Advanced Search
Article Contents

A Comparison Study of the Climatological Air-Sea Heat Fluxes Estimated by Different Computational Schemes of Bulk Formula


doi: 10.1007/BF02666545

  • In this paper the different results of estimated air-sea heat fluxes by different computational schemes of bulk formula are researched. The varying results may bring another source of the uncertainties of flux climatology.In addition to the classical scheme and the sampling scheme, a revised sampling scheme named semi-sampling scheme is proposed in this paper. In this revised version, the monthly means of and are cal?culated from each simultaneous measurement as that in the sampling method. But the transfer coefficients in this version are defined based on monthly means of and instead of those in each measurement in older to use the files of monthly mean variables and in COADS (Woodruff et al. 1987).The results of a comparison study show that the covariance between and and that between and are less than 2 W / m2 and 5 W / m2 respectively in most areas, which are about one order of magni?tude less than the standard deviation of the fluxes. Therefore the difference between two schemes is not statistically significant on average. However, in the regions off coast of Asian and North American continents, the contribution of covariance between and can be as large as 15 W / m2, which is about one third to a half of the standard deviation. Since there are files of monthly mean and for each year in the COADS, we pro?pose to use these files directly in calculation of climatology. It is not necessary to use every individual report.The flux climatology calculated directly from the long-term mean values of basic meteorological elements shows an significant difference from that calculated from the mean of each year’s flux, particularly for the latent heat flux which is on the order of 10 to 15 W / m2, about 3-4 times of the difference between semi-sampling and classical schemes and about one third of the standard deviation. Therefore it indicates that the time interval of months is per?haps a better one in the calculation of flux climatology. It is not recommended to use the long-term means of the me?teorological variables.
  • [1] Changyu LI, Jianping HUANG, Lei DING, Yu REN, Linli AN, Xiaoyue LIU, Jiping HUANG, 2022: The Variability of Air-sea O2 Flux in CMIP6: Implications for Estimating Terrestrial and Oceanic Carbon Sinks, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1271-1284.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1273-x
    [2] PU Shuzhen, ZHAO Jinping, YU Weidong, ZHAO Yongping, YANG Bo, 2004: Progress of Large-Scale Air-Sea Interaction Studies in China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 383-398.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915566
    [3] Li Chongyin, Liao Qinghai, 1996: Behaviour of Coupled Modes in a Simple Nonlinear Air-Sea Interaction Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 13, 183-195.  doi: 10.1007/BF02656861
    [4] P.C. Chu, 1988: AN INSTABILITY THEORY OF AIR-SEA INTERACTION FOR COASTAL UPWELLING, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 5, 277-286.  doi: 10.1007/BF02656752
    [5] Shao Yongning, Chen Longxun, 1991: On Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in Air-Sea System, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 8, 11-22.  doi: 10.1007/BF02657361
    [6] Zhang Renhe, Chao Jiping, 1993: Unstable Tropical Air-Sea Interaction Waves and Their Physical Mechanisms, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 10, 61-70.  doi: 10.1007/BF02656954
    [7] Charlie C. F. LOK, Johnny C. L. CHAN, Ralf TOUMI, 2022: Importance of Air-Sea Coupling in Simulating Tropical Cyclone Intensity at Landfall, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 39, 1777-1786.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-022-1326-9
    [8] LI Weibiao, 2004: Modelling Air-Sea Fluxes during a Western Pacific Typhoon: Role of Sea Spray, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 21, 269-276.  doi: 10.1007/BF02915713
    [9] Ting ZHANG, Jinbao SONG, 2018: Effects of Sea-Surface Waves and Ocean Spray on Air-Sea Momentum Fluxes, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 35, 469-478.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-7101-7
    [10] Soon-Il An, In-Sik Kang, 2001: Sensitivity of the Equatorial Air-Sea Coupled System to theZonal Phase Difference between SST and Wind Stress, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 155-165.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-001-0010-8
    [11] FANG Yongjie, ZHANG Yaocun, HUANG Anning, LI Bo, 2013: Seasonal and Intraseasonal Variations of East Asian Summer Monsoon Precipitation Simulated by a Regional Air-Sea Coupled Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 315-329.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-1241-6
    [12] Ngar-Cheung LAUInstitute of Environment, Energy and Sustainability, and Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, 2017: The Pioneering Works of Professor Duzheng YE on Atmospheric Dispersion, Tibetan Plateau Meteorology, and Air-Sea Interaction, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 34, 1137-1149.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-6256-6
    [13] Yan SUN, Fan WANG, De-Zheng SUN, 2016: Weak ENSO Asymmetry Due to Weak Nonlinear Air-Sea Interaction in CMIP5 Climate Models, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 352-364.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5018-6
    [14] Li Chongyin, 1998: The Quasi-Decadal Oscillation of Air-Sea System in the Northwestern Pacific Region, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 15, 31-40.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-998-0015-7
    [15] ZHOU Xiaomin, LI Shuanglin, LUO Feifei, GAO Yongqi, Tore FUREVIK, 2015: Air-Sea Coupling Enhances the East Asian Winter Climate Response to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1647-1659.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-5030-x
    [16] Yan Jinghua, Chen Longxun, Wang Gu, 1988: THE PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERANNUAL LOW-FREQUENCY OSCILLATIONS IN THE TROPICAL AIR-SEA SYSTEM, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 5, 405-420.  doi: 10.1007/BF02656787
    [17] ZhouTianjun, Zhang Xuehong, Yu Yongqiang, Yu Rucong, Liu Xiying, Jin Xiangze, 2000: Response of IAP/ LASG GOALS Model to the Coupling of Air-Sea Fresh Water Exchange, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 17, 473-486.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-000-0037-2
    [18] REN Xuejuan, William PERRIE, 2006: Air-sea Interaction of Typhoon Sinlaku (2002) Simulated by the Canadian MC2 Model, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 23, 521-530.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-006-0521-4
    [19] YANG Yun, WU Lixin, 2015: Changes of Air-sea Coupling in the North Atlantic over the 20th Century, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 445-456.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4090-7
    [20] Lin CHEN, Tim LI, Swadhin K. BEHERA, Takeshi DOI, 2016: Distinctive Precursory Air-Sea Signals between Regular and Super El Niños, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 996-1004.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-5250-8

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 10 April 1994
Manuscript revised: 10 April 1994
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

A Comparison Study of the Climatological Air-Sea Heat Fluxes Estimated by Different Computational Schemes of Bulk Formula

  • 1. Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080,C1RES, University of Colorado, CO 80309 U.S.A,State Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081

Abstract: In this paper the different results of estimated air-sea heat fluxes by different computational schemes of bulk formula are researched. The varying results may bring another source of the uncertainties of flux climatology.In addition to the classical scheme and the sampling scheme, a revised sampling scheme named semi-sampling scheme is proposed in this paper. In this revised version, the monthly means of and are cal?culated from each simultaneous measurement as that in the sampling method. But the transfer coefficients in this version are defined based on monthly means of and instead of those in each measurement in older to use the files of monthly mean variables and in COADS (Woodruff et al. 1987).The results of a comparison study show that the covariance between and and that between and are less than 2 W / m2 and 5 W / m2 respectively in most areas, which are about one order of magni?tude less than the standard deviation of the fluxes. Therefore the difference between two schemes is not statistically significant on average. However, in the regions off coast of Asian and North American continents, the contribution of covariance between and can be as large as 15 W / m2, which is about one third to a half of the standard deviation. Since there are files of monthly mean and for each year in the COADS, we pro?pose to use these files directly in calculation of climatology. It is not necessary to use every individual report.The flux climatology calculated directly from the long-term mean values of basic meteorological elements shows an significant difference from that calculated from the mean of each year’s flux, particularly for the latent heat flux which is on the order of 10 to 15 W / m2, about 3-4 times of the difference between semi-sampling and classical schemes and about one third of the standard deviation. Therefore it indicates that the time interval of months is per?haps a better one in the calculation of flux climatology. It is not recommended to use the long-term means of the me?teorological variables.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return