012). Dong et al. (2016, 2018) proposed two routes for water vapor transport from the Indian subcontinent to the TP: upslope and up-and-over.

      Previous studies related to water vapor transport over the TP have focused mainly on the monsoon system and the westerlies in summer. In the monsoon transition seasons, the role of the monsoon is greatly weakened, while the role of the westerlies is more prominent (Feng and Zhou, 2012; Zhang et al., 2017). Water vapor transport over the TP during the monsoon transition seasons is rarely studied. Therefore, this study focuses mainly on water vapor transport into the TP during this time.

      During the monsoon transition seasons, the BOB TC system cannot be ignored. The annual variation of BOB TCs is characterized by double-peak seasons, with May and October–November being the peak periods (Gray, 1968; Singh et al., 2000; Islam and Peterson, 2009; Li et al., 2013). April–May and October–November correspond to the monsoon transition seasons, indicating that the “bimodal” characteristic may be related to the seasonal transition of atmospheric circulation (Lü, 2017). During the monsoon transition seasons, which are also the double-peak TC seasons, BOB TCs may cause a significant precipitation anomaly over the TP (Dai, 1974). Xiao and Duan (2015) found that most of the northern Indian Ocean TCs that have a large impact on the TP originate from the BOB, and most occur in May and October, with an impact radius of about 1000 km. The contribution to water vapor transport over the southern boundary of the TP (SBTP) caused by BOB TCs from April to June is about twice that from September to December. However, TC frequency from April to June is apparently lower than that from September to December, which begs the following question. What is the cause of this contrast?

      The impact of TCs on the precipitation in China occurs mainly through the direct arrival of TCs themselves (Tu et al., 2022; Yu et al., 2022), and the effective influence radius of precipitation is less than 1000 km (Li and Zhou, 2015; Li et al., 2015). BOB TCs can cause more extensive water vapor transport anomalies by coordinating with specific weather systems such as troughs in the westerlies, and these water vapor transport anomalies caused by different circulation conditions also have significant differences (Zhou et al., 2022). Research on the influence of troughs on TC activity has been concentrated in the western Pacific Ocean, mainly involving the influence of troughs on cyclogenesis (Chen and Huang 2008; Li et al., 2012a; Wang and Wu, 2016, 2018) and TC intensity (Li and Zhou, 2013). For the BOB, the effects of trough or ridge systems on TC activity during the monsoon transition seasons are relatively scarce and are mentioned only in the context of case studies (Li et al., 2012b; Suo and Ding, 2014).

      In previous studies, it has been found that during the double-peak TC seasons, TC frequency is lower, but TC contribution to water vapor transport over the SBTP is higher in the first peak TC season. The mechanism of this phenomenon has not been further studied and is the main concern of this paper.

      The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The data and methods are described in section 2. Section 3 discusses the seasonal variation of BOB TC frequency and the meridional moisture budget anomaly (MMBA) associated with BOB TCs. The key factor responsible for the contribution to the MMBA is analyzed in section 4. The physical mechanism of the influence of westerlies on the MMBA is detailed in section 5. Finally, a conclusion and discussion are given in section 6.

    2.   Data and methods
    • Reanalysis datasets including wind fields, specific humidity, and geopotential height are obtained from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis Interim (ERA-Interim; Dee et al., 2011), with a horizontal resolution of 0.5° × 0.5° and a temporal resolution of 6 hours. The datasets are collected from 1979 to 2018, and the vertical level is 37. BOB TC datasets are downloaded from the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS). In this study, SBTP refers specifically to a line from 78° to 102°E at 28°N, which is close to the southernmost latitude of the TP.

    • The meridional moisture budget (MMB, in g s–1 hPa–1 cm–1) is calculated by (Zhou et al., 2022):

      where v and q represent the meridional wind (v) and specific humidity (q), respectively, and n is the grid number in the selected area.

      On certain timescales, each variable can be divided into three components: low-frequency oscillations, with periods of over 90 days, intraseasonal oscillations, with periods of 20–90 days, and synoptic-scale perturbations, with a cycle of 2–20 days. The relevant equations are as follows:

      The meridional and zonal components of the momentum equation in large-scale motion in the upper troposphere at mid-latitudes are (Zhou et al., 2022):

      where u and v are the zonal and meridional components of velocity, respectively. The subscript z (m) indicates the zonal (meridional) components. G represents the pressure gradient force, A represents the Coriolis force, and du/dt (dv/dt) represents the zonal (meridional) acceleration.

    3.   Characteristics of BOB TC frequency and MMBA over the SBTP
    • During 1979–2018, a total of 240 TCs formed in the BOB (5°–25°N, 75°–100°E). Figure 1a shows that the TC frequency over the BOB during 1979–2018 has significant seasonal variation. BOB TCs are characterized by double peaks, with the two peak TC seasons occurring in May and October–December. The number of TCs forming in the BOB during May, October, November, and December is 26, 52, 43, and 23, respectively. Among the double-peak TC seasons (May and October–December), the TC frequency is the highest in October, followed by November. It is relatively low in May and the lowest in December. Strong TCs are the most frequent in November (18 strong TCs).

      Figure 1.  Annual variation of (a) frequency for weak and strong TCs and (b) for TCs with different tracks during 1979–2018.

      The different influences of BOB TCs on precipitation and water vapor transport can also be found in different tracks. If a TC moves northward, it may greatly impact Bangladesh and the TP; if it moves eastward, it may affect Myanmar, the Indochina Peninsula, and southwestern China; if it moves westward, it may have a major impact on India and Sri Lanka (Lü, 2017). Therefore, when considering water vapor transport to the TP, it is essential to take into account different TC tracks. In this study, TCs are classified into five categories according to their tracks: north, west, east, northwest, and northeast. The frequency of each category is shown in Fig. 1b and the spatial distribution is shown in Fig. S1 [in the electronic supplementary material (ESM)]. From June to December, most TCs tend to move westward, while from February to May, they tend to move northward. There are no TCs with a west track in May. In contrast, the proportion of both northeast- and east-track TCs is relatively small. Northeast-track TCs occur only in April–May and October–November, and only two east-track TCs occur in April and October. Northwest-track TCs occur from May to December, and in October, the proportion of northwest-track TCs is comparable to that of north-track TCs. Comparing TCs in the double-peak TC seasons, the frequency of north-track TCs in May and October-November is similar, with 16, 14, and 13 cases, respectively, with only 7 cases occurring in December. Almost half of the west-track TCs occur in October–December, but none in May. In addition, the proportion of northwest-track TCs is relatively higher in October than in May and November.

    • It is widely acknowledged that May and October–December represent the double-peak TC seasons, which also coincide with the monsoon transition seasons. During these periods, water vapor transport associated with westerlies and BOB TCs is an important source of water vapor for the TP. The water vapor coming from BOB TCs enters the TP mainly from the SBTP. In this paper, we choose a straight line close the southern slope of the Himalayas to represent the SBTP.

      To understand the difference in water vapor transport over the SBTP, an MMBA over the SBTP during the double-peak TC seasons is first confirmed. The MMBA over the SBTP is 29.76 and 29.94 g s–1 cm–1 in May and October (Table 1). The difference in MMBA between October and May is small, but since there are fewer TCs in May, the contribution rate is the highest in May (1.14). The MMBA in November is 18.91 g s–1 cm–1, which is less than that in May and October; the MMBA is the lowest in December (4.86 g s–1 cm–1). The contribution rate to the MMBA (MMBA divided by TC frequency) is the highest in May and decreases month by month from October to December. That is, the difference in the contribution rate is characterized by significant seasonal variation. For TCs with different tracks, the contribution rate is the highest for north-track TCs, followed by northeast-track TCs, except for October (when northeast-track TCs are the highest, followed by northwest-track TCs), and it is lowest for west-track TCs. It can be seen that the difference in the TC track has an important impact on the contribution rate.

      MMBA/TC frequency
      May Oct. Nov. Dec.
      All 29.76/26
      (1.14)
      29.94/52
      (0.58)
      18.91/43
      (0.44)
      4.86/23
      (0.21)
      North track 24.01/16
      (1.50)
      9.65/14
      (0.69)
      13.60/13
      (1.05)
      2.54/7
      (0.36)
      West track 3.75/20
      (0.19)
      1.51/20
      (0.08)
      0.00/11
      (0)
      Northwest track 2.27/5
      (0.45)
      10.35/14
      (0.74)
      1.66/6
      (0.28)
      2.32/5
      (0.46)
      Northeast track 3.48/5
      (0.70)
      6.19/4
      (1.55)
      2.14/4
      (0.53)

      Table 1.  The MMBA (g s–1 cm–1) over the SBTP integrated from 500 to 100 hPa during the double-peak TC seasons (values in parentheses represent the values of the MMBA divided by TC frequency).

      Figure S2 (in the ESM) shows the MMBA for TCs with an MMBA greater than zero during the double-peak TC seasons. There are 22 TCs with MMBAs greater than zero in May, and 24, 19, and 5 TCs in October, November, and December, respectively. The proportion of TCs with an MMBA greater than zero is the highest in May, and there is a decreasing trend from October to December, which is consistent with the variation in the contribution rate to the MMBA. This again confirms the seasonal variation of the MMBA shown in Table 1.

      It is of interest to determine whether TC track and intensity are the main factors that cause seasonal differences in the MMBA. West-track TCs have little impact on the TP, but they account for almost half of the TC frequency from October to December. This is one reason for the high contribution rate to the MMBA in May. When west-track TCs are not considered, the contribution (contribution rate) to the MMBA in May and October–December is 29.76 (1.14), 26.19 (0.82), 17.4 (0.76), and 4.86 (0.41) g s–1 cm–1, respectively. Except for west-track TCs, the contribution rate is still the highest in May and decreases month by month from October to December. This means that TC track is not the key factor behind the seasonal differences in the MMBA. For TC intensity, the frequency of strong TCs is the highest in November, followed by May. There are more strong TCs in May than in October, which is one reason for the higher contribution in May than in October. The number of strong TCs is the highest in November (18 strong TCs), but the contribution rate in November is lower than that in May and October. When west-track TCs are not counted, the frequency of strong TCs in May and October–December is 10, 5, 9, and 1, respectively. The frequency of strong TCs in November is similar to that in May, and more than that in October, but the contribution rate is much lower than that in May and October. These results suggest that TC intensity is not the main reason for seasonal differences in the MMBA.

      In summary, the contribution rate to the MMBA has seasonal variation and is the highest in May, even though TC frequency is relatively low. From October to December, the contribution rate decreases month by month. Neither TC track nor intensity is the key factor, which then begs the question: what is the key factor that contributes to the seasonal variation of the contribution rate to the MMBA over the SBTP during the double-peak TC seasons?

    4.   The key factor responsible for the contribution rate to the MMBA: the role of the westerlies
    • It is known from previous studies (Zhou et al., 2022) that the westerlies are the key factor in determining whether water vapor can cross the SBTP. If a TC wind field in the upper troposphere encounters southwesterly downstream of the trough, which is called a Type-T TC (“T” means “trough”), the water vapor may cross the SBTP, but when it encounters a northwesterly downstream of the ridge, which is called a Type-R TC (“R” means “ridge”), it is difficult for the water vapor to enter the TP. Therefore, it is speculated that the difference in the contribution rate to the MMBA is related to the seasonal variation of the westerlies.

      To understand the relationship between the westerlies and BOB TCs, annual variation characteristics of the average latitude of the southern boundary of the westerlies (SBW) within the longitude of the SBTP during 1979–2018 are shown in Fig. 2a. The geopotential height and wind field at 300 hPa (Figs. 2be) indicate that the 950 dagpm contour line is very close to the SBW within the longitude of the TP (78°–102°E), so the latitude of this contour line is used to approximately place the position of the SBW in this study. The meridional position of the SBW is relatively north in summer and south in winter. In May and October (Figs. 2b, c), the latitude of the SBW is very close, and it is near the SBTP; from October to December (Figs. 2ce), the latitude of the SBW gradually turns southward, corresponding to the gradual reduction of the contribution rate to the MMBA.

      Figure 2.  (a) Annual variation of the average latitude of the southern boundary of the westerlies within the longitude of the SBTP and (b–e) the geopotential height (contours, dagpm) and wind field (vectors) at 300 hPa for the double-peak TC seasons during 1979–2018. The solid bold black line approximates the location of the southern boundary of the westerlies.

      To further verify the influence of the seasonal variation of the westerlies on the seasonal change in the MMBA induced by BOB TCs during the double-peak TC seasons, TC cases in May and October–December are selected and water vapor flux is plotted. In previous work (Zhou et al., 2022), it was clarified that in May, for Type-T TCs (Type-R TCs) with westerlies around the SBTP, the water vapor may (may not) enter the TP. That is to say, the configuration of the trough and ridge during the TC activity period affects water vapor transport in different ways. Therefore, 4 Type-T TC cases (Fig. 3) and 4 Type-R TC cases (Fig. 4) in May and October–December are selected to compare the difference in water vapor transport between the two configurations. For Type-T TCs, the geopotential height and water vapor flux at three different moments are selected and shown in Fig. 3. The trough is relatively north in May and October (Figs 3af), and relatively south in November and December (Figs. 3gl). When the trough is relatively north (Figs. 3af), water vapor can be transported farther north. When the trough is relatively south, water vapor does not necessarily cross the SBTP (Fig. 3i). For Type-R TCs, the geopotential height and water vapor flux are shown in Fig. 4. The ridge is relatively north in May and October (Figs. 4af), and relatively south in November and December (Figs. 4gl). When the ridge is abnormally north (Figs. 4ac), water vapor may cross the SBTP, but it can affect only the southern region of the TP. When the ridge is relatively south, the water vapor cannot cross the SBTP (Figs. 4gl).

      Figure 3.  The geopotential height (contours, dagpm) and water vapor flux (vectors) at 300 hPa, and TC path (solid blue and red lines indicate weak and strong TC paths, respectively) for Type-T TC cases in (a–c) May, (d–f) October, (g–i) November and (j–l) December. The red circles represent the position of the TC center at the time shown in each plot.

      Figure 4.  The same as in Fig. 3, but for Type-R TC cases.

      In addition, for Type-T TCs (Fig. 3), TC intensities in May (Figs. 3a–c) and October (Figs. 3df) are weak, the trough is relatively north, and water vapor around the TCs can enter the TP. TCs in November (Figs. 3gi) are strong, the trough is relatively south, and the contribution to water vapor transport is small. For Type-R TCs (Fig. 4), even if the selected TC cases in November and December are strong, due to the configuration of a ridge around the SBTP, it is difficult for water vapor to enter the TP. These conclusions again show that TC intensity is not the key factor affecting the contribution rate to the MMBA.

    5.   The mechanism of the influence of westerlies on the MMBA over the SBTP
    • To explain the influential mechanism of the westerlies, we further analyze the momentum equation. In the mid-latitudes, air masses in the upper troposphere in large-scale motion are controlled by the Coriolis force and pressure gradient force, in opposing directions.

      Figure 5 shows the meridional component of the pressure gradient force (Gm), Coriolis force (Am), and resultant acceleration (dv/dt) at 300 hPa for the four Type-T TC cases. With different meridional positions of the westerlies, the distribution of Gm and Am is also different in the meridional direction. In the westerlies, Gm is positive and the direction is north, while Am is negative and the direction is south. For Type-T TCs in May and October (Figs. 5af), the trough is relatively north, and the distribution of Gm and Am is significantly north. When the trough is relatively south in November and December (Figs. 5gl), the distribution of Gm and Am is relatively south. For the resultant acceleration (Figs. 5c, f, i, and l), in the area near the trough line, it is positive and the direction is north, and in the area near the ridge line, it is negative and the direction is south. Therefore, it is easy for water vapor to cross the SBTP when it enters the westerlies from the area near the trough line. When the water vapor enters the westerlies from the area near the ridge line, for Type-T TCs with the trough relatively south, the water vapor may not cross the SBTP, or it affects only the southern region of the TP. Such is the case in November (Fig. 5i).

      Figure 5.  (Gm: a, d, g, j) Geopotential height (dagpm, blue lines), wind field (m s–1, vectors), TC path (bold blue and purple lines represent weak and strong TCs, respectively), and the meridional component of the pressure gradient force, (Am: b, e, h, k) Coriolis force, and (dv/dt: c, f, i, l) resultant acceleration for Type-T TC cases at 300 hPa. Red dots represent the position of the TC center at the time shown in each plot.

      The zonal component of the pressure gradient force (Gz), Coriolis force (Az), and resultant acceleration (du/dt) for Type-T TCs is shown in Fig. 6. Downstream of the trough, Gz is westwardly directed, and Az is eastwardly directed, and the opposite is true downstream of the ridge. Therefore, when water vapor enters the westerlies from the area near the ridge line downstream of the trough, it will quickly be deflected to the east, which is not conducive to the northward transport of water vapor.

      Figure 6.  The same as in Fig. 5, but for the zonal component of the (Gz; a, d, g, j) pressure gradient force, (Az: b, e, h, k) Coriolis force, and (du/dt: c, f, i, l) resultant acceleration for Type-T TC cases.

      For Type-R TCs (Fig. 7), the distribution of Gm, Am, Gz, and Az is the same as for Type-T TCs (Fig. 5). As the meridional resultant acceleration is negative (Fig. 7) and the zonal resultant acceleration (Fig. 8) is positive near the ridge line; therefore, when the ridge is relatively south, it is difficult for water vapor to be transported northward, and when the ridge is relatively north, the southward resultant acceleration does not necessarily affect the northward transport of water vapor.

      Figure 7.  The same as in Fig. 5, but for Type-R TC cases.

      Figure 8.  The same as in Fig. 6, but for Type-R TC cases.

      A schematic diagram illustrates the previous conclusions (Fig. 9). Figures 9a, c, and e show Type-T TCs, and Figs. 9b, d, and f show Type-R TCs. When the westerlies are relatively south (Figs. 9a, b), it is difficult for water vapor to be transported into the TP. The westerlies along the SBTP from November to April belong mostly to this configuration. When the westerlies are relatively north (Figs. 9e, f), especially when they are north of the SBTP, they have little effect on water vapor transport. From June to September, the westerlies, on average, are north of the SBTP and the contribution to the MMBA over the SBTP is independent of the westerlies. When the westerlies are near the SBTP, whether water vapor can be transported into the TP depends on the configuration of the trough and ridge, as detailed in a previous paper (Zhou et al., 2022). The westerlies in May and October are near the SBTP, so when a TC encounters the trough, it is easy for water vapor to be transported into the TP, but the opposite is true when it encounters the ridge. Due to the relatively southern position of the westerlies in November and December, their contribution rate is lower than that in May and October.

      Figure 9.  Schematic diagram of the effect of the meridional position of the westerlies on the MMBA.

    6.   Conclusion and discussion
    • This study focuses mainly on the following question: Why is the contribution rate to the MMBA over the SBTP induced by BOB TCs the highest when the TC frequency is relatively low in May?

      BOB TCs are characterized by double peaks, with May and October–December constituting the two peak seasons. TC frequency decreases from October to December and is lower in May than in October and November. In May, north-track TCs are the most frequent, and from October to December almost half of the TCs move westward. The MMBA is the largest in May, and from October to December, it decreases month by month. TC intensity and track are not the main factors.

      Through previous studies, we know that the westerlies play a decisive role in water vapor transport, so we speculate that the westerlies may be the key factor affecting the seasonal variation of the MMBA over the SBTP. First, it is confirmed that the seasonal change of the westerlies is consistent with that of the MMBA. Then, to confirm the influence of westerlies on the MMBA, we choose 8 TC cases and compare the water vapor flux. For Type-T TCs, when the trough is farther north (south), water vapor can be transported farther north over the TP (water vapor may not necessarily cross the SBTP). For Type-R TCs, when the ridge is south (north), no water vapor can be transported into the TP (water vapor may affect the southern TP). The westerlies in November and December are relatively south, leading to a low contribution rate to the MMBA over the TP in November and December.

      To further understand the mechanism, the momentum equation is used. The meridional resultant acceleration is positive (negative) in the area near the trough line (ridge line), and the resultant zonal acceleration is negative (positive) downstream of the trough (ridge). For Type-T TCs, when the trough is relatively south and the water vapor enters the trough from the area near the ridge line, the direction of the resultant meridional (zonal) acceleration is south (east), water vapor will be transported eastward but may not necessarily cross the SBTP. For Type-R TCs, when the ridge is farther south and the water vapor enters the ridge from the area near the ridge line, the direction of the resultant meridional (zonal) acceleration is south (west), which is not conducive to the northward transport of water vapor.

      Although BOB TCs can transport water vapor to the TP, whether water vapor transported by BOB TCs is worthy of attention remains questionable? To learn more about this issue, the MMB over the SBTP is classified according to timescale.

      The nine components of the MMB over the SBTP during the double-peak TC seasons are shown in Fig. 10a. During the TC activity period, for the MMB over the SBTP, the term $ (1/g){v'}{q'} $, which is the result of the synoptic-scale perturbation of v and q. The life cycle of TCs is several days to more than ten days, which qualifies such phenomena a synoptic-scale perturbation. This result shows that the contribution to the MMB over the SBTP caused by BOB TCs is the highest during the TC activity period. It is sufficient to show that in the monsoon transition seasons, the MMB over the SBTP caused by BOB TCs is an important source of water vapor for the TP. With global warming, the frequency of BOB TCs tends to increase (Lakshani and Zhou, 2023), and the influence of water vapor transport by BOB TCs is more noteworthy.

      Figure 10.  Components of the MMB (g s–1 cm–1) over the SBTP integrated from 500 to 100 hPa for different types of TC tracks during the double-peak TC seasons.

      The synoptic-scale disturbance term $ (1/g){v'}{q'} $ is the highest in May and decreases from October to December (Fig. 10a). North-track TCs in May contribute the most, northwest-track TCs contribute the most in October, and west-track TCs contribute the least (Fig. 10e). Of these three terms [$ (1/g)\overline {vq} $, $ (1/g)\overline v {q^ * } $, $ (1/g)\overline v {q'} $], $ (1/g)\overline v {q'} $ has the largest value; of these three terms [$ (1/g)\overline {vq} $, $ (1/g){v^ * }\overline q $, $ (1/g){v'}\overline q $], $ (1/g){v'}\overline q $ has the largest value in May and December and the values of $ (1/g)\overline {vq} $ and $ (1/g){v'}\overline q $ are equivalent in October and November (Fig. 10a). That means $ \overline v $ and $ {q'} $ contribute the most during the TC activity period. The values of the four terms consisting of $ \overline v $ and $ {q'} $ are further shown in Figs. 10be. The north-track TC contribute the most in May, November and December, and the northwest-track TC contribute the most in October.

      On the whole, the components of the MMB show that the contribution to the synoptic-scale disturbance term is the highest, which means that the MMB over the SBTP associated with BOB TCs is crucial.

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return