高级检索
毕研盟, 李娟, 吴春强, 等. 2024. 卫星微波高层探测通道定标精度评估[J]. 大气科学, 48(2): 602−618. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2307.22214
引用本文: 毕研盟, 李娟, 吴春强, 等. 2024. 卫星微波高层探测通道定标精度评估[J]. 大气科学, 48(2): 602−618. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2307.22214
BI Yanmeng, LI Juan, WU Chunqiang, et al. 2024. Calibration Evaluation of Satellite Microwave Sounding with Channels in the Upper Atmosphere [J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (in Chinese), 48(2): 602−618. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2307.22214
Citation: BI Yanmeng, LI Juan, WU Chunqiang, et al. 2024. Calibration Evaluation of Satellite Microwave Sounding with Channels in the Upper Atmosphere [J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (in Chinese), 48(2): 602−618. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2307.22214

卫星微波高层探测通道定标精度评估

Calibration Evaluation of Satellite Microwave Sounding with Channels in the Upper Atmosphere

  • 摘要: 全球/区域数值预报同化系统所需要的重要资料来源之一是卫星微波遥感的亮温数据。微波遥感仪器的高层大气(平流层中上部)探测通道亮温的定标精度,受多种因素影响,存在一定的偏差。由于高层大气高精度探测资料相对比较匮乏,因此对微波遥感的高层大气亮温的精度检验评估成为重要研究内容。本文对在轨运行的微波温度遥感器AMSU-A、ATMS 和FY-3D MWTS-2在2020年观测数据进行了定标精度检验评估,综合使用了三种评估方法进行了较为全面的分析,即基于掩星资料、再分析资料的辐射传输模拟比较和同类仪器交叉定标比较。三种检验评估方法从不同角度揭示了各仪器高层大气探测通道观测资料的误差特征,分析了对比误差的可能来源。三种评估方案给出的高层通道亮温的偏差存在差异,但基本结果变化趋势是一致的,即高层通道相比中低层通道,存在较大的噪音。除了交叉定标方法,其它两种方法都检验出了高层资料偏差的季节变化;整体而言,AMSU-A表现要优于MWTS-2和ATMS。本研究评估的高层亮温偏差的时间、空间变化特征可为微波高层大气资料的同化、气候应用提供参考。

     

    Abstract: Satellite microwave remote sensing data are one of the most important data required by global/regional assimilation systems. The brightness temperatures of the upper atmosphere (middle and upper stratosphere) from microwave remote sensing are affected by many factors and have certain errors. Evaluation of the accuracy of microwave remote sensing of the upper atmosphere has become an important research topic owing to the lack of high-accuracy sounding data of the upper atmosphere. In this study, the accuracy of the observation data of on-orbit microwave temperature radiometers, such as Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-A (AMSU-A), Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS), and FengYun-3D Microwave Temperature Sounder-2 (FY-3D MWTS-2), was examined and evaluated in 2020. Three evaluation methods (comparison with radio occultation observation, radiation transfer simulation, and cross-calibration) were comprehensively used for the analysis. From different perspectives, the three methods revealed the error characteristics of the data in the upper atmosphere from various instruments and the possible sources of the errors analyzed. The specific deviation values of the brightness temperatures of high-level channels differed from those achieved using the three evaluation methods; however, the basic trend of the variation remained consistent, i.e., high-level channels had greater noise than middle- and low-level channels. In addition to the cross-calibration method, the other two methods demonstrated seasonal variation in the deviation. Overall, AMSU-A outperformed FY-3D MWTS-2 and ATMS. The temporal and spatial variation characteristics of brightness temperature accuracy in the upper atmosphere can provide a reference for microwave data assimilation and climate applications.

     

/

返回文章
返回