高级检索

多源陆地生态系统净碳交换资料在低纬高原地区的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Net Ecosystem Exchange Data of Multi-Source Terrestrial Ecosystems in Low Latitude Plateau Region

  • 摘要: 中国低纬高原区具有丰富的地表类型,是我国重要的碳汇地区,同时也是气候变化的敏感地区,但由于该地区直接观测的陆地生态系统净碳交换(Net Ecosystem Exchange, NEE)资料较少,因而对其碳汇状况缺乏深入了解。本文利用4套不同来源的NEE资料,对比分析了NEE在中国低纬高原地区的时空分布差异,并利用广义三角帽方法评估了不同资料间的相对不确定性,旨在为该地区陆地生态系统碳汇研究提供资料的一致性指引。研究结果表明:从4套NEE资料的年均值而言,GCDF(Global Carbon Fluxes Dataset)、FLUXCOM和GCAS(Global Carbon Assimilation System)资料均表现为碳汇,其值分别为−423.23、−321.25和−63.57 g(C) m−2 a−1,而Ms TMIP(Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project)资料表现为碳源,其值为2.63 g(C) m−2 a−1;4套资料在夏秋季节均为负值,表现为明显的碳汇,在春冬季,FLUXCOM和GCFD资料表现为碳汇,而GCAS和Ms TMIP资料表现为碳源;从空间分布而言,在整个低纬高原地区,4套资料在冬季均表现为碳源,在夏季均表现为碳汇,在春季Ms TMIP资料在云南地区表现为强碳源,在夏季GCFD资料表现为强碳汇;从不同植被类型而言,FLUXCOM和GCFD资料在除草地外的其他植被类型四季均呈现为碳汇,除Ms TMIP资料外其他资料年平均值在落叶阔叶林下最小,碳汇最显著;从相对不确定性而言,四套资料中FLUXCOM资料在各个季节和全年的相对不确定性均为最小。

     

    Abstract: The low-latitude plateau region in China features a rich variety of surface types and is an important carbon sink area sensitive to climate change. However, owing to the scarcity of direct terrestrial net ecosystem exchange (NEE) observations in this area, an in-depth understanding of the carbon sink status is lacking. This study utilized four sets of NEE data from different sources to comparatively analyze the spatial and temporal distribution differences of NEE in the low-latitude plateau region of China. The relative uncertainty between different data sets was assessed using the generalized triangular hat method, with the aim of providing consistent data to guide studies of terrestrial ecosystem carbon sinks in this region. The results of the study indicated the following: in terms of the annual average values of the four sets of NEE data, GCDF (Global Carbon Fluxes Dataset), FLUXCOM, and GCAS (Global Carbon Assimilation System) all exhibited carbon sinks with values of −423.23, −321.25, and −63.57 g(C) m−2 a−1, respectively, while Ms TMIP (Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project) data exhibited a carbon source with a value of 2.63 g(C) m−2 a−1. In addition, all four data sets showed negative values during summer and autumn, indicating a clear carbon sink; FLUXCOM and GCDF data showed carbon sinks during spring and winter, while GCAS and Ms TMIP data showed carbon sources. In terms of spatial distribution, all four sets of data exhibited carbon sources in winter and carbon sinks in summer across the entire low-latitude plateau region. Furthermore, Ms TMIP data showed a strong carbon source in the Yunnan region in spring, while GCFD data showed a strong carbon sink in summer. In terms of different vegetation types, FLUXCOM and GCDF data showed carbon sinks in all seasons except for grasslands, and the annual average values of carbon sinks were most significant under deciduous broadleaf forests, except for Ms TMIP data. Finally, in terms of relative uncertainty, the relative uncertainty of the FLUXCOM data was the smallest of the four data sets in all seasons and throughout the year.

     

/

返回文章
返回