高级检索

碳排放的行为驱动因素:意图、知识和能力的协同效应

Behavioral Drivers of Carbon Emissions: The Synergy of Intention, Knowledge, and Capability

  • 摘要: 以“有序人类活动”理论为学术起点,创新性地构建了涵盖“意愿—知识—能力”三维一体的行为驱动指标框架,将公众意愿、知识与系统能力纳入统一量化体系。基于1995~2022年8个典型国家的面板数据,本研究采用可解释机器学习(Random Forest-SHAP)结合多模型前瞻预测(STIRPAT、BPNN、MLP、GPR)的混合分析框架,定量识别碳排放的行为驱动机制并开展多情景轨迹模拟。研究发现:1)“意愿—知识—能力”框架中的4个核心指标(可再生能源消费、人均GDP、研发人员比例、高等教育入学率)共同解释了约67%的国家间碳排放差异;2)教育与研发能力指标对碳排放的边际效应与调节作用在发达国家与新兴经济体之间呈现显著分化与协同,揭示出软性驱动因素的跨国异质性;3)未来情景模拟表明,进取路径不仅能带来更早、更低的排放峰值,还因公众参与与制度能力的协同增强而显著降低预测不确定性。本研究弥补了碳排放定量研究中“人的因素”的结构性缺失,为全球因地制宜地将行为干预融入宏观气候政策提供了新的理论框架与跨国比较证据。

     

    Abstract: Inspired by the theoretical framework of "orderly human activities", this study introduces a novel multi-dimensional behavioral indicator framework integrating three dimensions — intention, knowledge, and capacity. Using panel data from eight representative countries spanning 1995–2022, we employ a hybrid analytical approach combining interpretable machine learning (Random Forest-SHAP) with multi-model prospective forecasting (STIRPAT, BPNN, MLP, GPR) to quantify behavioral driving mechanisms of carbon emissions and simulate multi-scenario emission trajectories. Key findings include: 1) Four core indicators within the intention-knowledge-capacity framework (renewable energy consumption, GDP per capita, researchers in R&D, and tertiary enrollment) collectively explain approximately 67% of cross-national variation in carbon emissions; 2) The marginal effects and moderating roles of education and R&D capacity indicators on carbon emissions show significant differentiation and synergy between developed countries and emerging economies, revealing the cross-border heterogeneity of soft drivers; 3) Scenario simulations show that the enterprising pathway not only yields earlier and lower emission peaks, but also substantially reduces predictive uncertainty through the synergistic strengthening of public engagement and institutional capacity. This study addresses the structural absence of the "human factor" in quantitative carbon emission research and offers a new theoretical framework and cross-national comparative evidence for integrating behavioral interventions into macro-climate policy.

     

/

返回文章
返回