Advanced Search

Editor’s Award

The Editor’s Award is given to an individual who has contributed a reviewer’s report of outstanding merit on a manuscript submitted for publication in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences (AAS). The quality of AAS depends essentially upon reviewers’ voluntary and painstaking efforts. Nominations are considered by the editors and editorial office, which make recommendations for final approval by the Editors-in-Chief.

2019 AAS Editor's Award 

1. Baggett, Cory (USA). For providing a detailed review with insightful comments and useful suggestions for improving a manuscript.

2. Chen, Xiaodong (USA). For his very timely and thoughtful review and very constructive comments that greatly improved the quality of the article he reviewed.

3. Chen, Xianyao (China). For providing very professional and helpful comments to the authors and editors.

4. Fan, Ke (China). For providing timely, insightful and constructive comments for the manuscripts she reviewed.

5. Freychet, Nico (UK). For precise and thorough reviews that help improve a manuscript

6. Jia, Xing (China). For thoughtful and constructive comments.

7. Keenlyside, Noel (Norway). For multiple, detailed, insightful reviews that improved manuscripts.

8. Morioka, Yushi (Japan). For providing a thorough and detailed review that included several good scientific suggestions for the authors to consider

9. Suo, Lingling (Norway). For timely and constructive review on the manuscripts.

10. Zhang, Guifu (USA). For timely and detailed reviews of a number of papers on radar meteorology and instrumentation.

2018 AAS Editor's Award

1. Exarchou, Eleftheria (Spain). For providing a very insightful and detailed review

2. Hayashi, Masahiko (Japan). For careful, specific, and insightful reviews that were very helpful in editorial decisions.

3. Jung, Youngsun (USA ). For multiple, detailed, insightful reviews that improved manuscripts.

4. Sarangi, Chandan (USA). For his very timely and thoughtful review and very constructive comments that greatly improved the quality of the article he reviewed.

5. Schwartz, Craig (USA). For a very thoughtful review and very constructive and detailed comments that greatly improved the quality of the article he reviewed.

6. Screen, James (UK). For providing extensive, detailed and constructive comments on original and revised versions that led to substantial improvements of manuscripts.

7. Stein, Thorwald (UK). For thoughtful, precise, and timely reviews.

8. Su, Xiang (China). For timely and constructive reviews of multiple manuscripts.

9. Uotila, Petteri (Finland). For multiple and timely reviews helping to maintain AAS’ high standards.

10. Yasunaga, Kazuaki (Japan). For highly constructive, relevant, thorough, and timely reviews that significantly improved the quality of the submitted manuscripts.

2017 AAS Editor’s Award

1. Huang, Yang (USA). For providing extensive, detailed and constructive comments on original and revised versions that led to substantial improvements.

2. Huang, Yi-Husan (China). For a most comprehensive review with constructive comments that raised the quality of the manuscript significantly.

3. Luo, Yali (China). For multiple and timely reviews that greatly improved manuscripts.

4. Merhala, Thurai-Rajasingam (USA). For thoughtful, precise, and timely reviews

5. Nakamura, Tetsu (Japan). For his very insightful and constructive comments that led to the significant improvement of the manuscript, helping to maintain AAS’ high standards.

6. Sakaguchi, Koichi (USA). For his very thoughtful review and very constructive detailed comments that greatly improved the quality of the article he reviewed.

7. Sasaki, Yoshi (Japan). For careful, specific, and insightful reviews that were very helpful in improving the paper, and in editorial decisions.

8. Shi, Yuning (USA). For carefully reading the manuscript and providing very detailed and useful comments to help improve the manuscript.

9. Taylor, Tommy(USA). For his highly constructive, relevant, thorough, and timely reviews that significantly improved the quality of the submitted manuscripts.

10. Zhou, Bowen (China). For multiple, detailed, insightful reviews that improved manuscripts.

2016 AAS Editor’s Award

1. Bergman, John (USA).       For an insightful and constructive review.

2. Bonin, Timothy (USA).     For being one of the best reviewers in the field of boundary layer meteorology, thanks to his thorough and instrumental comments to improve the quality of the manuscripts he reviews.

3. Chiswell, Stephen(New Zealand). For prompt and constructive reviews of manuscripts.

4. Gao, Jidong (USA).       For insightful and detailed comments that have contributed to significant improvements of multiple manuscripts.

5. Kennedy, Aaron (USA).      For multiple, timely, and thorough reviews that improved manuscripts.

6. Park, Mijeong (USA).       For a lengthy and detailed review of a manuscript.

7. Qian, Weihong (China).      For his comprehensive and timely reviews that provided valuable insights with unusual precision and thoughtfulness.

8. Wu, Renguang (China).      For multiple and timely reviews that greatly improved manuscripts.

9. Xu, Kuan-Man(USA).       For a critical but insightful and constructive review, which is essential for maintaining AAS at a high-quality level.

10. Yu, Kosaka (Japan). For relevant, fruitful and constructive comments that greatly helped authors to enhance the quality of paper.

2015 AAS Editor’s Award

1. Duan, Wansuo (China). For numerous, constructive, and timely reviews of manuscripts on predictability of weather and climate.

2. Gong, Daoyi (China). For providing a large number of timely and thorough reviews that have contributed to significant improvements of numerous manuscripts.

3. Hezel, Paul (Norway). For insightful reviews on a manuscript on Arctic climate change.

4. Hong, Jinkyu (Korea). For constructive reviews of a manuscript through several rounds of revision.

5. Li, Qingqing (China). For prompt and thorough reviews of many manuscripts

6. Hu, Xiaoming (China). For multiple and timely reviews that improved manuscripts

7. Kumar, Sanjiv (Canada). For insightful and thorough reviews of a manuscript through several rounds of revision

8. Martin, Gill (UK). For thorough comments that have contributed to a much improved accepted article.

9. Tomikawa, Yoshihiro (Japan). For lengthy, fair and detailed reviews of a manuscript

10. Xu, Qin (USA). For detailed reviews of multiple manuscripts, always delivered on time.