高级检索

我国2024年2月大范围冻雨事件的落区判识及GraphCast预报产品的适用性研究

Identification of Affected Areas and Evaluation of GraphCast Forecasts During the February 2024 Freezing-Rain Event in China

  • 摘要: 针对2024年2月21~25日我国一次大范围低温雨雪冰冻过程,聚焦于冻雨落区的判识及其在GraphCast气象大模型预报产品中的适用性评估。基于站点观测和欧洲中期天气预报中心第五代大气再分析数据(ERA5),系统比较了3类区域性冻雨落区的判识指标(关键指示层阈值、冷暖层厚度阈值以及冷暖层强度的面积元比较法)在GraphCast预报场中的应用效果,并结合环境条件、单站探空廓线及温度层结演变特征,深入评估了GraphCast对本次冻雨过程落区的预报性能和误差来源。结果表明:(1)GraphCast预报中,关键指示层阈值法判识的冻雨落区范围过小;改进的冷暖层强度的面积元比较法能较好捕捉冻雨落区主体的南北演变,但存在早期湖南中部冻雨漏报、后期长江下游冻雨误判问题;而冷暖层厚度阈值法判识的冻雨落区与实况最为接近,更适用于GraphCast产品的冻雨落区预报。(2)GraphCast预报场能较好地再现该次冻雨发生地区代表站点的探空廓线特征和低层冷垫、中间暖层的温度层结演变特征,然而,GraphCast对冻雨落区的预报仍存在系统性偏差,如冻雨事件前期河南及安徽北部的漏报、以及后期贵州西部、南部等地的漏报与江西及浙江省中北部的误报。(3)误差分析表明,GraphCast对低层气温的预报存在系统性偏差,且对冻雨前期(21日)冷垫强度存在低估,后期(24~25日)冷层、暖层强度存在高估(尤其冷垫过强),是导致上述落区预报偏差的主要原因。本研究结果明确了冷暖层厚度阈值法在GraphCast冻雨预报中的适用性,并揭示了模型在低层气温和层结强度预报上的关键缺陷,为利用和改进GraphCast等气象机器学习模型提升我国大范围极端冻雨事件的落区精细化预报能力提供了重要依据。

     

    Abstract: Focusing on the widespread freezing-rain event in China during February 21–25, 2024, this study evaluated freezing-rain zone identification methods and assessed the applicability of the GraphCast machine-learning forecast system. Using station observations and ERA5 reanalysis, three regional identification approaches—key indicator layer thresholds, cold/warm layer thickness thresholds, and an area-integral comparison of cold/warm layer intensity—were compared within GraphCast forecast fields. In addition, sounding profiles and temperature stratification were analyzed to quantify forecast skill and error sources. Results indicate the following. (1) Among the three approaches, the cold/warm layer thickness threshold yielded the closest agreement wth observed freezing-rain areas. In contrast, the key indicator layer threshold approach severely underestimated the affected zones, while the area-integral comparison method, although capturing meridional displacement of the main freezing rain area, suffered from missed early freezing rain in central Hunan and incorrect late-stage identification in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. (2) GraphCast reproduced representative sounding structures and the evolution of the low-level cold dome and mid-level warm layer. However, systematic misses occurred over Henan and northern Anhui on February 21 and over western/southern Guizhou on February 24–25, accompanied by false alarms over north–central Jiangxi and Zhejiang. (3) Error analysis revealed systematic low-level temperature biases: an underestimated cold dome on February 21 and an overestimated cold dome combined with an overestimated warm layer on February 24–25. These biases were identified as the primary drivers of forecast-area discrepancies. Overall, the findings identify cold/warm layer thickness thresholds as the preferred approach for GraphCast-based freezing-rain prediction and expose critical deficiencies in low-level temperature and stratification forecasts, providing a basis for refining machine-learning-based forecasts of extreme freezing-rain events in China.

     

/

返回文章
返回