高级检索

基于S2S模式的贵州省汛期降水预测误差分析与订正

Error Analysis and Correction of Flood-Season Precipitation Forecasts in Guizhou Province Based on S2S Models

  • 摘要: 本研究评估了2021~2023年汛期中国气象局(CMA)、中国科学院大气物理研究所(IAP-CAS)和美国国家环境预报中心(NCEP)三个次季节至季节(S2S)模式对贵州降水的预测性能与误差来源,并针对CMA模式开展了误差订正试验。检验表明,NCEP模式表现最优,其风险评分(TS)和预报准确率(PC)显著高于另外两个模式;IAP-CAS模式次之,CMA模式误差最大。三个模式均表现出汛期前期预报技巧高于后期、贵州东北部与东南部误差偏高的特征。误差来源方面:CMA模式在500 hPa位势高度上呈现独特的经向偶极结构(副热带低估、中高纬高估),降水低估主要源于东亚-太平洋遥相关(EAP)空间梯度的系统性削弱;IAP-CAS模式表现为几乎全域低估,降水低估以高层急流动力强迫不足和低层副高形态偏移为主导;NCEP模式在环流误差与其他模式相似的情况下呈现相反的降水高估,暗示其误差可能与模式物理参数化有关。基于CMA模式误差特征,本研究设计了两种非参数百分位映射订正方案:直接订正(CM1)与考虑热带大气季节内振荡(MJO)信号约束的订正(CM2)。对比表明,CM1能有效改进CMA模式对5–20毫米降水的预测技巧;CM2通过融合MJO约束,在CM1基础上进一步提升了预测技巧。研究结果为贵州次季节降水预测提供了订正依据,也为S2S模式的解释应用提供了可参考的科学路径。

     

    Abstract: This study evaluates the forecast performance and error sources for precipitation in Guizhou of three Sub-seasonal to Seasonal (S2S) models—the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IAP-CAS), and the U.S. National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)—during the flood seasons of 2021-2023, and conducts error correction experiments for the CMA model. Results show that NCEP performs best, with its threat score (TS) and percentage correct (PC) significantly higher than the other two models; IAP-CAS ranks second, while CMA exhibits the largest errors. All three models share common characteristics: higher forecast skill in the early flood season than in the late flood season, and larger errors over northeastern and southeastern Guizhou. Regarding error sources, CMA presents a unique meridional dipole structure in 500-hPa geopotential height (underestimation over subtropical regions and overestimation over mid-high latitudes), with its precipitation underestimation mainly attributed to systematic weakening of the East Asia-Pacific (EAP) teleconnection pattern gradient. IAP-CAS shows nearly full-domain underestimation, with precipitation underestimation dominated by insufficient dynamic forcing of the upper-level jet and shifts in the lower-level subtropical high pattern. NCEP, despite exhibiting similar circulation errors to the other models, shows opposite precipitation overestimation, suggesting that its errors may be more related to model physical parameterization. Based on the understanding of the CMA"s error characteristics, this study designs two nonparametric percentile mapping correction schemes: direct correction (CM1) and Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO)-constrained correction (CM2). Comparative verification shows that CM1 effectively improves CMA"s forecast skill for 5–20 mm precipitation, while CM2 achieves further improvement by incorporating MJO constraints. The results provide a correction basis for sub-seasonal precipitation forecasts in Guizhou and offer a scientific reference for the interpretative application of S2S models.

     

/

返回文章
返回