高级检索

云南省腾冲地区大气边界层高度变化特征及其影响因子

Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Planetary Boundary Layer Height Variation in Tengchong Region in Yunnan Province

  • 摘要: 云南省腾冲市地处云贵高原,地形复杂,是一个典型的山区城市,特殊地理位置引起的边界层及其污染物跨境输送问题急需关注,研究腾冲长期边界层结构和气象条件变化特征具有重要意义。本文利用腾冲L波段无线电探空观测资料和理查森数方法计算得到的大气边界层高度(PBLH)验证了ERA5再分析资料,基于ERA5再分析资料,采用统计方法,分析了腾冲1980~2023年PBLH的时间特征及其影响因子。结果表明:腾冲ERA5的PBLH与观测的PBLH有较好的相关性,08时(北京时,下同)和20时ERA5的PBLH比观测的平均PBLH分别低3.7 m和279.4 m。腾冲PBLH呈现出显著的波动变化,夏季和秋季呈上升趋势(0.7 m a−1、0.2 m a−1),春季和冬季呈下降趋势(−0.1 m a−1、−0.2 m a−1),干季和湿季呈上升趋势(0.05 m a−1、0.3 m a−1)。白天PBLH,春季(1504 m)>冬季(871 m)>秋季(572 m)>夏季(468 m),干季(934 m)>湿季(551 m);夜间PBLH,夏季(52 m)>秋季(23 m)>春季(27 m)>冬季(19 m),湿季(44 m)>干季(21 m)。白天PBLH波动较大,夜间较为稳定,午后14时或15时达到日峰值。干季PBLH可超过3500 m、湿季可超过2000 m。春季和干季日PBLH波动最大。PBLH在少云天最高,阴天最低,夜间则相反。在年尺度上,PBLH与10 m风速、地表感热通量、地—气温差、地表温度、2 m气温呈显著的正相关关系,与相对湿度、总云量、地表潜热通量、2 m露点温度呈显著的负相关关系。在季节尺度上,春、秋、冬和干季PBLH主要受到10 m风速的驱动,夏季和湿季则主要受到较高潜热通量、总云量、相对湿度和较低感热通量的热力作用驱动。在昼夜变化上,白天10 m风速、地表感热通量和相对湿度是影响PBLH发展的主要因子,而夜间地表潜热通量则是影响PBLH发展的唯一显著因子。

     

    Abstract: Tengchong, located on the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, is a typical mountain city characterized by complex terrain. Its PBL (planetary boundary layer) and cross-border transport of pollutants, influenced by its unique geographical location, urgently require attention. Therefore, the long-term structure of the PBL and the changing characteristics of meteorological conditions in Tengchong should be studied. In this study, L-band radiosonde data of Tengchong and the atmospheric PBLH (PBL height) calculated using the Richardson number method are used to verify the ERA5 reanalysis data. Based on these data, the temporal characteristics and influencing factors of PBLH in Tengchong during 1980–2023 are analyzed using statistical methods. The results indicate that the PBLH of ERA5 correlates well with the observed PBLH in Tengchong, although the average PBLH of ERA5 is 3.7 m and 279.4 m lower than the observed PBLH at 0800 BJT (Beijing time) and 2000 BJT, respectively. The PBLH in Tengchong exhibits significant fluctuations, with upward trends in summer and autumn (0.7 m a−1 and 0.2 m a−1, respectively), downward trends in spring and winter (−0.1 m a−1 and −0.2 m a−1, respectively), and upward trends during the dry and wet seasons (0.05 m a−1 and 0.3 m a−1, respectively). Daytime PBLH follows the order spring (1504 m)>winter (871 m)>autumn (572 m)>summer (468 m), while nighttime PBLH follows the order summer (52 m)>autumn (23 m)>spring (27 m)>winter (19 m). Overall, PBLH was higher in the wet season (44 m) than in the dry season (21 m). PBLH fluctuates greatly during the daytime and remains relatively stable at night, reaching its daily peak around 1400–1500 BJT in the afternoon. PBLH can exceed 3,500 m during the dry season and 2,000 m during the wet season. Daily fluctuations are greatest in spring and during the dry season. On an annual scale, PBLH is positively correlated with 10-m wind speed, surface sensible heat flux, ground–air temperature difference, surface temperature, and 2-m air temperature, and negatively correlated with relative humidity, total cloud cover, surface latent heat flux, and 2-m dew point temperature. On a seasonal scale, PBLH in spring, autumn, winter, and the dry season was primarily driven by 10-m wind speed, while in summer and the wet season, it was primarily driven by high latent heat flux, total cloud cover, relative humidity, and low sensible heat flux. On a diurnal scale, daytime PBLH development was primarily affected by 10-m wind speed, surface sensible heat flux, and relative humidity, while nighttime PBLH was primarily affected by the surface latent heat flux.

     

/

返回文章
返回