高级检索

2024年4月2日连续影响浙江的两次飑线及极端大风对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Two Continuous Squall Lines and Extreme Wind Events that Affected Zhejiang on April 2, 2024

  • 摘要: 本文利用常规观测资料、S波段双偏振雷达资料、风廓线雷达资料、ERA5(0.25°×0.25°)再分析资料等,从环境条件、飑线结构和发展机制、极端大风成因等方面,对比分析了2024年4月2日同一天气背景下连续影响浙江的两次飑线过程,结果表明:(1)与西南急流型飑线相似,本次过程发生在高空南支槽、中低层低涡切变和地面低压倒槽强烈发展的环流背景下,对流先后在不同区域触发后,组织化成连续飑线。高低层强西南急流、地面辐合线、强垂直风切变等均为飑线的生成和发展提供了有利条件。两条飑线彼此独立,其触发区、移动方向、对流系统组织形式和程度、生命史、大风范围均不同。(2)飑线1主要发展机制为高空有强干侵入,叠加低层高能高湿空气向上输送,对流不稳定性增强,同时高低空强垂直风切变、地面强辐合、大的对流有效位能为飑线提供抬升和不稳定能量条件,雷暴高压和冷池偏弱,飑线自发展机制较弱。飑线2主要发展机制为雷暴高压和冷池较强,飑线自发展机制强,低层垂直风切变的方向与飑线走向交角几近垂直,低层垂直气流不断抬升,飑线得到发展,同时冷池和低层垂直风切变保持平衡,有利于飑线生命史维持。(3)飑线1极端大风出现在后期东北段再次加强过程中,冷池的传播早于极端大风的产生,降水粒子的拖曳作用、动量下传均是极端大风产生的成因之一。飑线2极端大风出现在飑线成熟阶段,冷池的传播迟于极端大风的产生,极端大风主要由强下沉气流造成。

     

    Abstract: This study utilized conventional observation data, S-band dual polarization radar data, wind profile radar data, and ERA5 (0.25°×0.25°) reanalysis data, etc., to examine the extreme wind and continuous squall lines that affected Zhejiang on April 2, 2024. The environmental conditions, structure and development mechanism, and causes of extremely strong winds of the two continuous squall lines, which affected Zhejiang under a given weather background, were compared and analyzed. The results revealed the following: (1) Similar to the southwest jet type squall line, the events of April 2 occurred under the background of strong circulation development in the high-altitude southern trough, middle- and low-level vortex shear, and surface low-pressure trough. After being triggered in different regions, the convection organized into continuous squall lines. The strong southwest jet stream at high and low levels, ground convergence lines, and strong vertical wind shear were favorable conditions for generating and developing squall lines. The two squall lines were independent of each other, with different triggering areas, directions of motion, organization and degree of the convective system, life histories, and wind ranges. (2) The main development mechanism of squall line 1 was a strong dry intrusion in the upper atmosphere, coupled with upward transport of high-energy, high-humidity air in the lower atmosphere, which enhanced convective instability. Simultaneously, strong vertical wind shear in the high and low air, strong ground convergence, and large convective effective potential energy provided lifting and unstable energy conditions for the squall line. The thunderstorm high and cold pool were relatively weak, and the self-development mechanism of the squall line was weak. The main development mechanism of squall line 2 was the strong thunderstorm high and cold pool. The self-development mechanism of the squall line was strong, and the low-level vertical wind shear was almost perpendicular to the direction of the squall line. The low-level vertical airflow continued to rise, and the squall line developed. Meanwhile, the balance between the cold pool and low-level vertical wind shear was maintained, providing conditions conducive to maintaining the life of the squall line. (3) The extreme wind of squall line 1 occurred during the later strengthening process in the northeast section. Cold pool propagation occurred earlier than extreme wind generation. The drag effect of precipitation particles and the downward transfer of momentum contributed to the generation of extreme winds. The extreme wind of squall line 2 occurred during the mature stage, and cold pool propagation occurred later than extreme wind generation. The extreme wind was mainly caused by strong downdrafts.

     

/

返回文章
返回