Advanced Search
Article Contents

Application of Aircraft Observations over Beijing in Cloud Microphysical Property Retrievals from CloudSat

Fund Project:

doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3156-2

  • Cloud microphysical property retrievals from the active microwave instrument on a satellite require the cloud droplet size distribution obtained from aircraft observations as a priori data in the iteration procedure. The cloud lognormal size distributions derived from 12 flights over Beijing, China, in 2008-09 were characterized to evaluate and improve regional CloudSat cloud water content retrievals. We present the distribution parameters of stratiform cloud droplet (diameter 500 m and 1500 m) and discuss the effect of large particles on distribution parameter fitting. Based on three retrieval schemes with different lognormal size distribution parameters, the vertical distribution of cloud liquid and ice water content were derived and then compared with the aircraft observations. The results showed that the liquid water content (LWC) retrievals from large particle size distributions were more consistent with the vertical distribution of cloud water content profiles derived from in situ data on 25 September 2006. We then applied two schemes with different a priori data derived from flight data to CloudSat overpasses in northern China during April-October in 2008 and 2009. The CloudSat cloud water path (CWP) retrievals were compared with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) liquid water path (LWP) data. The results indicated that considering a priori data including large particle size information can significantly improve the consistency between the CloudSat CWP and MODIS CWP. These results strongly suggest that it is necessary to consider particles with diameters greater than 50 m in CloudSat LWC retrievals.
    摘要: Cloud microphysical property retrievals from the active microwave instrument on a satellite require the cloud droplet size distribution obtained from aircraft observations as a priori data in the iteration procedure. The cloud lognormal size distributions derived from 12 flights over Beijing, China, in 2008-09 were characterized to evaluate and improve regional CloudSat cloud water content retrievals. We present the distribution parameters of stratiform cloud droplet (diameter 500 m and 1500 m) and discuss the effect of large particles on distribution parameter fitting. Based on three retrieval schemes with different lognormal size distribution parameters, the vertical distribution of cloud liquid and ice water content were derived and then compared with the aircraft observations. The results showed that the liquid water content (LWC) retrievals from large particle size distributions were more consistent with the vertical distribution of cloud water content profiles derived from in situ data on 25 September 2006. We then applied two schemes with different a priori data derived from flight data to CloudSat overpasses in northern China during April-October in 2008 and 2009. The CloudSat cloud water path (CWP) retrievals were compared with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) liquid water path (LWP) data. The results indicated that considering a priori data including large particle size information can significantly improve the consistency between the CloudSat CWP and MODIS CWP. These results strongly suggest that it is necessary to consider particles with diameters greater than 50 m in CloudSat LWC retrievals.
  • Austin, R. T., 2007: Level 2B radar-only cloud water content (2B-CWC-RO) process description document. CloudSat project report, 24 pp. [Available online at http://www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu/ICD/2B-CWC-RO/2B-CWC-RO_PD_5.1.pdf]
    Austin, R. T., and G. L. Stephens, 2001: Retrieval of stratus cloud microphysical parameters using millimeter-wave radar and visible optical depth in preparation for CloudSat: 1. Algorithm formulation. J. Geophysi. Res., 106(D22),28233-28242.
    Austin, R. T.,A. J. Heymsfield, and G. L. Stephens, 2009: Retrieval of ice cloud microphysical parameters using the CloudSat millimeter-wave radar and temperature. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00A23, doi: 10.1029/2008jd010049.
    Barker, H. W.,A. V. Korolev,D. R. Hudak,J. W. Strapp,K. B. Strawbridge, and M. Wolde, 2008: A comparison between CloudSat and aircraft data for a multilayer, mixed phase cloud system during the Canadian CloudSat-CALIPSO Validation Project. J. Geophys. Res., 113, doi: 10.1029/2008JD009971.
    Brunke, M. A.,S. P. de Szoeke,P. Zuidema, and X. Zeng, 2010: A comparisons of ship and satellite measurements of cloud properties with global climate model simulations in the southeast Pacific stratus deck. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6527-6536.
    Cober, S. G.,G. A. Isaac, and J. W. Strapp, 2001: Characterizations of aircraft icing environments that include supercooled large drops. J. Appl. Meteor., 40, 1984-2002.
    Comstock, K. K.,R. Wood,S. E. Yuter, and C. S. Bretherton, 2004: Reflectivity and rain rate in and below drizzling stratocumulus. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 2891-2918.
    de La Torre Juárez, M.,B. Kahn, and E. Fetzer, 2009: Cloud-type dependencies of MODIS and AMSR-E liquid water path differences. Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics Discussions, 9, 3367-3399.
    Dong, X. Q.,P. Minnis,B. Xi,S. Sun-Mack, and Y. Chen, 2008: Comparison of CERES-MODIS stratus cloud properties with ground-based measurements at the DOE ARM Southern Great Plains site. J. Geophys. Res., 113, doi: 10.1029/2007JD008438.
    Feng, W. W.,Z. G. Yao,Z. G. Han, and Z. L. Zhao, 2009: Simulation analysis on microphysical parameters retrieval of liquid water clouds with satellite-based millimeter-wave radar. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 10, 95-102. (in Chinese)
    Guo, X. L.,D. H. Fu, and Z. X. Hu, 2013: Progress in cloud physics, precipitation, and weather modification during 2008-2012. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 351-363. (in Chinese)
    Kahn, B. H., and Coauthors, 2008: Cloud type comparisons of AIRS, CloudSat, and CALIPSO cloud height and amount. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8, 1231-1248.
    Knollenberg, R. G., 1976: Three new instruments for cloud physics measurements: The 2-D spectrometer, the forward scattering spectrometer probe, and the active scattering aerosol spectrometer. Intel. Conf. on Cloud Physics, American Meteorological Society,July 1976, 554-561.
    Li, J. L. F., and Coauthors, 2008: Comparisons of satellites liquid water estimates to ECMWF and GMAO analyses, 20th century IPCC AR4 climate simulations, and GCM simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, doi: 10.1029/2008GL035427.
    Matrosov, S. Y.,T. Uttal, and D. A. Hazen, 2004: Evaluation of radar reflectivity-based estimates of water content in stratiform marine clouds. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 405-419.
    Miles, N. L.,J. Verlinde, and E. E. Clothiaux, 2000: Cloud droplet size distributions in low-level stratiform clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 295-311.
    Morrison, H., and A. Gettelman, 2008: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests. J. Climate, 21, 3642-3659.
    Noh, Y. J.,C. J. Seaman,T. H. Vonder Haar,D. R. Hudak, and P. Rodriguez, 2011: Comparisons and analyses of aircraft and satellite observations for wintertime mixed-phase clouds. J. Geophys. Res., 116, doi: 10.1029/2010JD015420.
    Partain, P., 2007: Cloudsat MODIS-AUX auxiliary data process description and interface control document. Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University,23 pp.
    Peng, J.,H. Zhang, and X. Y. Shen, 2013: Analysis of vertical structure of clouds in East Asia with cloudSat data. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 91-100. (in Chinese)
    Platnick, S.,M. D. King,S. A. Ackerman,W. P. Menzel,B. A. Baum,J. C. Riedi, and R. A. Frey, 2003: The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from terra. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, 459-473.
    Ramanathan, V.,R. D. Cess,E. F. Harrison,P. Minnis,B. R. Barkstrom,E. Ahmad, and D. Hartmann, 1989: Cloud-radiative forcing and climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment. Science, 243, 57-63.
    Rodgers, C. D., 1976: Retrieval of atmospheric temperature and composition from remote measurements of thermal radiation. Rev. Geophys., 14, 609-624.
    Seethala, C., and À. Horváth, 2010: Global assessment of AMSR-E and MODIS cloud liquid water path retrievals in warm oceanic clouds. J. Geophys. Res., 115, doi: 10.1029/2009JD 012662.
    Stephens, G. L., and Coauthors, 2002: The CloudSat mission and the A-Train: A new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 1771-1790.
    Vidaurre, G., and J. Hallett, 2009: Ice and water content of stratiform mixed-phase cloud. Quar. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 1292-1306.
    Wang, L.,C. C. Li,Z. L. Zhao,Z. G. Yao,Z. G. Han, and Q. Wei, 2014: The Application of the 2D habit classification in cloud microphysics analysis. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 38(2),201-202. (in Chinese)
    Wang, S. H.,Z. G. Han,Z. G. Yao,Z. L. Zhao, and X. Jie, 2011: Analysis on Cloud vertical structure over China and its neighborhood based on cloudSat data. Plateau Meteorology, 30, 38-52. (in Chinese)
    Wang, Y. F.,H. C. Lei,Y. X. Wu,W. A. Xiao, and X. Q. Zhang, 2005: Size distributions of the water drops in the warm layer of stratiform clouds in Yanan. Journal of Nanjing Insitute of Meteorology, 28, 787-793. (in Chinese)
    Yan, C. F., and W. K. Chen, 1990: The stratus cloud droplet number/size distributions and spectral parameters calculation. J. Appl. Meteor., 1, 352-359. (in Chinese)
    Yang, D. S., and P. C. Wang, 2012: Tempo-spatial distribution characteristics of cloud particle size over China during Summer. Climatic and Environmental Research, 17, 433-443. (in Chinese)
    Zhao, Z. L.,J. T. Mao,Q. Wei,Y. J. Ying,L. Wang,Z. G. Han, and C. C. Li, 2010: A study of vertical structure of spring stratiform clouds in Northwest China. Meteorological Monthly, 36, 71-77. (in Chinese)
  • [1] ZHAO Zhen, LEI Hengchi, 2014: Aircraft Observations of Liquid and Ice in Midlatitude Mixed-Phase Clouds, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 604-610.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3083-2
    [2] ZONG Rong, LIU Liping, YIN Yan, 2013: Relationship between Cloud Characteristics and Radar Reflectivity Based on Aircraft and Cloud Radar Co-observations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 30, 1275-1286.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-2090-7
    [3] QIU Yujun, Thomas CHOULARTON, Jonathan CROSIER, Zixia LIU, 2015: Comparison of Cloud Properties between CloudSat Retrievals and Airplane Measurements in Mixed-Phase Cloud Layers of Weak Convective and Stratus Clouds, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 1628-1638.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-015-4287-4
    [4] Tuanjie HOU, Hengchi LEI, Youjiang HE, Jiefan YANG, Zhen ZHAO, Zhaoxia HU, 2021: Aircraft Measurements of the Microphysical Properties of Stratiform Clouds with Embedded Convection, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 966-982.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0287-8
    [5] GUO Zhun, ZHOU Tianjun, 2015: Seasonal Variation and Physical Properties of the Cloud System over Southeastern China Derived from CloudSat Products, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 659-670.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4070-y
    [6] YI Mingjian, FU Yunfei, LIU Peng, ZHENG Zhixia, 2015: Deep Convective Clouds over the Northern Pacific and Their Relationship with Oceanic Cyclones, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 32, 821-830.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4056-9
    [7] Jiefan YANG, Fei YAN, Hengchi LEI, Shuo JIA, Xiaobo DONG, Xiangfeng HU, 2024: Aircraft Observation and Simulation of the Supercooled Liquid Water Layer in a Warm Conveyor Belt over North China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 529-544.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3068-8
    [8] PENG Jie, ZHANG Hua, Zhanqing LI, 2014: Temporal and Spatial Variations of Global Deep Cloud Systems Based on CloudSat and CALIPSO Satellite Observations, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 31, 593-603.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-013-3055-6
    [9] P. Ernest Raj, P. C. S. Devara, A. M. Selvam, A.S.R. Murty, 1993: Aircraft Observations of Electrical Conductivity in Warm Clouds, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 10, 95-102.  doi: 10.1007/BF02656957
    [10] Eun-Han KWON, Jinlong LI, B. J. SOHN, Elisabeth WEISZ, 2012: Use of Total Precipitable Water Classification of A Priori Error and Quality Control in Atmospheric Temperature and Water Vapor Sounding Retrieval, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 29, 263-273.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-1119-z
    [11] Zhehan CHEN, Qingqing LI, 2021: Re-examining Tropical Cyclone Fullness Using Aircraft Reconnaissance Data, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1596-1607.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0282-0
    [12] Ming YING, Xiaoqin LU, 2024: The Contribution of United States Aircraft Reconnaissance Data to the China Meteorological Administration Tropical Cyclone Intensity Data: An Evaluation of Homogeneity, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 639-654.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-3040-7
    [13] Yue SUN, Huiling YANG, Hui XIAO, Liang FENG, Wei CHENG, Libo ZHOU, Weixi SHU, Jingzhe SUN, 2024: The Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of Cloud Types and Phases in the Arctic Based on CloudSat and CALIPSO Cloud Classification Products, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 41, 310-324.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2231-6
    [14] LI Lijuan, Yuqing WANG, WANG Bin, ZHOU Tianjun, 2008: Sensitivity of the Grid-point Atmospheric Model of IAP LASG (GAMIL1.1.0) Climate Simulations to Cloud Droplet Effective Radius and Liquid Water Path, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 25, 529-540.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-008-0529-z
    [15] Wenyue HE, Bo SUN, Huijun WANG, 2021: Dominant Modes of Interannual Variability in Atmospheric Water Vapor Content over East Asia during Winter and Their Associated Mechanisms, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 38, 1706-1722.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0014-5
    [16] Zou Jinshang, Liu Huilan, 1986: DISTRIBUTION OF WATER VAPOR CONTENT (WVC) AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATION OVER THE MAINLAND OF CHINA, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 3, 385-395.  doi: 10.1007/BF02678659
    [17] YAN Changxiang, ZHU Jiang, ZHOU Guangqing, 2007: Impacts of XBT, TAO, Altimetry and ARGO Observations on the Tropical Pacific Ocean Data ssimilationImpacts of XBT, TAO, Altimetry and ARGO Observations on the Tropical Pacific Ocean Data Assimilation, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 383-398.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-0383-4
    [18] ZHOU Lian-Tong, HUANG Ronghui, 2010: An Assessment of the Quality of Surface Sensible Heat Flux Derived from Reanalysis Data through Comparison with Station Observations in Northwest China, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 27, 500-512.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9081-8
    [19] Xingchao CHEN, Kun ZHAO, Juanzhen SUN, Bowen ZHOU, Wen-Chau LEE, 2016: Assimilating Surface Observations in a Four-Dimensional Variational Doppler Radar Data Assimilation System to Improve the Analysis and Forecast of a Squall Line Case, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 33, 1106-1119.  doi: 10.1007/s00376-016-5290-0
    [20] Junhong Wang, Harold L. Cole, David J. Carlson, 2001: Water Vapor Variability in the Tropical Western Pacific from 20-year Radiosonde Data, ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 18, 752-766.

Get Citation+

Export:  

Share Article

Manuscript History

Manuscript received: 06 August 2013
Manuscript revised: 16 October 2013
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Application of Aircraft Observations over Beijing in Cloud Microphysical Property Retrievals from CloudSat

    Corresponding author: YAO Zhigang; 
  • 1. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871
  • 2. Beijing Institute of Applied Meteorology, Beijing 100029
Fund Project:  This work is supported by China public science and technology research funds projects of meteorology (GYHY201406015), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA05040000), the National High-Tech R\D Program of China (SQ2010AA1221583001), National Science Foundation program (41375024, 40775002, 41175020, and 41375008), and the basic research program (2010CB950802). We would like to acknowledge the NASA CloudSat project for making CloudSat data available to the scientific community. We are also grateful to NASA/GSFC for the use of their MODIS Level 2 cloud products.

Abstract: Cloud microphysical property retrievals from the active microwave instrument on a satellite require the cloud droplet size distribution obtained from aircraft observations as a priori data in the iteration procedure. The cloud lognormal size distributions derived from 12 flights over Beijing, China, in 2008-09 were characterized to evaluate and improve regional CloudSat cloud water content retrievals. We present the distribution parameters of stratiform cloud droplet (diameter 500 m and 1500 m) and discuss the effect of large particles on distribution parameter fitting. Based on three retrieval schemes with different lognormal size distribution parameters, the vertical distribution of cloud liquid and ice water content were derived and then compared with the aircraft observations. The results showed that the liquid water content (LWC) retrievals from large particle size distributions were more consistent with the vertical distribution of cloud water content profiles derived from in situ data on 25 September 2006. We then applied two schemes with different a priori data derived from flight data to CloudSat overpasses in northern China during April-October in 2008 and 2009. The CloudSat cloud water path (CWP) retrievals were compared with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) liquid water path (LWP) data. The results indicated that considering a priori data including large particle size information can significantly improve the consistency between the CloudSat CWP and MODIS CWP. These results strongly suggest that it is necessary to consider particles with diameters greater than 50 m in CloudSat LWC retrievals.

摘要: Cloud microphysical property retrievals from the active microwave instrument on a satellite require the cloud droplet size distribution obtained from aircraft observations as a priori data in the iteration procedure. The cloud lognormal size distributions derived from 12 flights over Beijing, China, in 2008-09 were characterized to evaluate and improve regional CloudSat cloud water content retrievals. We present the distribution parameters of stratiform cloud droplet (diameter 500 m and 1500 m) and discuss the effect of large particles on distribution parameter fitting. Based on three retrieval schemes with different lognormal size distribution parameters, the vertical distribution of cloud liquid and ice water content were derived and then compared with the aircraft observations. The results showed that the liquid water content (LWC) retrievals from large particle size distributions were more consistent with the vertical distribution of cloud water content profiles derived from in situ data on 25 September 2006. We then applied two schemes with different a priori data derived from flight data to CloudSat overpasses in northern China during April-October in 2008 and 2009. The CloudSat cloud water path (CWP) retrievals were compared with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) liquid water path (LWP) data. The results indicated that considering a priori data including large particle size information can significantly improve the consistency between the CloudSat CWP and MODIS CWP. These results strongly suggest that it is necessary to consider particles with diameters greater than 50 m in CloudSat LWC retrievals.

Reference

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint