高级检索

机载前向散射云粒子谱仪FCDP数据解析与质量控制方法研究

Data Parsing and Quality Control Methods for the Airborne Forward Scattering Cloud Particle Spectrometer FCDP

  • 摘要: 本文系统阐述了机载前向散射云粒子谱仪FCDP(Fast Cloud Droplet Probe)的探测原理、原始数据解析流程及质量控制方法,并结合实际观测数据对各质控环节的处理效果进行了分析与验证。针对FCDP原始数据易受破碎粒子、非有效采样区粒子及重合粒子事件影响而导致粒子数浓度、粒径谱及液态水含量等反演参数偏差的问题,构建了标准化质控流程。结果表明:自适应法在破碎粒子剔除中较固定阈值法具有更好的适用性和可靠性;基于景深判据可有效筛除非有效采样区粒子,应依据所用仪器对应的标定报告选取景深阈值,从而较好兼顾反演参数精度与样本代表性;重合粒子剔除应根据云条件选择相应方法,其中波峰位置对称判别法因误剔除率低,适用于低浓度云况,而理想渡越时间匹配法正确剔除率较高但误剔除率也相对较高,更适用于高浓度云况,且高斯光束模型优于顶帽光束模型;基于有效采样时长修正能够有效改善采样体积被高估及数浓度、液态水含量被低估的问题。本文结果可为FCDP及同类前向散射类云粒子谱仪观测资料的标准化处理提供参考。

     

    Abstract: This study systematically describes the detection principle, raw data processing workflow, and quality control methods of the FCDP (Fast Cloud Droplet Probe), a type of airborne forward scattering cloud droplet spectrometer. The performance of each quality control procedure is analyzed and validated using in-situ observational data. To address biases in retrieved parameters including particle number concentration, particle size distribution, and liquid water content that arise from shattered particles, particles in non-valid sampling regions, and coincident particle events in raw FCDP data, a standardized quality control framework is established. The results show that the adaptive method is more applicable and reliable than the aggressive fixed-threshold method for removing shattered particles. The depth of field (DOF) criterion can effectively filter particles outside the qualified sampling regions. The DOF threshold should be selected according to the calibration report of the specific instrument used, so as to achieve a suitable balance between retrieval accuracy and sample representativeness. The method for coincident particle rejection should be selected according to cloud conditions. The symmetric discrimination method based on peak position is suitable for low-concentration clouds owing to its low false rejection rate, whereas the ideal transit-time matching method yields a higher correct rejection rate but also a relatively higher false rejection rate, making it more appropriate for high-concentration clouds. Moreover, the Gaussian beam model is superior to the Top-Hat beam model. Correction based on live time effectively alleviates the overestimation of sampling volume and the underestimation of number concentration and liquid water content in clouds. The results of this study can provide a reference for the standardized processing of observational data from the FCDP and similar forward-scattering cloud particle spectrometers.

     

/

返回文章
返回