Advanced Search
Article Contents

Severe Global Environmental Issues Caused by Canada’s Record-Breaking Wildfires in 2023


doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3241-0

  • Due to the record-breaking wildfires that occurred in Canada in 2023, unprecedented quantities of air pollutants and greenhouse gases were released into the atmosphere. The wildfires had emitted more than 1.3 Pg CO2 and 0.14 Pg CO2 equivalent of other greenhouse gases (GHG) including CH4 and N2O as of 31 August. The wildfire-related GHG emissions constituted more than doubled Canada’s planned cumulative anthropogenic emissions reductions in 10 years, which represents a significant challenge to climate mitigation efforts. The model simulations showed that the Canadian wildfires impacted not only the local air quality but also that of most areas in the northern hemisphere due to long-range transport, causing severe PM2.5 pollution in the northeastern United States and increasing daily mean PM2.5 concentration in northwestern China by up to 2 μg m–3. The observed maximum daily mean PM2.5 concentration in New York City reached 148.3 μg m–3, which was their worst air quality in more than 50 years, nearly 10 times that of the air quality guideline (i.e., 15 μg m–3) issued by the World Health Organization (WHO). Aside from the direct emissions from forest fires, the peat fires beneath the surface might smolder for several months or even longer and release substantial amounts of CO2. The substantial amounts of greenhouse gases from forest and peat fires might contribute to the positive feedback to the climate, potentially accelerating global warming. To better understand the comprehensive environmental effects of wildfires and their interactions with the climate system, more detailed research based on advanced observations and Earth System Models is essential.
    摘要: 2023年加拿大破纪录的野火向大气中释放了大量的温室气体和空气污染物。截止8月31日,野火排放了1.3 Pg CO2以及0.14 Pg CO2当量的CH4和N2O等其它气体温室气体。野火温室气体排放量超过了加拿大计划10年累积人为减排量的2倍,对缓解全球变暖的努力构成了显著挑战。数值模拟结果显示加拿大野火不仅影响局地空气质量,还会通过长距离传输影响北半球大部分地区。加拿大野火造成美国东北部地区发生严重的空气污染,而中国西北部地区日均PM2.5浓度增加可达2 μg m–3。观测数据也显示纽约市日均PM2.5浓度高达148.3 μg m–3,为50多年来最恶劣的空气质量,接近世界卫生组织空气质量指导值(15 μg m–3)的10倍。除了森林大火的直接排放,地表下的泥炭土可能会持续阴燃数月甚至更长时间,释放巨量CO2。通过排放温室气体,加剧全球变暖,野火可能会与全球变暖形成正反馈。为了全面理解野火的综合环境效应及其与气候系统的相互作用,亟需基于先进的观测数据和地球系统模式开展深入研究。
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Cumulative and daily PM2.5 emissions from Canadian wildfires based on GFAS emission data.

    Figure 2.  Horizontal distribution of monthly PM2.5 emissions from Canadian wildfires in 2023 based on GFAS emission data.

    Figure 3.  Long-range transport of PM2.5 from Canadian wildfires from May to August, 2023.

    Figure 4.  Horizontal distribution of maximum daily mean PM2.5 concentration and PM2.5 pollution days due to Canadian wildfires from May to August 2023.

    Figure 5.  Global distribution of monthly averaged surface CO2 concentration due to the Canadian wildfires.

    Figure 6.  Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions due to the wildfires from May to August 2023 (red) with the planned cumulative anthropogenic emission reduction between 2020 and 2030 (green).

  • Aguilera, R., T. Corringham, A. Gershunov, and T. Benmarhnia, 2021: Wildfire smoke impacts respiratory health more than fine particles from other sources: Observational evidence from Southern California. Nature Communications, 12, 1493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21708-0.
    Arriagada, N. B., A. J. Palmer, D. M. J. S. Bowman, G. G. Morgan, B. B. Jalaludin, and F. H. Johnston, 2020: Unprecedented smoke-related health burden associated with the 2019−20 bushfires in eastern Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 213, 282−283, https://doi.org/10.5694.mja2.50545.
    Aubry-Wake, C., A. Bertoncini, and J. W. Pomeroy, 2022: Fire and ice: The impact of wildfire-affected albedo and irradiance on glacier melt. Earth’s Future, 10, e2022EF002685. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ef002685.
    Bernath, P., C. Boone, and J. Crouse, 2022: Wildfire smoke destroys stratospheric ozone. Science, 375, 1292−1295, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm5611.
    Bowman, D. M. J. S., C. A. Kolden, J. T. Abatzoglou, F. H. Johnston, G. R. van der Werf, and M. Flannigan, 2020: Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, 500−515, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0085-3.
    Bowman, D. M. J. S., and Coauthors, 2009: Fire in the earth system. Science, 324, 481−484, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163886.
    Chen, G. B., and Coauthors, 2021: Mortality risk attributable to wildfire-related PM2.5 pollution: A global time series study in 749 locations. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5, e579−e587, https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00200-x.
    Di Giuseppe, F., S. Rémy, F. Pappenberger, and F. Wetterhall, 2018: Using the Fire Weather Index (FWI) to improve the estimation of fire emissions from fire radiative power (FRP) observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18, 5359−5370, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5359-2018.
    Liu, Z. H., A. P. Ballantyne, and L. A. Cooper, 2019: Biophysical feedback of global forest fires on surface temperature. Nature Communications, 10, 214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08237-z.
    Liu, Z. H., and Coauthors, 2023: Carbon emissions, impacts, and mitigation strategies of forest fires. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38, 1552−1560, https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20230823001.
    Roberts, G., and M. J. Wooster, 2021: Global impact of landscape fire emissions on surface level PM2.5 concentrations, air quality exposure and population mortality. Atmospheric Environment, 252, 118210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118210.
    Tang, W. Y., and Coauthors, 2021: Widespread phytoplankton blooms triggered by 2019−2020 Australian wildfires. Nature, 597 , 370−375, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03805-8.
    van der Velde, I. R., and Coauthors, 2021: Vast CO2 release from Australian fires in 2019−2020 constrained by satellite. Nature, 597, 366−369, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03712-y.
    Wei, Y., and Coauthors, 2019: IAP-AACM v1.0: A global to regional evaluation of the atmospheric chemistry model in CAS-ESM. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19, 8269−8296, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8269-2019.
    Xu, R. B., and Coauthors, 2023: Global population exposure to landscape fire air pollution from 2000 to 2019. Nature, 621, 521−529, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06398-6.
    Yu, P. F., and Coauthors, 2019: Black carbon lofts wildfire smoke high into the stratosphere to form a persistent plume. Science, 365, 587−590, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1748.
    Zheng, B., P. Ciais, F. Chevallier, E. Chuvieco, Y. Chen, and H. Yang, 2021a: Increasing forest fire emissions despite the decline in global burned area. Science Advances, 7, eabh2646. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh2646.
    Zheng, B., Q. Zhang, G. N. Geng, C. H. Chen, Q. R. Shi, M. S. Cui, Y. Lei, and K. B. He, 2021b: Changes in China's anthropogenic emissions and air quality during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Earth System Science Data, 13, 2895−2907, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2895-2021.
    Zheng, B., and Coauthors, 2023: Record-high CO2 emissions from boreal fires in 2021. Science, 379, 912−917, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade0805.
  • [1] Xiao HAN, Meigen ZHANG, 2021: The Interannual Variation of Transboundary Contributions from Chinese Emissions of PM2.5 to South Korea, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 701-706.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1003-4
    [2] Zhixuan TONG, Yingying YAN, Shaofei KONG, Jintai LIN, Nan CHEN, Bo ZHU, Jing MA, Tianliang ZHAO, Shihua QI, 2024: Distribution and Formation Causes of PM2.5 and O3 Double High Pollution Events in China during 2013–20, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3156-9
    [3] Hongyan LUO, Xiao TANG, Huangjian WU, Lei KONG, Qian WU, Kai CAO, Yating SONG, Xuechun LUO, Yao WANG, Jiang ZHU, Zifa WANG, 2022: The Impact of the Numbers of Monitoring Stations on the National and Regional Air Quality Assessment in China During 2013–18, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1709-1720.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1346-5
    [4] Lan GAO, Xu YUE, Xiaoyan MENG, Li DU, Yadong LEI, Chenguang TIAN, Liang QIU, 2020: Comparison of Ozone and PM2.5 Concentrations over Urban, Suburban, and Background Sites in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 37, 1297-1309.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0054-2
    [5] Chuwei LIU, Zhongwei HUANG, Jianping HUANG, Chunsheng LIANG, Lei DING, Xinbo LIAN, Xiaoyue LIU, Li Zhang, Danfeng WANG, 2022: Comparison of PM2.5 and CO2 Concentrations in Large Cities of China during the COVID-19 Lockdown, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 861-875.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1281-x
    [6] Qiuyan DU, Chun ZHAO, Jiawang FENG, Zining YANG, Jiamin XU, Jun GU, Mingshuai ZHANG, Mingyue XU, Shengfu LIN, 2024: Seasonal Characteristics of Forecasting Uncertainties in Surface PM2.5 Concentration Associated with Forecast Lead Time over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 801-816.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3060-3
    [7] Zexuan WANG, Hongmei XU, Rong FENG, Yunxuan GU, Jian SUN, Suixin LIU, Ningning ZHANG, Dan LI, Tao WANG, Linli QU, Steven Sai Hang HO, Zhenxing SHEN, Junji CAO, 2023: Characteristics of PM2.5 and Its Reactive Oxygen Species in Heating Energy Transition and Estimation of Its Impact on the Environment and Health in China—A Case Study in the Fenwei Plain, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 40, 1175-1186.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-2249-1
    [8] Qian LU, Jian RAO, Chunhua SHI, Dong GUO, Ji WANG, Zhuoqi LIANG, Tian WANG, 2022: Observational Subseasonal Variability of the PM2.5 Concentration in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area during the January 2021 Sudden Stratospheric Warming, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1623-1636.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1393-y
    [9] Wei DU, Xinpei WANG, Fengqin YANG, Kaixu BAI, Can WU, Shijie LIU, Fanglin WANG, Shaojun LV, Yubao CHEN, Jinze WANG, Wenliang LIU, Lujun WANG, Xiaoyong CHEN, Gehui WANG, 2021: Particulate Amines in the Background Atmosphere of the Yangtze River Delta, China: Concentration, Size Distribution, and Sources, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1128-1140.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0274-0
    [10] WANG Mingxing, LIU Qiang, YANG Xin, 2004: A Review of Research on Human Activity Induced Climate Change I. Greenhouse Gases and Aerosols, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 314-321.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915561
    [11] Israel LOPEZ-COTO, Subhomoy GHOSH, Kuldeep PRASAD, James WHETSTONE, 2017: Tower-Based Greenhouse Gas Measurement Network Design——The National Institute of Standards and Technology North East Corridor Testbed, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 1095-1105.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-6094-6
    [12] Xiang LI, Yiyong LUO, 2016: Response of North Pacific Eastern Subtropical Mode Water to Greenhouse Gas Versus Aerosol Forcing, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 522-532.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5092-9
    [13] M. Mohsin IQBAL, M. Arif GOHEER, 2008: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agro-Ecosystems and Their Contribution to Environmental Change in the Indus Basin of Pakistan, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 25, 1043-1052.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-008-1043-z
    [14] A. Longhetto, S. Ferrarese, C. Cassardo, C. Giraud, F. Apadttla, P. Bacci, P. Bonelli, A. Marzorati, 1997: Relationships between Atmospheric Circulation Patterns and CO2 Greenhouse-Gas Concentration Levels in the Alpine Troposphere, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 14, 309-322.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-997-0052-7
    [15] Nan WANG, Zhenhao LING, Xuejiao DENG, Tao DENG, Xiaopu LYU, Tingyuan LI, Xiaorong GAO, Xi CHEN, 2018: Source Contributions to PM2.5 under Unfavorable Weather Conditions in Guangzhou City, China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 1145-1159.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-018-7212-9
    [16] Zheng Xunhua, Wang Mingxing, Wang Yuesi, Shen Renxing, Li Jing, J. Heyer, M. Koegge, H. Papen, 2000: Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Nitric Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 17, 83-92.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-000-0045-2
    [17] MA Xiaoyan, GUO Yufu, SHI Guangyu, YU Yongqiang, 2004: Numerical Simulation of Global Temperature Change during the 20th Century with the IAP/LASG GOALS Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 227-235.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915709
    [18] B. ABISH, P.V. JOSEPH, Ola. M. JOHANNESSEN, 2015: Climate Change in the Subtropical Jetstream during 1950-2009, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 140-148.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4156-6
    [19] Ting WEI, Wenjie DONG, Qing YAN, Jieming CHOU, Zhiyong YANG, Di TIAN, 2016: Developed and Developing World Contributions to Climate System Change Based on Carbon Dioxide, Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 632-643.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5141-4
    [20] Qin SU, Buwen DONG, Fangxing TIAN, Nicholas P. KLINGAMAN, 2024: Anthropogenic Influence on Decadal Changes in Concurrent Hot and Dry Events over China around the Mid-1990s, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 233-246.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2319-z

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 27 September 2023
Manuscript revised: 26 October 2023
Manuscript accepted: 31 October 2023
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Severe Global Environmental Issues Caused by Canada’s Record-Breaking Wildfires in 2023

    Corresponding author: Zifa WANG, zifawang@mail.iap.ac.cn
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • 2. International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • 3. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China

Abstract: Due to the record-breaking wildfires that occurred in Canada in 2023, unprecedented quantities of air pollutants and greenhouse gases were released into the atmosphere. The wildfires had emitted more than 1.3 Pg CO2 and 0.14 Pg CO2 equivalent of other greenhouse gases (GHG) including CH4 and N2O as of 31 August. The wildfire-related GHG emissions constituted more than doubled Canada’s planned cumulative anthropogenic emissions reductions in 10 years, which represents a significant challenge to climate mitigation efforts. The model simulations showed that the Canadian wildfires impacted not only the local air quality but also that of most areas in the northern hemisphere due to long-range transport, causing severe PM2.5 pollution in the northeastern United States and increasing daily mean PM2.5 concentration in northwestern China by up to 2 μg m–3. The observed maximum daily mean PM2.5 concentration in New York City reached 148.3 μg m–3, which was their worst air quality in more than 50 years, nearly 10 times that of the air quality guideline (i.e., 15 μg m–3) issued by the World Health Organization (WHO). Aside from the direct emissions from forest fires, the peat fires beneath the surface might smolder for several months or even longer and release substantial amounts of CO2. The substantial amounts of greenhouse gases from forest and peat fires might contribute to the positive feedback to the climate, potentially accelerating global warming. To better understand the comprehensive environmental effects of wildfires and their interactions with the climate system, more detailed research based on advanced observations and Earth System Models is essential.

摘要: 2023年加拿大破纪录的野火向大气中释放了大量的温室气体和空气污染物。截止8月31日,野火排放了1.3 Pg CO2以及0.14 Pg CO2当量的CH4和N2O等其它气体温室气体。野火温室气体排放量超过了加拿大计划10年累积人为减排量的2倍,对缓解全球变暖的努力构成了显著挑战。数值模拟结果显示加拿大野火不仅影响局地空气质量,还会通过长距离传输影响北半球大部分地区。加拿大野火造成美国东北部地区发生严重的空气污染,而中国西北部地区日均PM2.5浓度增加可达2 μg m–3。观测数据也显示纽约市日均PM2.5浓度高达148.3 μg m–3,为50多年来最恶劣的空气质量,接近世界卫生组织空气质量指导值(15 μg m–3)的10倍。除了森林大火的直接排放,地表下的泥炭土可能会持续阴燃数月甚至更长时间,释放巨量CO2。通过排放温室气体,加剧全球变暖,野火可能会与全球变暖形成正反馈。为了全面理解野火的综合环境效应及其与气候系统的相互作用,亟需基于先进的观测数据和地球系统模式开展深入研究。

    • Wildfires are essential disturbances in the Earth’s system, which can affect the biosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere, and cryosphere, and can cause substantial environmental damage, severe air pollution, human mortality, and economic losses (Bowman et al., 2020). Direct exposure to the flames of wildfires can cause human fatalities, e.g., more than 1 000 people died due to the Peshtigo Fire in October 1871, which was the deadliest fire in the recorded history of the United States of America (USA). However, the exposure to air pollution caused by wildfires can affect much larger populations and potentially cause much larger human mortality, since the smoke from such fires can be transported hundreds or even thousands of kilometers away (Xu et al., 2023). One estimation indicated that the annual average mortality due to exposure to wildfire-related PM2.5 was 677 745 globally, with the highest mortality occurring in Africa and Asia (Roberts and Wooster, 2021).

      Although wildfires began soon after the appearance of terrestrial plants and have been a natural feature of the Earth system for the last 420 million years (Bowman et al., 2009, 2020), their severity and frequency are thought to be increasing as a result of anthropogenic climate change (Xu et al., 2023). The enhanced wildfires can release more greenhouse gases (e.g., CO2, CH4, N2O), which may result in positive fire-climate feedback. Forest fires are an important component of wildfires due to a higher CO2 emission per unit area burned compared with grassland fires, and the burned area and CO2 emission from forest fires were found to be increasing over the past two decades (Zheng et al., 2021a). In recent years, wildfires have rapidly expanded into boreal forests due to the most rapid warming occurring over the northern high-latitude regions, consequently, boreal fires contributed 23% to global fire CO2 emissions in 2021, which was the highest fraction since 2000 (Zheng et al., 2023).

      In 2023, serious wildfires occurred over the boreal forests in Canada and caused widespread concern. As of 31 August, 6049 fires were reported across Canada, resulting in a cumulative burned area that exceeded 156 000 km2, shattering the record of 71 060 km2 set in 1995, according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Center (CIFFC, https://ciffc.ca). The burned area accounts for 1.7% of Canada’s land area, surpassing the size of more than half of the countries in the world. The unprecedented wildfires have released significant amounts of air pollutants and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, leading to severe air pollution and the potential exacerbation of global warming.

    2.   Severe air pollution due to the Canadian wildfires
    • Wildfires can release a variety of air pollutants, such as primary fine particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Among these air pollutants, PM2.5 causes the most severe air pollution and directly endangers human health. An epidemiological study based on a large international dataset found that the relative risks were 1.019 for all-cause mortality, 1.017 for cardiovascular mortality, and 1.019 for respiratory mortality, associated with each 10 μg m–3 increase in the 3-day moving average of wildfire-related PM2.5 exposure (Chen et al., 2021). The PM2.5 pollution due to the wildfires in Australia in 2019−2020 was responsible for an excess of 417 all-cause deaths, 1124 hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases and 2027 for respiratory diseases, and 1305 emergency department visits with asthma over eastern Australia (Arriagada et al., 2020). A recent study based on respiratory hospitalizations in Southern California suggested that wildfire-specific PM2.5 is up to 10 times more harmful to human health than PM2.5 from other sources (Aguilera et al., 2021).

      The emissions of air pollutants could be derived using satellite observations and land use-dependent emission factors, e.g., fire emissions estimated from the Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS) (Di Giuseppe et al., 2018). Based on the GFAS emission data, it is evident that the Canadian wildfire season usually starts in May and ends in September (Fig. 1). As of 31 August, the cumulative PM2.5 emission in the year 2023 had reached 10.07 Tg which is 6.6 times greater than the average value of the previous 20 years. The PM2.5 emission from Canadian wildfires in 2023 was much larger than the annual anthropogenic primary PM2.5 emission from China which was about 6 Tg (Zheng et al., 2021b). The maximum daily PM2.5 emission reached 0.55 Tg on 13 August 2023.

      Figure 1.  Cumulative and daily PM2.5 emissions from Canadian wildfires based on GFAS emission data.

      According to the GFAS emission data, the area where wildfires occurred in Canada significantly changed from May to August 2023 and thus were capable of affecting the air quality in different areas (Fig. 2). In May 2023, wildfires mainly occurred in the southwestern region of Canada. In addition to the southwestern region of Canada, the southeastern region also suffered from widespread wildfires in June. Compared to May and June, the areas with wildfires in July and August had shifted significantly to the north because the weather became warmer in mid and late summer due to seasonal variations over north Canada.

      Figure 2.  Horizontal distribution of monthly PM2.5 emissions from Canadian wildfires in 2023 based on GFAS emission data.

      Massive PM2.5 emissions not only affect local air quality but also significantly impact downstream areas through long-range transport. Air quality models play an important role in analyzing the long-range transport of air pollutants. By using the Aerosol and Atmospheric Chemistry Model of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP-AACM) in the Chinese Academy of Sciences Earth System Model (CAS-ESM) (Wei et al., 2019), the impacts of the Canadian wildfires on global air quality were analyzed, and the preliminary results showed that the Canadian wildfires did indeed significantly impact air quality in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 3).

      Figure 3.  Long-range transport of PM2.5 from Canadian wildfires from May to August, 2023.

      Six widespread air pollution episodes due to the Canadian wildfires were found from May to August: 15–22 May, 5–9 June, 24 June–1 July, 12–19 July, 7–15 August, and 17–22 August. In addition to Canada itself, the first episode also affected the air quality of the north-central parts of USA (Fig. 3a). The second episode caused severe pollution in the northeastern USA (Fig. 3b). On 7 June, the average of the observed daily mean PM2.5 concentration in 11 monitoring sites of New York City reached 148.3 μg m–3, with a range of 115.6–203.5 μg m–3 for each site, which was the worst air quality there in more than 50 years (https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/mayor-adams-to-address-nycs-air-quality-alert-from-canadian-wildfires-residents-urged-to-avoid-outdoor-exertion). During the third episode, fire-induced PM2.5 was transported over long distances to Europe (Fig. 3c). The fourth episode caused severe pollution in western Canada and the north-central USA (Fig. 3d). The fifth episode mainly affected northern Canada (Fig. 3e), while the sixth episode affected both the western and eastern coastal regions of the USA (Fig. 3f). Due to the northward movement of the wildfires, high concentrations of PM2.5 were transported to the Arctic region in July and August.

      Figure 4a shows the distribution of the simulated maximum daily mean PM2.5 due to the Canadian wildfires from 1 May to 31 August 2023, at each model gridpoint. The maximum PM2.5 concentrations were larger than 1 μg m–3 over most areas of the northern hemisphere and were larger than 150 μg m–3 over both western and eastern Canada. Because the Canadian wildfire plume was transported across the Atlantic Ocean to Europe, Western and Central Asia, and eventually to East Asia under the prevailing westerly winds, the PM2.5 concentrations in the northwest region of China increased by about 2 μg m–3. The PM2.5 pollution (PM2.5 concentration higher than the WHO air quality guideline, i.e., 15 μg m–3) mainly occurred over North America, with more than 40 pollution days over both western and eastern Canada, as well as more than 10 days over the northeastern USA (Fig. 4b).

      Figure 4.  Horizontal distribution of maximum daily mean PM2.5 concentration and PM2.5 pollution days due to Canadian wildfires from May to August 2023.

    3.   Vast greenhouse gases released from the Canadian wildfires
    • According to a recent study (Liu et al., 2023), the Canadian wildfires in 2023 also emitted huge amounts of greenhouse gases, including more than 1.3 Pg CO2 and 0.14 Pg CO2 equivalent (e) of CH4 and N2O as of 31 August. The CO2 emission from the Canadian wildfires in 2023 was higher than that from the Australian wildfires in 2019−20 which was 0.715 Pg (van der Velde et al., 2021). The transport of wildfire-related CO2 was also simulated using the IAP-AACM model. From the distribution of the monthly averaged surface CO2 concentration due to the Canadian wildfires (Fig. 5), it is evident that the wildfire-related CO2 reached high concentrations of >30 ppm near the source areas. The anomalously high CO2 concentrations were transported to most northern hemisphere areas within two months. The Canadian wildfires increased the CO2 concentrations mainly over North America in May, and by June, high concentrations were also observed Europe and the northwest part of Asia. The wildfire-related CO2 concentrations were more than 0.1 ppm over most northern hemisphere areas except Southeast Asia, India, and South China in July, and increased to more than 0.2 ppm in August. The high concentrations of greenhouse gases over the fire areas and their downwind regions might enhance high temperatures due to the greenhouse effect and consequently may lower relative humidities as a result of the higher temperatures. Warmer and drier conditions would tend to increase the likelihood for fires to occur, which potentially demonstrates positive feedback between wildfires and greenhouse gases. This proposed mechanism is not well understood and is worthy of future study.

      Figure 5.  Global distribution of monthly averaged surface CO2 concentration due to the Canadian wildfires.

      The greenhouse gas emissions due to the wildfires from May to August 2023 were enough to offset Canada’s planned cumulative anthropogenic emissions reductions for more than 10 years (Fig. 6). According to Canada’s 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan (https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/climate-plan/climate-plan-overview/emissions-reduction-2030/plan.html), the annual anthropogenic GHG emissions are to be reduced from 0.669 Pg CO2e in 2020 to 0.472 Pg CO2e in 2030. The cumulative emissions reduction (CER) between 2020 and 2030 was 0.718 Pg CO2e as calculated according to the following formula:

      Therefore, the wildfire-related greenhouse gas emissions were more than twice Canada’s planned cumulative anthropogenic emission reduction over 10 years, which poses a significant challenge to controlling global warming.

      Figure 6.  Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions due to the wildfires from May to August 2023 (red) with the planned cumulative anthropogenic emission reduction between 2020 and 2030 (green).

    4.   Summary and discussion
    • As a result of Canada’s record-breaking wildfires in 2023, record-high amounts of air pollutants and greenhouse gases were released into the atmosphere, which caused severe air pollution and have the potential to enhance global warming. The Canadian wildfires impacted not only the local air quality but also that of most northern hemisphere areas due to long-range aerosol transport, causing severe PM2.5 pollution in the northeastern USA and increasing the daily mean PM2.5 concentration in northwestern China by up to 2 μg m–3. Wildfire aerosols not only directly harm human health, but also affect the climate through processes such as aerosol-radiation interactions, aerosol-cloud interactions, and reducing the albedo of snow/ice surfaces and enhancing ocean phytoplankton blooms upon deposition (Tang et al., 2021; Aubry-Wake et al., 2022). Due to the solar heating of the absorbing aerosol (e.g., black carbon), the wildfire smoke could be lifted into the stratosphere (Yu et al., 2019), which could destroy stratospheric O3 (Bernath et al., 2022). Unlike the stratosphere, wildfires would enhance O3 pollution near the surface due to the emissions of wildfire-related CO, NOx, and VOCs (Xu et al., 2023).

      The Canadian wildfires in 2023 also emitted huge amounts of greenhouse gases, including more than 1.3 Pg CO2 and 0.14 Pg CO2 equivalent of CH4 and N2O as of 31 August. The wildfire-related emissions were more than twice Canada’s planned cumulative anthropogenic emissions reductions in 10 years. The wildfires could enhance global warming not only via biogeochemical processes, e.g., emissions of greenhouse gases, but also through direct biophysical processes, e.g., changing the albedo and energy budget at Earth’s surface. Forest fires could increase surface temperature by 0.15°C in the next year over burned areas globally (Liu et al., 2019).

      Canada stores more than 300 billion tons of carbon in its terrestrial ecosystem. The vast carbon storage is equivalent to several decades’ worth of human-caused global greenhouse gas emissions. Notably, 94% of this carbon is stored in soil, with peatland alone accounting for 32% of the total soil carbon content. Peat fires, once ignited, exhibit remarkable persistence, smoldering and spreading beneath the surface for several months or even longer. Extinguishing these fires presents formidable challenges. The combustion of peat not only releases substantial amounts of carbon dioxide but also contributes to a perilous feedback loop, potentially accelerating global warming. Recognizing the pivotal role of peatlands in Canada's carbon cycle and their vulnerability to wildfires is of paramount importance. Prompt suppression measures are essential in breaking this dangerous feedback loop and propelling our endeavors toward a more sustainable future.

      Wildfires have become one of the significant environmental challenges in the world today, with far-reaching impacts on the atmosphere, land, and water resources. These effects extend beyond the immediate outbreak areas and can have complex and interconnected relationships with the climate system. To better understand the comprehensive environmental effects of wildfires and their interactions with the climate system, it is essential to conduct more detailed research based on advanced observations and Earth System Models for our ability to address this global issue effectively. This will help us predict and respond to the impacts of wildfires in a more effective manner and provide more accurate data and scientific evidence for environmental conservation and climate change mitigation.

      Acknowledgements. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 92044302), the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant Nos. 2020YFA0607801, 2022YFE0106500), and the National Key Scientific and Technological Infrastructure project “Earth System Numerical Simulation Facility” (EarthLab).

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return