Advanced Search
Article Contents

Scientific Advances and Weather Services of the China Meteorological Administration’s National Forecasting Systems during the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics


doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3206-3

  • Since the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics was the first Winter Olympics in history held in continental winter monsoon climate conditions across complex terrain areas, there is a deficiency of relevant research, operational techniques, and experience. This made providing meteorological services for this event particularly challenging. The China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre, achieved breakthroughs in research on short- and medium-term deterministic and ensemble numerical predictions. Several key technologies crucial for precise winter weather services during the Winter Olympics were developed. A comprehensive framework, known as the Operational System for High-Precision Weather Forecasting for the Winter Olympics, was established. Some of these advancements represent the highest level of capabilities currently available in China. The meteorological service provided to the Beijing 2022 Games also exceeded previous Winter Olympic Games in both variety and quality. This included achievements such as the “100-meter level, minute level” downscaled spatiotemporal resolution and forecasts spanning 1 to 15 days. Around 30 new technologies and over 60 kinds of products that align with the requirements of the Winter Olympics Organizing Committee were developed, and many of these techniques have since been integrated into the CMA’s operational national forecasting systems. These accomplishments were facilitated by a dedicated weather forecasting and research initiative, in conjunction with the preexisting real-time operational forecasting systems of the CMA. This program represents one of the five subprograms of the WMO’s high-impact weather forecasting demonstration project (SMART2022), and continues to play an important role in their Regional Association (RA) II Research Development Project (Hangzhou RDP). Therefore, the research accomplishments and meteorological service experiences from this program will be carried forward into forthcoming high-impact weather forecasting activities. This article provides an overview and assessment of this program and the operational national forecasting systems.
    摘要: 精准气象预报是历届冬奥会成功举办的最重要条件之一。北京2022年冬奥会和冬残奥会是大陆性冬季风主导的气候条件下内陆地区举办的一次冬奥盛会,但寒冷、大风、干燥、降水少、温度变化大等气候特点对北京冬奥会的气象服务保障提出了严峻考验。此外,赛场区域分布广、赛区复杂地形复杂、赛事项目安排紧、专项保障要求高,进一步提升了服务难度。高精度山地气象预报本身就是国际难题,特别在预报经验几乎为零的山地赛场,冬奥组委要求:“一场一策”、“一项一策”,精准预报难度极大,对北京冬奥气象保障服务工作提出了前所未有的挑战。中国气象局地球系统数值预报中心承担着国家级数值预报业务系统的研发、建设和改进任务。面向冬奥服务保障需求,数值中心专门组建了冬奥预报服务攻关团队,基于自主研发的一体化数值预报模式,研究了复杂地形下冬奥保障关键天气的短、中期集合预报技术,包括精细区域模式及同化技术改进、高分辨区域集合构建、产品偏差订正、无缝隙融合产品研发等,发展了面向冬奥气象保障服务的精细无缝隙数值天气预报技术方法。核心内容包括:改进的区域模式动力框架(三维参考大气和预估修正迭代算法)、随高度增加的侧边界方案,解决了冬奥预报“精”、“细”关键技术;发展了地面自动站稠密观测资料及国产风云卫星同化技术,形成了以冬奥赛区为中心的京津冀区域1公里分辨率、1小时更新的0-24小时冬奥精细预报产品;构建了复杂地形条件下多尺度混合初值扰动、时空尺度相关的物理过程随机扰动方案的冬奥保障3km高分辨集合预报系统,提供了山地赛场0-36小时集合预报信息;发展了5种基于统计和机器学习方法的数值预报产品订正融合方法,构建了0-360小时赛区全覆盖的冬奥无缝隙客观天气预报技术和产品支撑体系,在复杂地形条件下精细天气预报攻关工作中取得了突破性进展。取得新技术30项,形成4大产品体系60余种产品,建立了基于中国气象局自主研发模式的“百米级、分钟级”、0-15天预报时效、赛区全覆盖的冬奥高精度天气预报服务技术体系,实现了中国气象局自主研发产品在重大活动气象保障中全覆盖、挑大梁。团队研发的冬奥预报产品在冬奥预报团队冬训、冬奥及冬残奥赛事活动保障中均获得全方位应用,为运动员官方训练、比赛日程调整提供了重要支撑,受到了冬奥气象预报服务团队和新闻媒体的好评。冬奥攻关发展的核心技术方法,已经集成和应用于国家级业务预报系统,在日常和重大活动中持续发挥作用;部分成果与杭州亚运会及成都大运会开展服务对接,后冬奥时代继续发挥作用。冬奥会中研发的气象条件预测技术与科技冬奥专项其它研究内容一起,得到了国际专家的认可,纳入世界气象组织高影响天气预报示范项目,可为国际高影响天气高精度预报技术研发和应用提供中国经验。
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  The three competition areas (Zhangjiakou, Yanqing, and Beijing) of the Beijing Winter Olympics, showing the venue locations and associated sports.

    Figure 2.  Weather forecasting models and products used to provide meteorological services for the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games.

    Figure 3.  RMSEs of the control (CTL, black) and the new scheme (T2, red) for (a) 2-m temperature (units: °C), (b) 10-m zonal wind (units: m s−1), and (c) 10-m meridional wind (units: m s−1) in the 24-h forecasts of the 3-km version of CMA-MESO. The experimental period was 2–28 February 2020 on a 0000 UTC cycle. Reproduced from Xu et al. (2023).

    Figure 4.  The CMA products docked to major Winter Olympics service platforms (in Chinese) for real-time applications.

    Figure 5.  Hourly ensemble forecasts of weather elements (low-cloud cover, 6-h-accumulated precipitation, 10-m wind speed, and 2-m temperature) by CMA-GEPS and CMA-BLD. Model initiation time is 1200 UTC 25 January, with a forecast length of 360 h(CMA-BLD is 240 h). The deterministic forecast is in red, and the ensemble range is expressed by the box-and-whisker plot (median, 25%, 75%, maximum and minimum). The time is in UTC, which is 8 h later than Beijing time (BT). The red box indicates the opening ceremony weather service period (0000–1600 UTC or 0800–2400 BT 4 February).

    Figure 6.  The EMOS-calibrated ensemble mean forecast’s error of surface temperature (upper) and wind speed (lower) from CMA-REPS_3km during the Beijing 2022 Games (29 January to 3 March 2022). The result is for the 36-h forecasts averaged over all sporting venues. RMSE is in red, and the ensemble spread is in blue. The solid lines are the original forecasts, while the dashed line indicates the calibration results, where the calibrated forecasts were used in the real time Olympic services.

    Table 1.  Atmospheric model configurations for the Beijing 2022 Games.

    Model Domain Horizontal resolution (km) Forecast length (hour) Run frequency (hourly) Main technological improvements
    CMA-GEPS Global 50 360 6 Vertical coordinate upgrades; enhancements of initial SV perturbations
    CMA-GFS Global 25 240 6 Correction algorithm to mass conservation; 4DVar; satellite data assimilation; microphysics and cumulus parameterization
    CMA-TYM Asia 9 120 6 Static data (MODIS); SAS convection scheme; cloud analysis
    CMA-REPS China 10 84 6 3D rescaling masks of initial perturbation; revisions to background fields; SPP model perturbation scheme
    CMA-MESO_3km China 3 72 3 Terrain filtering; 3D reference profile; boundary layer scheme based on C-P grid
    CMA-HREPS Huabei region 3 36 6 Error analysis over complex terrain; data assimilation–related ensemble techniques; multi-scale blending
    CMA-MESO_1km Huabei region 1 24 1 Dynamics (more vertical levels; hybrid coordinates); 3DVar (B Matrixes; multi-analysis; IAU initialization); microphysics (new Noah, new static data; double-moment microphysical scheme
    Downscaling Chongli and Yanqing competition area 0.1 (100 m) 24 1 CALMET wind downscaling; small-scale atmospheric dispersion forecasts
    DownLoad: CSV
  • Chen, M. X., and Coauthors, 2018: Enhanced weather research and forecasting in support of the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games. WMO Bulletin, 67 (2), 58−61.
    Deng, G., L. L. Dai, Y. S. Zhou, J. Chen, H. Q. Li, F. J. Chen, and J. Z. Wang, 2022: Evaluation and analysis of meteorological service for Beijing Winter Olympic Games supported by CMA high-resolution regional ensemble prediction system. Meteorological Monthly, 48 (2), 129−148, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2021.092901. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Deng, G., J. Du, Y. S. Zhou, L. Yan, J. Chen, F. J. Chen, H. Q. Li, and J. Z. Wang, 2023: A comparison between 2D and 3D rescaling masks of initial condition perturbation in a 3-km storm-scale ensemble prediction system. Wea. Forecasting, 38 (1), 199−222, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-22-0073.1.
    Di, D., R. L. Zhou, and R. Z. Lai, 2022: Parallax shift effect correction and analysis based on Fengyun-4A advanced imager. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 80 (4), 632−642, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2022.044. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Du, J., and Coauthors, 2018: Ensemble methods for meteorological predictions. Handbook of Hydrometeorological Ensemble Forecasting, Q. Y. Duan et al., Eds., Springer, 1−52, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40457-3_13-1.
    Fan, Y. E., H. Q. Li, J. Chen, Z. Z. Xu, F. J. Chen, and G. Deng, 2022: Sensitivity experiments of a stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme within the CMA-REPS regional ensemble prediction system. Meteorological Monthly, 48 (9), 1077−1089, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2022.051201. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Goger, B., M. W. Rotach, A. Gohm, I. Stiperski, and O. Fuhrer, 2016: Current challenges for numerical weather prediction in complex terrain: Topography representation and parameterizations. Proc. 2016 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS), Innsbruck, IEEE, 890−894, https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCSim.2016.7568428.
    Joe, P., and Coauthors, 2010: Weather services, science advances, and the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 31−36, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2998.1.
    Joe, P., G. W. Lee, and K. Kim, 2023: The challenges of micro-nowcasting and the Women’s slope style event at the PyeongChang 2018 Olympic winter games. Meteorology, 2, 107−127, https://doi.org/10.3390/meteorology2010008.
    Kim, K., W. Bang, E.-C. Chang, F. J. Tapiador, C.-L. Tsai, E. Jung, and G. Lee, 2021: Impact of wind pattern and complex topography on snow microphysics during International Collaborative Experiment for PyeongChang 2018 Olympic and Paralympic winter games (ICE-POP 2018). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21 , 11 955−11 978, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11955-2021.
    Lee, Y.-H., G. Lee, S. Joo, and K.-D. Ahn, 2018: Observational study of surface wind along a sloping surface over mountainous terrain during winter. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35 (3), 276−284, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7075-5.
    Li, J., Z. G. Cheng, J. J. Zhang, and Y. J. Dou, 2020: Meteorological field experiment and preliminary analysis result in the winter Olympic venue in Xiaohaituo mountain. Meteorological Monthly, 46 (9), 1178−1188, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2020.09.005. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Li, X. L., M. Charron, L. Spacek, and G. Candille, 2008: a regional ensemble prediction system based on moist targeted singular vectors and stochastic parameter perturbations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 (2), 443−462, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2109.1.
    Pokhrel, R., and H. Lee, 2019: Comparison of Gaussian plume model and lagrangian particle model for the application of coastal air quality modelling. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 4 (4), 152−158, https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.16.
    Roberts, N., and Coauthors, 2023: IMPROVER: The new probabilistic postprocessing system at the met office. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 104, E680−E697, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0273.1.
    Scheuerer, M., and G. König, 2014: Gridded, locally calibrated, probabilistic temperature forecasts based on ensemble model output statistics. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 2582−2590, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2323.
    Shen, X. S., X. J. Zhou, J. S. Xue, D. H. Chen, Y. J. Zhang, and Q. L. Wan, 2013: GRAPES Numerical Prediction System for Heavy Rainfall. China Meteorological Press, 186 pp. (in Chinese)
    Sports Department of Beijing Winter Olympic Organizing Committee, 2020: Beijing 2022 Weather and Wind Analysis Report. China Meteorological Press, 26 pp. (in Chinese)
    Su, Y., X. S. Shen, Z. T. Chen, and H. L. Zhang, 2018: A study on the three-dimensional reference atmosphere in GRAPES_GFS: Theoretical design and ideal test. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 76 (2), 241−254, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2017.097. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Su, Y., X. S. Shen, H. L. Zhang, and Y. Z. Liu, 2020: A study on the three-dimensional reference atmosphere in GRAPES_GFS: Constructive reference state and real forecast experiment. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 78 (6), 962−971, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2020.075. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Tong, H., J. L. Hu, and Y. T. Zhang, 2020: Improvement and application of post-processing technology in GRAPES model. Meteorological Science and Technology, 48 (4), 511−517, https://doi.org/10.19517/j.1671-6345.20190308. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Tsai, C. L., K. Kim, Y. C. Liou, and G. W. Lee, 2023: High-resolution 3D winds derived from a modified WISSDOM synthesis scheme using multiple Doppler lidars and observations. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 16, 845−869, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-845-2023.
    Veenhuis, B. A., 2013: Spread calibration of ensemble MOS forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2467−2482, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00191.1.
    Wang, W. G., W. J. Shaw, T. E. Seiple, J. P. Rishel, and Y. L. Xie, 2008. An evaluation of a diagnostic wind model (CALMET). J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 47 (6), 1739−1756, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1602.1.
    Xia, J. J., and Coauthors, 2020: Machine learning−based weather support for the 2022 Winter Olympics. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37 (9), 927−932, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0043-5.
    Xin, Y., and H. W. Chen, 2014: Influence of CALMET parameter adjustment in the XJRUC coupling of CALMET over Dabanchen-Xiaocaohu wind area. Plateau Meteorology, 33 (6), 1674−1686, https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00191. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Xu, Z. F., and R. C. Wang, 2022: Multiscale separation of background error for multiscale filtering in CMA-MESO 3km resolution system. Meteorological Monthly, 48 (12), 1525−1538, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2022.081501. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Xu, Z. F., Y. Wu, J. D. Gong, and Y. Cai, 2021: Assimilation of 2 m relative humidity observations in CMA-MESO 3DVar system. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 79 (6), 943−955, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2021.060. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Xu, Z. F., L. Zhang, R. C. Wang, and J. D. Gong, 2023: Effect of 2-m temperature data assimilation in the CMA-MESO 3DVAR system. Journal of Meteorological Research, 37 (2), 218−233, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-023-2115-9.
    Xue, J. S., and D. H. Chen, 2008: Scientific Design and Application of GRAPES Numerical Prediction System. Science Press, 383 pp. (in Chinese)
    Yang, L., M. X. Chen, X. L. Wang, L. Y. Song, M. L. Yang, R. Qin, C. L. Cheng, and S. T. Li, 2021a: Classification of precipitation type in North China using model-based explicit fields of hydrometeors with modified thermodynamic conditions. Wea. Forecasting, 36 (1), 91−107, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0005.1.
    Yang, L., G. Q. Nan, M. X. Chen, L. Y. Song, R. T. Liu, C. L. Cheng, and W. H. Cao, 2021b: The construction and comparison of high resolution precipitation type prediction models based on three machine learning methods. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 79 (6), 1022−1034, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2021.059. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Zhang, H. L., X. S. Shen, and Y. Su., 2022: A semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian time integration schemes with a predictor and a corrector and their applications in CMA-GFS. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 80 (2), 280−288, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2022.021. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Zhang, Y. T., H. Tong, and J. Sun, 2020: Application of a bias correction method to meteorological forecast for the Pyeongchang Winter Olympic Games. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 31 (1), 27−41, https://doi.org/10.11898/1001-7313.20200103. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Zhi, X. F., and W. Huang, 2019: Multimodel ensemble forecasts of surface air temperature and precipitation over China by using Kalman filter. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 42 (2), 197−206, https://doi.org/10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.20181108001. (in Chinese with English abstract
    Zhi, X. F., B. Y. Cui, Y. Ji, S. P. Zhu, Z. Q. Ma, and X. W. Zhang, 2022: Prediction of water level in urban waterlogging area based on deep learning approach. Proc. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications (AEECA), Dalian, IEEE, 548−551, https://doi.org/10.1109/AEECA55500.2022.9919102.
  • [1] LI Shan, RONG Xingyao, LIU Yun, LIU Zhengyu, Klaus FRAEDRICH, 2013: Dynamic Analogue Initialization for Ensemble Forecasting, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1406-1420.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2244-z
    [2] GAO Feng*, Peter P. CHILDS, Xiang-Yu HUANG, Neil A. JACOBS, and Jinzhong MIN, 2014: A Relocation-based Initialization Scheme to Improve Track-forecasting of Tropical Cyclones, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 27-36.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2254-5
    [3] ZHENG Xiaogu, WU Guocan, ZHANG Shupeng, LIANG Xiao, DAI Yongjiu, LI Yong, , 2013: Using Analysis State to Construct a Forecast Error Covariance Matrix in Ensemble Kalman Filter Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1303-1312.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2133-5
    [4] ZHU Jiang, LIN Caiyan, WANG Zifa, 2009: Dust Storm Ensemble Forecast Experiments in East Asia, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 26, 1053-1070.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-8218-0
    [5] Jihang LI, Zhiyan ZHANG, Lu LIU, Xubin ZHANG, Jingxuan QU, Qilin WAN, 2021: The Simulation of Five Tropical Cyclones by Sample Optimization of Ensemble Forecasting Based on the Observed Track and Intensity, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1763-1777.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0353-2
    [6] Lili LEI, Yangjinxi GE, Zhe-Min TAN, Yi ZHANG, Kekuan CHU, Xin QIU, Qifeng QIAN, 2022: Evaluation of a Regional Ensemble Data Assimilation System for Typhoon Prediction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1816-1832.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1444-4
    [7] Banglin ZHANG, Vijay TALLAPRAGADA, Fuzhong WENG, Jason SIPPEL, Zaizhong MA, 2016: Estimation and Correction of Model Bias in the NASA/GMAO GEOS5 Data Assimilation System: Sequential Implementation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 659-672.  doi: 10.1007/ s00376-015-5155-y
    [8] Yong LI, Siming LI, Yao SHENG, Luheng WANG, 2018: Data Assimilation Method Based on the Constraints of Confidence Region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 334-345.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-7045-y
    [9] Xiaogu ZHENG, 2009: An Adaptive Estimation of Forecast Error Covariance Parameters for Kalman Filtering Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 26, 154-160.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-0154-5
    [10] Bohua Huang, James L. Kinter III, Paul S. Schopf, 2002: Ocean Data Assimilation Using Intermittent Analyses and Continuous Model Error Correction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 19, 965-992.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-002-0059-z
    [11] Fuqing ZHANG, Meng ZHANG, James A. HANSEN, 2009: Coupling Ensemble Kalman Filter with Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 26, 1-8.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-0001-8
    [12] LIU Juanjuan, WANG Bin, WANG Shudong, 2010: The Structure of Background-error Covariance in a Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System: Single-point Experiment, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 1303-1310.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9067-6
    [13] Hongqin ZHANG, Xiangjun TIAN, Wei CHENG, Lipeng JIANG, 2020: System of Multigrid Nonlinear Least-squares Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction (SNAP): System Formulation and Preliminary Evaluation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 1267-1284.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-9252-1
    [14] Fabien CARMINATI, Stefano MIGLIORINI, 2021: All-sky Data Assimilation of MWTS-2 and MWHS-2 in the Met Office Global NWP System., ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1682-1694.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1071-5
    [15] Rong KONG, Ming XUE, Edward R. MANSELL, Chengsi LIU, Alexandre O. FIERRO, 2024: Assimilation of GOES-R Geostationary Lightning Mapper Flash Extent Density Data in GSI 3DVar, EnKF, and Hybrid En3DVar for the Analysis and Short-Term Forecast of a Supercell Storm Case, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 263-277.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2340-2
    [16] Fabien CARMINATI, Nigel ATKINSON, Brett CANDY, Qifeng LU, 2021: Insights into the Microwave Instruments Onboard the Fengyun 3D Satellite: Data Quality and Assimilation in the Met Office NWP System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1379-1396.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0010-1
    [17] T. N. Krishnamurti, Mukul Tewari, Ed Bensman, Wei Han, Zhan Zhang, William K. M. Lau, 1999: An Ensemble Forecast of the South China Sea Monsoon, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 16, 159-182.  doi: 10.1007/BF02973080
    [18] Magnus LINDSKOG, Adam DYBBROE, Roger RANDRIAMAMPIANINA, 2021: Use of Microwave Radiances from Metop-C and Fengyun-3 C/D Satellites for a Northern European Limited-area Data Assimilation System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1415-1428.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0326-5
    [19] GU Jianfeng, Qingnong XIAO, Ying-Hwa KUO, Dale M. BARKER, XUE Jishan, MA Xiaoxing, 2005: Assimilation and Simulation of Typhoon Rusa (2002) Using the WRF System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 22, 415-427.  doi: 10.1007/BF02918755
    [20] Dongmei XU, Feifei SHEN, Jinzhong MIN, Aiqing SHU, 2021: Assimilation of GPM Microwave Imager Radiance for Track Prediction of Typhoon Cases with the WRF Hybrid En3DVAR System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 983-993.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0252-6

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 03 September 2023
Manuscript revised: 07 November 2023
Manuscript accepted: 27 December 2023
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Scientific Advances and Weather Services of the China Meteorological Administration’s National Forecasting Systems during the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics

    Corresponding author: Xueshun SHEN, shenxs@cma.gov.cn
    Corresponding author: Jun DU, jun.du@noaa.gov
  • 1. China Meteorological Administration Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • 3. Key Laboratory of Earth System Modeling and Prediction, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • 4. National Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • 5. Environmental Modeling Center/NCEP/NWS/NOAA, College Park, MD 20740, USA
  • 6. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
  • 7. Institute of Urban Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100089, China
  • 8. School of Atmospheric Sciences and Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Severe Weather/Ministry of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • 9. Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Abstract: Since the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics was the first Winter Olympics in history held in continental winter monsoon climate conditions across complex terrain areas, there is a deficiency of relevant research, operational techniques, and experience. This made providing meteorological services for this event particularly challenging. The China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre, achieved breakthroughs in research on short- and medium-term deterministic and ensemble numerical predictions. Several key technologies crucial for precise winter weather services during the Winter Olympics were developed. A comprehensive framework, known as the Operational System for High-Precision Weather Forecasting for the Winter Olympics, was established. Some of these advancements represent the highest level of capabilities currently available in China. The meteorological service provided to the Beijing 2022 Games also exceeded previous Winter Olympic Games in both variety and quality. This included achievements such as the “100-meter level, minute level” downscaled spatiotemporal resolution and forecasts spanning 1 to 15 days. Around 30 new technologies and over 60 kinds of products that align with the requirements of the Winter Olympics Organizing Committee were developed, and many of these techniques have since been integrated into the CMA’s operational national forecasting systems. These accomplishments were facilitated by a dedicated weather forecasting and research initiative, in conjunction with the preexisting real-time operational forecasting systems of the CMA. This program represents one of the five subprograms of the WMO’s high-impact weather forecasting demonstration project (SMART2022), and continues to play an important role in their Regional Association (RA) II Research Development Project (Hangzhou RDP). Therefore, the research accomplishments and meteorological service experiences from this program will be carried forward into forthcoming high-impact weather forecasting activities. This article provides an overview and assessment of this program and the operational national forecasting systems.

摘要: 精准气象预报是历届冬奥会成功举办的最重要条件之一。北京2022年冬奥会和冬残奥会是大陆性冬季风主导的气候条件下内陆地区举办的一次冬奥盛会,但寒冷、大风、干燥、降水少、温度变化大等气候特点对北京冬奥会的气象服务保障提出了严峻考验。此外,赛场区域分布广、赛区复杂地形复杂、赛事项目安排紧、专项保障要求高,进一步提升了服务难度。高精度山地气象预报本身就是国际难题,特别在预报经验几乎为零的山地赛场,冬奥组委要求:“一场一策”、“一项一策”,精准预报难度极大,对北京冬奥气象保障服务工作提出了前所未有的挑战。中国气象局地球系统数值预报中心承担着国家级数值预报业务系统的研发、建设和改进任务。面向冬奥服务保障需求,数值中心专门组建了冬奥预报服务攻关团队,基于自主研发的一体化数值预报模式,研究了复杂地形下冬奥保障关键天气的短、中期集合预报技术,包括精细区域模式及同化技术改进、高分辨区域集合构建、产品偏差订正、无缝隙融合产品研发等,发展了面向冬奥气象保障服务的精细无缝隙数值天气预报技术方法。核心内容包括:改进的区域模式动力框架(三维参考大气和预估修正迭代算法)、随高度增加的侧边界方案,解决了冬奥预报“精”、“细”关键技术;发展了地面自动站稠密观测资料及国产风云卫星同化技术,形成了以冬奥赛区为中心的京津冀区域1公里分辨率、1小时更新的0-24小时冬奥精细预报产品;构建了复杂地形条件下多尺度混合初值扰动、时空尺度相关的物理过程随机扰动方案的冬奥保障3km高分辨集合预报系统,提供了山地赛场0-36小时集合预报信息;发展了5种基于统计和机器学习方法的数值预报产品订正融合方法,构建了0-360小时赛区全覆盖的冬奥无缝隙客观天气预报技术和产品支撑体系,在复杂地形条件下精细天气预报攻关工作中取得了突破性进展。取得新技术30项,形成4大产品体系60余种产品,建立了基于中国气象局自主研发模式的“百米级、分钟级”、0-15天预报时效、赛区全覆盖的冬奥高精度天气预报服务技术体系,实现了中国气象局自主研发产品在重大活动气象保障中全覆盖、挑大梁。团队研发的冬奥预报产品在冬奥预报团队冬训、冬奥及冬残奥赛事活动保障中均获得全方位应用,为运动员官方训练、比赛日程调整提供了重要支撑,受到了冬奥气象预报服务团队和新闻媒体的好评。冬奥攻关发展的核心技术方法,已经集成和应用于国家级业务预报系统,在日常和重大活动中持续发挥作用;部分成果与杭州亚运会及成都大运会开展服务对接,后冬奥时代继续发挥作用。冬奥会中研发的气象条件预测技术与科技冬奥专项其它研究内容一起,得到了国际专家的认可,纳入世界气象组织高影响天气预报示范项目,可为国际高影响天气高精度预报技术研发和应用提供中国经验。

    • Accurate weather forecasting is critical for the success of the Winter Olympic Games because winter sports are severely impacted by various weather conditions (Joe et al., 2010, 2023; Chen et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020; Tong et al., 2020; Xia et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021a, b; Deng et al., 2022; Tsai et al., 2023). Given the complex topography and scarce observational data in mountainous regions, achieving accurate and high-resolution (both spatially and temporally) weather forecasts for a specific site or sporting event represents a significant challenge (Goger et al., 2016). Therefore, dedicated weather forecasting research programs have consistently been established prior to each occurrence of the Winter Olympic Games.

      The Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games were held inland, where the climate conditions were dominated by continental winter winds leading to cold, windy and dry conditions with low precipitation and large diurnal temperature variation. It was therefore unlikely that existing experience gained from the previous three Winter Olympic Games would be suitable in this instance. The wide areal distribution of the competition venues (Fig. 1), the tight schedule of the competitions or events, the high-level security requirements, and the heightened COVID-19 restrictions all posed considerable challenges to the meteorological services developed for the Beijing 2022 Games (Sports Department of Beijing Winter Olympic Organizing Committee, 2020).

      Figure 1.  The three competition areas (Zhangjiakou, Yanqing, and Beijing) of the Beijing Winter Olympics, showing the venue locations and associated sports.

      Due to the unique complex topography and synoptic differences of the competition areas, we could not simply adopt existing forecasting techniques but needed to develop new ones to better serve this Olympic Games in particular. In China, the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Earth System Modeling and Prediction Center (CEMC) is responsible for the development and operation of national numerical weather prediction (NWP) models and products, representing the highest level of NWP research and operations nationally. To provide enhanced meteorological services for the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics, a dual-pronged strategy was implemented: (1) to make ongoing improvements to existing CMA operational models to enhance their forecasting capability; and (2) to carry out new research and development efforts, as outlined in this article. The final support system encompassed refined and calibrated numerical weather forecasts along with corresponding applications (detailed in Fig. 2). A comprehensive forecasting system of CMA models was formed, including global, regional and high-resolution rapid-cycle assimilation and forecasts from both deterministic and ensemble models. The scientific progress central to the precise winter weather services provided are described in section 2. The real-time operational forecasting systems for the Olympics are presented in section 3, followed in section 4 by a focus on several typical Olympic services. Finally, a summary is provided in section 5.

      Figure 2.  Weather forecasting models and products used to provide meteorological services for the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games.

    2.   Scientific progress
    • Successful meteorological services cannot be separated from advances in meteorological science and technological innovation. The key supporting technology for Winter Olympics weather forecasting and prediction is numerical weather forecasting and its application. To better serve the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics, a weather forecasting research program was implemented. The goal of the program (Chen et al., 2018) was to improve techniques for short- and medium-range (1–15 days) predictions based on the CMA’s Global and Regional Analysis and Prediction System (GRAPES) (Xue and Chen, 2008; Shen et al., 2013). To reach this goal, the program was organized into the following four research components: model and data assimilation; ensemble prediction system; forecast bias correction; and forecast integration. The accomplishments include the following six aspects.

      (1) Improved high-resolution regional NWP model over complex terrain. Adapted from CMA-GFS (Su et al., 2018, 2020), firstly, a 3D reference atmosphere profile was introduced to the regional model CMA-MESO to improve the fine-resolution forecasting skill. The second improvement was to the predictor and corrector within the time integration scheme in the regional model (Zhang et al., 2022). And thirdly, improvement was made to the lateral boundary relaxation scheme, whereby the specified and relaxed area of the lateral boundary conditions were revised.

      (2) Assimilation of high spatial and temporal resolution observations (satellite, radar, and surface observations) into the model. This category of improvements included the assimilation scheme of surface moisture data and surface temperature (Xu et al., 2023), a multi-scale hybrid filtering data assimilation technique (Xu and Wang, 2022), and the assimilation of new satellite imager data (FY-4A AGRI; Di et al., 2022). Furthermore, improvement to the assimilation of dense ground-level data increased the use of surface automatic station data by approximately 40% (Xu et al., 2021). These techniques were used to construct the real time, 1-km, hourly cycle assimilation version, as well as the operational 3-km fast-cycle version, of the CMA-MESO modeling system. Figure 3 shows an example of the improvement in 2-m temperature.

      Figure 3.  RMSEs of the control (CTL, black) and the new scheme (T2, red) for (a) 2-m temperature (units: °C), (b) 10-m zonal wind (units: m s−1), and (c) 10-m meridional wind (units: m s−1) in the 24-h forecasts of the 3-km version of CMA-MESO. The experimental period was 2–28 February 2020 on a 0000 UTC cycle. Reproduced from Xu et al. (2023).

      (3) Establishment of a cloud-resolving ensemble forecast system. The initial condition (IC) perturbation quality is important to the performance of an ensemble prediction system, especially for storm-scale and short-range forecasts (Du et al., 2018). Two improvements related to IC perturbation methods were achieved in this program. One was the 3D rescaling of the IC perturbation magnitude (Deng et al., 2023), and the other was the mixing or blending of large-scale and small-scale perturbations. As demonstrated by Deng et al. (2023), 3D rescaling is superior to a 2D rescaling mask, as it benefits from both the vertical structure of IC perturbations and the forecast performance. A blended multi-scale IC perturbation via the 3DVar framework for a high-resolution regional ensemble prediction system (CMA-REPS) was established for real-time forecasting during the Olympics.

      (4) Dynamical downscaling and small-scale fireworks dispersion forecasting techniques of CMA-MESO surface wind fields. In order to meet the “100-meter level, minute-level” requirement, i.e., very high resolution forecasting capability, for special events like the opening and closing ceremonies of the Beijing 2022 Games, a CMA-MESO-based wind field dynamical downscaling technique (Wang et al., 2008; Xin and Chen, 2014) and small-scale fireworks dispersion method (Pokhrel and Lee, 2019) were developed. This represented the first time that the CMA model had realized such refined, fine-resolution wind field forecast products with a 100-m spatial resolution and 10-min output frequency.

      (5) Bias correction and machine learning approach. To reduce the forecasting errors of surface variables and efficiently extract useful information from “massive” forecast data at both short- to medium-range scales, various bias correction techniques were applied to the raw deterministic and ensemble numerical forecasts to produce calibrated final forecast products at both grid points and stations. The bias correction techniques included traditional statistical methods (e.g., the adaptive Kalman filtering method; Zhang et al., 2020), machine learning algorithms (e.g., XGboost and ResUnet), and ensemble model output statistics (EMOS; Scheuerer and König, 2014). These bias correction methods significantly reduced the forecast errors of surface variables in the competition region and at venue sites. For example, on average, the 24-h forecast error based on the adaptive Kalman filtering method was less than 2°C for 2-m temperature and close to 2 m s−1 for 10-m wind speed, which met the service requirements of the Winter Olympic Games.

      (6) Processing of seamless 0- to 360-h forecast products. There were several operational and developmental CMA modeling systems used for weather forecasting during the Beijing 2022 Games (Tong et al., 2020). Different modeling systems with different resolutions have their own unique characteristics and advantages for certain variables and levels, and it is desirable to efficiently extract and integrate information from these available systems to construct a unified forecast. The methods explored included Bayesian model averaging, EMOS, and machine learning fusion models (Veenhuis, 2013; Scheuerer et al., 2014; Zhi and Huang, 2019; Zhi et al., 2022; Roberts et al., 2023). A fusion model, using different forecast fields, was constructed based on the U-Net model. Results showed that forecast errors could be further reduced by adding the attention mechanism, random depth, point-by-point regression, and residual training.

    3.   Real-time operational weather forecasting systems
    • Successful Olympic services cannot be separated from continuous improvement to operational technology. Besides the scientific achievements mentioned above, several real-time operational systems were also improved and used for the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics according to the Science and Technology Winter Olympics Special Program. Based on both operational and experimental modeling systems, a whole set of seamless, refined numerical forecast model technologies and forecasting systems were established (Table 1). These NWP systems are highlighted below.

      Model Domain Horizontal resolution (km) Forecast length (hour) Run frequency (hourly) Main technological improvements
      CMA-GEPS Global 50 360 6 Vertical coordinate upgrades; enhancements of initial SV perturbations
      CMA-GFS Global 25 240 6 Correction algorithm to mass conservation; 4DVar; satellite data assimilation; microphysics and cumulus parameterization
      CMA-TYM Asia 9 120 6 Static data (MODIS); SAS convection scheme; cloud analysis
      CMA-REPS China 10 84 6 3D rescaling masks of initial perturbation; revisions to background fields; SPP model perturbation scheme
      CMA-MESO_3km China 3 72 3 Terrain filtering; 3D reference profile; boundary layer scheme based on C-P grid
      CMA-HREPS Huabei region 3 36 6 Error analysis over complex terrain; data assimilation–related ensemble techniques; multi-scale blending
      CMA-MESO_1km Huabei region 1 24 1 Dynamics (more vertical levels; hybrid coordinates); 3DVar (B Matrixes; multi-analysis; IAU initialization); microphysics (new Noah, new static data; double-moment microphysical scheme
      Downscaling Chongli and Yanqing competition area 0.1 (100 m) 24 1 CALMET wind downscaling; small-scale atmospheric dispersion forecasts

      Table 1.  Atmospheric model configurations for the Beijing 2022 Games.

      CMA-GFS is the CMA’s global forecasting system, wherein a new hybrid vertical coordinate (87 vertical layers with 0.1 hPa as the model top) was implemented. The new coordinate improved the forecasting capability at upper levels. The horizontal resolution is 25 km globally, and a 4DVar data assimilation system uses the maximum amount of satellite and conventional observations from global sources and generates ICs for the global forecasts. It makes a 10-day forecast at 0000/1200 UTC and a 5-day forecast at 0600/1800 UTC.

      CMA-GEPS stands for CMA Global Ensemble Prediction System, in which a total energy norm–based approach with singular vectors (SVs) is implemented to create initial perturbations. These SV perturbations are closely related to the development of the CMA global 4DVar system. The Stochastically Perturbed Parameterization Tendencies (SPPT) scheme was applied to represent the model uncertainty. There are 31 ensemble members with a forecast lead time of 15 days.

      CMA-TYM is the CMA’s operational Typhoon Forecast Model, based on the CMA-MESO software infrastructure. The key techniques include a vortex initialization scheme, physical process tuning, and highlights on data assimilation. It replaced the original 10-km resolution CMA-MESO and extended its forecast domain from China to Asia and the western Pacific.

      CMA-REPS is the CMA’s Regional Ensemble Prediction System. It uses an Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter for IC perturbation, and the SPPT scheme for model perturbation. A cloud analysis scheme was added to each ensemble member, which assimilates radar and satellite data. The model’s horizontal resolution is 0.1°, and the forecast length is 84 h.

      CMA-MESO_3km is a 3-km fast-cycle assimilation version of CMA-MESO. The main improvements include better calculation accuracy and stability of the model dynamic framework, improved microphysics for the high-resolution model, and the establishment of a convection-resolving assimilation system and land surface data assimilation system to make use of conventional and unconventional local dense data such as those from radar, wind profile radar, FY-4A, surface precipitation, and near-surface measurements.

      CMA-HREPS is an experimental 3-km cloud-resolving High-Resolution Ensemble Prediction System. Using the improved CMA-MESO model, data assimilation system, IC perturbation scheme, and model physics perturbation schemes developed for the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics weather forecasting and research program, CMA-HREPS was established for the Beijing 2022 Games. The first-order Markov process-based model stochastic perturbation technique was used to perturb the model physics (Li et al., 2008; Fan et al., 2022). It has 15 members and runs two cycles per day (0000 and 1200 UTC) to 36 h (extended to 60 h at a later stage). Bias correction of ensemble forecasts, probabilistic products, and verification are also part of this ensemble prediction system.

      CMA-MESO_1km is a 1-km hourly cycle assimilation version of CMA-MESO. In order to overcome the difficulties resulting from complex terrain and high-frequency observations, a special design involving ground temperature/humidity observation algorithms, high-resolution static data, optimization of the radiation parameterization scheme, and a mixed-scale scheme was introduced during the development of this hourly cycle assimilation system. With these improvements, the quality of 2-m temperature, 10-m wind field, and precipitation forecasts was obviously improved.

      A 100-meter dynamical downscaling model and a fine-scale fireworks dispersion forecasting model were two other capabilities developed for the Beijing 2022 Games. The forecast wind fields from CMA-MESO_1km were downscaled to different height levels based on the complex mountain conditions of sporting venues. It ran 24 times per day to provide forecasters with very high spatial (100 m) and temporal resolution (every 10 min) gridded forecasts, 24 h per cycle. During the Winter Olympics, it provided “100 m-level, minute-level” wind field forecasts for Chongli station and the Yanqing competition sites. The fireworks dispersion forecasting used small-scale Lagrangian smoke diffusion forecasting technology. The 100-m resolution fireworks diffusion products were applied to some special events like the opening and closing ceremonies.

    4.   Olympic service
    • During the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics, seamless 0–15-day numerical forecast products were provided based on the CMA real-time operational forecasts and other experimental forecasts through bias correction techniques, machine learning, and fusion methods. Figure 4 shows an example for deterministic forecasts, and Fig. 5 shows an example for ensemble forecasts.

      Figure 4.  The CMA products docked to major Winter Olympics service platforms (in Chinese) for real-time applications.

      Figure 5.  Hourly ensemble forecasts of weather elements (low-cloud cover, 6-h-accumulated precipitation, 10-m wind speed, and 2-m temperature) by CMA-GEPS and CMA-BLD. Model initiation time is 1200 UTC 25 January, with a forecast length of 360 h(CMA-BLD is 240 h). The deterministic forecast is in red, and the ensemble range is expressed by the box-and-whisker plot (median, 25%, 75%, maximum and minimum). The time is in UTC, which is 8 h later than Beijing time (BT). The red box indicates the opening ceremony weather service period (0000–1600 UTC or 0800–2400 BT 4 February).

      Compared to the raw model forecasts, the final calibrated products supported by the Olympic Games significantly reduced the forecast errors of surface weather elements. The error reduction rate was about 10%–40%. Taking the 3-km cloud-resolving scale ensemble forecast as an example, after the calibration of the EMOS method, the 36-h average forecast error of the venues was lower than 2°C for 2-m temperature, and the wind speed error was close to 1.7 m s−1 for the 10-m wind during the entire Olympic Games (Fig. 6), besides the improvements in ensemble spread. It also provided early warning information for disruptive weather risks at individual sporting venues.

      Figure 6.  The EMOS-calibrated ensemble mean forecast’s error of surface temperature (upper) and wind speed (lower) from CMA-REPS_3km during the Beijing 2022 Games (29 January to 3 March 2022). The result is for the 36-h forecasts averaged over all sporting venues. RMSE is in red, and the ensemble spread is in blue. The solid lines are the original forecasts, while the dashed line indicates the calibration results, where the calibrated forecasts were used in the real time Olympic services.

    5.   Summary
    • The International Olympic Committee President, Thomas BACH, described the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games as “a truly unparalleled Winter Olympics”. One of the keys to the success was the meteorological service, which provided accurate and reliable 0–15-day high-resolution forecasts over complex mountainous regions. The forecast products were derived from the CMA’s integrated global and regional weather forecast modeling systems and were provided in both deterministic and probabilistic formats on model grids and at venue sites. The success of this meteorological service can be attributed to the progress made in the research and development of the national weather forecasting program (as covered in this article), as well as the incorporation of advanced technologies from similar programs in previous Olympics.

      Although this program was tailored for the Beijing 2022 Games, many techniques developed by the program have already been implemented into the CMA’s operational forecasting systems. These developments showcase the highest capabilities currently available in China. The meteorological service provided to the Beijing 2022 Games also exceeded the level of similar services during previous Winter Olympic Games in terms of both variety and quality. Notably, achievements included the utilization of a downscaled spatiotemporal resolution at the “100-meter level, minute level”, as well as extending forecasts from 1 to 15 days ahead. In addition, valuable experiences were gained in using weather forecast information to deliver effective and intelligent meteorological services for decision-making, thereby mitigating the social impacts of prominent events like the Olympic Games. This program constitutes one of the five subprograms of the WMO’s high-impact weather forecasting demonstration project (SMART2022) and continues to play an important role in their Regional Association (RA) II Research Development Project (Hangzhou RDP). The research achievements and meteorological service experiences garnered from this program will be integrated into future high-impact weather forecasting and research endeavors.

      Data Statement Given that this is a project review rather than a specific research result, a dataset could potentially be provided upon request for readers who express interest.

      Declaration of Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

      Acknowledgements. This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41975137, 42175012, and 41475097) and the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2018YFF0300103).

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return