高级检索
晋立军, 封秋娟, 李军霞, 孙鸿娉, 申东东, 任晓霞. 自动激光雨滴谱仪在雷达降水估测中的应用[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2012, 17(6): 740-746. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2012.06.11
引用本文: 晋立军, 封秋娟, 李军霞, 孙鸿娉, 申东东, 任晓霞. 自动激光雨滴谱仪在雷达降水估测中的应用[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2012, 17(6): 740-746. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2012.06.11
JIN Lijun, FENG Qiujuan, LI Junxia, SUN Hongping, SHEN Dongdong, REN Xiaoxia. Application of Automatic Laser Raindrops Spectrometer in Radar Rainfall Estimation[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2012, 17(6): 740-746. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2012.06.11
Citation: JIN Lijun, FENG Qiujuan, LI Junxia, SUN Hongping, SHEN Dongdong, REN Xiaoxia. Application of Automatic Laser Raindrops Spectrometer in Radar Rainfall Estimation[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2012, 17(6): 740-746. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2012.06.11

自动激光雨滴谱仪在雷达降水估测中的应用

Application of Automatic Laser Raindrops Spectrometer in Radar Rainfall Estimation

  • 摘要: 利用Parsivel 激光降水粒子谱与地面雨量计对2008 年9 月9 号山西的一次混合降水天气过程进行分析, 根据汾阳、介休两站的雨滴谱资料, 利用最小二乘法拟合出反射率因子Z与雨强I的关系Zott=159Iott1.5, 利用最优化关系法计算出地面雨量计与雷达反射率因子的关系Zrad=200Irain1.2, WSR_88D 中默认的关系ZDef=300I1.4, 然后分别利用3 种Z-I关系对此次降水过程进行估测, 计算过程累计雨量, 并将估测降水结果与地面雨量计实测结果进行对比。结果表明:利用雨滴谱关系的估测降水效果最好, 利用雨量计关系的估测降水结果次之, 默认关系计算结果最差;第一者相对第二者提高4%左右, 相对第三者则提高近18%左右。

     

    Abstract: A mixed precipitation weather process by using Parsivel laser raindrops spectrometer system (OTT Parsivel Co., Germany) and a ground rain gauge on 9 September 2008, in Shanxi Province, China, was analysed. With the least squares method, spectrum data of Fenyang and Jiexiu stations were used to determine the first Z-I relationship Zott=159Iott1.5. With optimization Z-I relationships, the data of the ground rain gauge and radar reflectivity is used to calculate the second Z-I relationship Zrad=200Irain1.2, the third is the WSR_88D default Z-I relationship ZDef=300I1.4. The precipitation process by using these three types of Z-I relationships was estimated, the accumulated rainfall was calculated, and the results of precipitation were compared with the ground rain gauge measured results. The results show that the precipitation estimation of the rain spectrum Zott-Iott relationship had the best effect; using the rain gauge Zrad-Irain relationship to estimate precipitation provided the second-best effect; and the default ZDef-I relationship calculation showed the worst results. The first method is nearly promoted 4% in contrast with the second method and nearly 18% in contrast with the third method.

     

/

返回文章
返回